Army National Guard AGR Jobs

Do you need a job? Why not work for the National Guard? Go check out the list of AGR available for your state.

Texas Army National Guard AGR Jobs

Are you a member of the Texas Army National Guard? "Texas AGR jobs" are the most searched AGR jobs on Google. Check them out now!

Florida Army National Guard AGR Jobs

Are you a member of the Florida Army National Guard? "Florida AGR jobs" are the second most searched AGR jobs on Google. Check them out now!

California Army National Guard AGR Jobs

Are you a member of the California Army National Guard? "California AGR jobs" are the third most searched AGR jobs on Google. Check them out now!

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

ARMY DIR 2014-11 ENLISTED TO MEDICAL DEGREE PREPARATORY PROGRAM

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/NOCASE-ARMY_DIR_2014-11-000-WEB-0.pdf

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
WASHINGTON
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
t 4 MAY 2014
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-11 (Enlisted to Medical Degree Preparatory Program)
1. Purpose. This directive authorizes the Army Enlisted to Medical Degree Preparatory
Program (EMDP2) in conjunction with the Uniformed Services University of the Health
Sciences (USUHS). Related references are at the enclosure.
2. Background. Under the EMDP2, USUHS and the Army will partner to provide an
opportunity for highly qualified, Regular Army enlisted Soldiers to remain on active duty
while completing the coursework necessary to be eligible to apply for admission to
USUHS or civilian medical schools via the Health Professions Scholarship Program
(HPSP). In turn, this partnership will strengthen the Army Medical Corps by providing
the Army with a new source of physicians who have an enlisted background and
strongly rooted Army values.
a. The EMDP2 includes full-time coursework in a traditional classroom setting,
structured pre-health advising, formal preparation for the Medical College Admission
Test, dedicated faculty and peer mentoring at USUHS, and integrated clinical exposure.
The EMDP2 is a post-baccalaureate program for Regular Army enlisted Soldiers who
have an undergraduate degree, but need to complete additional specific coursework to
apply for admission to USUHS or most civilian medical schools.
b. The training Soldiers will receive as part of the EMDP2 is necessary to give them
the opportunity to complete the required preparatory coursework for admission to
USUHS, most medical schools and the HPSP.
3. Policy. To establish the EMDP2, and subject to the supervision of the Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs), I am delegating to The Surgeon
General the following authorities and directing the following actions. The Surgeon
General wil l:
a. enter into a memorandum of agreement with USUHS, pursuant to reference b, to
establish the specific roles and responsibilities of the Army and USUHS for the EMDP2.
The Surgeon General may agree that the Army will fund training billets on a
nonreimbursable basis.
b. establish eligibility requirements, guidelines and procedures, consistent with this
directive, for Regular Army enlisted Soldiers to apply for the EMDP2. The Surgeon
General will coordinate these areas with the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 ;
U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC); and U.S. Army Recruiting Command.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-11 (Enlisted to Medical Degree Preparatory Program)
c. ensure that all participants meet the academic eligibility requirements USUHS
sets forth.
d. appoint a board to screen candidates and recommend those who are best
qualified for detail into the EMDP2. The Surgeon General will make final selections.
e. exercise, in coordination with HRC, my authority under reference a to annually
detail Regular Army enlisted Soldiers to participate in the EMDP2. HRC will track the
number of enlisted Soldiers detailed to participate in the program as required by
reference a. Details are limited to a maximum of seven and are subject to the
Commander, HR C's authority to ensure that no more than 2 percent of the authorized
strength of Regular Army enlisted Soldiers be detailed as students.
4. Eligibility Requirements
a. Regular Army enlisted Soldiers who meet the academic requirements set forth by
USUHS and who have served a minimum of 3 years at the time of enrollment in the
EMDP2 are eligible to apply.
b. As a condition of admittance into the EMDP2, applicants must agree to and
qualify for reenlistment or extension for a period of 54 months, or for the time required to
participate in the program and meet the service remaining requirement of 36 months
after completion of the program, in accordance with reference i, chapter 4 and
reference j, paragraph 4-6.
c. Applicants must meet the eligibility criteria for appointment as a commissioned
officer as prescribed by references e-g , or obtain a waiver.
(1) Applicants may not be considered for EMDP2 if they are currently scheduled
for or attending military occupational specialty training resulting from an approved
reclassification or reenlistment contract. However, before training begins, applicants
may request cancellation of a voluntary reclassification or waive the reenlistment
contract option in accordance with reference i.
(2) Applicants must meet age and time-in-service requirements for appointment
to the Medical Service Corps in accordance with reference f, as required for
participation in USUHS or the HPSP, and will account for the projected date of
appointment after the 2-year EMDP2.
(3) Applicants must satisfy the medical standards for appointment as a
commissioned officer in accordance with reference d.
(4) Requests for waivers with supporting documentation must be submitted and
approved by the appropriate authority by a date The Surgeon General will determine.
2
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014- 11 (Enlisted to Medical Degree Preparatory Program)
d. Applicants must obtain a conditional letter of release from their branch manager
at HRC.
e. Applicants must meet eligibility requirements set forth pursuant to paragraph 4b.
5. Application to Medical Degree Programs
a. Soldiers will agree to apply to USU HS upon completion of the EMDP2.
Application requirements are in accordance with USUHS policies and procedures.
b. Soldiers may apply to civilian medical degree programs concurrently with
application to the HPSP. Application to the HPSP will be in accordance with
reference h, paragraph 2- 7.
c. Soldiers accepted into the USU HS medical degree program or the HPSP will
request discharge in accordance with reference k, paragraph 16-2.
6. Service Obligation
a. Soldiers who complete the EMDP2 and are appointed as a commissioned officer,
in conjunction with attendance at USUHS or participation in the HPSP, will incur a
3-year active duty service obligation, which wi ll be served consecutively with the active
duty service obligation arising from the respective medical degree program.
b. Soldiers who participate in the EMDP2 but do not complete the program, who
decline participation, or who are otherwise not later appointed as commissioned officers
upon entry into USUHS or the HPSP will serve their remaining service obligation, in
accordance with paragraph Sb , as HRC directs, in their enlisted status.
7. The Army's partnership with USUHS to participate in the EMDP2 is meant to be
enduring and wi ll continue until it is rescinded by USUHS or the Army. The Surgeon
General is the proponent for EMDP2 and will staff policy for the program for publication
in a new Army regulation within 1 year of the date of this directive.
8. This directive is rescinded upon publication of the new Army regulation.
Encl
DISTRIBUTION:
(see next page)
~I... l,q • "'' ~,.__
John M. McHug~
3
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014 - 11 (Enlisted to Medical Degree Preparatory Program)
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Africa/Southern European Task Force
U.S. Army Special Operati ons Command
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
U.S . Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U. S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
U. S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Superintendent, U.S. Mili tary Academy
Director, U.S. Ar my Acquisition Support Center
Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery
Commander , U. S. Army Accessions Support Br igade
Commandant, U.S. Army War Coll ege
Commander, Second Army
CF:
Director, Army National Guard
Director of Business Transformation
Commander, Eighth Army
Commander , U.S. Army Cyber Command
4
REFERENCES
a. 10 U.S.C. section 4301 (Members of Army: detail as students, observers, and
investigators at educational institutions, industrial plants, and hospitals).
b. Department of Defense Instruction 4000.19 (Support Agreements), April 25, 2013.
c. Department of Defense Instruction 6000.13 (Medical Manpower and Personnel),
June 30, 1997.
d. Army Regulation (AR) 40- 501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), 14 December 2007,
including Rapid Action Revision 3 Issued 4 August 2011.
e. AR 135-100 (Appointment of Commissioned and Warrant Officers of the Army),
1 September 1994.
f. AR 135-101 (Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers for Assignment to
Army Medical Department Branches), 15 February 1984.
g. AR 601 -100 (Appointment of Commissioned and Warrant Officers in the Regular
Army), 21 November 2006.
h. AR 601-141 (U . S. Army Health Professions Scholarship, Financial Assistance, and
Active Duty Health Professions Loan Repayment Programs), 19 September 2006.
i. AR 601-280 (Army Retention Program), 31 January 2006, including Rapid Action
Revision 1 Issued 15 September 2011.
j. AR 614-200 (Enlisted Assignments and Utilization Management), 26 February 2009,
including Rapid Action Revision 2 Issued 11 October 2011 .
k. AR 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations}, 6 June 2005,
including Rapid Action Revision 3 Issued 6 September 2011 .
Enclosure 

Monday, May 12, 2014

ARMY DIR 2014-08 WATER RIGHTS POLICY FOR ARMY INSTALLATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ad2014_08.pdf

MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-08 (Water Rights Policy for Army Installations in the
United States)
1. Reference Memorandum, Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Logistics
and Environment), 24 Nov 95, subject: Policy Guidance on Water Rights at Army
Installations in the United States.
2. Purpose. The Army requires enough water to carry out its missions without
significant disruptions. This directive, which supersedes the reference, sets policy and
assigns responsibilities for identifying, asserting and preserving the Army’s water rights.
3. Background. Water is scarce throughout much of the Western United States and
becoming scarcer in some parts of the Eastern United States. Increasing demand for
water to support growing populations and economic development places stress on the
same supplies of ground and surface water that Army installations depend on to fulfill
their missions. Over the past decade, several Army installations have become involved
in litigation over water rights. As competition for water increases, more Army
installations are likely to become involved in disputes over water. Consequently, it is
critical that we protect the Army’s water rights and its ability to carry out its missions.
4. Applicability. This policy applies to all Army installations in the United States. It is
not applicable to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Civil Works projects and facilities.
5. Policy. Effective immediately:
a. the Army will acquire and maintain water rights for both ground and surface water
consistent with mission requirements;
b. the Army will identify, assert, defend and preserve its water rights to the
maximum extent possible under State and Federal law to sustain mission capability;
and
c. Army installations will locate, record and retain documentation related to water
rights.
6. Reporting. By 31 December of each calendar year, the Office of the Assistant Chief
of Staff for Installation Management (OACSIM) will report to the Office of the Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy and Environment) on the current state of
the Army’s water rights. This report will include the following topics: an assessment of
the sufficiency of existing water rights to meet mission requirements; the state of
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y
W A S H I N G T O N
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-08 (Water Rights Policy for Army Installations in the
United States)
2
documentation to assert, maintain and defend the Army’s water rights; and a current
summary of all legal challenges to the Army’s water rights.
7. Command Policy and Guidance. OACSIM will issue implementing guidance to
execute this policy no more than 180 days from the date of this directive and will
coordinate the guidance with the Environmental Law Division, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, before it is issued. Enclosure 1 contains a legal framework for water
rights to aid OACSIM, commands and command counsel in identifying, asserting and
preserving water rights. Enclosure 2 offers a nonexclusive list of issues to address in
the guidance.
8. Proponent. The proponent for this policy is OACSIM, who will incorporate the
guidance in this directive into the next revisions of Army Regulation 405-80
(Management of Title and Granting Use of Real Property) and Army Regulation 420-1
(Army Facilities Management), as appropriate.
9. Rescission. This directive is rescinded upon publication of the revised regulations.
Encls John M. McHugh
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Africa/Southern European Task Force
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
(CONT)
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-08 (Water Rights Policy for Army Installations in the
United States)
3
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery
Commander, U.S. Army Accessions Support Brigade
Commandant, U.S. Army War College
Commander, Second Army
CF:
Director, Army National Guard
Director of Business Transformation
Commander, Eighth Army
Commander, U.S. Army Cyber Command
Army Directive 2014-08 Enclosure 1
LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR WATER RIGHTS
A water right is the legal right to use water from a source. Water rights are distinct from
contractual rights of purchase. Federal installations own and can obtain water rights in
support of their missions. The analysis of the status of Army water rights is specific to
each installation, highly specialized and dependent on careful legal review by the
installation’s Staff Judge Advocate.
Army water rights may arise from State or Federal law. State water rights are typically
obtained through acquisition. Although the Army is part of the Federal Government,
many of its installations’ water rights are held pursuant to State law. The character of
these State water rights depends on the legal doctrine each State follows. In general,
the Eastern States assign “riparian” water rights: all landowners whose property adjoins
a body of water have the right to make reasonable use of it. The Western States use a
system called “prior appropriation,” which assigns water rights prioritized by the date on
which a person first put a quantity of water to beneficial use. In these prior
appropriation States, ownership of land is divorced from ownership of water rights.
Some States have hybrids of these two systems. Each State’s specific laws are unique
and should be reviewed by the installation legal counsel.
Federal water rights differ significantly from State water rights and, most critically, take
priority over State rights. Army installations may have obtained Federal water rights in
one of the following ways:
 Federal Reserved Water Rights. When the Federal Government withdraws land
from the public domain to establish a reservation or installation, courts infer the
intent to reserve unappropriated water to fulfill the reservation’s established
purpose, both presently and in the future.
 Cession. On land ceded to the Federal Government, the cession authorization
may include water rights.
 Preemption. When Congress has clearly and specifically preempted State water
law, either expressly or by necessary implication, on lands that are not reserved,
the Federal installation will have senior water rights.
For Federal reserved rights, uses of water to fulfill the “primary purpose” of the
reservation or installation include all municipal and industrial uses of water necessary to
sustain a self-contained community, including water adequate for the morale and
welfare needs of the Army community. Federal reserved rights may also change over
time, depending on the installation’s future needs.
A final significant difference between Federal and State water rights is that Federal
reserved water rights clearly may not be lost by nonuse. Under the law of some prior
appropriation States, a long period of nonuse may raise a rebuttable presumption of
intent to abandon a State right. Reserved rights are not subject to abandonment. It is
Army Directive 2014-08 2 Enclosure 1
not clear, however, whether other water rights owned by the United States are subject
to State laws on abandonment.
Although the Federal Government is generally immune to lawsuits from the States, the
McCarran Amendment, Title 43 United States Code section 666 (1988), provides a
limited waiver of sovereign immunity for “general stream adjudications.” In this
situation, individual States can require the United States to quantify, assert and define
its water rights. During an adjudication, a court will consider evidence to establish the
existence of water rights within a watershed or basin. The result of the adjudication is a
decree fixing the amounts, relative priorities and specific details of water rights.
However, even when such rights have been fixed, Federal reserved rights may still
trump State water rights, and the appropriation of water may have to be revisited,
depending on the Army’s needs.
Timely and thorough identification and characterization of an installation’s water rights
are important. State water rights must be preserved to prevent arguments that they
have been abandoned. Generally, State adjudications of water rights also require the
assertion of water rights claims to be brought within a certain timeframe. If the Army
fails to assert or preserve its water rights in a timely manner, it may be in jeopardy of
losing those rights.
The policy in this directive requires that the Army identify, assert, defend and preserve
its water rights to the maximum extent possible under State and Federal law. The
complexity and diversity of water rights means that installation commanders must
consult with their Staff Judge Advocates to determine what legal rights and limitations
apply at their specific installation to ensure continued access to a sufficient water supply
to carry out the Army’s missions. The Office of the Judge Advocate General,
Environmental Law Division is available to coordinate guidance at the command level
and specific implementation instructions at the installation level.
The assertion and defense of Army water rights must be coordinated, through the
installation and land holding command’s Office of the Staff Judge Advocate or legal
office, with the Chief, Environmental Law Division, U.S. Army Legal Services Agency.
The Environmental Law Division represents the Department of the Army in litigation
(and some administrative proceedings) involving water rights and other environmental
and natural resources matters. The U.S. Department of Justice has the primary
responsibility for representing Federal agencies in litigation. Consequently, the
Environmental Law Division will coordinate as necessary with the Justice Department
and Office of the Army General Counsel on all matters related to Army water rights.
Army Directive 2014-08 Enclosure 2
ISSUES TO ADDRESS IN GUIDANCE
Here is a nonexclusive list of issues the Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for
Installation Management (OACSIM) will include in its water rights guidance to
commands. Commands may issue further guidance to aid in local implementation as
they deem necessary. Local implementation should also address any additional
Federal, State or regional issues that may be unique to the command’s particular
missions and circumstances.
1. Importance of the Army Water Rights Policy. Each command must emphasize the
critical importance that sufficient water rights and access to water may have on the
command’s ability to continue to carry out its missions in the future.
2. Assignment of Responsibilities. Each command must clearly establish who is
responsible for collecting and maintaining records; analyzing current and future water
needs and supply; analyzing water rights necessary for continued access to a sufficient
supply of water; and asserting, maintaining and defending water rights and access.
3. Federal and State Water Rights Laws. OACSIM’s guidance should include a
summary of Federal and State water laws, and also direct appropriate legal counsel to
supplement this summary with State and regional laws and issues that may be pertinent
to each installation or activity. The guidance should discuss potentially relevant Federal
laws, such as the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
4. Analysis of Existing Water Rights. All installations or activities must analyze the
adequacy of their current and future water supply needs, rights and access. Such rights
and access should be sufficient to continue essential activities under drought or other
shortage conditions and to support increased demand due to mobilization, contingency
operations or increases in population or missions. Attention should be paid to actions
necessary to maintain existing water rights, including planning and continued beneficial
use to avoid abandonment or loss. Likewise, any privatization of Army-owned water
systems must be accomplished in such a manner as to not jeopardize the Army’s water
rights. If additional water access or rights are necessary, the analysis should also
include what other sources of water are available and how to acquire the rights or
access to that water.
5. Identification of Supporting Data and Records. The guidance should address the
importance of collecting and maintaining sufficient evidentiary records to assert,
maintain and defend the Army’s water rights. Guidance should be provided on how to
locate, record and retain existing and future water rights documentation. As applicable,
this documentation should include information concerning the dates, locations, means,
rates of diversion and uses of water, as well as documents establishing the acquisition
and history of all water rights acquired (for example, executive orders, decrees or
permits).
Army Directive 2014-08 2 Enclosure 2
6. Maintenance of Records. OACSIM should require commands to initiate procedures
for permanently maintaining such records. These procedures should clearly identify
who is responsible for the maintenance, how the maintenance will be monitored to
ensure that it is carried out, and how such records will be passed on to successors.
The transfer of documents is especially important given the indefinite number of years
during which the Army will need to assert, maintain and/or defend its water rights.
Effective retention of information collected, now and in the future, will be key to
protecting the current and future property interests of the United States Army.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

ARMY DIR 2014-02 NET ZERO INSTALLATIONS POLICY

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/NOCASE-ARMY_DIR_2014-02-000-WEB-0.pdf

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
WASHINGTON
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 201 +02 (Net Zero Installations Polley)
1 . References:
2 8 JAN 2014
a. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, Public Law 11 0-140.
b. Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58.
c. Executive Order 13514 (Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and
Economic Perfonnance), October 5, 2009.
d. Executive Order 13423 (Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and
Transportation Management), January 24, 2007.
e. Department of Defense Strategic Sustainability Perfonnance Plan, FY 2012.
f. Finding of No Significant Impact, Programmatic Environmental Assessment:
Implementation of the Net Zero Program at Army Installations, October 2, 2012.
g. Programmatic Environmental Assessment: Army Net Zero Installations, Final,
July 2012.
2. Purpose. The Army's vision is to appropriately manage our natural resources with a
goal of Net Zero in energy, water and solid waste at installations. This memorandum
sets policy and assigns responsibilities to strive toward Net Zero at all Army installations
where fiscally responsible and in support of mission accomplishment. Net Zero is not a
new program, but seeks to build on existing Army sustainability efforts to integrate
environmental, energy and green procurement programs. This holistic strategy is
targeted to improve management of existing Federal energy, water and solid waste
programs with the goal of increasing resiliency where fiscally responsible. Net Zero is a
force multiplier that enables the Army to appropriately steward available resources,
manage costs and provide Soldiers, Families and Civilians with a sustainable future.
3. Applicability. This policy applies to all permanent Active Army, Army National Guard
and U.S. Army Reserve installations, sites and facilities operated and/or maintained by
Federal funds in the continental United States (CONUS) and outside the continental
United States (OCONUS), hereafter referred to as "installations." This policy does not
apply to contingency bases or Civil Works facilities. For the purposes of this policy, the
tenn "Commands" refers to U.S. Army Materiel Command, U.S. Anny Installation
Management Command, the Army National Guard and the Army Reserve.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014·02 (Net Zero Installations Policy)
4. Policy. Net Zero builds on longstanding sustainable practices and incorporates
emerging best practices in building and community management of energy, water and
solid waste at Army installations.
a. Effective immediately, Commands will implement Net Zero to the maximum
extent practical and fiscally prudent by:
(1) reducing overall energy use , maximizing efficiency, implementing energy
recovery and cogeneration opportunities, and offsetting the remaining demand with the
production of renewable energy from onsite sources so that the Net Zero energy
installation produces as much renewable energy as it uses over the course of a year.
{2) reducing overall water use, regardless of the source; increasing use of
technology that uses water more efficiently; recycling and reusing water, shifting from
the use of potable water to non-potable sources as much as possible; and minimizing
interbasin transfers of any type of water, potable or non•potable, so that a Net Zero
water installation recharges as much water back into the aquifer as it withdraws.
(3) reducing, reusing, recycling/composting and recovering solid waste streams
and converting them to resource values, resulting in zero landfill disposal.
b. Commands, both CONUS and OCONUS, will work to gain local, regional and
national (where applicable) support toward Net Zero goals.
c. The original Net Zero pilots will continue to strive toward a goal of Net Zero in
energy, water and/or solid waste by fiscal year 2020. The Net Zero pilots will serve as
sources of "best practices" that other installations can implement.
5. Implementation. Army Net Zero is designed to further the Army energy, water, solid
waste and overall sustainability goals, primarily through improved management
practices.
a. Commands are expected to move toward the Net Zero goals using existing
programs and resources, where practical. Efforts will be funded with existing program
resources from funds for military construction; the Energy Conservation Investment
Program; the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program ; sustainment,
restoration and modernization; and base operations services.
b. Commands are encouraged to:
(1) leverage existing utilities privatization contracts, energy savings performance
contracts and utility energy service contracts; ·
2
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-02 (Net Zero Installations Policy)
(2) explore options for alternative financing through power purchase agreements
end enhanced use leases;
(3) collaborate with other Federal agencies and the private sector to finance
project development; and
(4) use life-cycle cost analysis to assess any proposed new Net Zero initiative or
project.
c. Commands are expected to review and validate all life-cycle cost analyses that
installations develop to ensure that the recommended project or initiative is fiscally
responsible and cost-effective.
6. Responsibilities
a. The Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy and
Environment) (OASA (IE&E)) develops Net Zero strategy and policy, represents Army
environmental and sustainability interests, and provides strategic oversight and direction
for Net Zero.
b. The Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management (OACSIM)
establishes guidance and secures program resources to achieve Net Zero goals.
OACSIM will develop and maintain a process to oversee command performance, share
best practices and lessons learned across commands, and report progress toward Net
Zero by leveraging existing systems and reporting requirements.
c. Commands will oversee installation performance as they strive to exceed the
legal, regulatory, Presidential, Department of Defense and Army policy requirements for
increasing efficiency, and reusing and reducing energy and water consumption and
solid waste generation as cost-effectively as possible (references 1a-1 g and the
supplemental Net Zero references at the enclosure). Commands will continually
evaluate and implement efficiencies, reductions and reuse of energy, water and solid
waste to the maximum extent possible within available funding levels and as new
technologies and approaches are proven cost-effective.
7. Tracking Progress
a. OACSIM will provide quarterly updates to the CASA (IE&E) on each command's
progress, as well as overall Army energy, water and solid waste goal performance.
OACSIM will include periodic Net Zero training in existing Army Energy Managers
Workshops and help commands incorporate Net Zero into other appropriate Army
training.
3
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-02 (Net Zero Installations Policy)
b. Commands will hold quarterly conference calls to facilitate information exchange,
identify best practices, track progress and publish success stories and lesson learned.
Commands will summarize the results in quarterly reports to OACSIM.
c. Commands will ensure that installations report progress quarterly and annually
on energy, water and solid waste in accordance with Army policy via existing reporting
systems (for example, Army Energy and Water Reporting System, Solid Waste Annual
Reporting and Headquarters Army Environmental System). Commands will review and
certify the accuracy and completeness of data quarterly, track progress toward Net Zero
goals through the aggregation of existing data sources, and assess and report individual
installation progress toward Net Zero.
8. Exceptions. Requests for exception to this policy must be forwarded in writing
through the chain of command to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Energy
and Sustainability) for approval.
9. Proponent. The proponent for this policy is OACSIM, who will incorporate the
guidance in this directive into the next revisions of Army Regulation 200-1
(Environmental Protection and Enhancement) and Army Regulation 420-1 (Army
Facilities Management), as appropriate.
10. Rescission. This directive is rescinded upon publication of the revised regulations.
Encl
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Africa/Southern European Task Force
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command
(CONT)
4
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-02 (Net Zero Installations Policy)
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
U.S. Army Cyber Command
U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command/9th Signal Command (Army)
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army MIiitary District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Superintendent, United States Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery
Commandant, U.S. Army War College
Commander, U.S. Army Accessions Support Brigade
CF:
Director, Army National Guard
Director of Business Transformation
5
SUPPLEMENTAL REFERENCES FOR NET ZERO INSTALLATIONS POLICY
1. 10 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 2911 (e), Goal regarding use of renewable energy
to meet facility energy needs.
2. 10 U.S.C. § 2913, Energy savings contracts and activities.
3. 10 U.S.C. § 2662, Real property transactions: reports to congressional committees.
4. 10 U.S.C. § 2667, Leases: non-excess property of military departments and
Defense Agencies.
5. 10 U.S.C. § 2922a, Contracts for energy or fuel for military installations.
6. 42 U.S.C § 8287, Authority to enter into contracts.
7. Memorandum; Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology
and Logistics); 19 Jan 10; subject: DoD Implementation of Storm Water Requirements
under Section 438 of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA).
8. Memorandum ; Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology
and Logistics); 25 Oct 1O; subject: Department of Defense Sustainable Buildings.
9. Army Regulation 200-1 (Environmental Protection and Enhancement),
13 December 2007.
1O. Army Regulation 420-1 (Army Facilities Management), 12 February 2008, Rapid
Action Revision 2 dated 24 August 2012 .
11. Memorandum; Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) and
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisitions, Logistics and Technology); 22 Nov 06;
subject: Establishment of the Army Green Procurement Program.
12. Memorandum; Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy and
Environment); 23 Aug 12 ; subject: Comprehensive Energy and Water Evaluations
Policy.
13. Memorandum; Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy and
Environment); 16 Dec 13; subject Sustainable Design and Development Policy
Update.
14. Memorandum, ACSIM, DAIM-ZA, 23 Nov 11, subject: Master Planning Policy
Guidance for Sustainable Design and Development (Environmental and Energy
Performance). ·
Army Directive 2014-02 Enclosure
15. Memorandum, ACSIM, DAIM-OD, 15 May 13, subject: FY2013 Solid Waste Annual
Reporting (SWARWeb) Schedule.
16. Facility Energy Management Guidelines and Criteria for Energy and Water
Evaluations in Covered Facilities (42 U.S.C. 8253 Subsection (f), Use of Energy and
Water Effic;ency Measures in Federal Buildings), Federal Energy Management
Program, 25 November 2008.
17. Unified Facilities Criteria 1-200-01 (General Building Requirements), 1 July 2013,
with Change 1, 1 September 2013.
18. Unified Facilities Criteria 2-100-01 (Installation Master Planning), 15 May 2012.
19. Unified Facilities Criteria 3-210-10 (Low Impact Development), 15 November 2010.
20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Technical Guidance on Implementing the
Stormwater Runoff Requirements for Federal Projects under Section 438 of the Energy
Independence and Security Act, EPA 841-8-09-001, December 2009.
Army Directive 2014-02 2 

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Monday, January 28, 2013

ARMY DIR 2013-01 GUIDANCE ON THE ACQUISITION AND USE OF SERVICE DOGS BY SOLDIERS

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/NOCASE-ARMY_DIR_2013-01-000-WEB-0.pdf

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
WASHINGTON
2 B JAN 2013
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2013-01 (Guidance on the Acquisition and Use of Service
Dogs by Soldiers)
1. References:
a. Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), including Rapid Action
Revision Issued 4 Aug 11. ·
b. Army Regulation 40-905 (Veterinary Health Services), 29 Aug 06.
c. Technical Bulletin Med No. 4 (DoD Human-Animal Bond Principles and
Guidelines), 16 Jun 03.
2. Purpose. This directive sets forth policies and procedures for the acquisition and
use of service dogs by wounded, ill and injured Soldiers with disabilities for whom a
service dog is clinically indicated. The guidance in this directive is applicable to all
Soldiers regardless of component or duty status. It also sets forth certain requirements
for Soldiers who have already received and are using a service dog. This directive does
not apply to emotional support animals, therapy animals and activity animals. This
directive does not prevent Soldiers from owning pets, subject to installation pet policies.
3. Definitions
a. Service Dogs. A service dog is a dog individually trained to do work or perform
specific tasks for the benefit of an individual with a disability. Service dogs include
guide dogs that assist individuals who are blind or have low vision with navigation and
other tasks. Generally, Soldiers requiring a service dog are expected to require the dog
for an extended period of time, often for life. A service dog usually undergoes a period
of training with the individual Soldier who will receive it. Currently, the U.S. Department
of Veterans Affairs (VA) does not recognize service dogs for behavioral health
conditions, and therefore psychological service dogs are not considered service dogs
for the purposes of this directive. If the VA policy in this regard changes, The Surgeon
General will review and propose amendments to this directive for my approval. Species
other than dogs, whether wild or domestic, trained or untrained, are not covered by this
policy. Except as provided in paragraph 9, the Army will recognize only those service
dogs obtained by eligible Soldiers from a source accredited by an organization
recognized by the VA.
b. Service Dogs in Training. These dogs are undergoing a period of training
designed to lead to their ultimate designation and employment as service dogs. At the
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2013-01 (Guidance on the Acquisition and Use of Service
Dogs by Soldiers)
discretion of the installation's senior commander, access to Army facilities by trainers
with service dogs in training may be granted, provided that the training is occurring
under the auspices of a source accredited by a VA-recognized organization. In some
cases, the training of service dogs occurs as part of a medically supervised program
wherein the trainer benefits from the act of training dogs for service to other individuals.
The use of such medically supervised training programs and the granting of access
rights to medical treatment facilities to such dogs in training are at the discretion of the
commander of the applicable medical treatment facility. A Soldier is not authorized to
train his/her own service dog.
c. Emotional Support Animals. These animals provide therapeutic benefit to
individuals through the provision of companionship and affection. These animals have
the same rights as pets and fall outside the scope of this policy.
d. Therapy Animals. These animals are used in goal-directed interventions where
the animal is an integral part of a treatment process designed to improve physical,
social, emotional and/or cognitive functions. The animal is kept under the control and
possession of medical staff or volunteers, not the patient. Therapy animals fall outside
the scope of this policy.
e. Activity Animals. These animals are used in interactions designed to enhance
quality of life. An example is use of a puppy to brighten the lives of children who are
patients on a pediatric oncology ward. The animal is kept under the control and
possession of medical staff or volunteers, not the patient. Activity animals fall outside
the scope of this policy.
4. Access to Army Facilities and Spaces. Service dogs will be given access to those
Army facilities and spaces generally open to the public, including (but not limited to)
installations, hospitals, treatment facilities, recreational facilities, barracks and other
structures, as long as such access does not compromise public health (including
infection control standards), safety, readiness, mission accomplishment, and good order
and discipline.
5. Acquisition of Service Dogs
a. The Army does not provide service dogs. With a view to assisting Soldiers as
they transition to Veteran status, the Army will recognize only those service dogs
obtained by eligible Soldiers from a source accredited by a VA-recognized organization.
Reliance on those sources accredited by VA-recognized organizations also gives the
Army an effective and efficient means to conclude that a service dog is qualified and
capable of pertorming those tasks clinically required to assist the Soldier.
2
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2013-01 (Guidance on the Acquisition and Use of Service
Dogs by Soldiers)
b. Eligible veterans may be authorized certain VA benefits related to recognized
service dogs, such as payment for veterinary care and equipment required for optimal
use of the dog. Soldiers should be aware that dogs obtained from sources not
acc redited by VA-recognized organizations may not qualify as service dogs and may be
ineligible for VA benefits.
6. Deployment Status. Soldiers for whom a service dog is recommended are not
deployable.
7. Determination of Eligibility for and Acquisition of a Service Dog. The following
procedures must be used in determining eligibility for and acquisition of a service dog.
a. A Soldier may be identified as a potential candidate for a service dog by his/her
primary care manager (PCM). Other medical providers familiar with the Soldier must
make their recommendation for a service dog to the Soldier's PCM. Soldiers who
believe they are potential candidates to receive a service dog may also request one
from their PCM.
b. Upon receipt of a recommendation or request that a Soldier receive a service
dog, the PCM will counsel the Soldier on the provisions of this directive and the
potential effects of receiving a service dog. If, after counseling, the Soldier validates the
recommendation or request for a service dog, the PCM will convene a multidisciplinary
team consisting of the Soldier's PCM; a behavioral health provider; a command
representative (an officer or senior noncommissioned officer) designated by the
Soldier's unit commander; and, if the Soldier is assigned to an installation, an
installation representative designated by the garrison commander (officer or senior
noncommissioned officer). The PCM may invite the participation of other members
necessary to enable the multidisciplinary team to make an informed decision, such as a
veterinarian or unit medical provider who is familiar with the Soldier. The team will
consider the following matters with a view to making appropriate recommendations to
the first colonel or GS-15 in the Soldier's chain of command:
(1) whether a service dog is clinically required in light of the Soldier's
documented medical conditions;
(2) whether the Soldier is suited for a service dog;
(3) whether any limitations should be placed on the Soldier's use of the service
dog, such as specifying areas where a service dog may not accompany the Soldier or
tasks assigned to the Soldier for which accompaniment by the service dog would not be
permitted;
3
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2013-01 (Guidance on the Acquisition and Use of Service
Dogs by Soldiers)
(4) whether appropriate accommodations are available for the Soldier and the
service dog if the Soldier lives in barracks or family housing. In some circumstances,
this may include consideration as to whether the Soldier should be allowed to move off
post; and
(5) any other matters deemed appropriate for consideration.
c. The PCM will notify the Soldier of the multidisciplinary team's recommendation.
If the team does not recommend a service dog for the Soldier or cannot reach a
consensus, the PCM will refer the team's recommendation, together with its rationale or
viewpoints, to the Deputy Commander for Clinical Services (DCCS) of the servicing
military treatment facility for review. The DCCS will consider the factors set forth in
paragraph 7b in making a recommendation and will provide written rationale for his/her
recommendation.
d. If the multidisciplinary team or the DCCS recommends that the Soldier receive a
service dog, the PCM will ensure that the Soldier has an existing Permanent-3 or
Permanent-4 profile or is immediately assigned such a profile. The PCM will also make
sure the Soldier is in the Disability Evaluation System or is immediately referred into the
system. For Soldiers not already in a Warrior Transition Unit, the unit commander shall
determine whether to recommend the Soldier's assignment to a Warrior Transition Unit.
e. Neither the multidisciplinary team nor the DCCS may issue a final decision on a
recommendation or request for a service dog. The PCM will prepare a packet
containing the multidisciplinary team's recommendation and the recommendation from
the DCCS, if applicable. A sample packet is at the enclosure. The PCM will forward the
packet through command channels to the first colonel or GS-15 in the Soldier's chain of
command for decision. Each commander in the chain of command must document
his/her recommendation as to whether the Soldier should or should not receive a
service dog, as well as any recommended limitations on use of the service dog that are
in addition to those the multidisciplinary team or DCCS proposed. The first
colonel/GS-15 will consider those factors set forth in paragraph 7b in making his/her
decision, according considerable weight to the clinical recommendations of the
multidisciplinary team or the DCCS.
(1) If the first colonel/GS-15 approves the recommendation or request for a
service dog, the decision is final. The first colonel/GS-15 will specify any limitations on
use of the service dog.
(2) If the first colonel/GS-15 disapproves the recommendation or request for a
service dog, he/she must provide a written rationale for the decision.
4
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2013-01 (Guidance on the Acquisition and Use of Service
Dogs by Soldiers)
f. A decision by the first colonel/GS-15 to disapprove the recommendation or
request for a service dog will be reviewed by the first general officer (GO) or member of
the Senior Executive Service (SES) in the Soldier's chain of command, who also will
consider those factors set forth in paragraph ?b and give considerable weight to the
clinical recommendations of the multidisciplinary team or the DCCS. The first GO/SES
will issue a final decision, provide a written rationale and, if the service dog is approved,
specify any limitations on the Soldier's use of the service dog.
g. The PCM will notify the Soldier of the final decision.
(1) If a service dog is approved, the PCM will refer the Soldier to the VA's online
resources at http://www.va.gov/health/ServiceandGuideDogs.asp so that the Soldier
may seek to obtain a service dog from a VA-recognized source. Soldiers are
responsible for obtaining their service dogs, including any associated expenses. Army
approval is no guarantee that a VA-recognized source will provide a service dog. Once
a VA-recognized source agrees to provide a service dog, the Soldier must notify his/her
PCM and unit commander and give the PCM sufficient documentation that the service
dog was obtained from a VA-recognized source.
(2) If a service dog is not approved, and if one or more of the factors set forth in
paragraph 7b materially changes such that the PCM or other medical professional
familiar with the Soldier again recommends a service dog, the PCM will convene a
multidisciplinary team to consider the matter. The recommendation or request for a
service dog will be processed in accordance with the procedures set forth in
paragraph 7.
h. Before the Soldier obtains the service dog, the Soldier's unit commander will
counsel the Soldier about installation and facilities access, any workplace issues and
the need to keep the commander informed of any changes in the Soldier's condition that
might affect the Soldier's ability to keep the service dog. If the Soldier is approved to
move off post, the unit commander will coordinate with the garrison commander to
initiate the Soldier's receipt of Basic Allowance for Housing.
8 . If the Soldier is not approved for a service dog or if a Soldier is unable to obtain a
service dog from a VA-recognized source, the Soldier may nonetheless obtain a dog,
subject to installation policies on pets.
9. Dogs Acquired Before Effective Date
a. A Soldier who acquired a dog before the effective date of this policy, and for
whom an authorized licensed medical provider previously determined the dog was
clinically indicated (including psychological service dogs), may keep the animal provided
he/she complies with the provisions of paragraph 10 (except paragraph 10g), maintains
5
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2013-01 (Guidance on the Acquisition and Use of Service
Dogs by Soldiers)
the dog's proper health and behavior, and adheres to appropriate limitations on the use
of the animal imposed by the chain of command.
b. Commanders, in consultation with the Soldier's current medical provider, are
authorized and expected to take necessary actions to ensure the health, safety and
proper use of such dogs within the command.
c. Commanders, in consultation with the Soldier's current medical provider, may
refer such cases to the multidisciplinary team to evaluate whether a Soldier's continued
or ongoing possession of a dog remains clinically indicated. If not, the Soldier may be
allowed to retain the animal as a pet. Note: solely for the purposes of reviewing cases
involving a previously acquired, clinically indicated (and documented) psychological
service dog, commanders and the multidisciplinary team will not apply the VA
accreditation requirements of this policy in making its recommendation.
d. Nothing in this policy should be construed to permit the prescription or acquisition
of psychological service dogs after the effective date of this policy.
10. Care and Control of Service Dogs. Soldiers with service dogs that are subject to
this policy shall comply with the following requirements:
a. Soldiers are solely responsible for caring for their dog, which includes feeding,
watering, exercising, toileting, waste removal, stewardship and veterinary care.
Soldiers must provide their unit commander with a Family Care Plan that includes a
care plan for the service dog and update it at least annually.
b. Soldiers with service dogs must follow all applicable laws, rules and regulations
related to service dogs and must maintain the dog's proper behavior. Soldiers and/or
service dog providers may be responsible for any damages and injuries their dogs
cause.
c. Soldiers will make sure their service dog wears a special vest or harness
identifying it as a service dog at all times while on an installation or in Army facilities.
d. Service dogs may receive military veterinary care on a space-available basis in
accordance with reference 1b. TRI CARE policies in effect at this time exclude service
dogs from coverage.
e. Soldiers must register their service dogs with the garrison provost marshal's
office/directorate of emergency services (or installation equivalent), which will maintain
a registry of service dogs residing or working on the garrison.
6
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2013-01 (Guidance on the Acquisition and Use of Service
Dogs by Soldiers)
f. Soldiers must maintain documentation of the dog's current immunizations.
g. Soldiers must maintain proof that their service dog was obtained from a
VA-recognized source. (This provision does not apply to a previously acquired,
clinically indicated psychological service dog discussed in paragraph 8.)
11. Responsibilities. The Surgeon General is the proponent for this directive and shalt:
a. establish and implement any necessary guidelines for clinical recommendations
related to the need for a service dog.
b. monitor and track service dog employment to ensure compliance with
references 1b and 1c and other applicable regulations, policies and guidance.
c. establish measures of effectiveness, annually review issues surrounding
Soldiers with service dogs and submit a report of the review to the Secretary of the
Army. Reporting requirements include:
(1) the creation of a registry of Soldiers with service dogs, together with the
diagnosis applicable to each Soldier;
(2) the source of each service dog and an assessment of each Soldier's
utilization rate for his/her service dog;
(3) an assessment of timeliness in the assignment of Permanent-3 or
Permanent-4 profiles to Soldiers recommended to receive a service dog and of
beginning the Disability Evaluation System process for such Soldiers; and
(4) a summary of Soldiers' dispositions after receipt of a service dog (for
example, discharged from or retained on active duty).
12. This directive is effective immediately. Should the Department of Defense
promulgate a service dog policy, The Surgeon General will expeditiously review and
propose for my approval any changes to this directive required to conform to that policy.
If the Department issues such policy, The Surgeon General shall, within 270 days,
prepare and submit a comprehensive Army policy on service dogs for publication in an
Army regulation.
Enclosure
7
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2013-01 (Guidance on the Acquisition and Use of Service
Dogs by Soldiers)
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Europe
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Africa
U. S. Army Special Operations Command
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command
U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command/9th Signal Command (Army)
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Superintendent, United States Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
CF:
Commander, U.S. Army Cyber Command
Commander, Eighth U.S. Army
Commander, U.S. Army Reserve Command
Director, Army National Guard
Director, Business Transformation
Executive Director, Army National Military Cemeteries
8
SAMPLE MEMORANDUM RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SERVICE DOG
FROM SOLDIER'S PRIMARY CARE MANAGER TO FI RST GENERAL OFFICER OR
MEMBER OF THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE IN SOLDIER'S CHAIN OF
COMMAND
PRIMARY CARE MANAGER'S OFFICIAL LETTERHEAD
OFFICE SYMBOL Date
MEMORANDUM THAU Chain of Command
FOR (Insert Name of First General Officer or Memoer of the Senior Executive Service in
the Soldier's Chain of Command)
SUBJECT: Recommendation for Approval of a Service Dog for (Insert Soldier's Name,
Rank and Unit of Assignment)
1. A multidisciplinary team considered whether a service dog is clinically required for
(insert Soldier's rank and name) and whether the Soldier is suited for a service dog. I
participated on the team as the Soldier's primary care manager. Other team members
were (insert names of team members and roles; for example, behavioral health
provider, unit command representative).
2. The team recommends approval of a service dog for (insert Soldier's rank and last
name). The service dog will assist (insert him or her) with (insert activities that formed
the basis for the clinical recommendation).
3. The team recommends the following limitations on the use of the service dog: (insert
any applicable limitations).
4. Endorsement of the team's recommendations by the Soldier's chain of command,
including any limitations on use of the service dog that the command recommends, will
be appended to this recommendation.
5. The Soldier has been placed on a (insert Permanent-3 or Permanent-4) profile and
will be considered for medical separation or retirement through the Disability Evaluation
System. ·
Army Directive 2013-01 Enclosure
OFFICE SYMBOL
SUBJECT: Recommendation for Approval of a Service Dog for (Insert Soldier's Name,
Rank and Unit of Assignment)
6. If approved, the Soldier must acquire a service dog from a source recognized by the
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Army Directive 2013-01
PRIMARY CARE MANAGER'S
SIGNATURE BLOCK
2
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ORGANIZATIONAL NAME/TlnE
STANDARDIZED STREET ADDRESS
CITY, STATE AND ZIP+ 4 CODE
SAMPLE CHAIN OF COMMAND RECOMMENDATION
USE APPROPRIATE LETTERHEAD
OFFICE SYMBOL
MEMORANDUM THAU
Date
MEMORANDUM FOR (Insert Name of First General Officer or Member of the Senior
Executive Service in the Soldier's Chain of Command)
SUBJECT: Recommendation for Approval of a Service Dog for (Insert Soldier's Name,
Rank and Unit of Assignment)
1. I have reviewed the multidisciplinary team's recommendation that (insert Soldier's
name and rank), assigned under my command, receive a service dog.
I recommend approval of this recommendation.
I do not recommend approval of this recommendation.
2. Insert appropriate comments. (If the commander is recommending approval, the
comments should include any suggested limitations on use of the dog in addition to, or
different from, any that the multidisciplinary team recommended. If the commander
does not believe additional limitations are required, he/she should document that
position here. If the commander does not recommend approval of the team's
recommendation, he/she should detail the rationale for disapproval here).
AUTHORITY LINE: (if necessary)
Army Directive 2013-01
COMMANDER'S
SIGNATURE BLOCK
3
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ORGANIZATIONAL NAME/TITLE
STANDARDIZED STREET ADDRESS
CITY, STATE AND ZIP+ 4 CODE
SAMPLE GENERAL OFFICER/MEMBER OF THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
USE APPROPRIATE LETTERHEAD
OFFICE SYMBOL Date
MEMORANDUM FOR Primary Care Manager of (Insert Soldier's Name, Rank and Unit
of Assignment)
. SUBJECT: Action on Recommendation to Approve a Service Dog for (Insert Soldier's
Name, Rank and Unit of Assignment)
I approve the recommendation for a service dog for (insert Soldier's name
and rank). The Soldier's use of a service dog is subject to the following limitations
(specify):
I disapprove the recommendation for a service dog for the following
reason(s):
My point of contact is (insert name, telephone number and email address).
CF:
CHAIN OF COMMAND
Army Directive 2013-01
APPROPRIATE
SIGNATURE BLOCK

Tuesday, September 4, 2012