https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN43568-AR_11-6-001-WEB-2.pdf
*This regulation supersedes AR 11–6, dated 25 February 2022 and DA Pam 11–8, dated 28 February 2022.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024
UNCLASSIFIED
Headquarters
Department of the Army
Washington, DC
*Army Regulation 11–6
9 May 2024 Effective 9 June 2024
Army Programs
Army Foreign Language Program
History. This publication is an administrative revision. The portions affected by this administrative revision are listed in the summary
of change.
Authorities. This regulation implements in part 37 USC 353, DoDD 5160.41E, DoDI 1340.27, DoDI 1315.20, and DoDI 5160.70.
Applicability. This regulation applies to the Regular Army, the Army National Guard/Army National Guard of the United States, and
the U.S. Army Reserve unless otherwise stated. It also applies to Department of the Army Civilians.
Proponent and exception authority. The proponent of this regulation is the Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 2. The proponent has the
authority to approve exceptions or waivers to this regulation that are consistent with controlling law and regulations. The proponent
may delegate this approval authority, in writing, to a division chief within the proponent agency or its direct reporting unit or field
operating agency, in the grade of colonel or the civilian equivalent. Activities may request a waiver to this regulation by providing
justification that includes a full analysis of the expected benefits and must include formal review by the activity’s senior legal officer.
Commanders or senior leaders of the requesting activity will endorse all waiver requests and forward them through their higher head-
quarters to the policy proponent. Refer to AR 25 – 30 for specific requirements.
Army internal control process. This regulation contains internal control provisions in accordance with AR 11 – 2 and identifies key
internal controls that must be evaluated (appendix F).
Suggested improvements. Users are invited to send comments and suggested improvements on a DA Form 2028 (Recommended
Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) directly to the Deputy Chief of Staff, G – 2 (DAMI – OIO) via email at usarmy.pentagon.hqda-
dcs-g-2.list.foreign-language-office@army.mil.
Distribution. This publication is available in electronic media only and is intended for the Regular Army, Army National Guard/Army
National Guard of the United States and the U.S. Army Reserve.
Summary of Change
AR 11 –6
Army Foreign Language Program
This administrative revision, dated 22 April 2025—
• Incorporates Army General Order 2025– 06, replacing Fort Liberty to Fort Bragg (throughout).
• Updates references (app A).
This major revision, dated 9 May 2024—
• Delays assignment of 35P Defense Language Institute graduates until advanced individual training to
enable the identification and assignment of the higher proficiency linguists to critical intelligence
missions at the National Security Agency (para 1–11h(20)).
• Adds requirement for the Deputy Chief of Staff, G –3/5/7 to assess and report the foreign language
capability readiness for Army units in the Defense Readiness Reporting System (para 1–13l).
• Adds requirement for units to inspect subordinate unit’s command language program every 2 years
(paras 1–14k, 1–15i, 1–17m, 1–18e, 1–19j, and 1–23i).
• Requires commanders to comply with Public Law 116– 92 and AR 220 –1 to annotate foreign language
fit, fill, and proficiency as part of regular unit status reporting (paras 1–14n, 1–15k, 1–17o, and 1–23v).
• Requires the Commanding General, U.S. Army Recruiting Command to inform all Soldiers who score
a 129 or higher on the skilled technical portion of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery of
specific military occupational skills that guarantee language training (para 1–18b(2)).
• Adds the requirement for commanders to designate and maintain a permanent space on their
installation in which assigned language-capable and language-dependent Soldiers may conduct self-
study and receive contract instruction to maintain and improve their language capabilities (para 1–23h).
• Requires commanders to provide language-dependent and language-capable Soldiers with the
requisite hours of language training each month during the duty day (paras 1–23k and 3–1b(3)).
• Requires commanders to provide language-dependent and language-capable Soldiers with a 160
consecutive hour significant language training event annually (paras 1–23m and 3–1b(4)).
• Authorizes use of the two-score oral proficiency interview for Army special operations forces Soldiers
only. Eliminates 35M Soldiers and foreign area officer’s eligibility to take the two-score oral proficiency
interview unless these Soldiers are assigned to locations where no testing facilities are available or for
languages that do not have a Defense Language Proficiency Test (para 2–5d(1)).
• Changes the initial Defense Language Proficiency Test recertification timeline for initial entry and
reclassified 35M and 35P Soldiers (para 2–5f(4)).
• Allows grandfathered 35M Soldiers to attend the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center
for initial language acquisition without being reclassified to another military occupational skill if they fail
to graduate (para 2–8k).
• Exempts L3/R3 proficiency linguists from monthly language training if they are confident they can
maintain their language proficiency. Requires 12 hours of language training monthly if they are not
confident they can maintain their 3/3 language proficiency (para 3–1b(3)).
• Adds requirement for unit command language program managers to maintain the Army Command
Language Program Manager’s Database (para 3 –18).
• Adds criteria for when officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers are eligible draw a foreign
language proficiency bonus (para 4–2a).
• Implements the new Department of Defense foreign language proficiency bonus pay by modality
system prescribed in DoDI 1340.27 (para 4–3).
• Adds requirement for Soldiers to complete all recertification testing prior to the expiration date listed on
the written agreement (paras 4–3c and 5–13e).
• Allows Soldiers drawing a foreign language proficiency bonus for an additional dialect to receive
additional pay for the listening modality only (para 4–3e).
• Adds requirement for The Army Language Program Manager to conduct quarterly foreign language
proficiency bonus reviews to ensure Soldiers are authorized to receive the bonus (para 4 –10).
• Adds requirements for non-language-dependent Soldiers supporting contingency operations to qualify
for foreign language proficiency bonus pay (para 4 –11).
• Provides guidance on initiating and processing an administrative personnel action request written
agreement through the Integrated Personnel and Pay System–Army (paras 4–13 through 4– 19).
• Provides updated verbiage to use in the written agreements (paras 4 –14 through 4 – 17).
• Implements the new Department of Defense foreign language proficiency bonus pay by modality
system for Army special operations forces in accordance with DoDI 1340.27. Authorizes the Army
special operations forces military occupational specialties to receive pay for all three modalities once
they achieve an L2/R2/S2 proficiency (para 5–15c(3)(a)).
• Adds a contract linguist waiver memorandum sample format (fig 8– 2).
• Adds a contract linguist revalidation memorandum sample format (fig 8 – 3).
• Adds a contract linguist validation technical exhibit sample format (fig 8 – 4).
• Updates the Command Language Program inspection checklist (app B).
• Eliminates the Army Language and Cultural Enterprise meeting (throughout).
• Reduces the annual language training requirement for foreign area officers and Army Special
Operations Soldiers to 80 consecutive hours annually (throughout).
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 i
Contents (Listed by chapter and page number)
Summary of Change
Chapter 1
Introduction, page 1
Chapter 2
Linguist Recruiting, Language Testing, Control Language, and Establishing Linguist Require-
ments, page 12
Chapter 3
Linguist Training, Management, and Utilization, page 21
Chapter 4
Foreign Language Proficiency Bonus, page 33
Chapter 5
Army Special Operations Forces Foreign Language Program, page 46
Chapter 6
Department of the Army Civilian Foreign Language Proficiency Pay, page 54
Chapter 7
Language Programming and Budgeting, page 57
Chapter 8
Contract Linguist Support, page 59
Chapter 9
Command Language Program Inspection Program, page 69
Appendixes
A. References, page 71
B. Department of the Army Inspection Checklist for Participating Command Language Pro-
grams, page 73
C. Command Language Program Development, page 76
D. Guidelines for a Successful Command Language Program, page 78
E. Training Resources, page 81
F. Internal Control Evaluation, page 84
Table List
Table 2– 1: Language proficiency indicator, page 20
Table 4– 1: Foreign language proficiency bonus monthly payments by modality, page 36
Table 6– 1: Department of the Army Civilian foreign language proficiency pay table, page 56
Table B–1: Inspection items, page 73
Figure List
Figure 8 –1: Contract linguist acquisition flowchart, page 66
Figure 8 –2: Sample memorandum for contract linguist waiver request, page 67
Figure 8 –3: Sample memorandum for contract linguist request/revalidation, page 68
Contents—Continued
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 ii
Figure 8 –4: Sample format for contract linguist validation technical exhibit spreadsheet, page 69
Glossary of Terms
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 1
Chapter 1
Introduction
Section I
General
1–1. Purpose
This regulation prescribes policies, assigns responsibilities, and delegates authorities for the Army For-
eign Language Program to include the use of Soldiers, Department of the Army (DA) Civilians, and con-
tract linguists to provide linguistic support to Army missions. It prescribes policies for managing Army lan-
guage-dependent and language-capable military occupational specialty (MOS) Soldiers, DA Civilians; the
management and acquisition of contract linguists; command language programs (CLPs); provision of for-
eign language proficiency bonus (FLPB) pay to Soldiers and DA Civilians; management of Army special
operations forces (ARSOF) language-capable Soldiers; and policy for the use of The Army Language
Program (TALP) funds. Additionally, this regulation prescribes minimum language training and language
proficiency standards and establishes associated language testing requirements.
1–2. References, forms, and explanation of abbreviations
See appendix A. The abbreviations, brevity codes, and acronyms (ABCAs) used in this electronic publica-
tion are defined when you hover over them. All ABCAs are listed in the ABCA directory located at
https://armypubs.army.mil/.
1–3. Associated publications
This section contains no entries.
1–4. Responsibilities
See chapter 2.
1–5. Records management (recordkeeping) requirements
The records management requirement for all record numbers, associated forms, and reports required by
this publication are addressed in the Records Retention Schedule–Army (RRS–A). Detailed information
for all related record numbers, forms, and reports are located in Army Records Information Management
System (ARIMS)/RRS– A at https://www.arims.army.mil. If any record numbers, forms, and reports are not
current, addressed, and/or published correctly in ARIMS/RRS– A, see DA Pam 25–403 for guidance.
1–6. Scope
a. The Army must recruit, train, or contract for proficient linguists to respond to worldwide roles, mis-
sions, and contingencies.
b. The Army will ensure resources are available to certify language proficiency in languages for which
Defense Language Proficiency Tests (DLPTs) are available. If DLPTs are not available, administer an
oral proficiency interview (OPI) or other DoD-approved proficiency test according to paragraph 2–5c of
this regulation. Vendors certify contract linguists to the proficiency levels designated in the terms and con-
ditions of the applicable contract or agreement.
c. Commands not authorized linguists or with linguist requirements that exceed the number of linguists
authorized or with regular or periodic mission requirements for foreign language capability will identify
those requirements to the Chief of the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G–2’s Foreign Language Team
(DAMI– OIO) or the DoD Contract Linguist Program Manager (DAMI – OIO).
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 2
Section II
Responsibilities
1–7. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology)
The ASA (ALT) will ensure that human language technology (HLT) tools, if required, will have an ap-
proved and validated requirement to develop, test, evaluate, acquire, and integrate this capability as pre-
scribed by DoD policy and this regulation (see DoDD 5160.41E).
1–8. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller)
The ASA (FM&C) will—
a. Develop procedures for the payment and accounting of FLPB by installation finance and accounting
offices.
b. Ensure that the statutory authority for paying FLPB has been extended each year (see 37 USC
353).
c. Provide monthly accounting of disbursements by category (officer, warrant officer, enlisted Soldier,
and DA Civilian), FLPB level, language identification code (LIC), MOS, and total amount paid.
1–9. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs)
The ASA (M&RA) will—
a. Oversee execution of the FLPB Program by the DCS, G – 1; DCS, G – 2; DCS, G –3/5/7; Chief of
Army Reserve (CAR); and Commanding General (CG), U.S. Army Human Resources Command
(USAHRC).
b. Coordinate with the Director, Defense Finance and Accounting System (DFAS) and the Chief, Na-
tional Guard Bureau (CNGB) to ensure FLPB Program requirements are met.
c. Recommend FLPB Program policy changes to the DCS, G–2.
d. Carry out additional responsibilities identified in paragraph 4–1d.
1–10. General Counsel
The GC, in coordination with The Judge Advocate General (TJAG) and the DCS, G – 2, will determine re-
quirements for HLT tools that support multi-discipline collection, analysis, and intelligence production (see
DoDD 5160.41E).
1–11. Deputy Chief of Staff, G– 1
The DCS, G –1 will—
a. Plan and manage the execution of the FLPB Program in coordination with DCS, G– 2; DCS,
G –3/5/7; CG, USAHRC; and CAR.
b. Submit linguist status reports upon request from the DCS, G –2.
c. Provide guidance concerning the FLPB Program report preparation to the Army National Guard
(ARNG), U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), USAHRC,
and DFAS.
d. Manage the FLPB management decision evaluation package (MDEP) and program objective mem-
orandum (POM) for the required annual funding to sustain the program.
e. Advise and assist the ASA (M&RA) in the development of policies that ensure the Army Continuing
Education System (ACES) and the Army learning centers support foreign language proficiency testing.
f. Monitor and recommend for approval to the DCS, G– 2 any changes to the language coded billets on
the U.S. Army Recruiting Command (USAREC)’s tables of distribution and allowances (TDAs) and tables
of organization and equipment (TOEs).
g. Participate in the review of linguist procedures, policies, and requirements.
h. Through the CG, USAHRC—
(1) Have overall staff supervisory authority for the acquisition, assignment, utilization, and retention of
Army linguists.
(2) Assist in developing personnel management systems and procedures for the operation of the Army
Foreign Language Program.
(3) Ensure testing policies, facilities, and equipment support DLPT testing.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 3
(4) Coordinate with the DCS, G– 1 and users to manage career programs based on Armywide require-
ments for officer, warrant officer, and enlisted linguists.
(5) Conduct language inventory analysis and provide requirements to develop Regular Army (RA) lan-
guage training requirements. Develop language training requirements to maintain language inventory and
readiness for presentation at the Structure and Manning Decision Review (SMDR) and the Training Re-
sources Arbitration Panels (TRAPs). Manage the training cycle for all language requirements at the De-
fense Language Institute Foreign Language Center (DLIFLC) and for advanced individual training (AIT)
training seats for RA MOSs 35M, 35P, and foreign area officers (FAOs).
(6) Provide annual, quarterly, and monthly language reports and ensure that linguist data is current
and accessible to the Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) staff, Army command (ACOM),
Army service component command (ASCC), and direct reporting unit (DRU) language personnel manag-
ers.
(7) Announce changes to FLPB policy, proficiency requirements, pay rates, and procedures.
(8) Monitor RA and USAR FLPB recipients by position, language, pay rate, MOS, or area of concentra-
tion (AOC), unit of assignment, and category (officer, warrant officer, enlisted, and DA Civilian), and report
this information quarterly to the DCS, G– 1 and DCS, G –2.
(9) Assist the DCS, G–1; Chief, Foreign Language Team, Operations Division; DCS, G–2; CAR; and
CNGB in implementing provisions of chapter 4 of this regulation.
(10) In consultation with the DCS, G– 2, approve exceptions to policy (ETPs) for the retesting of lan-
guage proficiency within 6 months.
(11) In coordination with the CAR, ensure adequate resources are available to support foreign lan-
guage training for USAR individual mobilization augmentees (IMAs).
(12) Ensure personnel management systems are properly coded to identify sub-proficient linguists
serving in language-dependent MOSs.
(13) Review and make final disposition on requests to change the control language (CLANG) for RA
language-dependent and language-capable MOSs (not including ARSOF career management fields
(CMFs) 18, 37, 38R, 38W, 38Z, and AOC 38S) and functional area (FA) 48 (FAOs) in accordance with
Army readiness requirements, policy, and professional development requirements.
(14) Conduct analysis and make recommendations to the DCS, G– 1 on the Army Civilian Acquired
Skills Program (ACASP) annual mission letter.
(15) Determine MOS 35P (skill level 2 and 3 only) promotions monthly by language and complete the
promotion allocation report.
(16) Distribute all initial entry training assignments for MOS 35M and 35P Soldiers.
(17) As the executing agent for the DCS, G – 1, manage the acquisition, assignment, utilization, and
retention of Soldiers in language-dependent MOSs.
(18) Provide a senior level representative to the Defense Language Steering Committee (DLSC), De-
fense Language Action Panel (DLAP), SMDR, and TRAP meetings.
(19) Screen language-dependent MOSs inventory monthly to ensure Soldiers meet language profi-
ciency requirements. Code any Soldier not in compliance with language proficiency requirements with an
immediate reenlistment prohibition (IMREPR) code 9P indicating non-MOS qualified. Remove the
IMREPR code 9P from a Soldier’s record after he or she achieves language proficiency requirements.
(20) Delay assignment of 35P DLIFLC students until after graduation. Once assigned to AIT, screen
DLIFLC 35P graduates to identify and assign the higher proficiency linguists (L2+/R2+ or higher) to criti-
cal intelligence missions (National Security Agency (NSA)).
(21) Ensure compliance with Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) entry requirements.
(22) Upon request, provide lists of non- language-capable/language-dependent Soldiers proficient in a
language(s) supporting a contingency operation to the requesting organization.
1–12. Deputy Chief of Staff, G– 2
The DCS, G –2 will—
a. Serve as the Army’s Deputy Senior Language Authority (SLA). In the absence of the Army SLA, ad-
vise senior leadership on doctrine, policies, planning guidance, and resources for language (foreign and
English), regional expertise, and cultural capability requirements.
b. Serve as the Army’s foreign language proponent.
c. In coordination with the GC and TJAG, determine requirements for HLT that support multi-discipline
collection, analysis, and intelligence production (see DoDD 5160.41E).
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 4
d. Provide expertise to support the development, testing, evaluation, acquisition, and integration of
HLT tools that support multi-discipline collection, analysis, and intelligence production (see DoDD
5160.41E).
e. Represent the Army at the following meetings: Foreign Language Executive Committee, the Tech-
nology Working Group, the Education and Instructional Technology Working Group, Testing Assessment
Working Group, the Defense Language Testing Working Group, SMDR, TRAP, the DLSC (as an alternate
if the DCS, G– 3/5/7 is not available), the DLAP, the Defense Intelligence Foreign Language and Area Ad-
visory Group, the Cryptologic Language Advisory Committee, the Cryptologic Training Advisory Commit-
tee, the Defense Language Curriculum Working Group, and the Advanced Command Language Program
Manager (CLPM) Working Group.
f. Serve as the Army foreign language Service Program Manager (SPM) with overall staff responsibility
to develop, coordinate, and execute the Army Foreign Language Program.
g. The SPM is the sole approval authority for all DLAB waivers.
h. Serve as the responsible official (RO) for the DoD Contract Linguist Program. Execute responsibili-
ties in accordance with paragraphs 8–3a and 8–3b.
i. Coordinate with representatives of the Secretary of the Navy, Secretary of the Air Force, and heads
of Defense Agencies to identify validated requirements and resources needed to execute contract linguist
support (see DoDI 5160.70).
j. Identify critical languages to meet Army requirements and document in the Army Strategic Language
List (ASLL) for both the General Purpose Forces (GPFs) and the ARSOF.
k. Publish the annual ASLL, the ARSOF ASLL, and the Prevalent in the Force language list.
l. Announce changes to the DA Civilian Foreign Language Proficiency Pay (FLPP) policy for DA Civil-
ians performing intelligence duties to include proficiency requirements, pay rates, and procedures.
m. Review and validate foreign language proficiency requirements for modified table of organization
and equipment (MTOE) and TDA language positions annually.
n. In conjunction with the DCS, G– 3/5/7, recommend the Army’s foreign language proficiency standard
for all language-dependent and language-capable MOSs.
o. Conduct an annual review of MTOE and TDA authorization documents for units with language
coded positions. Approve/disapprove unit submissions and coordinate with the appropriate HQDA staff
elements for changes to these language coded positions.
p. Appoint a TALP manager and manage the TALP budget.
q. Assist the Chief, Institutional Training Division, DCS, G – 3/5/7 with the management and require-
ments build process of the TALP MDEP throughout the annual programming and budget cycles.
r. Implement policies, objectives, and guidelines designed to achieve, maintain, and improve Army lin-
guists’ language proficiency.
s. Plan and manage the execution of the CLP policy.
t. Determine the overall Army language requirements based on the National Defense Strategy and pro-
vide guidance to ACOMs, ASCCs, and DRUs based on their areas of responsibility (AORs), estimated
future contingencies, and foreign policy needs. Disseminate guidance annually in the Army Command
Plan guidance.
u. Stabilize language requirements by monitoring and limiting changes to overall unit MTOE/TDA lan-
guage requirements to ensure that units do not increase their MTOE/TDA language requirements by
more than 10 percent annually nor decrease by more than 20 percent.
v. Coordinate changes in language requirements with CG, USAHRC to allow sufficient lead time to
identify, recruit, and train Soldiers prior to linguist requirements affecting the manning of the force.
w. Monitor and recommend for approval to the DCS, G –3/5/7 any changes to linguist TDA and TOE
authorizations for intelligence CMF 35.
x. Participate in all reviews of linguist policies, procedures, and requirements.
y. Inspect U.S. Army Forces Command (FORSCOM), U.S. Army Special Operations Command
(USASOC), the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), USAR, and ARNG CLPs bien-
nially. Ensure subordinate commands inspect their CLPs every 2 years in accordance with this regulation
and AR 11–2.
z. Consolidate input from the ARNG, USAR, and the RA to provide an annual informal estimate of the
OPIs by language and number of tests for the upcoming fiscal year (FY) to the DLIFLC not later than 1
June.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 5
aa. Manage the DLIFLC SMDR submission process for all language-dependent and language coded
MOSs. Review and approve SMDR requirements from the CG, USAHRC, CG, INSCOM, CG,
FORSCOM, CG, USASOC, FAO proponent, CNGB, and the CAR. Assist units with SMDR input into the
Army Training Requirements and Resources System (ATRRS) if necessary.
bb. Identify to the Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command all ARSOF-only FLPB costs that
exceed the Army FLPB policy (see DoDI 1340.27).
cc. Through the CG, INSCOM—
(1) Administer the Contract Linguist Program in accordance with paragraph 8–3c.
(2) Maintain the Army Command Language Program Manager’s Database (ACD) and provide training
upon request.
(3) Maintain the NSA/Central Security Service (CSS) CHANDELIER linguist database for all Army
MOS 35P Soldiers.
(4) Coordinate with National Cryptologic University (NCU) personnel to coordinate training seats for all
NCU language training detachment (LTD) intermediate and advanced language training courses.
1–13. Deputy Chief of Staff, G– 3/5/7
The DCS, G –3/5/7 will—
a. Serve as the SLA for the Army. As the Army SLA, advise senior leadership on doctrine, policies,
planning guidance, and resources for language (foreign and English), regional expertise, and cultural ca-
pability requirements.
b. Oversee The Defense Language Program (TDLP) MDEP. Formulate, present, and defend foreign
language training resource requirements to the program evaluation group for the TDLP MDEP.
c. Serve as the RO for the DLIFLC.
d. Represent the Army at the DLAP and the DLSC.
e. Coordinate with representatives of the Secretary of the Navy, Secretary of the Air Force, and heads
of Defense Agencies:
(1) To identify validated requirements and resources needed to execute foreign language proficiency
training and test development and maintenance (see DoDI 5160.70).
(2) On the establishment of language training facilities (such as location, purpose, resourcing) (see
DoDI 5160.70).
f. Serve as the FAO proponent.
g. Validate foreign language training seat requirements during the SMDR and reconcile those require-
ments to an affordable, acceptable, and executable training program.
h. Manage and implement foreign language training program adjustments in the budget and execution
years via the TRAP.
i. Monitor and recommend for approval to the DCS, G– 2 any changes to language coded MTOE and
TDA authorizations for military assistance advisory groups; electronic warfare units; security force assis-
tance brigades (SFABs); FAOs; TOE and TDA positions unless otherwise designated herein, where oper-
ational requirements override Officer Personnel Management System (OPMS) or Enlisted Personnel
Management System considerations; and law enforcement.
j. Participate in the review of linguist policies, procedures, and requirements.
k. In coordination with DCS, G– 2, recommend the Army’s foreign language proficiency standard.
l. Assess and report the foreign language capability readiness for Army units in the Defense Readiness
Reporting System (DRRS) using Universal Joint Task List TA 7.4.3.4.
m. Carry out additional responsibilities identified in paragraphs 1–9a, and 1–11a.
1–14. Chief, National Guard Bureau
The CNGB will—
a. Ensure that state adjutants general comply with the requirements of this regulation.
b. Develop requirements for the annual DLIFLC SMDR and submit them to the Chief, Foreign Lan-
guage Team for review and approval not later than 1 June. Once validated, the CNGB will submit require-
ments into the ATRRS system in accordance with the schedule developed by the DCS, G– 3/5/7.
c. Provide policy and procedural guidance on the Army Foreign Language Program’s implementation
and Army linguist management to the states and territories adjutants general.
d. Ensure the FLPB Program is executed within the Army National Guard of the United States in ac-
cordance with DoDI 1340.27 and this regulation.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 6
e. Maintain an inventory of authorized language positions within the ARNG.
f. Submit linguist status reports to the DCS, G –2 upon request.
g. Designate an office to manage/monitor TALP activities and subordinate CLPs within the ARNG.
h. Ensure that adequate resources and facilities are available to support foreign language training for
ARNG Soldiers.
i. Report TALP requirements and expenditures for the ARNG as required by chapter 7 of this regula-
tion to the TALP Manager, Operations Division, DCS, G –2.
j. Document the ARNG language force structure in coordination with the DCS, G–2 to ensure that in-
ventory and training is accurate (for example, “35M10 QB” should read “35M1LQB”).
k. Inspect subordinate unit language programs every 2 years to ensure compliance with this regulation
and AR 11–2.
l. Monitor FLPB recipients by position, language, pay rate, and category (officer, warrant officer, en-
listed) to ensure personnel are entitled to receive FLPB and that they are receiving the amount of FLPB
they are entitled to.
m. Provide an annual informal estimate of the OPIs by language and number of tests to the Chief, For-
eign Language Team not later than 1 June. For example, the ARNG would provide the estimated number
of OPIs for FY 25 on 1 June 2024.
n. Ensure subordinate units are annotating foreign language fit, fill, and proficiency as part of regular
unit status reporting (see Public Law 116 –92 and AR 220–1).
o. Carry out additional responsibilities identified in paragraphs 5–6e and 5–7b.
p. Ensure compliance with DLAB entry requirements.
q. Submit FLPB policy/process changes through the state adjutants general. CNGB will review and co-
ordinate changes with the Chief of the Army Foreign Language Team.
r. Ensure that ARNG commanders provide language training during their monthly battle assemblies
and during their annual training (AT) as time permits.
s. Ensure subordinate unit language programs utilize the ACD as the linguist management program of
record in accordance with paragraph 3–18.
t. Define specific language proficiency training goals and objectives to meet mission requirements for
authorized linguists and disseminate in the commander’s AT guidance.
u. Adjudicate FLPB eligibility, award, or termination issues.
1–15. Chief of Army Reserve
The CAR will—
a. Develop the USAR initial entry and prior service language requirements for the DLIFLC SMDR and
submit the SMDR requirements to the DCS, G– 2 for review and approval not later than 1 June. Once the
DCS, G– 2 validates the USAR’s SMDR requirements, input SMDR requirements into ATRRS in accord-
ance with the Institutional Training Division SMDR schedule.
b. Exercise staff supervision and management of the USAR FLPB Program.
c. Maintain an inventory of authorized USAR language positions.
d. Submit linguist status reports to the DCS, G– 2 upon request.
e. Designate an office to manage and monitor TALP resources and provide oversight of subordinate
CLPs.
f. Ensure adequate resources and facilities are available to support foreign language training for USAR
linguists.
g. Report TALP requirements and expenditures for the USAR, as required in chapter 7 of this regula-
tion, to the Army TALP Manager.
h. Properly document and code the USAR language force structure in coordination with the DCS, G–
2’s guidance to ensure inventory and training requirements are accurate (for example, “35M10 QB”
should read “35M1LQB”).
i. Inspect subordinate unit language programs every 2 years to ensure compliance with this regulation
and AR 11–2.
j. Provide an annual estimate of the OPIs by language and number of tests to the Chief, Foreign Lan-
guage Team not later than 1 June. For example, the U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC) would pro-
vide the estimated number of OPIs for FY 25 on 1 June 2024.
k. Ensure subordinate units are annotating foreign language fit, fill, and proficiency, as part of regular
unit status reporting (see Public Law 116 –92 and AR 220–1).
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 7
l. Ensure compliance with DLAB entry requirements.
m. Ensure that USAR commanders will provide language training during their monthly battle assem-
blies and during their AT as time permits.
n. Ensure subordinate unit language programs utilize the ACD as the linguist management program of
record in accordance with paragraph 3–18.
o. Define specific language proficiency training goals and objectives to meet mission requirements for
authorized linguists and disseminate in the commander’s AT guidance.
1–16. The Judge Advocate General
TJAG, in coordination with the GC and the DCS, G– 2, will determine requirements for HLT tools that sup-
port multi-discipline collection, analysis, and intelligence production (see DoDD 5160.41E).
1–17. Commanders of Army commands, Army service component commands, and direct
reporting units
Commanders of ACOMs, ASCCs, and DRUs will––
a. Direct subordinate commands to manage nonresident foreign language remedial, refresher, sustain-
ment, and enhancement training to ensure they achieve readiness objectives. Assign language training
with the same priority given to physical fitness, common Soldier skill training, weapons qualification train-
ing, and MOS training.
b. Develop personnel systems and procedures to ensure the assignment of linguists to authorized po-
sitions that require foreign language capability.
c. Designate officials to approve positions and duties that meet the requirements for FLPB.
d. Consolidate subordinate unit language code changes annually and submit to the Chief, Foreign
Language Team for review and approval prior to submitting through Force Management channels. En-
sure subordinate units do not increase their MTOE/TDA language requirements by more than 10 percent
annually nor decrease by more than 20 percent.
e. Coordinate with the CG, U.S. Army Materiel Command for the facilities to support the effective train-
ing of assigned linguists.
f. Document the command’s TALP requirements and the method used to determine them and submit
to the TALP manager no later than 1 August. Support the TALP manager as required by chapter 7 of this
regulation.
g. Use TALP funds for the language training of assigned military linguists (such as for travel, per diem,
meals and incidental expenses, and contract instruction) and CLPMs. This includes the use of TALP
funds to hire contract CLPMs (units with 70 or more assigned linguists only). See paragraph 7–5a for ex-
ceptions to this policy.
h. Maintain a CLP and designate a CLPM responsible for all aspects of the development, implementa-
tion, and management of the CLP. RA commanders of units with 70 or more linguists assigned will use a
full-time CLPM with a specified job description to manage their CLP. Units with fewer than 70 authorized
linguists will identify a CLPM as an additional duty to manage their CLP.
i. Use ATRRS to schedule CLPMs for attendance at the DLIFLC resident or nonresident CLPM course
within 6 months of hiring or assuming the position.
j. Execute contract linguists’ responsibilities in accordance with paragraph 8–3d.
k. Establish a unit policy for the payment of DA Civilian FLPP and review this policy annually to deter-
mine if it is still applicable.
l. Provide an annual informal estimate of the OPIs by language and number of tests to the Chief, For-
eign Language Team not later than 1 June. For example, FORSCOM would provide the estimated num-
ber of OPIs for FY 25 on 1 June 2024.
m. Inspect subordinate unit language programs every 2 years to ensure compliance with this regula-
tion and AR 11 –2.
n. Ensure subordinate unit language programs utilize the ACD as the linguist management program of
record in accordance with paragraph 3–18.
o. Ensure subordinate units are annotating foreign language fit, fill, and proficiency as part of regular
unit status reporting (see Public Law 116 –92 and AR 220–1).
p. Consolidate DLIFLC training seat requirements and send via email to the Chief, Foreign Language
Team not later than 1 June for the annual SMDR requirements call. The Chief, Foreign Language Team
will review and approve all SMDR training requests.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 8
q. Establish an ASCC theater linguist office (TLO). Designate a theater linguist manager (TLM) within
the TLO that works directly for the supported theater commander responsible for the staffing, accountabil-
ity, and validation of contract linguist requirements in the theater of operations. Theaters that maintain
over 500 contract linguist requirements will designate a full-time TLM position. The TLM will—
(1) Consolidate, prioritize, and process linguist support requests for the theater.
(2) Manage the language requirements to meet the mission; submit theater contract linguist require-
ments to the Chief, Army Foreign Language Team for validation and resourcing. Requirements are sub-
mitted to Chief, Army Foreign Language Team up to three times per year (March, July, and November) as
dictated by operational requirements.
(3) Maintain theater-wide accountability of linguist requirements and fill rates.
r. Define specific language proficiency training goals and objectives to meet mission requirements for
authorized linguists and disseminate in the commander’s AT guidance.
s. Establish a program to screen locally hired category (CAT) I linguists.
1–18. Commanding General, U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
The CG, TRADOC has overall responsibility for the recruiting and training of Army linguists. CG,
TRADOC will delegate to the CG, USAREC, the following responsibilities:
a. Interview every applicant to determine his or her proficiency in a foreign language, if any.
b. Inform applicants of the following:
(1) The ACASP for those who claim foreign language proficiency.
(2) Specific MOS options that guarantee language training for those who qualify. This includes all Sol-
diers who score 129 or higher on the skilled technical (ST) portion of the Armed Services Vocational Apti-
tude Battery (ASVAB).
c. Record foreign language capability on the DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing–Armed
Forces of the United States) in block 13 and indicate in the remarks section for all recruits enlisting as
part of the ACASP program.
d. Include completed DA Form 330 (Language Proficiency Questionnaire) as part of the enlistment
packet.
e. Inspect subordinate unit language programs every 2 years to ensure compliance with this regulation
and AR 11–2.
1–19. Commanding General, U.S. Army Special Operations Command
The CG, USASOC will—
a. Ensure that the CG, U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School
(USAJFKSWCS) serves as the proponent for AOCs and CMFs 18, 37, and 38.
b. Establish the qualifying DLAB scores for ARSOF Soldiers selected for nonresident DLIFLC basic
language courses.
c. Determine the minimum language proficiency standard for ARSOF personnel.
d. Request TALP funding for CMF 35 linguists only.
e. Coordinate with U.S. Special Operations Command for CLP funding to provide language training to
ARSOF MOS Soldiers.
f. Coordinate with U.S. Special Operations Command to determine the preferred proficiency test for
ARSOF linguists.
g. Report to the DCS, G –2 all ARSOF-only FLPB costs that exceed the Army FLPB policy (see DoDI
1340.27).
h. Carry out additional responsibilities identified in paragraphs 2–6f and 5–4d(4).
i. Define specific language proficiency training goals and objectives to meet mission requirements for
authorized linguists and disseminate in the commander’s AT guidance or USASOC 350 –1.
j. Inspect subordinate unit language programs every 2 years to ensure compliance with this regulation
and AR 11–2.
1–20. Commanders of U.S. Army Reception Battalions
Commanders of U.S. Army Reception Battalions will—
a. Screen every applicant’s record and record foreign language capabilities in the Integrated Personnel
and Pay System–Army (IPPS– A).
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 9
b. Test all applicants who claim knowledge of a foreign language with the DLPT or OPI in languages
where testing is available.
c. Record DLAB scores according to AR 612 –201.
d. Upload all completed DA Form 330s to include those received from the military entrance processing
stations (MEPS) to the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS).
1–21. Chief, Army Continuing Education System
The Chief, ACES will––
a. Assist in providing non-mission language education such as Headstart and off-duty college courses.
b. Provide DLAB, DLPT, and OPI testing capability. Proctor the administration of these tests.
1–22. Commanders of military personnel divisions/human resource offices, Regular Army military
personnel divisions, and U.S. Army Reserve units responsible for the custody of military records
The commanders of MPDs/HROs, RA MPDs, and USAR units responsible for the custody of military rec-
ords will—
a. Upload DA Form 330 to iPERMS.
b. Publish orders according to AR 600–8 –105 to record the award or withdrawal of skill qualification
identifier (SQI) L to or from—
(1) The specialty code for commissioned officers according to DA Pam 611– 21.
(2) The MOS for warrant officers and Soldiers according to DA Pam 611 –21.
c. Record DLAB results on the Soldier’s personnel qualification records according to AR 600–8 –104.
d. Screen and verify personnel information on applications for language training or linguist assignment
prior to forwarding to the CG, USAHRC.
e. Advise and assist unit commanders in administering the FLPB Program.
f. Ensure that Soldiers and DA Civilians receiving FLPB meet all the eligibility requirements specified in
chapters 4, 5, and 6 of this regulation.
1–23. Commanders at brigade, group, and battalion level
Commanders with assigned linguists at brigade, group, and battalion level will—
a. Establish, document, and maintain a CLP. See appendices D and E for guidance on establishing a
successful CLP.
b. Direct subordinate commands to manage nonresident foreign language remedial, refresher, sustain-
ment, and enhancement training to ensure they achieve readiness objectives. Treat language training
with the same priority given to physical fitness training, Soldier common skill training, weapons qualifica-
tion training, and MOS training.
c. Define specific language proficiency training goals and objectives to meet mission requirements for
authorized linguists and disseminate in the commander’s AT guidance.
d. Arrange through proper channels for the administration of DLPTs and/or OPIs to all Soldiers with
foreign language proficiency as required by this regulation and in accordance with AR 611–5.
e. Appoint a unit CLPM to assist the commander in overseeing the unit’s CLP. Commanders with 70 or
more linguists assigned will appoint a full-time CLPM with a specified job description to manage their
CLP. Schedule CLPMs for training in accordance with paragraph 3–11f(2) of this regulation. The CLPM
will remain in their position for at least 12 months to provide continuity to the CLP.
f. Ensure that raters address language proficiency requirements for language-dependent and lan-
guage-capable MOSs and for any officer, warrant officer, Soldier, or DA Civilian serving in a language
coded position.
g. Identify and submit annual TALP funding requirements through the appropriate chain of command in
accordance with paragraph 7 –6.
h. Designate, maintain, and equip a permanent space (for example, language training facility
(LTF)/language laboratory) on or close to their headquarters in which assigned language-dependent and
language-capable Soldiers may conduct self-study and instructor-led language training to sustain and im-
prove their language capabilities. This LTF/language laboratory must be sufficiently equipped to support
mobile training team (MTT)’s language courses, as well as remedial, refresher, sustainment, and en-
hancement language courses in accordance with individual linguist and unit language training require-
ments.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 10
i. Inspect subordinate unit language programs every 2 years to ensure compliance with this regulation
and AR 11–2.
j. Ensure all linguists in a language-dependent and language-capable MOS who received language
training at government expense or were recruited for their language capability (not to include Headstart,
Gateway, or other familiarization courses) complete training (see para 1–23m) and annual testing require-
ments for their CLANG. Commanders with language-capable Soldiers who fail to maintain their profi-
ciency will initiate processing in accordance with paragraph 2–6c to remove the SQI L.
k. Ensure all RA language-dependent and language-capable Soldiers and Soldiers serving in lan-
guage coded positions receive 8 to 16 hours of language training each month in their CLANG. USAR and
ARNG unit commanders will provide language training during their monthly battle assemblies and during
their AT event as time permits.
l. Commanders may allow Soldiers who are proficient in multiple languages to receive training for
those languages if time and funding are available and the Soldier has already received AT for their
CLANG and they are proficient in their CLANG.
m. In addition to the monthly language training, provide all language-dependent and language-capable
Soldiers (except for Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers, FAOs, and ARSOF) with an annual significant
language training event (SLTE) consisting of 160 consecutive hours of language training or equivalent.
Ideally, this SLTE should occur prior to the linguist’s annual DLPT. RC Soldiers, FAOs, and ARSOF Sol-
diers require an 80 consecutive hours SLTE annually.
n. Schedule remedial, refresher, sustainment, and enhancement training on the unit’s training sched-
ule.
o. Ensure the CLPM maintains an individual language training plan (ILTP) for each linguist in the Sol-
dier’s ACD folder. The ILTP should contain assignments, training, proficiency requirements, and test re-
sults.
p. Ensure all sub L3/R3 language-dependent and language-capable Soldiers validate their language
proficiency by taking an annual DLPT and/or OPI. This does not apply to Soldiers who reclassified from a
language-dependent or language-capable MOS into an MOS that does not require a language. L3/R3
language-dependent and language-capable Soldiers revalidate their language proficiency every 2 years.
q. Review MTOE and TDA language coded billets annually in accordance with Army Command Plan
guidance and submit changes to the higher headquarters.
r. Maintain the FLPB Program in accordance with chapters 4, 5, and 6 of this regulation as appropriate.
(1) Coordinate with the installation level finance office to determine Soldier eligibility for FLPB and is-
sue orders if eligible.
(2) Establish internal controls to verify FLPB for accuracy and for audit purposes in accordance with
AR 11–2.
(3) Ensure all Soldiers complete and submits their FLPB written agreements in IPPS– A for processing.
Approve the administrative personnel action request (PAR) (hereafter referred to as the written agree-
ment) in IPPS– A to authorize a Soldier to receive FLPB. Ensure linguists receiving FLPB meet the eligi-
bility requirements in paragraphs 4–2 and 4 –3, 5 –2, and 6– 3 as applicable. Ensure the CLPM uploads
copies of the written agreement to the Soldiers ACD file.
(4) Process FLPB written agreements for all linguists prior to the expiration of the Soldier’s current writ-
ten agreement. Coordinate with the installation finance office to develop a timely and accountable pro-
cess to track FLPB start and stop orders. Resolve all pay issues within 90 calendar days.
(5) Rescind Soldiers’ written agreements when their FLPB eligibility terminates and initiate a new writ-
ten agreement if the Soldier remains eligible to receive FLPB. Ensure linguists take the DLPT test prior to
the expiration of their written agreement or their FLPB will stop.
(6) Report linguist readiness status by fit, fill, and proficiency in the personnel section of the net-centric
unit status report in accordance with paragraph 3– 19.
s. Execute the following to ensure eligible DA Civilians receive FLPP:
(1) Document required foreign language skills and proficiency requirement in the DA Civilian’s duty po-
sition description (PD).
(2) Annually certify the foreign language requirement for each DA Civilian’s PD to ensure continued
eligibility for FLPP in accordance with paragraph 6– 3 (does not apply to Military Intelligence Civilian Ex-
cepted Career Program (MICECP) employees).
(3) Ensure standard form (SF) 52 (Request for Personnel Action) is processed and FLPP payments
executed.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 11
(4) Reflect and comment on the DA Civilian’s capability to maintain/use their foreign language profi-
ciency in the employee’s Defense Civilian Intelligence Personnel System (DCIPS) objectives.
(5) Ensure the DA Civilian reviews and acknowledges the ACOM, ASCC, and DRU commander’s pol-
icy authorizing FLPP.
(6) Encourage agency-sponsored and self-development efforts to obtain, maintain, and enhance profi-
ciencies in languages deemed critical by the Army.
t. Coordinate with the SPM to code the unit’s language billets with a 4+1 language that supports the
National Defense Strategy and the Army Command Plan guidance. Refer to the annual Army Command
Plan for updates on language coding billets. The Army Command Plan is released during the 3rd quarter.
u. Commanders will refer to paragraphs 2 – 9 and 2– 10 to determine proficiency requirements and es-
tablish, modify, and requisition linguists.
v. Ensure subordinate units are annotating foreign language fit, fill, and proficiency as part of regular
unit status reporting (see Public Law 116 –92 and AR 220–1).
1–24. Unit level command language program managers
Unit level CLPMs will—
a. Serve as the commander’s primary advisor on all foreign language training, readiness, and adminis-
trative issues. Assist the commander with developing language training and proficiency guidance for pub-
lication in his or her AT guidance. A CLPM will serve for at least 12 months to provide continuity/effective
management to the CLP.
b. Develop and execute command/unit language training plans in support of operational objectives and
contingency plans.
c. Coordinate language proficiency testing in accordance with AR 611– 5 and chapter 2 of this regula-
tion.
d. Coordinate with ACOM, DRU, or the Army Foreign Language team to obtain language training fund-
ing and training material, as required.
e. Develop language lab requirements and language equipment life cycle funding requests.
f. Maintain a record of language training events and participation. Ensure training certificates are
added to the Soldiers ILTP in the ACD.
g. Periodically evaluate the effectiveness of foreign language instruction. Provide feedback to the
higher headquarters contract manager.
h. Schedule and chair Command Language Council (CLC) meetings for units with 70 or more lan-
guage coded positions.
i. Advise their commander on linguist retention issues and incentives.
j. Remain current on foreign language issues through continued contact with the appropriate CLPM
community and periodic refresher training at the DLIFLC sponsored CLPM Workshop or Advanced Com-
petencies Course for ARSOF language program managers, as appropriate.
k. Provide regular reports on language readiness to the command or unit leadership. At a minimum,
these reports will include languages and language proficiency levels, currency on language tests, and
language training conducted to improve language readiness, as applicable.
l. Oversee the FLPB and DA Civilian FLPP Programs. Coordinate with the servicing personnel office to
ensure that qualified personnel receive the appropriate FLPB/FLPP amount. Terminate FLPB/FLPP when
a Soldier or DA Civilian ceases to be qualified.
m. Ensure all Soldiers eligible to receive FLPB complete a written agreement.
n. Develop and maintain an ILTP for each linguist that includes all current records of the command’s
linguist qualification status within the ACD.
o. Prepare and submit TALP reports as required by paragraph 7– 6 of this regulation.
p. Maintain a separate CLP hand receipt for all property purchased with TALP funds in excess of $250
in accordance with Army regulations.
q. Attend a DLIFLC CLPM course in residence or via MTT within 6 months of appointment. Schedule
attendance at a DLIFLC CLPM course through ATRRS.
r. Provide an annual estimate of the OPIs for the next FY by language and number of tests to the
higher headquarters CLPM not later than 15 May.
s. Manage and maintain the ACD for the unit. Ensure all assigned linguist records are updated and in-
serted into the ACD in accordance with paragraph 3–18.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 12
Chapter 2
Linguist Recruiting, Language Testing, Control Language, and Establishing Linguist
Requirements
Section I
Linguist Recruiting Programs
2–1. Introduction
The Army must recruit, train, and retain qualified linguists to satisfy Army requirements. Units must make
every effort to retain as many linguists as possible since it is significantly less expensive to retain a gov-
ernment-trained linguist than to recruit and train a new one. The following paragraphs describe how the
Army recruits linguists and describes the testing procedures used to identify personnel for language train-
ing.
2–2. Recruiting programs
a. The Army recruits Soldiers with various language and cultural skills through accessions, in-service
recruiting, and reclassification programs. The Army continually reviews its language inventory and sus-
tains that capability using various incentive programs such as enlistment and retention bonuses (see AR
612– 201 for information on initial entry bonuses). There are three ways a recruit or Soldier can qualify for
language training:
(1) Pass the DLAB test with a minimum score of 95.
(2) Score a 129 or higher on the ST portion of the ASVAB test. Recruits or Soldiers with ASVAB ST
scores of 129 or higher automatically qualify for language training and do not have to take the DLAB test.
(3) Qualify for the ACASP program. ACASP recruits bypass language training at DLIFLC.
b. Recruiters and career counselors will use the ACASP as much as possible to recruit personnel with
foreign language and cultural skills consistent with current and future readiness requirements. The DCS,
G –1 disseminates the annual ACASP requirements by a mission letter detailing specific recruiting targets
by language to the CG, USAREC. The ACASP saves the Army training time and money and enhances
Army readiness.
c. Recruiters and career counselors will screen recruits and Soldiers interested in a language-depend-
ent MOS by reviewing the ASVAB score to see if they scored 129 or higher on the ST portion of the test
or by administering the DLAB.
(1) Recruits or Soldiers who score 129 or higher on the ST portion of the ASVAB tests are eligible to
enlist for/reclassify into a language-dependent MOS without taking a DLAB test.
(2) All other recruits or Soldiers must take and pass a DLAB test to qualify for enlistment/reclassifica-
tion into a language-dependent MOS. The minimum score required to pass the DLAB is a 95, although
most the Army’s language requirements require a DLAB score of 105 or higher. Soldiers who do not meet
the minimum DLAB requirement for a language may request a waiver from the SPM per paragraph 1–
13e.
2–3. Additional requirements for recruiting programs
a. Recruits wanting to enlist in MOSs 35M or 35P must meet the MOS qualification requirements spec-
ified in the enlisted MOS specifications chapter of DA Pam 611 –21 (see paragraphs specific to 35M and
35P).
b. 35M and 35P Soldiers must be United States (U.S.) citizens.
c. Soldiers accessed as 35Ms or 35Ps must demonstrate clear enunciation and comprehension of the
English language and good grammar skills. Applicants who are not native-born citizens or who have not
attended U.S. schools since the age of 6 must obtain a minimum score of 80 in reading and listening on
the English Comprehensive Level Test (ECLT) to enlist or reclassify into the 35M and 35P MOSs.
d. Recruits who enlist outside the United States (does not include native-born U.S. citizens (excluding
Puerto Rico)) are required to take the ECLT at the MEPS. Schedule recruits with ECLT scores in the
range of 40 –74 to attend the Defense Language Institute English Language Center (DLIELC). These re-
cruits will first ship to Fort Sill, Oklahoma for in-processing into the Army. Test all recruits with an ECLT
score in the range 65 –74 again once they arrive at the Fort Sill Reception Battalion. Trainees scoring 75
or higher proceed to basic combat training (BCT). Send recruits who score 74 and below on their ECLT to
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 13
the DLIELC at Lackland Air Force Base, TX to improve their English language proficiency prior to attend-
ing BCT.
Section II
Language Proficiency Tests
2–4. Introduction
As an initial evaluation, potential recruits for CMF 18, 35M, 35P, 37F, 38R, and 38W must take the DLAB
during accessions to determine if they have the aptitude to learn a foreign language. Recruits who claim a
preexisting proficiency in a foreign language must take a DLPT and/or OPI to verify their foreign language
capability. Personnel enlisting for a language-dependent or language-capable MOS are given the DLPT
or OPI for any language in which they are trained (after they complete the training) or recruited at govern-
ment expense (excluding Gateway and Headstart courses or similar “survival level” courses and college
foreign language courses) for a language in which proficiency is validated. For languages in which there
is no DLPT or other DoD-approved proficiency test, recruits and reclassifying Soldiers will take an OPI
provided certified testers are available.
2–5. Language proficiency tests
a. The Defense Language Aptitude Battery.
(1) The DLAB provides a quantifiable indicator of the aptitude of a person to learn a foreign language
in a formal training program. Determine the minimum qualifying DLAB score using the language difficulty
category (LDC) to determine the languages for which a recruit or Soldier qualifies. Qualifying DLAB
scores by LDC are:
(a) CAT I language: 95 or higher.
(b) CAT II language: 100 or higher.
(c) CAT III language: 105 or higher.
(d) CAT IV language: 110 or higher.
(2) The minimum Army qualifying DLAB score for recruiting purposes is 95. Recruits and reclassifying
Soldiers who do not achieve the minimum passing DLAB score for the language they would like to study
can request a waiver from the Army Foreign Language Program SPM.
(3) Submit requests for DLAB waivers using a memorandum for record (MFR) format through email
from the recruiter, unit career counselor or commander to the Foreign Language Team (DAMI – OIO) at
usarmy.pentagon.hqda-dcs-g-2.list.foreign-language-office@army.mil. Requests should include mitigating
factors such as evidence of prior foreign language training or experience, education level, ASVAB ST
scores, and so forth.
(4) For officers and warrant officers the DLAB test is given to:
(a) All officers and warrant officers first entering active service at basic branch courses or at their first
duty station when not attending a basic branch course.
(b) All officers and warrant officers applying for language training if they have not previously tested.
(c) All officers and warrant officers requesting testing if they have not previously tested or if they meet
the re-evaluation criteria.
(d) All officers and warrant officers who successfully complete ARSOF (branches 18, 37, and 38) as-
sessment and selection training and whose personnel records do not reflect a DLAB score.
(e) Cadets at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA) and contracted cadets in the Reserve Officers’ Train-
ing Corps (ROTC) upon completion of their junior year.
(5) Give the test to enlisted Soldiers who achieve ASVAB scores qualifying them for the 35M, 35P,
37F, 38B, 38R, and 38W military occupational specialties (MOSs).
(6) For DA DCIPS Civilians, the test may be given to:
(a) Candidates for DCIPS positions that require foreign language proficiency.
(b) Personnel selected by their command or organization to attend foreign language training.
(7) DLAB scores are recorded and reported as follows:
(a) The Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) records and updates RA DLAB scores.
(b) For the ARNG, DMDC records the DLAB score alongside DLPT scores in a Soldier’s record. The
readiness noncommissioned officer records the scores in iPERMS and on the Soldier’s enlisted record
brief/officer record brief.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 14
(c) For the USAR individual Readiness Division (RD) and IMA Soldiers, the test control officer (TCO)
provides DLAB test results to the Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (AHRC – PLM–I),
1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY 40122 –5680 for inclusion in personnel files. For troop
program unit (TPU) Soldiers, the TCO forwards test results through the individual’s RD. The RD ensures
the submission of the Soldier’s test results into iPERMS and forwards a copy to the unit for inclusion in
the unit’s ACD personnel files. The unit also updates entries in the Regional Level Application Software.
(d) The TCO may provide a copy of the individual’s DLAB test results to the Soldier.
(e) The TCO provides the test results to the DCIPS Civilian and the office listed on the legacy DA Form
4187 (Personnel Action Request) requesting the DLAB.
(f) The servicing TCO maintains a record of test results for everyone tested in accordance with AR
611– 5.
b. Defense Language Proficiency Test.
(1) Both the listening and reading DLPT must be taken within 30 days of each other to count as a valid
test. These include the DLPT versions I, II, III, IV, 5, and the computer adaptive tests.
(2) Administer and score each DLPT according to the administration and scoring manual appropriate
for that test. The DLPT5 is scored automatically for multiple choice tests or by DLIFLC for constructed re-
sponse tests. Both military and civilian linguists must certify annually or biennially using the lower range
or all range Defense Language Proficiency Test 5–Computer Adaptive (DLPT5–CA) tests to sustain profi-
ciency and to qualify for FLPB. The upper range DLPT may only be taken within 60 days of scoring a 3 on
the lower range DLPT to show increased proficiency only in the modality for which the 3 was achieved on
the lower range DLPT. Soldiers and civilians who score an L3/R3 on their DLPT are exempt from the an-
nual testing requirement and are only required to test every 24 months. This 24-month testing require-
ment for Soldiers and civilians who score an L3/R3 or higher on their DLPT applies to both the lower
range and the upper range tests. Soldiers and civilians taking a DLPT5–CA test do not have to take the
upper range DLPT since the DLPT5 –CA can determine proficiency levels from 0+ to 4. A DLPT5 –CA
makes an upper range test obsolete.
(3) Linguists, language instructors, and any Soldier or civilian who takes the DLPT are not authorized
to hold any testing positions, to include TCO, assistant TCO, or test examiner. These personnel involved
in the testing process are not eligible to take a DLPT for a period of 180 days after leaving a testing posi-
tion. Contract linguists and basic skills instructors and applicants for these positions are not authorized to
take any Army language proficiency test. Military language instructors (MLIs) who do not have access to
DLPTs are required to take the DLPT annually (biennially if they score L3/R3 on their DLPT).
(4) DA Civilians with access to DLPT development and foreign language instructors will take an OPI to
satisfy annual foreign language certification requirements.
(5) If a DLPT5 is available for a language, that is the only authorized test. The DLIFLC Commandant
has the authority to administer or to authorize administration of superseded versions of the DLPT only for
conducting analyses of the performance of the tests. Direct all other requests to the Chief, Army Foreign
Language Team.
(6) Soldiers and DA Civilians with an Arabic dialect designated as their CLANG must take the Arabic-
Modern Standard (AD) reading test and the listening test for their respective dialect(s). Both the listening
and reading tests must be completed within 30 days of each other to count as a valid test. Army will only
pay FLPB for one reading test.
(7) Soldiers with a valid and current DLPT in a previous version who are taking the DLPT5 or
DLPT5–CA for the first time and score lower on the DLPT5 or DLPT5 –CA may substitute their previous
test score for annual certification one time only. The previous test score will be the test of record with an
effective date of the new submission.
(8) Provide the DLPT to the following personnel:
(a) All contracted USMA and ROTC cadets and all USMA and ROTC cadets who are attending a se-
mester abroad program. Cadets may take the DLPT before or after their trip abroad.
(b) Enlistees for ACASP options requiring a determination of foreign language proficiency prior to en-
listment.
(c) Enlistees processing through a U.S. Army Reception Battalion who claim proficiency in a foreign
language to verify their language capability.
(d) Soldiers graduating from the DLIFLC or contract foreign language training programs paid for with
Army funds and DA Civilian whose PD indicates a requirement for a foreign language.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 15
(e) Soldiers or DA Civilians requesting an initial evaluation upon completion of a self-study course (for
example, night school, college, or home study).
(f) Personnel whose records, evaluation reports, or other documents show knowledge of a foreign lan-
guage not recorded on their qualification records. This includes personnel applying for a language-de-
pendent MOS or FA.
(g) Soldiers who claim knowledge of a foreign language(s).
(h) DA Civilians as a condition of employment.
c. Oral proficiency interviews.
(1) Only request an OPI for MOSs and FAs which have a speaking requirement (35Ms, FAOs, CMFs
18, 37, and 38 Soldiers), languages for which no DLPT exists, or to enable a linguist (MOS immaterial)
who achieved proficiency levels of L3/R3 to demonstrate a higher proficiency.
(2) The OPI interviewers can assign a speaking proficiency level of 0 through 5. An OPI is conducted
with a DLIFLC approved and certified tester in the following circumstances:
(a) When an individual claims proficiency in a language on the ASLL for which no DLPT is available.
(Contact the program manager, ArmyU, Army Credentialing Continuing Education Services for Soldiers
(ACCESS) for a list of available tests.)
(b) When a Soldier or DA Civilian (does not apply to 35M and ARSOF Soldiers) who scores proficiency
levels of L3/R3 on their DLPT requests an OPI to demonstrate increased proficiency/ increase the
amount of FLPB they are entitled to. These individuals will not have their FLPB reduced or lose MOS
qualification if they fail the OPI.
(c) To enable DLIFLC instructors to meet annual foreign language proficiency certification require-
ments.
(d) To determine RA reenlistment bonus levels and FLPB eligibility for CMF 18, 37, and 38 Soldiers.
(3) Request OPIs for languages on the ASLL or other mission-required languages if no DLPT exists.
(4) Effective 1 October 2023, administer an OPI to all language qualified MOS 35M Soldiers as part of
the annual certification to assess speaking proficiency and to maintain MOS qualification. Soldiers must
score a minimum of S1+ on their OPI to maintain MOS qualification. Soldiers should schedule the OPI
prior to taking the DLPT to ensure they can complete all required testing (for all three modalities) within
60 days.
(5) Only the TCO can coordinate for OPI testing. The TCO should contact DLIFLC (ATFL–ESM) to
schedule an OPI.
(6) The DLIFLC (ATFL –ESM) reports the results of an OPI to the requesting TCO who completes and
submits DA Form 330.
(7) When a DLIFLC approved OPI interviewer is unavailable, the TCO should contact DLIFLC
(ATFL– ESM) for self-appraisal guidance and forms. The highest rating awarded using self-appraisal is a
speaking score of 3. Do not use self-appraisals to qualify for FLPB and do not report self-appraisal scores
to USAHRC. The use of the self-appraisal process is highly encouraged for non-career linguists upon en-
try to the Army and for Soldiers claiming proficiency in low density languages for which no DLPT exists.
(8) Administer an OPI to FAOs every 2 years in accordance with DoDI 1315.20 (Management of DoD
FAO programs). FAOs only qualify for additional FLPB when they score L3/R3 on their DLPT and an S2
or higher on their OPI in accordance with paragraph 4–3a(1) this regulation.
d. Two-score oral proficiency interview.
(1) Only ARSOF Soldiers (CMFs and AOCs 18, 37, 38R, 38S, 38W, 38Z, and 180A warrant officers)
are eligible to take a two-score oral proficiency interview (TSOPI). FAOs and 35M Soldiers are no longer
authorized to take a TSOPI. A TSOPI can assign proficiency levels in participatory listening (PL) in addi-
tion to speaking of 0 through 4. The PL score is equal to the speaking score. For example, an ARSOF
Soldier who scores an S3 on the speaking portion of the OPI would also receive an L3 in PL.
(2) See paragraph 4–3b for guidance on drawing FLPB when testing using the TSOPI.
(3) The DLIFLC (ATFL –ESM) reports the results of a TSOPI to the requesting TCO who completes
and submits the DA Form 330 (see paras 4– 23 and 4 –24 for preparing and submitting DA Form 330).
The TCO annotates the DA Form 330 for a speaking and a listening score. For example, a Soldier scor-
ing an S2+ on a TSOPI would have S2+ annotated for speaking and L2+ annotated for listening on the
DA Form 330.
e. Testing.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 16
(1) The Soldier, officer, warrant officer, or DA Civilian schedules their DLPT/OPI in a timely manner
prior to the expiration of their current written agreement to ensure continued, uninterrupted eligibility for
FLPB.
(2) Soldiers, officers, warrant officers, and DA Civilians testing on an Army installation will request a
DLPT/OPI in accordance with the Army Personnel Testing TCO Handbook located on the ACCESS web-
site (https://armyuniversity.edu/access/assets/13654.pdf).
(3) Soldiers, officers, warrant officers, and DA Civilians testing at a different service installation will
contact the education center directly to request the requirements to schedule a DLPT/OPI.
(4) Soldiers, officers, warrant officers, and DA Civilians testing at a different service installation will nor-
mally receive a memorandum showing the scores achieved.
(5) See paragraphs 4–23 and 4– 24 for use of the DA Form 330.
f. Re-evaluation.
(1) The Army’s minimum linguist proficiency level is L2/R2 in their CLANG for all linguists except for
35M Soldiers, ARSOF, and SFAB Soldiers. Language qualified MOS 35M Soldiers must score a mini-
mum of L2/R2/S1+ in their CLANG to maintain MOS qualification. ARSOF and SFAB minimum language
proficiency is L1+/R1+ or S1+ (see chap 5 for ARSOF-specific language proficiency requirements).
(2) Annual language proficiency recertification is mandatory for Soldiers and DA Civilians who have
received foreign language training at government expense and graduated, were recruited for their lan-
guage capability, serve in a language-dependent or language-capable MOS career field as defined in par-
agraph 4– 6, or are assigned to a language coded position.
(3) All linguists must retest annually (see para 4–3a) to remain eligible to receive FLPB except for
those personnel who score L3/R3 on their DLPT, OPI, or equivalent test. Servicemembers and DA Civil-
ians who score L3/R3 or better on their DLPT and/or OPI are required to test every 2 years. 35M,
ARSOF, U.S. Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command (USACAPOC), and SFAB Sol-
diers must score a 3 in any two modalities to qualify for biennial testing. For example, a 35M who scored
L2/R3/S3 is not required to retest for 24 months.
(4) Due to the length of the 35M and 35P AIT courses and insufficient language training integrated in
the AIT programs of instruction, the first DLPT 12-month recertification period for these Soldiers begins on
the date the Soldier reports to their first duty station. For example, a 35M completes the Defense Lan-
guage Institute (DLI) with a DLPT date of 5 January 2024. He or she completes the 19-week 35M course
and checks in to their first duty station on 15 August 2024. The new written agreement start date is 15 Au-
gust 2024. Based on the arrival date, the new DLPT recertification date would be 31 August 2025. 35Ms
and 35Ps attaining L3/R3 upon graduation from DLI must also retest 12 months after signing into their
first operational unit.
(a) 35M and 35P Soldiers (includes Soldiers who reclassified into these MOSs) reporting to their first
operational duty assignment are required to complete a written agreement as soon as possible to docu-
ment the start of their initial 12-month FLPB recertification period. The start date is the day the Soldier re-
ported to their first operational unit after completion of AIT. The written agreement must include the fol-
lowing annotation: “Pursuant to AR 11– 6, the recipient will have 12 months from [date] to retest on the
DLPT. During this waiver period, the 35M and 35P Soldier must attend an SLTE consisting of a minimum
of 160 hours of consecutive language training.” For example, a 35M completes DLI with a DLPT date of 5
January 2024. He or she completes the 19-week 35M course and checks in to the first duty station on 15
August 2024. Based on arrival date, the new DLPT recertification date would be 31 August 2025. 35Ms
and 35Ps attaining L3/R3 upon graduation from DLI must also retest 12 months after signing into their
first operational unit. This includes Soldiers who reclassify into the 35M and 35P MOSs.
(b) Once approved, the written agreement becomes the source document for the new personnel ac-
tion.
(c) Units must immediately stop FLPB for any 35M or 35P Soldier who fails to graduate from AIT and is
reclassified or pending separation.
(5) Linguists who no longer serve in a language-dependent or language-capable MOS are encouraged
but not required to retest annually.
(6) Contract linguist vendors validate a contract linguist’s proficiency using vendor administered tests
in accordance with the standards established in the terms and conditions of the applicable contract or
agreement. Do not use government administered DLPTs and OPIs to determine or validate a contract lin-
guist’s language proficiency.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 17
(7) All linguists who are sub-proficient in their CLANG have 180 days (12 months for the RC) to com-
plete an SLTE consisting of a minimum of 160 consecutive hours of language training. During the SLTE,
the Soldier/DA Civilian and the chain of command will apply the maximum level of training resources,
time, and focus to improve the linguist’s language proficiency. The commanders, in consultation with their
CLPM, will counsel and clearly articulate the remediation training plan to sub-proficient linguists to include
stopping their FLPB immediately once they fail their DLPT or OPI. The Chief of USAHRC’s Enlisted Lan-
guage Branch will place an IMREPR code 9P (not MOS qualified) on all Soldiers serving in a language-
dependent MOS who fails to maintain language proficiency standards. Commanders must comply with
paragraph 6–3f of this regulation to terminate a DA Civilian’s FLPP.
(8) If a language-dependent Soldier fails to achieve a passing score on his or her DLPT or OPI after
completion of the remediation period, commanders will initiate the administrative process to remove the
linguist’s SQI L and initiate processing for separation or MOS reclassification within 12 months of the ini-
tial DLPT failure.
(9) If a language-capable Soldier fails to achieve a passing score on his or her DLPT after completion
of the remediation period, commanders must initiate action to withdraw the SQI L not later than 12
months from the date of the initial DLPT failure.
(10) FAOs who fail to maintain their language qualification will not be eligible to fill certain FAO posi-
tions, particularly those in overseas locations.
(11) Commanders and supervisors must follow paragraph 2–6c for Soldiers who fail to meet profi-
ciency requirements.
(12) Approval for DLPT and DLAB re-evaluation is as follows:
(a) Administer no more than two iterations of the same DLPT to the same person in a 12-month period.
Individuals who have completed an SLTE (minimum of 160 consecutive hours of training or equivalent for
the RA, 80 consecutive hours for the RC, ARSOF, and FAOs) may request a retest in less than 6 months
from the last test date as an ETP. Submit ETPs for DLPT and OPI retesting to the program manager,
ArmyU, ACCESS (AHRC–PDE) for approval. If the ETP for retesting is approved, at least 6 calendar
months must elapse before any subsequent test. Only one ETP may be granted within a 12-month period
to comply with the DoD policy which limits the number of times a year a DLPT in the same language may
be taken to twice per 12-month period. For example, if a linguist takes a DLPT on 8 January 2024 and
fails, takes a 160 consecutive hour SLTE from 1 through 30 April, receives an ETP to retest within 6
months, and retakes their DLPT on 5 May, then they would not be able to take another DLPT until 8 Jan-
uary 2025.
(b) Requests for this ETP will document the SLTE, to include a copy of the Soldier or DA Civilian’s cer-
tificate of graduation or completion of the language training event. The program manager, ArmyU,
ACCESS (AHRC – PDE) will accept a memorandum from the instructor, CLPM, or course administrator
stating the Soldier or DA Civilian has completed the training event in lieu of a graduation or completion
certificate. The memorandum must include the title of the specific course completed and the completion
date. This SLTE must consist of a minimum of 160 consecutive hours (80 consecutive hours RC, ARSOF,
or FAOs) of immersion training or classroom instruction (160 hours of classroom instruction over 5 con-
secutive weeks). RC ETP requests are handled on a case-by-case basis by the program manager,
ACCESS and must include an endorsed statement from the individual’s commander (O – 5 or above) ex-
plaining the type of training, purpose, or accomplishment that warrants retesting consideration.
(c) The retesting date then becomes the date required for annual re-evaluation according to paragraph
4–3a.
(d) Soldiers scheduled to attend training courses that are 180 days in length or greater should make
every effort to test prior to attending the course. If the Soldier cannot test prior to attending the course, he
or she is authorized a waiver of recertification (in all languages they receive FLPB for) for 180 days after
course graduation. This is to ensure Soldiers are not distracted during the training course by having to
take a DLPT(s). IMREPR code 9P will not be placed on individual personnel records and FLPB will con-
tinue to be paid while they are attending the course. If a recertified DLPT(s) for students attending either a
CAT III or CAT IV language course will expire prior to the end of the training, request a waiver from the
SPM to extend FLPB payments. Soldiers who fail to graduate from the course should have their waiver
amended to reflect 180 days from the date they were released from training.
(e) Re-evaluate personnel on the DLAB if they have not received the minimum qualifying score on the
initial test. Personnel may retest after a 6-month waiting period between each test.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 18
(f) Send requests for exceptions to the waiting period and requests to retest after attaining the mini-
mum score or higher to the SPM.
2–6. Proficiency standards
a. The goal for all linguists is level 3 in listening, reading, and speaking.
b. The Army’s minimum linguist proficiency standard is level 2 (limited working proficiency) for all initial
entry (apprentice level) Soldiers in the listening and reading modalities delineated by the Interagency Lan-
guage Roundtable (ILR) for all linguists except USACAPOC, SFAB, and ARSOF Soldiers (minimum lin-
guist proficiency of level L1+/R1+ or S1+). Language qualified MOS 35M Soldiers are required to score a
minimum of L2/R2/S1+ on their DLPT and OPI to maintain MOS qualification.
c. RA Soldiers in language-dependent MOSs who fail their DLPT or fail to retest before their current
test expires will have their FLPB stopped immediately and receive a USAHRC emplaced IMREPR code of
9P. RA Soldiers will then have 180 days (12 months for the RC) to receive remedial training and recertify.
If an RA language-dependent Soldiers fails to achieve the minimum proficiency level after the 180-day
remediation period (12-month remediation period for the RC), commanders will initiate the process to re-
move the linguist’s SQI L and to separate or reclassify the language-dependent Soldiers within 12 months
of the initial DLPT failure.
d. Language-capable Soldiers who fail their DLPT or fail to retest before their current test expires, will
have their FLPB stopped. RA language-capable Soldiers will then have 180 days (12 months for the RC)
to receive remedial training and retest. If RA language-capable Soldiers fail to achieve the minimum profi-
ciency level after the 180-day remediation period (12-month remediation period for the RC), commanders
will initiate the process to remove the language-capable Soldier’s SQI L within 12 months of the initial
DLPT failure. Commanders will submit a PAR to withdraw SQI L for Soldiers who fail to achieve a passing
score following the remediation period.
e. Evaluation report comments are mandatory for a significant improvement in a linguist’s language
capability or a failure to sustain the minimum level of language proficiency. Raters will not make a com-
ment on the linguist’s evaluation report when they initially fail to achieve the minimum proficiency on their
annual or biennial DLPT and/or OPI test. Commanders will wait until the linguist has completed remedia-
tion training and retesting. If the linguist fails the post-remediation DLPT or OPI test, then the rater must
address proficiency on the linguist’s evaluation report.
f. The CG, USASOC determines the minimum proficiency standard for ARSOF. The minimum profi-
ciency is S1+ on their TSOPI or L1+/R1+ on their DLPT.
Section III
Control Language
2–7. Description
The CLANG identifies the Soldier’s primary foreign language for management and strength accountability
purposes. The eighth and ninth characters of the enlisted Soldiers’ and warrant officers’ MOS and the
eighth and ninth characters of the officers’ specialty code identify their CLANG. Officers and warrant offic-
ers have a LIC that serves as a CLANG. Paragraph 2– 8 defines how a linguist’s CLANG is determined
and how a linguist can change his or her CLANG.
2–8. Control language determination
The overriding factor in determining a Soldier or civilian’s CLANG is the needs of the Army. Additional
considerations include a Soldier’s language proficiency and the desires of the individual.
a. RA Soldiers with skills in only one foreign language have that language designated as their CLANG.
b. For RA Soldiers with skills in more than one foreign language, the CLANG is the language for which
the Soldier was recruited or most recently attended a basic language acquisition course. If the Soldier has
not attended a basic language acquisition course and has instead attended a language conversion
course, such as Persian-Farsi to Dari, the CLANG will not change. The first language trained or recruited
for will be the Soldier’s CLANG until the Soldier is no longer under an active duty service obligation
(ADSO) for the language or as determined by the Chief of USAHRC’s Enlisted Language Branch.
c. The Chief of USAHRC’s Enlisted Language Branch will review CLANG changes based on require-
ments and proficiency level. The first O –6 in the Soldier’s chain of command may request a CLANG
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 19
change by submitting a PAR request for a CLANG change and a DA Form 330 demonstrating the re-
quired proficiency in the requested language. For RA enlisted Soldiers, commanders will send the PAR to
the Chief of USAHRC’s Enlisted Language Branch, Force Shaping Directorate, Inventory Management
Branch (EPF– F– LANG), 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY 40122 –5400 for consideration.
Officers and warrant officers will submit their CLANG change requests to their branch manager. The Chief
of USAHRC’s Enlisted Language Branch is the approval authority for all CLANG changes. The Chief of
USAHRC’s Enlisted Language Branch will consider Army readiness, bonus entitlements and require-
ments before approving a CLANG change. The Chief of USAHRC’s Enlisted Language Branch will re-
spond with a memorandum approving or disapproving CLANG change requests.
d. For DLIFLC graduates assigned the wrong CLANG, the Chief of USAHRC’s Enlisted Language
Branch will correct and change the CLANG during record reviews. Additionally, there are times when the
Chief of USAHRC’s Enlisted Language Branch will involuntarily change a Soldier’s CLANG based on
changes to language authorizations and the Soldier’s language proficiency in other required foreign lan-
guages.
e. RA officers and warrant officers must contact their branch manager for determination of their
CLANG.
f. For RC Soldiers, the CLANG is determined by the most recent language the Soldier was recruited
for, trained in, or by the language coded position to which the Soldier is assigned or as determined by the
following:
(1) For ARNG Soldiers, CNGB.
(2) For USAR Soldiers, USARC DCS, G –1.
g. A DA Civilian’s CLANG is determined by the most recent language he or she received training for at
government expense or the language the DA Civilian was recruited for. Commanders or supervisors must
identify the CLANG in the DA Civilian’s PD (all DA Civilians except MICECP, see chap 6). Commanders
or supervisors may change or eliminate a DA Civilian’s CLANG at any time by changing the PD.
h. MICECP employees may hold more than one CLANG. The MICECP program manager is the ap-
proval authority for multiple CLANGs for MICECP employees.
i. FA 48 officers may hold more than one CLANG. Base FA 48 personnel CLANG decisions on billet
and training requirements and AR 5– 22. Chief, FAO proponent approves FA 48 personnel CLANGs or
changes to CLANGs based on amended requirements for FA 48 personnel.
j. Operational GREAT SKILL personnel (MOS immaterial) may hold more than one CLANG. Base
GREAT SKILL personnel’s CLANGs on billet, operational requirements, training requirements, and AR
5 –22 tasks. The GREAT SKILL program commander is the approval authority for multiple CLANGs for
GREAT SKILL personnel. Additionally, the GREAT SKILL program commander approves CLANG
changes based on amended requirements for GREAT SKILL program members.
k. Grandfathered 35M Soldiers (YY and ZK LIC coded) who never received language training at gov-
ernment expense or who were not recruited for their language capability may request the Chief, Enlisted
assign a CLANG for a language for which they demonstrate proficiency. There is not a requirement for a
grandfathered 35M Soldier to obtain a language. Grandfathered 35M Soldiers who desire to learn a lan-
guage must request approval from Chief of USAHRC’s Enlisted Language Branch. Grandfathered 35M
language choices are limited to languages the Army has a requirement for (that is, the 4+1 languages).
Grandfathered 35M Soldiers will not request a Prevalent in the Force language for their CLANG since suf-
ficient capability in these languages already exists within the Army.
l. Grandfathered (YY and ZK LIC coded Soldiers) 35Ms may request to attend DLIFLC to acquire a
language. Grandfathered 35M Soldiers who volunteer to attend DLIFLC for language acquisition will not
be reclassified if they fail to graduate. These Soldiers will be allowed to return to the force and continue to
serve as a grandfathered 35M Soldier. Refer to chapter 3, section II for DLIFLC attendance requirements.
m. All members of the USAR, regardless of status are required to have a CLANG determination mem-
orandum issued by the Chief, USARC G– 1, Special Action Branch.
Section IV
Establishing Linguist Requirements
2–9. Establishing linguist requirements
a. When identifying linguist requirements, commanders will—
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 20
(1) Only identify positions for which the Army has validated foreign language requirements. These re-
quirements include essential operational, liaison, planning, coordination, and advisory functions. Foreign
language requirements are validated through the capabilities based requirements identification process
via validated and approved unit mission essential task lists and joint mission essential task lists.
(2) Recommend through their command and the Foreign Language Team (DAMI – OIO) the required
language and proficiency using the appropriate LIC and language proficiency indicator (LPIND), respec-
tively. Submit LIC and LPIND changes to the DCS, G– 2 on DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to
Publications and Blank Forms).
(3) Propose proficiency requirements (LPIND) updates to the DCS, G– 2 through the Foreign Lan-
guage Team (DAMI– OIO). Proficiency requirements are based on the duties of the specific TOE/TDA bil-
let that meet or exceed the Army’s GPF or ARSOF established minimum proficiency ILR standard.
(a) Commanders will code all positions to reflect the apprentice, journeyman, master ILR requirements
as defined by the Army SPM.
(b) Minimum LPIND codes for the apprentice, journeyman, and master ratings follow:
1. Apprentice: Code Skill level 10 35P Soldiers as L2/R2 (LPIND = 2000).
2. Journeyman: Code Skill Level 20 and Skill Level 3 35P Soldiers as L2+/R2+ (LPIND = 2500).
3. Master: Code Skill Level 40 35P Soldiers as L3/R3 (LPIND = 3000).
4. 35M Soldiers: Code all 35M Soldiers as L2/R2/S1+ (LPIND = 2015).
5. Code all ARSOF Soldiers with a minimum a 1+/1+ (LPIND = 1500).
(c) Commanders with assigned 35M and ARSOF Soldiers may increase the LPINDs based on mission
analysis. 35P LPINDs were implemented by the SPM in coordination with the DCS, G –3/5/7 to satisfy re-
quirements in the DoD Language Roadmap. These 35P LPIND proficiency ratings are effective 1 October
2024.
b. New language requirements or changes to existing authorizations are typically announced annually
during the Army Command Plan guidance review that occurs during the second quarter of each FY. Com-
manders of ACOMs, ASCCs, and DRUs with assigned linguists who would like to make modifications to
existing authorizations must submit LIC and LPIND changes for review and validation to the DCS, G– 2
through the Foreign Language Team (DAMI– OIO) by email (usarmy.pentagon.hqda-dcs-g-2.list.foreign-
language-office@army.mil).
2–10. Determining proficiency requirements
a. When determining the proficiency requirement for a language coded position, consider the following:
(1) The foreign language duties the incumbent will perform.
(2) The location of the position in question.
(3) The percentage of duty/mission time the incumbent will use the foreign language.
(4) The quantity of co-located similarly coded linguists.
(5) If current operational requirements justify increased proficiency, submit requests for changes to the
LPIND of a position through command channels by email to the Chief, Foreign Language Team
(DAMI– OIO). All requests will include an unit commander (O – 6 or above) endorsed MFR with supporting
justification for the increase in LPIND outlined in the body of the MFR.
b. The LPIND is a four-digit code. The first two digits identify the listening and reading proficiency level
and the last two digits identify the speaking proficiency level. For both the first two digits and the last two
digits, the first number identifies the whole proficiency level, and the second number identifies the plus
level (expressed as either 0 or 5) (see table 2– 1).
Table 2 – 1
Language proficiency indicator—Continued
L/R S LPIND
0 0 0000
0+ 0+ 0505
1 1 1010
1+ 1+ 1515
2 2 2020
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 21
Table 2 – 1
Language proficiency indicator—Continued
L/R S LPIND
2+ 2+ 2525
3 3 3030
3+ 3+ 3535
4 4 4040
4+ 4+ 4545
5 5 5050
Legend:
L = Listening
R = Reading
S = Speaking
2–11. Modifying linguist requirements
a. The DCS, G–2 reviews and approves all modifications to linguist personnel requirements (language
and proficiency changes) before documentation in TDA and TOE documents. Unit commanders request-
ing changes/updates to the LIC or LPIND on a unit TOE or TDA will submit a DA Form 2028 by email to
the DCS, G–2 through the Foreign Language Team (DAMI– OIO) documenting proposed changes follow-
ing the release of Army Command Plan guidance (annually in March or April).
b. Do not change more than 10 percent of the language coded billets annually. The local higher head-
quarters will submit these language coded changes to the DCS, G– 2 for approval prior to submitting
through Force Management channels. Forecasting requirements to the DCS, G– 2 will improve the Army’s
ability to synchronize training requirements with changes to unit authorization documents. Language
training program requirements are determined by the SMDR process and restricted by rules that prohibit
major changes to the training load during years of execution, which means the Army cannot TRAP to ad-
just training during the execution year. In addition, during the annual SMDR, the Army can only increase
training load by 10 percent and decrease by 20 percent.
c. The first O– 6 in the unit’s chain of command must approve requested changes. Once reviewed and
validated by the DCS, G –2, the DCS, G– 2 forwards the requests to the U.S. Army Force Management
Support Agency (USAFMSA) for action. Unit commanders may request critical updates throughout the
year via DA Form 2028 and an out-of-cycle update with USAFMSA. Unit commanders requesting an out-
of-cycle update to their TDA/TOE must also provide a memorandum signed by an O –6 or above stating
why the out-of-cycle update is required.
2–12. Requisitioning linguists
Request linguists using standard requisition procedures as described in AR 614–200. Unit commanders
must request officers with linguist skills under approved OPMS processes and procedures for the RA,
USAR, and Active Guard Reserve (AGR). Unit commanders must ensure LICs exist on TOEs/TDAs (see
paras 2– 7 and 2 –10). SQIs must be included in the remarks for CMF 35 and 48. Request contract lin-
guists in accordance with procedures found in chapter 8 of this regulation.
Chapter 3
Linguist Training, Management, and Utilization
Section I
General Language Training Information
3–1. Scope
Foreign language proficiency is a highly perishable skill and requires constant training to ensure Soldiers
increase their language proficiency throughout their career. The goal is for all Soldiers to achieve a L3/R3
by the time they are promoted to Sergeant First Class, if not sooner. Commanders, supervisors, CLPMs,
and members of the chain of command will develop a broad spectrum of training resources to tailor train-
ing programs. The three components of language training are institutional language training, unit
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 22
language training, and self-study. Commanders should use the three components of language training to
tailor unit and individual training programs to meet both mission and individual requirements.
a. Institutional training. DLIFLC conducts institutional language training at the DLIFLC main campus in
Monterey, California, or at one of their satellite campuses. Institutional training remains the primary acqui-
sition method for non-native professional linguists. See chapter 3, section II for the DLIFLC qualification
standards, procedures to send a Soldier to DLIFLC, and a list of individuals ineligible to attend DLIFLC.
Selection for DLIFLC training is as follows:
(1) General. The selection of RA personnel for language training is determined by current and pro-
jected requirements by MOS and Branch, grade, and language. DLIFLC training requirements are filled,
as much as possible, with volunteers. When volunteers are not available, the CG, USAHRC, may involun-
tarily reclassify Soldiers from an over strength MOS to an understrength language-dependent MOS. RA
Soldiers who do not meet the DLIFLC qualification standards may request a waiver from the Chief of
USAHRC’s Enlisted Language Branch (AHRC –FSC–I). The Army SPM may provide a DLAB waiver, if
necessary, to meet Army readiness requirements.
(2) Service obligation. Volunteers approved for language training at government expense will incur a
service obligation computed as follows.
(a) Officers and warrant officers. Officers and warrant officers incur consecutive ADSOs computed in
accordance with AR 350–100. The ADSO for language training does not apply to officers and warrant of-
ficers involuntarily ordered to language training.
(b) Enlisted Soldiers. Enlisted Soldiers incur service remaining requirements computed from the date
the course ends, in accordance with AR 614 –200. Personnel selected for language training for a special
program must meet the programs ADSO.
1. Applicants who are qualified for language training but who do not have enough time remaining in the
service to complete language training must extend or re-enlist (see AR 601–280) prior to departing their
current duty station or the Soldier’s DLIFLC assignment will be deleted. This includes Soldiers attending
intermediate and advanced language training courses.
2. RC Soldiers Selection to attend DLIFLC is limited to training Soldiers to fill specific positions with
language requirements.
3. Other educational institutions and commercial contractors. Use non-DoD educational institutions
and contractors for acquisition language training for FAOs when DoD assets are unavailable and when
these alternatives best meet the overall needs of the Army. For identified FAOs, the Chief, Strategic
Leadership Division, DCS, G –3/5/7, and Chief, FAO Branch, USAHRC, will seek the endorsement of the
Chief, Leadership Development Division, USAHRC prior to sending to DLIFLC for final approval. All other
officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers must attend a DLIFLC language acquisition course.
b. Unit language training.
(1) Commanders with assigned linguists will establish a CLP in accordance with the policy articulated
in paragraphs 1–23a and paragraphs 3 –9 through 3 –12 of this regulation. Commanders should also de-
velop and execute remedial, refresher, sustainment, and enhancement language training programs de-
signed to ensure all assigned linguists meet the minimum language proficiency standard and can in-
crease their language proficiency. Commanders will assign language training with the same priority given
to physical fitness, common Soldier skill training, weapons qualification training, and MOS training.
(2) Units with assigned cryptologic linguists supporting the NSA/CSS will develop and implement lan-
guage programs designed to develop L3/R3 linguists to meet NSA/CSS proficiency standards. Com-
manders of units supporting NSA missions will maximize the use of NCU LTDs for enhancement training
and to increase Soldiers’ proficiency by sending all eligible sub 2+/2+ Soldiers to intermediate language
training and all eligible sub 3/3 Soldiers to the advanced language training courses offered at the NSA
LTDs. Units with assigned 35Ms must develop and implement language training programs designed to
develop and enhance the speaking modality in conjunction with the listening and reading modalities.
(3) Commanders will provide opportunities for Soldiers to attend language training monthly. The num-
ber of language training hours allotted to Soldiers will vary with their proficiency. For example, sub-profi-
cient Soldiers and Soldiers scoring less than L2+/R2+ on their DLPT will receive 16 hours of language
training monthly. Soldiers scoring L2+/R2+ will receive 12 hours of language training monthly. Soldiers
scoring L3/R3 or higher may choose to be exempt from monthly language training if they are confident
they can sustain their L3/R3 proficiency. If the L3/R3 linguist chooses to participate in monthly language
training, they will receive 8 hours of language training. L3/R3 linguists who choose not to participate in
monthly language training will serve as language mentors for Soldiers with lower proficiency levels or
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 23
assist the language instructor with training. These language training hours will be conducted during the
duty day and make maximum use of the installation LTF. Language training hours is expressed in
monthly hours to provide commanders and CLPMs with the greatest flexibility when scheduling language
training for their language-capable/language-dependent Soldiers. For example, if a unit deploys to the
field for one week, the commander has the flexibility to schedule the 8 to 16 hours of language training for
assigned linguists in the remaining three weeks of the month.
(4) In addition to the 8 to 16 hours of monthly language training, Commanders will provide assigned
language-capable/language-dependent Soldiers with an annual 160 consecutive hour SLTE (80 hours for
ARSOF, FAOs, and the RC) prior to recertifying their DLPT proficiency.
c. Self-study. Commanders should ensure that sufficient study time and foreign language materials
are available to individual Soldiers for self-study. Self-study language training consists of supervised or
self-paced language training accomplished by the individual Soldier during the duty day and on their own
time. The objectives should include general language proficiency and improved mission performance. For
maximum effect, the training supervisor, mentor, or CLPM should prepare an ILTP listing individual train-
ing objectives, tasks, performance standards, milestones, and a program schedule for each Soldier. A
copy of the ILTP must be maintained in the Soldier’s ACD folder. Units may use TALP funds to purchase
software/equipment/software applications to support self-study programs. See para 7–5j for additional in-
formation on the use of TALP for equipment purchases.
3–2. Requesting language training
USAHRC, USAR, and the FAO proponent quota source (QS) managers must coordinate with the Chief of
the Foreign Language Team to plan and request language training seats at DLIFLC and DLI–W annually
prior to the SMDR. ARNG QS managers see paragraph 1–14b. ASCC and ACOM CLPMs must also plan
and request future external language training for their units. There are a significant number of external
language training opportunities available to help CLPMs enhance the proficiency of their assigned lin-
guists. This training includes DLI language training and CLPM MTTs, courses offered at DLI LTDs, NCU
language training opportunities, and other external training opportunities (for example, Concordia, Partner
Language Training Center–Europe (PLTCE)). Many of these language training opportunities are offered
at no or low cost to the unit. The procedures for requesting these language training opportunities follow:
a. Structure and Manning Decision Review.
(1) The SMDR is an annual process used to schedule DLIFLC and DLI–W language training seats and
MTT language training opportunities for all Services.
(2) The SMDR covers a period of 3 FYs and determines how many DLIFLC training seats and MTTs
the Army can program. For example, the FY25 SMDR will review FY 28 through FY 30 language training
requirements. Participants will review FY 28 language training requirements, validate FY29 requirements,
and establish FY 30 training requirements.
(3) USAHRC (includes enlisted and FAO Branch requirements), the ARNG, the USAR, and the FAO
proponent QS managers must use the SMDR process to request future DLIFLC and DLI–W language
training seats. Army ACOM, DRU, and ASCC CLPMs must use the annual SMDR process to request fu-
ture DLI language training MTTs.
(4) The SMDR begins in January when the DCS, G–3/5/7 releases the annual SMDR announcement.
The Army SPM notifies the USAHRC, USAR, and FAO QS managers and the ACOM and ASCC CLPMs
to develop their future language training requirements and submit them to the Army SPM by email for val-
idation. Once the Army SPM validates the language training requirements, the USAHRC, USAR, and
FAO QS managers and ACOM/ASCC CLPMs input approved requirements to the column update (CU)
screens in ATRRS by using the update SMDR CU function in the ATRRS.
(5) In cases where CLPMs do not have access to ATRRS CU screens, the Army SPM will input re-
quirements on their behalf. Units unable to access CU screens will provide Army SPM with a standard-
ized SMDR spreadsheet submission consisting of QS, component code, course code, and number of
seats requested. Contact the Army SPM with QS issues or general CU screen inquiries.
(6) USAHRC, FAO, and USAR QS managers determine their DLIFLC and DLI–W basic language
training seat requirements. DLIFLC language training seat requests should align with the National De-
fense Strategy and component fill requirements.
(7) An increase of any DLIFLC training seat requirement that is over 10 percent or a decrease that is
over 20 percent requires additional justification.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 24
(8) In addition to requesting CLPM basic course MTTs, CLPMs are encouraged to request foreign lan-
guage MTTs for their assigned linguists. DLIFLC offers language training MTTs in 2-, 4-, and 5-week ses-
sions. These MTTs count toward annual SLTE training, typically at little or no cost to the unit.
(9) In August of each year, after the CU screens have closed, the Army SPM will participate in the an-
nual DCS, G– 3/5/7’s SMDR meeting to negotiate the Army’s DLIFLC training seat and MTT require-
ments. SMDR meeting attendees include the Army SPM, the USAHRC QS manager, component QS
managers, and the FAO QS manager only. DCS, G –3/5/7 publishes the SMDR results within 180 days
after the meeting.
(10) QS managers who develop additional DLIFLC and DLI–W language training seat requirements
after the SMDR has closed may attempt to acquire additional language training seats using the quarterly
TRAP process.
(11) CLPMs who develop MTT requirements after the SMDR process has concluded may coordinate
with the DLIFLC Scheduling Branch Chief to determine if DLIFLC can accommodate their MTT request.
b. National Cryptologic University requirements call.
(1) NCU conducts an annual requirements call during the third quarter of each FY for the following FY.
(2) Submit all NCU training requirements using ACD’s Language Training Tool (LTT). The NCU team
notifies CLPMs of the specific due date for the requirements call. CLPMs are strongly encouraged to sub-
mit for every possible training scenario to ensure their requirements are considered. Once all language
training requirements are received, NCU produces the language training schedule for the next FY accord-
ing to service language training requests.
(3) Soldiers wanting to attend NCU language training must meet the language proficiency require-
ments of the language course requested.
(4) NCU has specific nomenclature aligned to course levels. Resources with complete nomenclature
guides are in the ACD LTT resources folder. Generally, course names are a four-letter language code
with a four-digit level indicator. For example, RUSS2099 is the requirement for Russian Basic Enhance-
ment or ILR 2; RUSS2154, RUSS3500, and RUSS4129 are next in succession on the Russian training
pathway for NCU.
(5) NCU has no cost, other than travel expenses, if a Soldier is not co-located with a schoolhouse.
c. Vendor requirements call. Consider executing training requirements that cannot be fulfilled by exist-
ing contract instruction, DLIFLC MTTs, DLIFLC LTDs, Defense Language and National Security Educa-
tion Office subsidized training opportunities (Concordia and so forth), or NCU training using external lan-
guage training vendors. CLPMs submit external vendor training requirements to their higher headquar-
ters, which maintains the organization’s TALP budget, for funding consideration.
Section II
Resident Language Training
3–3. Resident foreign language training
The DLIFLC provides full-time basic language acquisition training for the DoD. DLIFLC conducts most
resident basic course instruction at the Presidio of Monterey, California, however members of the De-
fense Attaché Service, Soldiers (second term and above), FAOs, and DA Civilians studying less com-
monly taught languages (LCTLs) are trained in other government or commercial facilities under the auspi-
ces of DLIFLC’s Washington, DC office. DLIFLC designs basic language acquisition courses to train to
ILR L2/R2/S1+ proficiency. Intermediate and advanced language courses are designed to train to ILR
L2+/R2+/S2 and ILR L3/R3/S2+ respectively. ARSOF Soldiers (CMF and areas of concentration (AOCs)
18, 37, 38) are trained to ILR L1+/R1+ or S1+ at USAJFKSWCS.
3–4. Qualifications for Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center training
a. All military applicants must have successfully completed high school or have a General Education
Development (GED) equivalent.
b. All military applicants must possess a qualifying DLAB score or equivalent for the language in which
training is sought as defined in paragraph 2 –5.
c. If applying for intermediate or advanced language training, all military applicants must submit a DA
Form 330 (Language Proficiency Questionnaire) dated within the last 12 months, reflecting the following
proficiency scores in the language for which training is requested:
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 25
(1) For intermediate language training, L2/R2.
(2) For advanced language training, L2+/R2+.
d. Soldiers desiring to attend another basic language acquisition course must have graduated from a
DLIFLC basic language acquisition course or were recruited for their language (ACASP) and have a cur-
rent proficiency score of L2/R2 (or S2 on the OPI if no written DLPT is available) or higher.
e. All military applicants must possess a physical profile series of 1 in the speaking factor and the mini-
mum hearing acuity of 2 in each ear in the hearing factor.
f. All military applicants must meet the height and weight standards in AR 600– 9 or AR 40–501.
g. Officers and warrant officers must—
(1) Be selected by their Branch, except those assigned to ARSOF (civil affairs (CA), psychological op-
erations (PSYOPS), and Special Forces Branches). All ARSOF officers are language-capable and re-
quired to attend language training.
(2) Have enough time-in-service remaining after language training to complete their service obligation
as outlined in AR 350 –100.
h. Enlisted Soldiers must—
(1) Have completed initial military training (except those receiving language training as a prerequisite
for AIT).
(2) Waive enlistment or re-enlistment commitments according to AR 601–280.
i. DA DCIPS Civilians must—
(1) Have successfully completed high school or possess a GED equivalent.
(2) Have the requirement for a foreign language documented in their PD (except for MICECP civilians).
(3) Possess a qualifying DLAB score or other qualifying test score as defined in paragraph 2–5, or an
approved DLAB waiver.
(4) Submit DA Form 330 dated within the last 12 months reflecting the following proficiency scores in
the language for which intermediate and advanced language training is requested:
(a) For intermediate, L2/R2.
(b) For advanced, L2+/R2+.
3–5. Preparation and submission of Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center
training applications
a. Regular Army officers and warrant officers. Officers and warrant officers may submit a PAR re-
questing language training to the Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (EPF – F–LANG),
1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY 40122 –5680, except as indicated in paragraphs 3–6h
and 3–6i.
b. All Regular Army enlisted Soldiers. Applications for DLIFLC training (must include DLAB scores or
equivalent) are prepared on a PAR and processed according to DA Pam 600 –8. Send the PAR to the
Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (EPF – F–LANG), 1600 Spearhead Division Ave-
nue, Fort Knox, KY 40122–5680.
c. All Reserve Component personnel. Submit applications according to AR 135– 200.
d. Nineteen-week intermediate and advanced courses at National Cryptologic University language
centers. Servicemembers should work with their CLPMs to submit a training requirement through the
ACD’s LTT. Once the NCU approves the requirement, CLPMs submit completed, signed ATRRS enroll-
ment forms to the appropriate schoolhouse point of contact. To increase fill rates in these courses, units
may work with their unit career counselor and Chief of the Enlisted Language Branch at USAHRC to pro-
cess a 12-month tour stabilization, extend, or re-enlist to meet the ADSO. Intent is for Servicemembers to
attend these courses locally to avoid temporary duty (TDY) costs and limit time apart from their family.
e. Nineteen-week intermediate and advanced courses at Defense Language Institute Foreign Lan-
guage Center.
(1) Unit commanders may also send Soldiers to DLIFLC to attend intermediate or advanced language
training and use TALP funds to pay for the training. The DCS, G– 2 funds a limited number of Soldiers to
attend the DLIFLC intermediate and advanced courses on a first come, first served basis. The unit com-
mander should coordinate with the Chief of the Army Foreign Language Team for funding. The Chief of
the Army Foreign Language Team will fund the TDY costs. RC units must pay all pay and allowances.
(2) Drill sergeants and MLIs assigned to DLIFLC should attend either intermediate or advanced lan-
guage training prior to permanent change of station (PCS). MLIs should attend intermediate/advanced
language training prior to assuming platform instruction duties and drill sergeants should attend either
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 26
intermediate or advanced language training prior to departure from DLIFLC. USAHRC will extend the
MLIs and drill sergeants to ensure they can attend these courses.
3–6. Individuals ineligible for resident language training
The following categories of personnel may not apply for resident language training:
a. Soldiers who fail to meet time-in-service remaining requirements (see AR 614– 200 and AR
601– 280).
b. Transient personnel and patients.
c. Individuals under court-martial charge.
d. Individuals serving on stabilized assignments (unless the application for training is for a time after
termination of the stabilized assignment).
e. Enlisted Soldiers attending courses at Army Service schools (unless training is in a language-capa-
ble MOS).
f. Personnel in overseas commands (unless the course is scheduled to begin after the overseas ser-
vice tour is completed). This does not apply to the intermediate and advanced language courses taught at
DLIFLC since they are TDY and return courses.
g. Individuals processing for discharge.
h. Personnel flagged for any reason.
i. Previous graduates of a DLIFLC basic language acquisition course who have a current proficiency
score below L2/R2 cannot attend an additional a foreign language basic acquisition course.
j. RA officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers who did not complete a DLIFLC basic language
acquisition course because they failed to achieve the DLIFLC graduation standard of a 2.0 grade point
average (GPA) and a minimum L2/R2/S1+ proficiency score. RA personnel who failed the DLIFLC basic
language acquisition course may request a waiver from the CG, USAHRC (EPF– F– LANG).
k. USAR officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers who did not complete a DLIFLC basic lan-
guage acquisition course because they failed to achieve the minimum DLIFLC graduation standard of a
2.0 GPA and a minimum L2/R2/S1+ proficiency score. USAR personnel who failed the DLIFLC basic lan-
guage acquisition course may request a waiver from the first general officer in their chain of command.
l. ARNG officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers who do not complete a DLIFLC basic language
acquisition course because they failed to achieve the minimum DLIFLC graduation standard of a 2.0 GPA
and a minimum L2/R2/S1+ proficiency score.
m. Personnel whose records are under suspension of favorable personnel actions.
n. RA, ARNG, and USAR officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers who did not complete a
DLIFLC course due to a lack of effort, misconduct, or a violation of school policy are permanently ineligi-
ble to attend resident DLIFLC language training.
3–7. Failure to meet minimum proficiency levels at Defense Language Institute Foreign Language
Center sponsored language acquisition courses
a. Failure to meet minimum proficiency levels at DLIFLC sponsored courses.
(1) Regular Army. The Chief of Military Intelligence (MI) is the MOS proponent and has the authority,
in coordination with the Commander, 229th MI Battalion and Director, USAHRC Enlisted Language
Branch (EPF– F– LANG), to determine the disposition of Soldiers who do not meet DLIFLC graduation
standards. Soldiers who do not achieve DLIFLC graduation standards may receive a prerequisite waiver
for foreign language proficiency to attend a language-dependent AIT MOS school. If the decision is made
to reclassify the Soldier, the 229th MI Battalion coordinates with the Chief of the Enlisted Language
Branch (EPF– F– LANG) to approve all reclassification actions for RA Soldiers.
(2) U.S. Army Reserve. For USAR non-initial entry training Soldiers, the DLIFLC USAR liaison officer
will communicate the failure and DLIFLC recommendation to the CLPM of the Soldier’s unit. The unit’s
CLPM coordinates with the commander to determine the final disposition of the Soldier. For initial entry
training Soldiers, the DLIFLC USAR liaison officer communicates with the Chief, USAR, G – 1 Accessions
and Training Branch to determine the final disposition of the Soldier.
(3) Department of the Army Civilians. DA Civilians’ supervisors will consult with their servicing Civilian
Personnel Advisory Center (CPAC) office regarding DA Civilians who fail to meet required proficiency
standards.
b. The Commander, 229th MI Battalion will coordinate with the following organizations before moving a
Soldier to a different language training course:
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 27
(1) Regular Army. Chief of the Enlisted Language Branch (EPF– F– LANG).
(2) Army National Guard. The CNGB.
(3) U.S. Army Reserve. Military Intelligence Readiness Command for MI MOSs and USACAPOC for
AOC 37A, MOS 37F, AOCs 38A and 38G, and MOS 38B.
c. Reclassify Soldiers who do not meet graduation standards and do not receive a waiver to attend a
language-dependent MOS school according to the needs of the Army.
3–8. Duty status while attending Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center training
a. Those selected for language training courses of 20 weeks or more are assigned on a PCS as fol-
lows:
(1) Assign Soldiers attending courses at the Presidio of Monterey to the 229th MI Battalion, DLIFLC,
Presidio of Monterey, California, 93944– 5006. Soldiers must report for enrollment during normal duty
hours on or before the report date specified on their orders.
(2) Assign students attending DLI–Washington who are not attaché trainees to the Headquarters Com-
pany, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Myer, VA 22211– 5009. They must report for enrollment to the DLI–
Washington Office, Zachary Taylor Building, 2530 Crystal Drive, Suite 1600, Arlington, VA 22202.
(3) Assign officer and warrant officer attaché trainees who receive language training under the auspi-
ces of the DLIFLC Washington Office to the U.S. Army Field Support Center (IASV– P), Fort Meade, MD
20755–5905. They must report for enrollment to the DLIFLC Washington Office, Zachary Taylor Building,
2530 Crystal Drive, Suite 1600, Arlington, VA 22202.
b. Assign Soldiers selected for language training of less than 20 weeks as TDY enroute to a new as-
signment or TDY and return to their unit.
Section III
Command Language Program Policy
3–9. Nonresident foreign language training
In accordance with DoDD 5160.41E and DoDI 5160.70, the administration of nonresident foreign lan-
guage programs is the responsibility of unit commanders. The Commandant, DLIFLC exercises technical
control of nonresident foreign language training and provides materials for nonresident training. Units may
also use other training materials or systems approved by DLIFLC, ACOM, ASCC, or DRU CLPMs. Submit
all requests to establish new contract language training programs for approval through email to the SPM
(usarmy.pentagon.hqda-dcs-g-2.list.foreign-language-office@army.mil).
3–10. Unit training: command language programs
a. Commanders with Soldiers in language-dependent and language-capable MOSs will establish a
CLP that provides foreign language remedial, refresher, sustainment, and enhancement training pro-
grams designed to increase foreign language proficiency. See appendixes C and D for useful information
on establishing and managing a CLP. Submit requests to establish new contract language training pro-
grams through the TALP Program Manager to the DCS, G– 2 for approval. Failure to gain DCS, G– 2 ap-
proval before establishing a contract language training program may result in the loss of TALP funding for
the command.
(1) For the RA, training in their CLANG is the priority for all language-dependent and language-capable
Soldiers with SQI L. Do not train additional languages until the Soldier completes a 160 consecutive
hours SLTE and successfully passes their DLPT/OPI (for his or her CLANG). Native/heritage speakers
recruited for their language capability who are serving in a language-dependent or language-capable
MOS may substitute English language training for target language training.
(2) For the RC, all language-dependent and language-capable officers, warrant officers, and enlisted
Soldiers are required to complete an 80 consecutive hours SLTE annually in their CLANG. Training in the
CLANG is the priority for all language-dependent and language-capable Soldiers with SQI L. Do not train
Soldiers in an additional language until they complete their 80 consecutive hours SLTE in their CLANG
and pass their DLPT/OPI.
(3) Officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers who are assigned to a language coded position but
are not linguists (have not been trained or assessed for foreign language proficiency) are exempt from the
160 consecutive hours (80 consecutive hours for RC) annual language training requirement.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 28
(4) FAO and ARSOF linguists must complete an 80 consecutive hours SLTE in their CLANG annually.
b. Commanders will not expend TALP funding or other designated language training funds on Soldiers
who are within 180 days of separation from the Army unless they are enlisting in the ARNG or the USAR
in a language-dependent or language-capable MOS. Commanders must also ensure that Soldiers meet
service remaining requirements timelines in accordance with AR 614 –200.
c. DA Civilians in language coded positions can use the online resources defined in appendix E of this
pamphlet for language sustainment training. Process requests for resident language instruction through
DA Civilian personnel training channels. CLPMs cannot use TALP to fund DA Civilian language acquisi-
tion or sustainment training.
3–11. Mandatory command language program requirements
At a minimum, ACOM, ASCC, DRU, and unit CLPs must satisfy the following criteria:
a. Command driven. The CLP is a commander’s program and should show evidence of command em-
phasis, support, and involvement.
b. Objectives. The CLPs must have clearly stated quantifiable objectives. A CLP’s objectives should
address both global and technical language skills. Express these objectives as mission essential or criti-
cal tasks.
c. Command language program manager. The ACOM, ASCC, DRU, and units with language-depend-
ent and language-capable MOSs or language coded positions must have a designated CLPM. Ideally, the
CLPM is one of the unit’s senior linguists who is a staff sergeant or above who can also serve as a lin-
guist mentor and advisor. The CLPM may also be a DA Civilian, preferably with experience as a military
linguist, who is knowledgeable of the CLP. Contractors can serve as a CLPM. However, Army policies
and responsibilities prescribed in this regulation do not apply to contractor CLPMs unless the applicable
contract or agreement explicitly incorporates the provisions of this regulation. Units may use TALP to hire
contractors to fill CLPM positions for units with 70 or more linguists authorized.
d. Commander's command language program responsibilities. Commanders of units with 70 or more
linguists authorized will establish a full-time CLPM position with a specified job description to manage
their language training program.
e. Command Language Council. The CLC is an optional meeting however, high performing CLPs rou-
tinely convene a CLC to effectively manage language training. The purpose of the CLC is to promote lin-
guistic excellence through the sharing of ideas and information and to prioritize training. Units with 70 or
more authorized language coded positions should establish a CLC to manage their CLP. The CLC should
include Soldiers from each of a unit’s languages and MOSs and representatives from all sub-units with
linguists. The make-up of the CLC is up to the commander however, the commander, command sergeant
major (CSM), S – 1, S – 2, S – 3, S – 4, and the resource manager should attend if their schedule permits.
The CLC should meet quarterly and be chaired by a Soldier or DA Civilian CLPM. A contract CLPM can-
not chair a CLC.
f. Command language program documentation. The CLPM is responsible for maintaining required
CLP documentation (see app A), the ACD, the CLP standard operating procedures (SOPs), and the CLP
files. AR See 25 –400 –2 for records retention information.
(1) At a minimum, CLPs must have on hand their CLP command guidance and electronic access to all
publications listed in appendix A. Units may access the publications on the Army Publishing Directorate
website at https://armypubs.army.mil/.
(2) Each unit with assigned/authorized language-dependent or language-capable MOS Soldiers, DA
Civilians with language recorded in their PD, or Soldiers who received language training at government
expense will have an identified and filled CLPM position. Appoint all CLPMs in writing. The CLPM position
will be at a level of authority within the organizational structure that is compatible with the language re-
quirements of the unit’s mission. The CLPM will screen all incoming personnel for language skills. The
CLPM will attend the DLIFLC resident or nonresident CLPM course or equivalent course (USASOC or
NSA CLPM course) within 6 months of appointment. Those CLPMs who manage Consolidated Crypto-
logic Program funded linguists will also attend the Cryptologic Language Training Manager (CLTM)–7100
course. Soldiers will not use TALP funds to attend the CLTM–7100 or the USASOC CLPM course. Units
will request CLPM course attendance through ATRRS. Units may use TALP funds to pay for DLIFLC
CLPM training.
(3) The Chief of INSCOM’s Language Training Division is responsible for maintaining the ACD and the
NSA/CSS CHANDELIER linguist database for all Army MOS 35P Soldiers. ACOM/ASCC/DRU level
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 29
CLPMs will coordinate directly with the Chief of INSCOM G–3’s Language Training Division (IOAP– TRL)
to facilitate CHANDELIER updates or ACD training/help desk support.
(4) The INSCOM CLPM will also coordinate with the NCU personnel to coordinate training seats for all
NCU LTD intermediate and advanced language training courses. Units supporting an NSA mission
should submit their intermediate and advanced language training requirements to the INSCOM G3/7 not
later than 15 May each year.
(5) All CLPMs will develop and publish a SOP covering all aspects of the unit CLP. Base the CLP SOP
upon higher headquarters’ CLP SOP, commander’s guidance, and Army policy. The SOP includes infor-
mation on language training requirements and procedures and all other information necessary for pro-
gram continuity. The CLP SOP will be part of the overall unit SOP. CLPMs maintain a separate point of
contact roster within the SOP to identify local and higher headquarter CLPMs. CLPMs review the CLP
SOP at least every 2 years and publish changes based upon higher-level guidance to ensure the unit
SOP reflects the most current information.
3–12. Command language program required reporting
There are two categories of required reporting for all CLPs:
a. The TALP reports required by the TALP manager, as required by paragraph 7 –6, for units receiving
TALP funds.
b. The CLP reporting through the ACOM, ASCC, and DRU to DLIFLC as required by AR
350– 20/OPNAVINST 1550.13/AFI 35 – 4004/MCO 1550.4E.
Section IV
Managing Linguists
3–13. Managing enlisted linguists
The Army manages linguists based on the following three categories: personnel in language-dependent
MOSs, personnel in language-capable MOSs, and personnel possessing a foreign language capability
not related to their MOS.
a. Language-dependent MOSs are 35P (Signals Intelligence Voice Interceptor) and 35M (Human Intel-
ligence Collector).
(1) Not all 35M Soldiers are language-dependent. RA and ARNG 35M Soldiers that the Army did not
enlist under the ACASP or did not have language specified in enlistment or reenlistment contracts are
grandfathered. Grandfathered 35M Soldiers have LIC codes of either YY or ZK. Grandfathered 35Ms are
not required to attend annual sustainment language training or maintain language proficiency to remain
MOS qualified. RA and ARNG 35M Soldiers who graduated from DLIFLC or were recruited for their lan-
guage are considered language-dependent Soldiers and are subject to the provisions of this regulation.
USAR 35M Soldiers who signed a contract prior to 30 September 2022 are grandfathered (unless lan-
guage was included in their enlistment contract). Grandfathered USAR 35M Soldiers are language-capa-
ble for the duration of their career. USAR 35M Soldiers who enter service after 1 October 2022 are lan-
guage-dependent and are subject to the provisions of this regulation.
(2) Career branch managers and unit commanders must closely monitor the training, assignment, and
utilization of language-dependent MOS Soldiers to ensure their career development stresses the progres-
sive acquisition and use of higher-level language skills. Incorporate intermediate and advanced language
courses into their career progression at every opportunity. All language-dependent Soldiers should attend
intermediate or advanced language training as soon as possible after their first enlistment.
b. Language-capable MOSs are:
(1) 00Z (limited to those with an 18, 37, and 38 CMF background or feeder MOS of 35P or 35M).
(2) 35Z (if the feeder MOS was 35P or 35M).
(3) CMFs 18, 37, and 38 series Soldiers.
c. Identify personnel trained in a foreign language in preparation for a specific assignment as a linguist
after their initial use and for subsequent linguist assignments. However, the attainment of a language skill
should not block or hinder the individual’s normal pattern for career development in their primary military
occupational specialty (PMOS) or CMF.
d. Utilization of personnel found by voluntary testing and self-identification to meet routine or contin-
gency language requirements will depend on the overall needs of the Army and the individual’s language
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 30
proficiency and availability. The primary reason for identifying such individuals is for potential use in na-
tional emergencies or mobilization. These personnel may be eligible for reclassification into a language-
dependent or language-capable MOS; however, their language capability normally does not influence ca-
reer development within their PMOS or CMF.
3–14. Application for linguist assignments (enlisted linguists)
a. Regular Army. USAHRC Enlisted Language Branch manages assignments for language-dependent
MOSs 35M and 35P through the Assignment Satisfaction Key–Enlisted Module (ASK– EM) process
based on year, month, and availability date. Non-language-dependent Soldiers who desire an assignment
to a language coded position must contact their Enlisted Management Branch upon notification that they
will be placed into the enlisted market as part of the enlisted manning cycle.
b. U.S. Army Reserve. USAR Soldiers who are duty MOS qualified and have a qualifying DLAB score
may apply for a linguist assignment/language training by submitting a request through command chan-
nels to the Commander, Military Intelligence Readiness Command (AFRC – MIR –OPTL), 8831 John J.
Kingman Drive, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060. CA and PSYOPS Soldiers should submit their requests through
command channels to Commander, U.S. Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command
(AFRC–CPC), 4037 Pratt Street, Building A 5585, Fort Bragg, NC 28310.
3–15. Training in additional languages
The minimum proficiency prerequisite to cross-train in an additional language is a current DLPT profi-
ciency rating of L2/R2 in the Soldier’s currently assigned CLANG (L2/R2/S1+ for 35M Soldiers). These
cross-training prerequisites do not apply to GREAT SKILL personnel, ARSOF personnel, or to FA 48 of-
ficers.
a. Upon completion of cross-training, the linguist must take the DLPT and/or OPI.
b. Change CLANGs in accordance with paragraph 2–8c.
c. Cross-training is not the same as language acquisition training. Soldiers must demonstrate pre-ex-
isting proficiency in the language they are requesting cross-training in.
d. The DCS, G–2 is the approval authority for all requests to use TALP to fund cross-training involving
acquisition of a second language.
3–16. Managing officer and warrant officer linguists
a. Base officer and warrant officer linguist career development on confirmed requirements. Administer
under the OPMS specialties or warrant officer MOS.
b. Designated warrant officer MOSs and officer AOCs with language requirements are:
(1) Language-dependent. FAs 47A, 47G, and 48 series officers.
(2) Language-capable. 351M, 351Y, 351Z, 352N (limited to those 352Ns who previously served in a
language-dependent MOS), 180A warrant officers, and AOCs 18, 37, and 38 series officers.
3–17. Officer, warrant officer, and enlisted linguist utilization
a. Upon completion of language training, assign individuals against the linguist authorizations for which
they were trained.
b. When requirements are canceled, assign individuals, when possible, to a position or location where
they can use their language capabilities.
c. Assign enlistment bonus and selective reenlistment bonus recipients against the MOS and language
requirements for which they received the bonus.
d. This utilization policy will not serve as a basis for preventing enlisted Soldiers from applying for
ROTC, Officer Candidate School, a direct commission, or warrant officer.
e. Utilization of enlisted Soldiers in language-capable MOSs and of officer and warrant officer linguists
to fill language requirements is determined on a case-by-case basis depending on the needs of the Army
and the impact on the individual’s professional development.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 31
Section V
Linguist Readiness Reporting
3–18. The Army Command Language Program Manager’s Database
a. Entries to the Army Command Language Program Manager’s Database. The ACD is the Army lin-
guist database of record. The INSCOM G–3 maintains the ACD for the Army. The unit CLPM is responsi-
ble for maintenance of the ACD at the unit level. Maintain the ACD for 100 percent of assigned language-
capable Soldiers, language-dependent Soldiers, and DA DCIPS civilian linguists. At the time of appoint-
ment, CLPMs will request an Air Force Portal account to gain access to the Joint CLPM Database and
obtain ACD administrative permissions. CLPMs attend training, as needed, to ensure compliance with da-
tabase maintenance requirements. Contact the Chief of INSCOM’s Language Training Branch to coordi-
nate for ACD training. The ACD will contain the following entries for each assigned linguist:
(1) Basic demographic data, including duty assignment, PMOS, and job title.
(2) Additional language training completed following DLIFLC graduation.
(3) Ongoing language training.
(4) Expiration term of service (ETS) and PCS dates.
(5) All future language training requirements (through LTT).
(6) FLPB written agreements.
(7) DA Form 330 for all DLPTs taken.
(8) Required DLPT retesting dates to prevent expiration of written agreement/FLPB.
(9) ILTPs including language maintenance and improvement objectives driven by the requirements of
the Soldier, manning tables, or authorizations.
b. Unit command language program database. The ACD database should match the individual lin-
guist’s personnel records on file at the servicing military personnel office or servicing civilian personnel
office. CLPMs will establish procedures and formats in the unit CLP SOP to ensure that the data remains
current and accurate. CLPMs maintain historical data in the ACD as a point of reference for measuring
changes in overall linguist proficiency from year to year and for assessing the effectiveness of the CLP.
The CLPM will maintain records of any ETPs/waivers granted. The ACD will also reflect all waivers and
deployments.
c. Command language program files. The CLP files will contain information reflecting DLPT testing,
training resource lists, the CLP SOP, TALP funding and budget information, ILTP arrival interview rec-
ords, maintenance, and remediation training, and SLTE training records.
d. Command language program training records. Units initiate an ACD training record containing the
items listed in paragraph 3–18a for each Soldier possessing a language capability they identify during in-
processing, regardless of MOS, duty assignment, or how acquired. Commands maintain the training rec-
ord at the lowest possible supervisory level (company or battalion CLPM).
e. Individual language training plans. Commanders will ensure that every linguist has an ILTP. CLPMs
in conjunction with the linguist’s direct supervisor and a language mentor should develop the ILTP for
each linguist that is tailored to meet the needs of the individual linguist. The ILTP assesses language pro-
ficiency and determines training needs, establishes training goals, develops short- and long-range train-
ing plans, and includes quarterly counseling statements. CLPMs and language mentors should closely
monitor the ILTP to assess language proficiency progress and recommend adjustments to training. Men-
tors and supervisors review ILTPs with their linguists at least quarterly. Language group leaders and unit
language instructors also validate and review the ILTP quarterly to ensure effectiveness and improve-
ment. ILTPs will reflect progress in all additional training performed. ILTP’s are subject to inspection un-
der the Organizational Inspection Program.
3–19. Unit status report
a. Commanders, who are authorized linguists, are required to report their linguist readiness status by
fit, fill, and proficiency (see Public Law 116 –92 and AR 220–1). Report linguist readiness status by the fit,
fill, and proficiency criteria in the personnel section of the net-centric unit status report. Fit means the cor-
rect language. Fill is defined as the correct MOS and grade. For example, if a 35P Soldier who speaks
Arabic is assigned to a Korean MTOE or TDA billet, they would not be counted as a filled language coded
billet because the Soldier is filling a billet that is not coded for Arabic. Proficiency is defined as the correct
aptitude as defined by the LPIND field on the unit’s MTOE or TDA.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 32
b. Report linguist readiness status by the fit, fill, and proficiency criteria in the personnel section of the
net-centric unit status report. In the status report window under the personnel tab, locate the LIC qualifica-
tion box by selecting the military strength dropdown and open the line on the MTOE or TDA (using the (+)
sign) for each language coded billet. For each Soldier, if fit, fill, and proficiency are met, check the box for
LIC Qualification located on the far right. If fit, fill, and proficiency are not all met, the LIC Qualification
block will remain unchecked.
3–20. Language-dependent military occupational specialty readiness reporting
Soldiers in a language-dependent MOS are only considered military occupational specialty qualified
(MOSQ) when they have completed the AIT for their MOS and have a current DLPT (within 12 months)
with a score meeting the Army’s minimum proficiency standards as outlined in paragraph 4–3. Language-
dependent Soldiers with sub-proficient DLPT scores are considered non-MOSQ if they have completed
remedial training, retaken the DLPT, and failed to achieve the minimum proficiency or have refused to at-
tend language remediation training in accordance with paragraph 2–5e. The provisions of this paragraph
do not apply to language-capable MOS Soldiers, as they do not have to maintain language proficiency to
remain MOSQ.
3–21. Contracting for language instruction
(1) This paragraph provides guidance to unit Commanders wo are considering contracting locally for
mission-required language training. Do not attempt to contract for non-mission or individual Soldier edu-
cation purposes.
(2) The following personnel may authorize a CLP instruction contract:
(a) ACOM, DRU, corps, and division senior commanders may authorize contract foreign language in-
struction.
(b) Only installation contracting officers (KOs) may negotiate with civilian contractors. This does not
apply to USASOC and Intelligence Community non-TALP funded contracts.
(3) The following rules apply to contracting:
(a) Contract for foreign language instruction for the language(s) matching the unit’s MTOE/TDA lan-
guage requirements. The purpose of this training is to provide remedial, refresher, sustainment, and en-
hancement training to Soldiers with previously acquired foreign language skills.
(b) The Dean of the DLIFLC School for Continuing Education (ATFL –SCE– FS) should, when possible,
authorize new contracts and the subsequent production of foreign language instructional materials.
(c) Inform the SPM prior to establishing a new contract. This is to ensure standardization and conform-
ity to existing Army regulations and policies.
(d) Commander should follow all applicable Federal Acquisition Regulations when contracting for for-
eign language training.
(e) Commanders must prepare a statement of work (SOW) and quality assurance surveillance plan in
accordance with local contracting policy.
(f) The completed SOW should be attached to DA Form 3953 (Purchase Request and Commitment)
and forwarded through command channels to the servicing procurement office or contracting agency.
(g) The contract and operation costs, including equipment requirements, maintenance, printing, and
reproduction, and duplication of audio or video tapes or other material is the unit Commanders responsi-
bility.
(h) KOs will ensure that contracts require vendors to certify in writing their employees language profi-
ciency. Contract instructors hired to provide foreign language instruction must have a foreign language
proficiency level of at least L3/R3.
(i) KOs will ensure that contracts require vendors to certify in writing their employees English language
proficiency. Contract foreign language instructors must have a 2+ or higher English fluency level (speak-
ing, listening, and reading).
(j) Instructors must have one or more years of prior experience teaching a foreign language to adult
English-speaking students, unless waived by terms of the contract.
(k) If the contractor intends to use original (not approved) foreign language materials for which there
may be a copyright question, obtain prior approval of these materials from your ACOM, ASCC, DRU
CLPM, or the SPM.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 33
(l) Appoint a contracting officer’s representative (COR). The COR is the person who developed the
contract SOW, prepares monthly progress reports, and gives briefings to the commander and staff, as
required.
(m) Units can identify local streamlined acquisition contract vehicles using the General Services Ad-
ministration language service schedule at https://www.gsa.gov.
(n) Units may use university programs that are available to the public without a contract. Use SF 182
(Authorization, Agreement, and Certification of Training) to pay for tuition costs.
Chapter 4
Foreign Language Proficiency Bonus
Section I
Foreign Language Proficiency Bonus
4–1. Foreign language proficiency bonus overview
a. This chapter prescribes policy for the administration of the FLPB Program for qualified RA, USAR,
and ARNG Soldiers.
b. The FLPB is a monthly monetary bonus paid to RA, ARNG, and USAR officers, warrant officers, and
enlisted Soldiers who maintain the required proficiency in designated languages.
c. Languages or specialties recommended for FLPB must satisfy the conditions prescribed by chapters
4, 5, and 6 of this regulation.
d. ASA (M&RA) and Chief, Compensation/Entitlements Division approve all pay, military compensa-
tion, and entitlements. DCS, G– 1 maintains the FLPB MDEP and POMs for FLPB funding.
e. Soldiers receive FLPB in addition to any other pay or allowances to which they are entitled.
f. Officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers authorized FLPB by MOS/Branch are eligible for
FLPB regardless of assignment.
g. The DCS, G–2 is the proponent for administrative and policy changes to the FLPB Program.
(1) Regular Army. Commanders of ACOMs may forward suggested FLPB policy/process changes to
the Deputy Chief of Staff, G –2 (DAMI–OIO), 1000 Army Pentagon, 2D382, Washington DC 20310 –1000
for consideration, with a copy furnished to ASA (M&RA) and DCS, G –1 (DAPE–PRC).
(2) National Guard Bureau. See paragraph 1–14q.
(3) U.S. Army Reserve. USAR commanders will forward requests through USARC G–1 (AFRC–PR),
and a copy to U.S. Army Reserve Command G–2 (AFRC –IN), Marshall Hall, 4710 Knox Street (Building
8 –1808), Fort Bragg, NC 28310 –3231.
h. The FLPB Program is authorized under the provisions of Section 353(b), Title 37, United States
Code (37 USC 353(b)). It is administered according to DoDI 1340.27 and DoD 7000.14 –R, Volume 7a.
i. A Soldier’s language proficiency is determined by the level of proficiency they possess in a foreign
language skill as certified by an approved ILR compliant testing method.
4–2. Criteria for individual Soldier eligibility for the foreign language proficiency bonus
a. Officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers of all components eligibility to receive FLPB begins
the date they successfully pass the DLPT at DLIFLC or an equivalent language school.
(1) A DLIFLC graduate’s FLPB eligibility is based on the MOS they are assigned. For example, a Sol-
dier assigned as a 35M who scores L2/R2/S2 on their final DLPT is eligible to draw $300 per month FLPB
in accordance with paragraph 4–3a and table 4–1.
(2) DLIFLC graduates assigned the 35P MOS will adhere to the guidance found in paragraph 4–3a
and table 4–1.
(3) 35M and 35P Soldiers (includes initial entry Soldiers and Soldiers who reclassify into these MOSs)
who complete AIT will complete a new 12-month written agreement in accordance with paragraph 2–
5b(4) when they report to their first operational unit.
(4) 35M and 35P Soldiers who fail to graduate from AIT and are reclassified or separated will have
their FLPB terminated immediately.
b. Warrant Officer Basic Course (WOBC) students whose feeder MOS was a language-dependent or
language-capable MOS who are designated for a language-dependent or language-capable warrant
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 34
officer specialty may continue to receive FLPB while attending the WOBC and are exempt from the re-
quirements to complete WOBC to be eligible for FLPB pay.
c. In addition to paragraphs 4–2a and 4–2b, RA Soldiers must––
(1) Be on active duty and entitled to basic pay.
(2) Be certified proficient within the past 12 months (24 months if the linguist scores L3/R3 or higher on
their DLPT/OPI) in their CLANG to be eligible for FLPB. Language-dependent and language-capable Sol-
diers may draw additional FLPB for demonstrated proficiency in a language listed on the ASLL the DCS,
G –2 publishes annually.
d. RC Soldiers must––
(1) Be assigned to a drilling TPU or IMA paid status, AGR, or on active duty operational support
(ADOS) orders.
(a) Soldiers serving on an ADOS tour that requires proficiency in a foreign language must ensure their
orders include the language required to receive FLPB.
(b) For FLPB purposes, the language specified in the ADOS orders will take priority over the CLANG
and the home station MTOE and/or TDA language coded billet. For example, if a Soldier who is proficient
in multiple languages with Arabic designated as their CLANG is mobilized, deployed, or ordered to active
duty to support a requirement for French, they will be paid FLPB for both French and their CLANG.
(c) Not be adjudicated as an unsatisfactory participant in the previous 12 months as defined in 10 USC
10147 and AR 135–91.
(2) Meet minimum annual service requirements for retirement eligibility pursuant to 10 USC 12732 dur-
ing the 12-month certification period for which FLPB was paid.
(a) For the ARNG, FLPB is prorated at the value of 2 percent for each retirement point less than 50
points. A Soldier who earns 25 retirement points during the 12-month certification period is entitled to 50
percent of the amount listed in the FLPB payment table. For example, an ARNG member who scores an
L2/R2 for his or her authorized language would receive an annual FLPB amount of $2,400 ($200 monthly)
for earning 50 retirement points in an anniversary year. However, if the ARNG member only amasses 25
points in his or her anniversary year, the member would only qualify to receive $1,200 ($100 monthly) for
the same period.
(b) For the USAR, Soldiers designated as unsatisfactory participants (as defined by AR 135–91) while
receiving FLPB will have their FLPB terminated and the entire amount recouped for the entire period doc-
umented on the written agreement.
(3) Not be required to have performed duty or received base pay in the month for which they are enti-
tled to FLPB and are not subject to the 1/30th rule.
(4) Be certified proficient within the past 12 months (24 months if the linguist scores 3/3 or higher on
the DLPT/OPI) in their CLANG. Language-capable/language-dependent Soldiers may draw additional
FLPB for demonstrated proficiency in a foreign language listed on the DCS, G–2 ASLL. When eligibility,
award, or termination of FLPB cannot be determined, forward the case with recommendations through
command channels to:
(a) For RA Soldiers, submit through Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command
(AHRC – PDP– I), 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Department 480, Fort Knox, KY 40122– 5408 or via
email to usarmy.knox.hrc.mbx.tagd-flpb@army.mil.
(b) For USAR Soldiers, submit through Commander, U.S. Army Reserve Command G–1 (AFRC–PR),
Marshall Hall, 4710 Knox St. (Building 8– 1808), Fort Bragg, NC 28310– 3231.
(c) For ARNG, see paragraph 1–14u.
4–3. Foreign language proficiency bonus proficiency requirements
All Soldiers must adhere to the requirements of this paragraph to draw FLPB by modality.
a. Soldiers who qualify for FLPB will draw pay by modality and use table 4–1 and the following guid-
ance to compute the amount of FLPB they are eligible to receive:
(1) Officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers who serve in a language-dependent/language-ca-
pable MOS (other than 35M, ARSOF CMFs and AOCs 18, 37, 38, USACAPOC CMFs and AOCs 37 and
38, and Soldiers assigned to an SFAB), occupy a language coded billet, or qualify for FLPB based on
their proficiency in a language on the ASLL must first score a minimum of 2 in the listening and reading
modality on the lower range DLPT to qualify for FLPB. To receive FLPB for all three modalities, these of-
ficers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers must score L3/R3 on the lower range DLPT to be eligible to
test in the speaking modality. Once the Soldier scores L3/R3 on the lower range DLPT, he or she is
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 35
eligible to take an OPI to show higher proficiency and to determine eligibility to draw FLPB for speaking.
The Soldier must score at least S2 on the OPI to qualify for additional FLPB. FAOs are required by DoDI
1315.20 to take an OPI every 2 years however, they only qualify for additional FLPB for Speaking if they
score L3/R3 on their DLPT.
(a) For example, a 35P scores L3/R2+ on his or her lower range DLPT. This Soldier is eligible to draw
FLPB at level 3 for listening and level 2+ for reading ($500 per month). The Soldier is not eligible to test
for additional FLPB for Speaking because they did not score L3/R3 on their DLPT.
(b) For example, a 35P Soldier scores L3/R3 on his or her lower range DLPT. This Soldier is eligible to
draw FLPB at level 3 for listening and level 3 for reading ($600 per month) and is eligible to test for
speaking. The Soldier takes the OPI and scores S2. This 35P Soldier is eligible to draw FLPB for all three
modalities ($700).
(2) 35M Soldiers must score a minimum of L2/R2/S1+ in all three modalities to maintain MOS qualifi-
cation and be eligible to draw FLPB. 35M Soldiers who score 2 or higher in all three modalities
(L2/R2/S2) are eligible to draw FLPB for all three modalities because MOS 35M is the only Army MOS
that requires a Soldier to maintain a speaking proficiency to maintain MOS qualification. 35M Soldiers
may take the DLPT and OPI tests in any sequence; however, Soldiers are strongly encouraged to coordi-
nate with their CLPM to take the OPI first due to the length of time it takes to schedule this test. 35M Sol-
diers must complete both their DLPT (listening and reading modalities) within 30 days for these scores to
count as a valid test. 35M Soldiers have an additional 30 days to complete their OPI. The date for FLPB
purposes is the date the 35M Soldier completes their third modality. All three modalities must be com-
pleted prior to the expiration of the written agreement.
(a) For example, a 35M Soldier scores L2/R2/S2 on the lower range DLPT and OPI. This Soldier is eli-
gible to draw FLPB for level 2 for listening, 2 for reading, and 2 for speaking ($300 per month).
(b) For example, a 35M Soldier scores L3/R3/S1+ on the lower range DLPT and OPI. The Soldier is
eligible to draw FLPB for level 3 for listening and level 3 for reading only ($600 per month). While this
35M is MOS qualified, the Soldier is not eligible to draw FLPB for the speaking modality because they did
not score a level 2 or higher in speaking on their OPI.
(3) ARSOF, USACAPOC, and SFAB Soldiers must obtain a minimum score of 1+/1+ to qualify for
FLPB. To receive FLPB for all three modalities, ARSOF (AOCs and CMFs 18, 37, and 38S, 38R, 38W,
38Z, and 180A warrant officers), USACAPOC (AOCs 37A, 38A, and 38G and CMFs 37F and 38B), and
SFAB officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers, must score L2/R2 or higher on the lower range
DLPT and S2 on the OPI to qualify for FLPB for all three modalities. ARSOF Soldiers testing in all three
modalities must complete both their DLPT (listening and reading modalities) within 30 days for these
scores to count as a valid test. ARSOF Soldiers then have an additional 30 days to complete their OPI.
The date for FLPB purposes is the date they complete their third modality test. All three modalities must
be completed prior to the expiration of the written agreement.
(a) For example, an ARSOF Soldier scores L2/R2 on his or her lower range DLPT. This Soldier is eligi-
ble to draw FLPB at level 2 for listening and level 2 for reading ($200 per month). If the Soldier scores an
S2 on the OPI, then he or she would be eligible for a total payment of $300 per month. ARSOF,
USACAPOC, and SFAB Soldiers may take the DLPT and OPI tests in any sequence. See paragraph 4–
3b for guidance on FLPB eligibility for ARSOF Soldiers who take the TSOPI.
(b) All other language-dependent or language-capable officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers
assigned to ARSOF must comply with paragraphs 4–3a(1) and 4–3a(2) to determine the amount of FLPB
they are eligible to receive.
b. Only ARSOF personnel (AOCs and CMFs 18, 37, and 38S, 38R, 38W, 38Z, and 180A warrant offic-
ers) are authorized to take a TSOPI to qualify for FLPB. ARSOF Soldiers taking a TSOPI will draw FLPB
for proficiency in the listening and speaking modalities only. They would not be able to receive FLPB for
all three modalities unless they take both the listening and reading portions of the lower range DLPT and
an OPI. For example, an ARSOF Soldier who scores S2 on a TSOPI is authorized FLPB at the L2/S2
rate. If the Soldier who takes a TSOPI wants to draw FLPB for all three modalities, he or she must take
both the listening and reading portions of the lower range DLPT and an OPI and must score at least a
minimum of L2/R2/S2 to draw FLPB for all three modalities.
c. Proficiency expires on the last day of the month in which the DLPT was taken 1 year later. For ex-
ample, a DLPT taken on 5 January 2024 would expire on 31 January 2025. For those scoring 3/3 or
higher on their DLPT and/or OPI, their proficiency would expire on the last day of the month in which the
DLPT/OPI is taken 2 years later. For example, a DLPT/OPI taken by a Soldier scoring 3/3 on 25 March
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 36
2024 would expire on 31 March 2026. The 31 March 2026 date should be recorded on the Soldiers writ-
ten agreement. Soldiers must complete all testing prior to the expiration of their written agreement to con-
tinue to receive uninterrupted FLPB.
d. Soldiers must test annually (24 months if they score 3/3 or higher on their DLPT/OPI) using the
lower range DLPT, the DLPT5 –CA, and/or the OPI to be considered proficient for FLPB purposes.
e. Use of a corresponding modality from a different dialect of the same language may be required.
Currently all Arabic languages/dialects require the AD reading modality in addition to the listening modal-
ity (in dialect). Portuguese-Brazilian (PQ) and Portuguese-European (PT) have a common Portuguese
(PY) reading modality. Soldiers taking the Chinese-Cantonese (CC) listening DLPT are required to take
the Chinese-Mandarin reading DLPT. Both the listening and reading tests must be taken within 30 days to
be considered a valid test. Qualified Soldiers testing in additional languages/dialects where a common
reading DLPT is required (for example, AD reading and Levantine listening; Chinese-Mandarin reading
and Chinese-Cantonese listening) are only authorized FLPB for the common reading modality one time.
For example, a 35P Soldier with AD as their CLANG tests on the AD DLPT and achieves scores of L3/R3.
This same 35P Soldier tests on both the Yemeni and Levantine listening DLPTs and achieves scores of
L2 (Yemeni) and L2+ (Levantine). This 35P Soldier is authorized FLPB at the following rates: AD $600
($300 for each 3 achieved), Yemeni $100 (L2), and Levantine $200 (L2+). This 35P Soldier will receive
FLPB in the amount of $900 monthly.
f. Base the effective date and termination of the FLPB payments on the date in which the second (or
third) modality is tested and requirements in paragraph 4 –2 are met. FLPB certification will expire 1 year
from the last day of the month after testing (2 years if the Soldier scores a 3/3). Take the two modalities
within 30 days of each other for the test to be valid. For example, if a 35P Soldier tests in listening on 2
January 2024 and tests on reading on 5 January 2024, then the certification will expire on 31 January
2025 (L3/R3 linguists test every 24 months so their certification would expire on 31 January 2026).
g. Soldiers eligible to take the upper range DLPT or a third modality must complete the upper range or
third modality within 30 days of completing the lower range DLPT. Soldiers scoring above an L3/R3 on
the upper range or an S3 on the third modality will have their FLPB effective date equal the date of quali-
fying for the higher rate of FLPB and will terminate on the last day of the month 2 years from when they
achieved the higher proficiency.
h. FLPB payment for multiple foreign languages or dialects and ILR skill levels may not exceed the an-
nual legal limit of $12,000 per individual for a 12-month period in accordance with 37 USC 353. Soldiers
may receive an FLPB up to $1,000 per month for multiple languages (see DoDI 1340.27).
i. PMOS/Branch 37 Soldiers assigned to the USAR and USAR AOC 38A and MOS 38B Soldiers as-
signed to GPF (non-ARSOF) units are eligible to receive FLPB at the 1+/1+ rate. While assigned to a
GPF unit, USAR AOC/CMF 37, AOC 38A, and MOS 38B Soldiers must use the GPF ASLL to determine
eligibility for additional FLPB.
j. Non-ARSOF Soldiers assigned to an ARSOF unit must use the GPF ASLL to determine eligibility for
additional FLPB.
Table 4 – 1
Foreign language proficiency bonus monthly payments by modality
ILR Skill–Level
Proficiency
L
$/month
R
$/month
S
$/month
1+1 80 80 80
2 100 100 100
2+ 200 200 200
3 300 300 300
3+ 350 350 350
4 or higher 400 400 400
Legend:
L = Listening
R = Reading
S = Speaking
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 37
Notes:
1 Qualified Soldiers only. See chapter 5 to determine if you qualify for sub-2/2 proficiency FLPB. Payments for multiple languages cannot exceed
$1,000 per month total/$12,000 for a 12-month period.
4–4. Eligibility for foreign language proficiency bonus payments
Soldiers must meet one of the following criteria to qualify for FLPB:
a. Be any PMOS or Branch designated as language-dependent or language-capable in accordance
with paragraph 4 –6.
b. Be assigned to a language coded billet on the unit’s MTOE/TDA as verified through FMSWeb, at-
tending or providing instruction in a professional military education (PME) course requiring foreign lan-
guage proficiency, or participating in the Military Personnel Exchange Program (MPEP).
c. Be certified proficient for one or more of the languages on the current ASLL classified as immediate
investment, emerging, or enduring.
d. Be supporting a contingency operation or rotation of forces in accordance with paragraph 4 –11 of
this regulation.
e. Be assigned to an SFAB.
4–5. Prevalent in the Force languages
a. Prevalent in the Force languages are not a training priority for the Army since the Army has suffi-
cient language capability resident in the force. Refer to the ASLL for a list of Prevalent in the Force lan-
guages.
b. Pay FLPB to Soldiers who demonstrate proficiency in a Prevalent in the Force language if one of the
following applies:
(1) Assigned to a language coded billet.
(2) Attending PME (where the Prevalent in the Force language is spoken).
(3) Providing instruction in a PME course.
(4) Participating in the MPEP as outlined in paragraph 4 –7.
(5) Language-dependent or language-capable MOS/Branches identified in paragraph 4 –6 with a Prev-
alent in the Force language as a CLANG.
4–6. Language-dependent and language-capable military occupational specialties and branches
for foreign language proficiency bonus purposes
The following MOSs, CMFs, and Branches (of all components) are language-dependent or language-ca-
pable for FLPB purposes:
a. Enlisted: PMOS 18, 35M, 35P, 35Z (who were previously a 35M or 35P), 37, and 38. CSMs desig-
nated as PMOS 00Z with a 35M, 35P, 18, 37, or 38 CMF background.
b. Warrant officer: MOS 180A, 351M, 351Y, 351Z, and 352N (limited to 352Ns who previously served
in a language-dependent MOS).
c. Officer: FA 47A, 47G, FA 48. AOCs 18, 37, and 38.
d. Only award CLANGs to PMOSs/Branches/AOCs identified in paragraphs 4–6a through 4–6c. Lan-
guage-dependent and language-capable PMOSs will receive FLPB for their CLANG as outlined in para-
graphs 2–8, and 4– 3. Pay additional FLPB for languages on the ASLL provided minimum proficiency is
met in accordance with paragraph 4– 3.
e. FA 48 officers are authorized to maintain multiple CLANGs as approved by the FAO proponent.
f. Military personnel (MOS immaterial) assigned to the GREAT SKILL Program are authorized to re-
ceive FLPB and maintain multiple CLANGs as approved by the GREAT SKILL Program commander.
g. Language-dependent PMOS and Branches must first be proficient in their CLANG to be eligible to
receive FLPB for other languages. Pay additional FLPB for languages on the ASLL provided minimum
proficiency is met in accordance with paragraph 4– 3.
h. Language-dependent or language-capable MOS warrant officers and Soldiers who were DA se-
lected for observer controller assignments within First Army or at the Combat Training Centers are author-
ized a 36-month waiver from retesting while serving in these positions. These warrant officers and Sol-
diers must retest not later than 90 days before reporting for observer controller duty. The Chief, Foreign
Language Team will consider individual waivers on a case-by-case basis. Warrant officers and Soldiers
may elect to take the DLPT while serving in these assignments. If taken, this DLPT becomes the test of
record until their next recertification.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 38
i. Soldiers with a language-dependent or language-capable MOS who have been DA selected for drill
sergeant duty or recruiting duty are authorized a 36-month waiver from retesting while serving in those
positions. Soldiers must retest not later than 90 days before reporting for drill sergeant or recruiting duty.
The Chief, Foreign Language Team will consider individual waivers on a case-by-case basis. Soldiers
may elect to take the DLPT while serving in these assignments. If taken, this DLPT becomes the test of
record until their next recertification.
j. Soldiers assigned as authorized Defense Threat Reduction Agency interpreters are authorized FLPB
for the language for which they are assigned to on the organization’s manning document.
k. All Soldiers eligible for FLPB in accordance with this paragraph must complete a written agree-
ment(s) (see paras 4– 12 through 4– 20).
4–7. Language coded billets, attendance at professional military education, assigned to Military
Personnel Exchange Program or assigned to a security force assistance brigade
a. Officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers who do not hold a language-dependent or language-
capable MOS, CMF, AOC, or FA may receive FLPB if they are assigned to an authorized language coded
billet on the unit’s MTOE/TDA (verified using FMSWeb) and are duty MOS qualified. The paragraph and
line number must have a LIC showing the language and a LPIND showing the required language profi-
ciency to qualify for FLPB.
b. Officers, warrant officers, Soldiers, and DA Civilians attending/instructing at a PME course con-
ducted in a foreign language are authorized FLPB. Examples of courses include, but are not limited to a
foreign military school, Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation, or the Olmsted Scholar
Program.
c. Officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers that are participating in MPEP are authorized FLPB.
d. Terminate FLPB eligibility for language coded billets, attendance at PME, assignment as MPEP, or
assignment to an SFAB once the officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier no longer occupies the billet.
e. It is the Soldier’s responsibility to stop FLPB once he or she no longer occupies a language coded
billet/assignment.
f. Soldiers assigned to an SFAB are eligible to receive FLPB at the L1+/R1+ proficiency level. An
SFAB Soldier must have a tested language score in a language associated with outside the continental
United States (OCONUS) mission his or her unit is supporting to be eligible to receive FLPB. SFAB Sol-
diers may draw FLPB for the duration of their assignment to the SFAB if they continue to demonstrate
proficiency in a language organic to the AOR their SFAB supports. Once a Soldier is no longer assigned
to the SFAB, it is his or her responsibility to terminate FLPB.
g. All Soldiers eligible for FLPB in accordance with this paragraph will complete a written agreement.
h. FLPB will continue uninterrupted for Soldiers assigned to a language coded billet when the officer,
warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier is performing temporary or special duties not to exceed 90 days, at-
tending a course of instruction directly related to or necessary for continuation in the billet, in an inpatient
status assigned to a Soldier Recovery Unit, or on authorized leave.
4–8. Languages designated as immediate investment, emerging, and enduring on the Army
Strategic Language List
a. Soldiers, regardless of MOS/Branch or duty position, are authorized to receive FLPB for languages
designated by the DCS, G– 2 on the ASLL as immediate investment, emerging, and enduring languages
provided they meet the requirements established by the DCS, G –2.
b. When the DCS, G– 2 adds a language to the ASLL, FLPB eligibility begins the date of the list if a
Soldier already has a valid proficiency score or the date the Soldier obtains proficiency.
c. When a language is removed from the ASLL by the DCS, G –2, Soldiers will be authorized FLPB for
the removed language until their written agreement expires. For example, a Soldier passed their DLPT on
5 January 2024. The language he or she demonstrated proficiency in is removed from the ASLL on 1
March 2024. The Soldier can continue to draw FLPB until 31 January 2025 (when the current DLPT ex-
pires). Linguists with an L3/R3 proficiency in the dropped language will continue to receive FLPB until
their current 24-month certification expires.
d. USAR assigned CMF 37, AOC 38A and 38G officers, and MOS 38B Soldiers assigned to GPF units
will use the GPF ASLL to determine eligibility for additional FLPB. RA and ARNG CMF/AOC 37, and 38R,
38W, 38Z Soldiers and AOC 38S officers will use the ARSOF ASLL to determine their eligibility for FLPB
regardless of assignment.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 39
e. Soldiers eligible for FLPB in accordance with this paragraph will complete a written agreement (see
para 4–15). This includes Soldiers eligible in accordance with paragraph 4– 6 of this regulation for lan-
guages in addition to their CLANG.
4–9. Waiver of annual testing requirement
a. In situations where no testing facility is available, Soldiers stationed OCONUS, deployed for greater
than 180 days, or in a temporary change of station (TCS) status of greater than 180 days are authorized
to receive a retest waiver from their commander (O –6 or above). Extensions are not authorized beyond
36 months of the date of the original certification without approval from the SPM and are intended for the
minimum amount of time required to allow the Soldier to retest.
b. Commander’s (O – 6 or above) retest waiver is authorized for up to 180 days for RA and 360 days for
ARNG/USAR from the expected date of redeployment.
c. The officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier works with his or her unit CLPM to complete the writ-
ten agreement. The first O– 5 Commander in the chain of command must approve the written agreement.
Once approved, the written agreement then becomes the source document for the new personnel action
in place of the DA Form 330. The approved waiver of the annual retesting written agreement along with
the current written agreement being extended and DA Form 330 are submitted to the servicing finance
office to allow for continued FLPB payments, uploaded to iPERMS as a language proficiency pay agree-
ment (LPPA), and added to the Soldiers ACD file.
d. FAOs stationed OCONUS, deployed for greater than 180 days, or in a TCS status of greater than
180 days are authorized to receive a DLPT waiver approved by their respective security cooperation of-
ficer, senior Defense official, or Defense attaché. The FAO must provide a copy of this waiver to the FAO
branch manager. DLPT recertification waivers for FAOs will not exceed 36 months.
e. Officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers receiving an annual retest waiver for their CLANG
are also entitled to receive a waiver for all languages for which they are receiving FLPB if they demon-
strate minimum proficiency.
f. Commanders (O – 6 or above) may authorize a waiver for language-capable and language-depend-
ent MOS/Branch officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers whose proficiency expires within 180
days of returning from a deployment of greater than 180 days. This allows the officer, warrant officer, and
enlisted Soldier to receive the 160 consecutive hours SLTE (80 consecutive hours SLTE for FAOs,
ARSOF, USAR, and ARNG) prior to taking their DLPT. This commander’s waiver is only valid for 180
days for the RA and 360 days for the USAR and the ARNG.
g. Commanders (O – 6 or above) will grant a language retest waiver for language-dependent or lan-
guage-capable MOS/Branch Soldiers who will attend an MOS producing course or language course that
is 180 days or longer if their language proficiency expires within 180 days prior to their course report date.
Soldiers should strive to test prior to the departure for the course. DCS, G –2 is the approval authority for
all Soldiers who request to take a DLPT early. While attending the course, language-dependent/lan-
guage-capable Soldiers may receive multiple commander recertification waivers not to exceed 24
months. Once the course ends, commanders must ensure that RA Soldiers receive a 160 consecutive
hour SLTE (FAOs, ARSOF, and RC Soldiers receive an 80 consecutive hour SLTE) before taking their
language proficiency test. The purpose of this policy is to eliminate training distractions that will impede
the Soldier’s ability to focus on training and passing a course. For example, the recertification waiver
would apply to a Soldier in a language-dependent or language-capable MOS/Branch who is attending DLI
to learn a new language, attending intermediate or advanced language training courses, or a Soldier at-
tending a Special Forces qualification course. This recertification waiver applies to all languages for which
the officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier receives FLPB.
h. Commanders (O – 6 or above) may request a waiver for Soldiers in a language-dependent or lan-
guage-capable MOS/Branch if they have a medical condition that prevents the completion of SLTE or
testing. This includes Soldiers who are on convalescent leave following childbirth. The request must spec-
ify that the Soldier was unable to complete an SLTE and/or testing with supporting documentation from a
physician (profile). The Chief of USAHRC’s Enlisted Language Branch will review the request and adjudi-
cate. The purpose of this policy is to ensure that Soldiers receive an SLTE prior to taking their language
proficiency test and continue to receive FLPB if a medical condition prohibits language training and test-
ing.
i. GPF language-dependent and language-capable MOS Soldiers promoted to E– 8 (master sergeant)
and higher are no longer required to maintain language proficiency. The Soldier should notify the Chief of
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 40
USAHRC’s Enlisted Language Branch if he or she no longer wishes to test annually so USAHRC can
stop FLPB once the Soldier’s current proficiency expires. However, if the Soldier wants to continue to
draw FLPB, he or she must continue to maintain language proficiency and test annually.
j. Commanders O –6 and above will issue a memorandum of record (MFR) certifying that the provi-
sions of paragraph 4 –9 apply. The MFR may include one or more Soldiers if applicable and will contain
the following statements:
(1) “I certify that the below Soldier(s) can perform their linguistic duties in a satisfactory manner and
is/are proficient at a level consistent with the FLPB rate for their previous qualifying DLPT.”
(2) “This waiver confirms the requirements of AR 11–6, paragraph 4 –9, have been met and the Sol-
dier(s) is/are unable to recertify the before the current DLPT expires.”
(3) “Soldier(s) is/are expected to redeploy/gain medical clearance/course completion on [date].”
(4) Soldier(s) information:
(a) Name.
(b) Previous DLPT date.
(c) Language(s).
(d) Date FLPB authorized through.
(5) “This waiver does not exceed 36 months from the date of the original DLPT date.”
(6) “Soldier is directed to complete a new FLPB written agreement through IPPS– A for the period au-
thorized by this waiver. A copy of this approved commander’s waiver of recertification will be included as
an attachment for the new FLPB written agreement request.”
(7) “The approved FLPB written agreement, original DA Form 330, and this approved waiver of recerti-
fication will be submitted to the servicing finance authority for processing.”
(8) “Point of contact is [battalion CLPM].”
k. The MFR will include the dates of the Soldier’s previously qualifying DLPT(s)/OPI(s), language(s)
being extended, expected redeployment date, course completion or medical or parental leave clearance
date, and period of authorized extension. An extension may not exceed 36 months from the date of the
original DLPT.
l. The MFR becomes the key supporting document in place of a new DA Form 330 for the Soldier(s) to
enter a new FLPB written agreement for the period authorized by the MFR. Send both the MFR and the
original DA Form 330 along with the written agreement to the servicing finance office.
4–10. Foreign language proficiency bonus reviews
The TALP manager conducts quarterly internal reviews of all Soldiers drawing FLPB to ensure they are
entitled to receive these payments and reports results to the SPM. The SPM will provide names of Sol-
diers that appear to be drawing FLPB erroneously to the Chief, Incentives and Compensation Branch
(ICB), USAHRC for review. The Chief, ICB will validate eligibility and take necessary actions to terminate
FLPB erroneously awarded and direct recoupment actions to DFAS for any overpayments. Soldiers may
request remission or cancellation of the debt in accordance with AR 600–4.
4–11. Foreign language proficiency bonus pay in support of contingency operations
Soldiers who are tasked to provide language support during contingency operations or during a rotation of
forces to either Europe or Korea may receive FLPB if they are on official orders as a linguist or occupy a
language coded TDA/Joint duty assignment position. Soldiers officially tasked to perform duties as a lin-
guist must have a current DLPT score in the required language and must have a proficiency score of
L2+/R2+ or higher to receive FLPB. Soldiers may receive FLPB for the duration of the deployment only.
FLPB eligibility begins the first day the Soldier arrives in theater and ends when the day the Soldier rede-
ploys. Soldiers must also enter into a written agreement (see para 4 –16). If the Soldier is not current
when they arrive in theater and subsequently test, the date they passed their DLPT is the date they are
eligible to draw FLPB. Send requests for an ETP to the Chief, Army Foreign Language Team
(usarmy.pentagon.hqda-dcs-g-2.list.foreign-language-office@army.mil) who will provide an ETP authoriz-
ing the Soldier to receive FLPB. Along with the ETP, Soldiers must include the following:
(1) Copy of the orders deploying the Soldier as a linguist.
(2) DA Form 330.
(3) Signed written agreement.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 41
Section II
Written Agreements
4–12. Written agreement for foreign language proficiency bonus
37 USC 353 requires an officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier to enter into a written agreement that
specifies the amount of the proficiency bonus, the period for which the bonus will be paid, and the initial
testing or retesting necessary for the payment of the proficiency bonus. The administrative PAR serves as
the written agreement and serves as an authorized pay document. See paragraphs 4– 14 through 4– 17
for the verbiage that must be included on written agreements.
4–13. Processing the administrative personnel action request written agreement for all
components
a. The officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier initiates the administrative written agreement in
IPPS– A using the following process if eligible for FLPB:
(1) Applicability. OFF, WO, ENL.
(2) Subcategories. Member.
(3) Navigation. Self Service > My Personnel Action requests.
(4) Action Required.
(a) Select Create Personnel Action button.
(b) Enter Effective Date as the date in which the last DLPT/OPI was taken (see paras 4 –3(f) and
4 –3(g)) and select Admin Records Corrections from Action dropdown menu.
(c) Select Other from the Reason dropdown menu then select Continue button.
(d) Enter one of the following in the Other Type field: FLPB–CLANG, FLPB–Position, FLPB–ASLL, or
FLPB–Terminate.
(e) Enter the appropriate text for the Other Type request from the information below in the More Infor-
mation field.
(f) Select the Save button then select the Next button.
(g) Select the Add Attachment button to add DA Form 330 and CLANG memo, if required. Select the
Save button then select the Next button.
(h) Select the Validate button then select the Next button. (Validation does not equal eligibility; IPPS– A
is only validating that all required fields are completed.)
(i) Select the Submit button.
(5) Additional Information. The written agreement is a non-transactional PAR. Upon approval by the
first commander in the chain of command, the approved hard copy and DA Form 330 must be submitted
to the servicing finance office for payment and uploaded to iPERMS as an LPPA. The PAR and the DA
Form 330 will also be added to the Soldiers ACD file.
(6) Record Update. None.
(7) IPPS – A Order Generated. No.
(8) Interface. None.
(9) TIN/FID. None My Personnel Action Requests.
b. The officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier completes the written agreement using the process in
paragraph 4–13a and submits the written agreement through IPPS– A along with the DA Form 330 to the
unit S1.
c. The unit S1 will coordinate with the unit CLPM to ensure the following information is correct:
(1) Ensure the Other Type is correct.
(2) Ensure the requested dollar amount is correct.
(3) Ensure the effective date and through date is correct.
(4) Ensure the language and the language code are entered in paragraph 1.
(5) Ensure the DLPT/OPI dates are correct.
d. The unit S1 can make any necessary corrections required to the written agreement directly in the
More Information field. Adding comments does not correct the written agreement and all corrections
should be made in the More Information field before submitting to the higher level. The unit S1 will add
the company commander as the intermediate approver and the upper echelon approver.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 42
e. The first commander in the officer’s, warrant officer’s or enlisted Soldier’s chain of command will
consult with the CLPM to validate or verify the information listed in the written agreement is in accordance
with this regulation and/or the ASLL prior to recommending approval of the written agreement.
f. Upon approval by the upper echelon, submit the approved FLPB written agreement PAR and the DA
Form 330 to the servicing finance authority in accordance with unit SOPs.
g. The validation and approval authority uploads a copy of the written agreement to iPERMS as an
LPPA.
h. CLPMs will enter a copy of the written agreement into the Soldier’s ACD file.
i. Officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers who have a flagging action in accordance with AR
600– 8–2 may continue to receive FLPB provided they have a valid DLPT/OPI and meet eligibility criteria.
4–14. Administrative personnel action request written agreement for type FLPB–CLANG
a. Officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers with a language-capable/language-dependent MOS
or Branch listed in paragraph 4 –6 will request FLPB using the Other Type written agreement for their
CLANG.
b. The following comments must be entered into the More Information field. Enter all required infor-
mation:
(1) “I understand that I am authorized monthly foreign language proficiency bonus (FLPB) pay in ac-
cordance with the AR 11–6, table 4–1, rate of $[amount], effective [date] through [date] for the language
of [language and language code] based on my Defense Language Proficiency Test results of [score] lis-
tening score, [score] reading score, and/or [score] speaking score taken on [date] and meeting the eligibil-
ity requirements in AR 11–6, paragraph 4 –2 or paragraph 5– 12.”
(2) “The language of [language and language code] is my control language for my language-capa-
ble/language-dependent MOS/Branch of [MOS/Branch] in accordance with AR 11–6, paragraph 2– 8,
4 –6, or 5– 6.”
(3) “I agree that if an Army audit determines that any representation or statement I have made in this
agreement is inaccurate, I am responsible for repaying any unauthorized amount received. I understand
that I am authorized no more than $1,000 monthly for one or more languages. I understand that I must
recertify prior to the expiration date of this agreement and meet all eligibility requirements and enter into a
new written agreement to continue to receive FLPB. I understand that if I change components during this
agreed upon service, a new written agreement will be required. I understand that I am obligated by law to
repay any unearned portion of the FLPB and that I am not entitled to receive any unpaid amounts of the
FLPB if I do meet the eligibility requirements in AR 11 –6, paragraph 4– 2 and paragraph 5–12 for the
length of the agreement. I understand that any previous FLPB written agreement for the language of [lan-
guage and language code] prior to the effective date of this agreement is no longer valid as of the effec-
tive date of this agreement.”
c. Include enclosures: DA Form 330 or commander's waiver of recertification if requesting extension,
and CLANG memo if required (USAR and FAOs only).
d. Any missing or incomplete information may be corrected by the unit S1 or returned by the S1 to the
officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier for corrections in the More Information field.
4–15. Administrative personnel action request written agreement for type FLPB–ASLL
a. Officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers will request FLPB using Other Type FLPB–ASLL
written agreement when one of the following conditions is met:
(1) Proficiency in one or more of the languages on the current GPF or ARSOF ASLL is designated as
Immediate Investment or Emerging for any Service, regardless of MOS/Branch or duty position in accord-
ance with paragraph 4– 8.
(2) Officer, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers with a language-capable/language-dependent
MOS/Branch are requesting FLPB for an Immediate Investment, Emerging, or Enduring language in addi-
tion to their CLANG in accordance with paragraph 4–8.
b. The following comments must be entered into the More Information field on the administrative PAR.
Soldier must enter all required information:
(1) “I understand that I am authorized monthly foreign language proficiency bonus (FLPB) pay in ac-
cordance with the AR 11–6, table 4–1, rate of $[amount], effective [date] through [date] for the language
of [language and language code] based on my Defense Language Proficiency Test results of [score]
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 43
listening score, [score] reading score, and/or [score] speaking score taken on [date] and meeting the eligi-
bility requirements in AR 11 –6, paragraph 4– 2 or 5– 12.”
(2) “Language has been designated as critical on the current GPF/Army Special Operation Forces (re-
move list not being referred) Army Strategic Language List dated [date] as Immediate Investment, Emerg-
ing, or Enduring (remove the two that don't apply) in paragraph 4–8.”
(3) “I am proficient in my CLANG of [language and language code] as of [date].” (Remove this state-
ment if the officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier does not hold a language-capable/language-de-
pendent MOS or Branch listed in paragraph 4– 6.)
(4) “I agree that if an Army audit determines that any representation or statement I have made in this
agreement is inaccurate, I am responsible for repaying any unauthorized amount received. I understand
that I am authorized no more than $1,000 monthly for one or more languages. I understand that I must
recertify prior to the expiration date of this agreement and meet all the eligibility requirements and enter
into a new written agreement in order to continue to receive FLPB. I understand that I am obligated by
law to repay any unearned portion of the FLPB and that I am not entitled to receive any unpaid amounts
of the FLPB if I do meet the eligibility requirements in AR 11 –6, paragraph 4– 2 and paragraph 5– 12 for
the length of the agreement. I understand that any previous FLPB written agreement for the language of
[language and language code] prior to the effective date of this agreement is no longer valid as of the ef-
fective date of this agreement.”
c. Include enclosures: DA Form 330.
d. Any missing or incomplete information may be corrected by the unit S1 or returned by the S1 to the
officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier for corrections in the More Information field.
4–16. Administrative personnel action request written agreement for type FLPB–Position
a. Officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers will request FLPB using the Other Type FLPB–
Position written agreement when one of the following conditions is met:
(1) Non-language-capable/language-dependent MOS or Branch serving in a position on the unit’s
MTOE/TDA in accordance with paragraph 4 –7.
(2) Participating in the MPEP in accordance with paragraph 4– 7.
(3) Attending/instructing at PME conducted in a foreign language in accordance with paragraph 4 –7.
(4) Assigned to an SFAB in accordance with paragraph 4 –7.
(5) Tasked to provide language support during a named contingency operation in accordance with par-
agraph 4– 11.
b. The following comments must be entered into the More Information field and enter all required infor-
mation:
(1) “I understand that I am authorized monthly foreign language proficiency bonus pay in accordance
with the AR 11 –6, table 4–1, rate of $[amount], effective [date] through [date] for the language of [lan-
guage and language code] based on my Defense Language Proficiency Test results of [score] listening
score, [score] reading score, and/or [score] speaking score taken on [date] and meeting the eligibility re-
quirements in AR 11–6, paragraph 4 –2.”
(2) “I am currently assigned to a language coded billet, attending a professional military education as-
signment, participating in the MPEP, assigned to an SFAB in accordance with AR 11– 6, paragraph 4–7,
or tasked to provide language support during a named contingency operation in accordance with AR
11 –6, paragraph 4– 11.” (Remove all but the reason for FLPB.) Add unit identification code and para-
graph/line number of MTOE/TDA or the assignment information from request for orders or special instruc-
tions.
(3) “I agree that if an Army audit determines that any representation or statement I have made in this
agreement is inaccurate, I am responsible for repaying any unauthorized amount received. I understand
that I am authorized no more than $1,000 monthly for one or more languages. I understand that I must
recertify prior to the expiration date of this agreement and meet all the eligibility requirements and enter
into a new written agreement in order to continue to receive FLPB. I understand that I am obligated by
law to repay any unearned portion of the FLPB and that I am not entitled to receive any unpaid amounts
of the FLPB if I do meet the eligibility requirements in AR 11 –6, paragraph 4– 2 and paragraph 5– 12 for
the length of the agreement. I understand that if I am removed from this assignment prior to [through end-
ing date], I must request termination in accordance with AR 11–6, paragraph 4– 20, or be subject to re-
coupment of any unearned FLPB. I understand that any previous FLPB written agreement for the
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 44
language of [language and language code] prior to the effective date of this agreement is no longer valid
as of the effective date of this agreement.”
c. Include enclosures: DA Form 330 and a copy of the unit manning report showing position require-
ments.
d. Any missing or incomplete information may be corrected by the unit S1 or returned by the unit S1 to
the officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier for corrections in the More Information field.
4–17. Administrative records correction personnel action request for type FLPB–Terminate
a. Other Type FLPB–Terminate applies to all Soldiers required to terminate their FLPB pay for one of
the reasons listed in paragraph 4–20a.
b. The following comments must be entered into the administrative PAR More Information field. Enter
all required information:
(1) “[Soldier’s name] foreign language proficiency bonus (FLPB) for the language [language and lan-
guage digraph], effective from [date] through [date], is terminated effective [date no longer eligible to re-
ceive FLPB].”
(2) “Reason for termination of FLPB is [reason] in accordance with paragraph 4–20a.”
(3) “Recoupment of any unearned FLPB received after the termination date is required.”
c. Any missing or incomplete information may be corrected by the unit S1 or returned by the S1 to the
officer, warrant officer, enlisted Soldier for corrections in the More Information field.
4–18. Processing the written agreement for the U.S. Army Reserve
a. The officer, warrant officer, and enlisted Soldier initiates the administrative PAR written agreement
in IPPS – A using the process in paragraph 4 –13.
b. USAR members in a TPU status (to include those in a mobilized status) submit the written agree-
ment to the major subordinate command (MSC) for validation and approval. The MSC commander may
delegate a authority in accordance with AR 25–50 no lower than the brigade level for packet approval be-
fore forwarding to the servicing finance office. No further delegation is authorized.
c. Continue to process FLPB actions in the electronic Personnel Actions Tracking System (ePAT) until
further IPPS–A guidance is issued.
d. The MSC commander validates and approves the written agreement and returns it to the unit. The
unit commander submits the written agreement to the servicing finance officer for upload into iPERMS.
e. USAR members in an AGR, Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), and IMA status submit the written
agreement to business unit ARRCA, workflow template ID 000000000052148 for approval after the com-
pany commander recommends approval.
f. The Chief, ICB submits the approved written agreement to the G– 8 Reserve Pay team for members
in an IRR or IMA status.
g. The Chief, ICB returns the approved written agreement to the unit for members in an AGR status.
The unit commander submits the written agreement to the servicing finance officer for payment.
h. USAR FAOs currently serving in authorized FA 48 positions, even those in a TPU status, submit a
written agreement to business ARRCA, workflow template ID 000000000052148 for approval after their
company commander recommends approval.
i. The written agreement remains valid for the specified period for officers, warrant officers, and en-
listed Soldiers who transfer between different USAR statuses.
j. The written agreement for Soldiers, officers, or warrant officers who transfer to the ARNG or RA will
be terminated upon transfer. They must enter into a new written agreement with their new component.
k. The officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier must be a satisfactory participant throughout the pe-
riod of the written agreement in accordance with AR 135– 91.
l. Report Soldiers, officers, or warrant officers who fail to meet the requirements in AR 135– 91 to the
servicing finance authority to have their FLPB terminated in accordance with paragraph 4– 20 and the un-
earned portion of their FLPB recouped.
4–19. Processing a written agreement for the Regular Army
a. The officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier initiates the administrative FLPB written agreement
using the process in paragraph 4–13.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 45
b. The battalion S1 will review and recommend approval, add the company commander as an interme-
diate approver, and either the battalion commander/S1 or installation MPD as the approver in accordance
with unit/installation SOPs.
c. Workflow should follow as: Soldier initiated > battalion S1 pool recommends approval > company
commander recommends approval > approved at battalion or higher in accordance with unit/installation
SOP.
d. Battalion S1 will submit approved FLPB written agreement PAR and DA Form 330 to the Chief of
the servicing finance officer for payment and upload a copy to iPERMS as an LPPA.
4–20. Terminating or reinstating a foreign language proficiency bonus
a. Terminate FLPB immediately for any of the following reasons:
(1) Loss of MOS or AOC qualification.
(2) Designation as an unsatisfactory participant in accordance with AR 135– 91 (USAR and ARNG
only).
(3) Failure to meet minimum proficiency of 2/2 (2/2/1+ if a 35M or 1+/1+ if ARSOF/SFAB/USACAPOC)
if testing prior to current FLPB expiring.
(4) Failure to retest annually prior to expiration of current DLPT (biennially if a 3/3 linguist).
(5) Removal from a language coded billet for officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers not in a
language-dependent/capable MOS.
b. Do not terminate FLPB when an officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier is flagged for actions that
do not lead to loss of MOS or AOC qualification.
c. The warrant officer or enlisted Soldier will submit a written request to terminate FLPB stating the ef-
fective date of termination along with the reason for the loss of eligibility and submit the form to the valida-
tion authority for approval. Once approved by the validation authority, the warrant officer or enlisted Sol-
dier will submit the written termination to the servicing finance officer for action.
d. FLPB continues uninterrupted when the officer, warrant officer, or enlisted Soldier who is assigned
to a language coded position, but is not in a language-dependent or language-capable MOS or AOC, is:
(1) Performing temporary or special duties not to exceed 90 days.
(2) Attending a course of instruction related directly to or necessary for continued FLPB qualification.
(3) In an inpatient status.
(4) On authorized leave.
(5) Attending training courses that are 180 days in length of longer.
e. Do not terminate FLPB for language-dependent/capable officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Sol-
diers solely based on a PCS move.
f. Should the reason for loss of MOS qualification be unfounded, reinstate FLPB as of the date FLPB
was terminated and retroactively pay the Soldier.
g. Officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers who had FLPB terminated for failing to meet the an-
nual retesting requirement will have FLPB reinstated effective the date the officer, warrant officer, or en-
listed Soldier achieved the minimum proficiency requirements.
h. Officers, Warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers will terminate their FLPB agreement in writing using
the verbiage in paragraph 4 –17.
4–21. Payment and non-repayment of bonuses
The provisions of DoDI 1332.18 and DoD 7000.14–R, Volume 7a apply to the repayment and non-repay-
ment conditions when a Soldier entitled to a bonus for language proficiency is found unfit by the Disability
Evaluation System.
Section III
Reporting Language Proficiency
4–22. DA Form 330 use
Use DA Form 330 to:
a. Report foreign language proficiency.
b. Report a Soldier’s FLPB eligibility.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 46
4–23. DA Form 330 preparation
a. Prepare a DA Form 330 for all Soldiers and DA Civilians every time they take a foreign language
proficiency test.
b. Soldiers and DA Civilians who take a DLPT, OPI, or other DLIFLC approved proficiency exam at a
test location that does not issue a DA Form 330 (for example, at a U.S. Air Force test facility) will take the
test results issued by the test facility to the organization responsible for issuing orders. The organization
prepares a DA Form 330, attaches the test results issued by the test facility, and then follows the proce-
dures listed in paragraph 4 –24.
4–24. DA Form 330 disposition
a. For iPERMS, provide copy 2 to the Soldier and maintain copy 3 in the Soldier’s ACD file. CLPMs
scan and upload a copy into the Soldier’s ACD file.
b. Servicing TCOs maintain a record of test results according to AR 611–5 for everyone tested.
4–25. Personnel database updates
USAHRC utilizes an automated process to update IPPS – A for RA, USAR, and ARNG personnel. This au-
tomated process uploads listening and reading scores for Soldiers who took a DLPT and the speaking
score for Soldiers who took an OPI. USAHRC uploads DLPT scores to the database within 72 hours.
USAHRC uploads OPI scores monthly due to the complexity of the OPI reporting process. OPI PL scores
are not reported since DLI does not report the data to the DMDC.
a. Test centers and USAHRC are not responsible for language data updates.
b. Submission of an IPPS– A customer relationship management (CRM) case is the appropriate pro-
cess for data resolution.
c. Soldiers should allow time for DMDC’s automated process to work. DLPT scores usually show up in
as little as 24 hours. If DLPT scores are visible in the DMDC site and do not appear on the Soldier Talent
Profile (STP) within 5 working days, Soldier should submit a CRM case along with a screen shot of the
DMDC site reflecting the DLPT score or a copy of the DA Form 330 to have the data corrected on the
STP. OPIs take up to 30 days before they appear on the STP because of the manual input process used
by DLIFLC. If the Soldier’s OPI does not appear on the STP within 30 days, then the Soldier can submit a
CRM case.
d. To create a CRM case, go to the website https://hr.ippsa.army.mil/ and select the IPPS– A Help
Center tile. Next click the Create Case tile to create and submit the case. Be sure to attach the required
source document (DMDC DLPT database screenshot, OPI Authorization and Reporting System database
screenshot, or DA Form 330) before submitting the case for resolution.
Chapter 5
Army Special Operations Forces Foreign Language Program
Section I
Information
5–1. Overview
This chapter prescribes policy for the administration of the ARSOF foreign language program and the ad-
ministering of FLPB payments for ARSOF Soldiers in the RA, USAR, and ARNG.
a. The FLPB is a monthly monetary bonus paid to officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers who
maintain the required proficiency in designated languages.
b. This chapter contains ARSOF-specific policy. In all instances, the policy set forth in this chapter will
take precedence over policy in other chapters within this regulation.
5–2. Soldiers subject to the provisions of Army special operations forces foreign language
program criteria
a. A Soldier is subject to the provisions of this chapter if he or she meets the criteria by serving in at
least one of the following CMFs or organizations:
(1) CMF: 18 (PMOS), 180A, and officer Branch 18.
(2) CMF: RA 37 (PMOS) and officer Branch 37.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 47
(3) CMF: RA 38R, 38W, 38Z (PMOS), and officer Branch 38S.
(4) ARNG CMF 37 and 38 and officer Branches 37 and 38 assigned to 19th and 20th Special Forces
Group.
(5) Assigned to the 75th Ranger Regiment or the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment
(SOAR); limited to languages supporting a deployment for an overseas contingency operation (OCO).
This applies to all personnel assigned to these units except for Soldiers who were language trained at
government expense (refers to language acquisition training courses taught at DLIFLC or a DLIFLC satel-
lite campus). CMF 35 Soldiers, and warrant officer MOSs 351 and 352 are not eligible under this chapter.
(6) Assigned for duty (not attached) to a special mission unit (SMU) (MOS immaterial).
(7) General officers and nominative position sergeants major assigned to ARSOF.
b. Direct all ARSOF FLPB eligibility questions to Headquarters, 1st Special Forces Command (Air-
borne) G–3 Language Training Office, Building H –2313, Psyop Lane, Fort Bragg, NC 28310. This applies
to all ARSOF Soldiers to include 75th Ranger Regiment, 160th SOAR, and SMUs.
c. Soldiers eligible under this chapter must score a minimum proficiency as determined in paragraph
5 –4 in their CLANG to be eligible for FLPB payments. These payments include payments where the Sol-
dier meets the minimum proficiency and other requirements set forth for in the current ARSOF ASLL pub-
lished annually by the DCS, G – 2.
d. Soldiers who have completed a foreign language basic acquisition course (graduation standard of
L2/R2/S1+) are not eligible for FLPB below L2/R2 proficiency for that language.
e. Soldiers are not eligible to receive FLPB at multiple levels for the same language.
Section II
Testing and Control Language Determination
5–3. Proficiency testing and control language determination
Soldiers subject to this chapter must maintain the minimum proficiency level and adhere to the testing
procedures set forth within this chapter. This chapter also regulates policy when determining a Soldier’s
CLANG and the procedure used to voluntarily or involuntarily change his or her CLANG.
5–4. Army special operations forces language proficiency testing
a. Initial evaluation. See paragraph 2–5a of this regulation for initial evaluation requirements prior to
accession into a designated ARSOF MOS/AOC.
b. Re-evaluation.
(1) The minimum proficiency level is S1+ TSOPI or L1+/R1+ DLPT in their CLANG for Soldiers subject
to this chapter. Annual language proficiency recertification is mandatory for all ARSOF MOS/AOC Sol-
diers scoring under the L3/R3 DLPT level or S3 TSOPI level. Those who score L3/R3 on the DLPT or S3
on the TSOPI have a biennial mandatory recertification requirement. Commanders must adhere to the
policies specified in this chapter to re-evaluate their assigned ARSOF Soldiers’ proficiency.
(2) ARSOF Soldiers who, upon re-evaluation, do not meet the minimum proficiency standard must un-
dergo a remediation period of no less than 180 days (12 months for the RC) during which time the Soldier
and their chain of command will apply the maximum level of training resources, time, and focus to im-
prove their language proficiency. Commanders, in consultation with their CLPM, must follow the counsel-
ing policy prescribed in paragraph 2–5f to articulate the remediation training plan to sub-proficient Sol-
diers.
c. Defense Language Proficiency Test. Various evaluation techniques and instruments measure lan-
guage skills in listening, reading, and speaking. Take the listening and reading tests within 30 days of
each other for the test to count as a valid test.
(1) Administer and score each DLPT according to the Administration and Scoring Manual appropriate
for that test. The DLPT5 is scored automatically for multiple choice tests or by DLIFLC for constructed re-
sponse tests.
(a) Only administer an upper range DLPT5, if available, when a linguist scores L3/R3 on the lower
range DLPT5. Only the modalities tested using the lower range test are authorized for testing at the upper
range. Take the upper range DLPT within 60 days of the lower range DLPT. The upper range DLPTs are
only used to test the capability to listen and read at a higher level and to qualify for higher FLPB payment
rates.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 48
(b) ARSOF Soldiers must retest annually using the lower range DLPT, DLPT5–CA, or OPI to continue
to qualify for FLPB and to demonstrate their language proficiency (except for 3/3 linguists who must cer-
tify every 2 years). The upper range test, without a valid lower range DLPT, does not extend the time a
Soldier is eligible for FLPB provided by the lower range DLPT. An upper range DLPT does not substi-
tute/qualify for the annual recertification requirement.
(2) Soldiers with an Arabic language (non-AD) or who use Brazilian as their CLANG, secondary lan-
guage capability, or are assigned to a billet requiring those languages must take specific DLPT reading or
listening tests to be eligible for FLPB or take the appropriate OPI. For Soldiers with an Arabic language
(non-AD) as their CLANG, the Arabic (AD) DLPT reading test must be taken in conjunction with one or
more of the DLPT listening language tests available for the Arabic dialects. For Soldiers with a CLANG of
Portuguese-Brazilian or Portuguese-European, pair a Portuguese reading test with a listening DLPT in
Portuguese-Brazilian or Portuguese-European.
(3) Soldiers who have a valid and current proficiency in a previous version of the DLPT and are taking
the DLPT5 or DLPT5–CA for the first time and score lower are authorized a one-time ETP to substitute
the previous year’s score. The effective date of the previous year’s scores is the date the Soldier took the
DLPT5 or DLPT5 –CA. This one-time ETP is only authorized for a 12-month period regardless of the pre-
vious score. The previous test score will be the test of record with an effective date of the new submis-
sion.
(4) Approval for a DLPT retest is as follows:
(a) Administer no more than two iterations of the same DLPT to the same person in a 12-month period.
Individuals who have completed SLTEs (minimum of 80 consecutive hours of training) may retest in less
than 6 months from the last test date as an ETP. Submit ETPs for DLPT or OPI retesting to the program
manager, ArmyU, ACCESS (AHRC –PDE), 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Department 480, Fort
Knox, KY 40122 –5408 for approval. If approved, 6 calendar months must elapse before any subsequent
test. Only one ETP may be granted within a 12-month period to comply with the DoD policy which limits
the number of times a year a DLPT in the same language may be taken to twice per 12-month period.
(b) Send requests for exceptions to the waiting period, and requests to retest after attaining the mini-
mum score or higher to the program manager, ArmyU, ACCESS (AHRC– PDE), 1600 Spearhead Division
Avenue, Department 480, Fort Knox, KY 40122– 5408.
(c) Soldiers scheduled to attend training courses where the course will end after the Soldier’s current
FLPB certification period will expire may recertify their FLPB certification as an ETP. This ETP is automat-
ically granted. The testing facility may require official notification of the training course to verify eligibility
for the automatic exception.
d. Oral proficiency interviews.
(1) All ARSOF Soldiers may request an OPI.
(2) The OPI interviewers can assign a speaking proficiency level of 0 through 5. A TSOPI can assign
proficiency levels in listening and speaking in the 0 –4 range. Coordinate in advance with DLIFLC
(ATFL– ESM) for a personal interview or telephone OPI. An OPI is conducted with DLIFLC approved and
certified testers. When a Soldier has a current and valid DLPT score and achieves a lower OPI score than
that DLPT, their DLPT score will not be lowered; the resulting OPI score will be treated as a separate
score.
(3) Only appointed testing officials can schedule OPIs. For specific scheduling concerns, the testing
official should contact the Director, Language Proficiency Assessment Directorate at DLIFLC
(ATFL– ESM).
(4) CG, USASOC determines the preferred proficiency test and OPI requirements for all ARSOF Sol-
diers. The OPI is the preferred testing method for all ARSOF Soldiers.
(5) The DLIFLC (ATFL –ESM) reports the results of a TSOPI to the requesting TCO who completes
and submits DA Form 330. Annotate the DA Form 330 for a speaking and a listening score. For example,
a Soldier scoring an S2+ on a TSOPI would have S2+ annotated for speaking and an L2+ annotated for
listening on their DA Form 330. In the remarks section of the DA Form 330, the administering TCO must
note that the test administered was the TSOPI and that the listening score is a PL score.
(6) ARSOF Soldiers taking the TSOPI must comply with paragraph 4–3b this regulation.
5–5. Army special operations forces control language
The CLANG identifies the Soldier’s primary foreign language for management and strength accountability
purposes. The eighth and ninth characters of the enlisted Soldiers’ and warrant officers MOS and the
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 49
eighth and ninth characters of the officers’ specialty code identify their language qualifications. Officers
and warrant officers have a LIC that serves as a CLANG.
5–6. Army special operations forces control language determination
a. The overriding factor in determining the CLANG is the needs of the Army. Additional considerations
include:
(1) A Soldier’s language proficiency providing it meets the minimum ARSOF standard.
(2) Strength of desired language within the Soldier’s assigned or projected unit.
(3) Theater special operations command (TSOC) language requirements.
(4) The desires of the individual.
b. RA ARSOF Soldiers with skills in only one foreign language have that language designated as their
CLANG.
c. For RA ARSOF Soldiers with skills in more than one foreign language, the CLANG is the language
for which the Soldier most recently attended a basic language acquisition course or was recruited. If the
Soldier has not attended a basic language acquisition course and has instead attended a language con-
version course, such as Persian-Farsi to Dari, the CLANG will not change. The first language trained or
recruited for will be the Soldier’s CLANG until the Soldier is no longer under an ADSO for the language or
as determined by the Soldier’s USAHRC career manager. Career managers will determine the CLANG
based on requirements and proficiency level. The first O – 6 in the Soldier’s chain of command may initiate
a request to change a Soldier’s CLANG (command directed) by submitting a PAR (request for CLANG
change) and a DA Form 330 (dated within the last 12 months) that demonstrates the required proficiency
in the requested language.
(1) For RA enlisted Soldiers, commanders will send the PAR through Headquarters, 1st Special
Forces Command (Airborne) G–3 Language Training Office, Building H–2313, Psyop Lane, Fort Bragg,
NC 28310 to their USAHRC branch manager.
(2) Officers and warrant officers will submit requests through Headquarters, 1st Special Forces Com-
mand (Airborne) G–3 Language Training Office, Building H–2313, Psyop Lane, Fort Bragg, NC 28310 to
their branch manager.
d. RA ARSOF officers, warrant officers and enlisted Soldiers must contact their branch manager for
determination of their CLANG or to change their CLANG.
e. ARNG ARSOF Soldiers’ CLANG is determined by the most recent language the Soldier was re-
cruited, trained in, by the language coded position to which the Soldier is assigned, or as determined by
CNGB.
5–7. Voluntary control language changes initiated by Soldier
a. Upon completion of their language training ADSO and scoring L1+/R1+ on their DLPT or an S1+ on
their TSOPI, Soldiers may initiate a CLANG change request on a PAR through the first O–5 in the Sol-
dier’s chain of command. Submit the PAR through Headquarters, 1st Special Forces Command (Air-
borne) G–3 Language Training Office, Building H –2313, Psyop Lane, Fort Bragg, NC 28310 to the appro-
priate USAHRC branch manager. The following ADSO requirements must be met prior to submission:
(1) USAJFKSWCS language course 2-year ADSO begins on the date the Soldier arrives at their as-
signed ARSOF unit.
(2) DLIFLC language course 3-year ADSO begins on the date the Soldier arrives at his or her as-
signed ARSOF unit.
(3) There is no additional ADSO for language training in support of units undergoing AOR realignment.
(4) CLANG changes within the same unit to a different TSOC validated language, and not part of an
AOR realignment, incur a 2-year ADSO.
b. ARNG ARSOF Soldiers’ CLANGs are determined by the most recent language the Soldier was re-
cruited for, trained in, by the language coded position to which the Soldier is assigned, or as determined
by CNGB.
5–8. Army special operations forces and Prevalent in the Force languages
ARSOF Soldiers are exempt from the provisions of paragraph 4 –5 of this regulation.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 50
Section III
Training and Utilization
5–9. Language training, management, and utilization
The components of foreign language training are the same as those in paragraph 3– 1 and apply to
ARSOF Soldiers as follows:
a. Institutional language training. Primary institutional language training is conducted at
USAJFKSWCS and unit LTFs.
b. Unit language training. Commanders will establish a CLP in accordance with the policy articulated
in paragraph 1–23a and chapter 5 of this regulation. Commanders should also refer to the requirements
found in paragraphs 1–23k and 3–1b(3) to develop and execute monthly remedial, refresher, sustain-
ment, and enhancement language training designed to ensure all assigned ARSOF Soldiers meet the
minimum language proficiency standard.
c. Self-study. Commanders should encourage the use of self-study materials during off-duty hours.
Self-study language training consists of supervised or self-paced language training accomplished by the
individual Soldier on his or her own time and during unit training hours. The objectives should include
general language proficiency and assurance of mission performance. For maximum effect, the training
supervisor should prepare an ILTP listing individual training objectives, tasks, performance standards,
milestones, and a program schedule.
5–10. Army special operations forces unit training: command language programs
Commanders at all levels will, as part of the CLP, establish foreign language remedial, refresher, sustain-
ment, and enhancement training programs to ensure that foreign language proficiency is sustained/in-
creased. RA and ARNG ARSOF Soldiers are required to complete an SLTE consisting of a minimum of
80 consecutive hours annually in their CLANG.
Section IV
Foreign Language Proficiency Bonus Eligibility and Payment Criteria
5–11. Foreign language proficiency bonus overview for Army special operations forces
a. This paragraph prescribes policy for the administration of all ARSOF FLPB payments for qualified
RA and ARNG ARSOF Soldiers.
b. The FLPB is a monthly monetary bonus paid to officers, warrant officers, and enlisted Soldiers who
maintain the required proficiency in designated languages.
c. For the purposes of this chapter, a Soldier’s language proficiency is determined by the level of profi-
ciency he or she possess in a foreign language skill as certified by an approved ILR compliant testing
method.
5–12. Criteria for individual Army special operations forces Soldier eligibility for the foreign
language proficiency bonus
A Soldier is eligible to receive FLPB if they meet all the following conditions:
a. RA Soldiers must—
(1) Be on active duty and entitled to basic pay.
(2) AOC and CMF 18, 37, AOC 38S officers and MOS 38R, 38W, and 38Z Soldiers must complete
Special Operations Language Training and successfully pass the DLPT or OPI with minimum scores of
L1+/R1+ or S1+ at USAJFKSWCS or associated school. FLPB eligibility begins upon completion of this
criteria.
(3) Be certified proficient within the past 12 months (24 months if the linguist scores 3/3 or higher on
their DLPT/OPI) in a foreign language listed on the ARSOF ASLL the DCS, G –2 publishes annually. All
Soldiers trained at government expense must be proficient in their CLANG before they are eligible for ad-
ditional FLPB. Soldiers assigned to an SMU are exempt from this rule.
b. ARNG Soldiers must—
(1) Be assigned to a drilling TPU (mobilization day status) or IMA paid status, AGR, or on ADOS.
(a) Soldiers serving an ADOS tour that requires proficiency in a foreign language must ensure their or-
ders specify the language required and the proficiency level to receive FLPB.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 51
(b) For FLPB purposes, the language specified in the ADOS orders will take priority over the CLANG
and the home station MTOE and/or TDA language coded billet. For example, if a Soldier who is proficient
in multiple languages with Arabic designated as their CLANG is mobilized, deployed, or ordered to active
duty to support a requirement for French, they will be paid FLPB for French and their CLANG.
(2) Not be adjudicated as an unsatisfactory participant in the previous 12 months as defined in 10 USC
10147 and AR 135–91.
(a) Meet minimum annual service requirements for retirement eligibility pursuant to 10 USC 12732 dur-
ing the 12-month certification period for FLPB. For ARNG Soldiers, FLPB is only prorated (at a value of 2
percent for each retirement point less than 50 points) if the Soldier will earn less than 50 points in a retire-
ment year. A Soldier who earns 25 retirement points during the 12-month certification period is entitled to
50 percent of the amount listed in the FLPB pay table. For example, an RC Soldier who scores L2/R2
would receive annual FLPB of $2,400 for earning 50 retirement points in an anniversary year, the same
as the RA member who was certified proficient for a full year.
(b) However, if another RC Soldier with identical foreign language qualifications as the RC Soldier in
paragraph 5–12b(2)(a) only amassed 25 points in his or her anniversary year, that member would re-
ceive: 25 points/50 points or 1/2 the annual FLPB of $2,400 ($1,200 FLPB).
(3) For enlisted Soldiers, hold an MOS to be eligible.
(4) WOBC students whose feeder MOS was a language-capable or language-dependent MOS who
are designated for a language-capable or language-dependent warrant officer specialty, may continue to
receive FLPB while attending the WOBC and are exempt from the requirement to complete WOBC to be
eligible for the FLPB pay.
(5) Not be required to have performed duty or received base pay in the month for which they are enti-
tled to FLPB and are not subject to the 1/30th rule.
(6) Be certified proficient within the past 12 months (24 months if the linguist scores 3/3 or higher on
their DLPT/OPI) in a foreign language for which the Army has authorized payment.
c. When eligibility, award, or termination of FLPB cannot be determined, forward the case with recom-
mendations through command channels to:
(1) For RA Soldiers, submit to Commander, 1st Special Forces Command (Airborne) G – 3 Language
Training Office, Building H– 2313, Psyop Lane, Fort Bragg, NC 28310. This includes all ARSOF Soldiers
including, but not limited to, those assigned to the 75th Ranger Regiment, 160th SOAR, USACAPOC
units, and SMUs.
(2) For ARNG ARSOF Soldiers, submit through the Chief, National Guard Bureau, 111 S. George Ma-
son Drive, Arlington, VA 22204.
5–13. Foreign language proficiency bonus payment criteria
a. Pay FLPB in addition to any other pay or allowance to which the Soldier is entitled.
b. The FLPB payment amount is determined by the Soldier’s CLANG and languages on the annual
ARSOF ASLL that the Soldier demonstrates proficiency in.
c. The maximum monthly FLPB rate will not exceed $1,000 for a single or multiple languages regard-
less of proficiency levels achieved. Soldiers may receive more than $500 for any one language but will
not exceed $1,000 per month for multiple languages (see DoDI 1340.27).
d. The effective date of FLPB payments is the date of the DLPT, OPI, or the date eligibility begins (see
para 5–12 for information on ARSOF FLPB criteria), whichever of the two dates is later. If the DLPT is ad-
ministered on two separate days, the effective date of the FLPB will begin on the later of the two dates;
however, Soldiers must complete testing within 30 days for the test to be valid unless they are testing in
three modalities. If an OPI is taken in addition to a DLPT, it must be completed not later than 60 days
from the test date of the first modality tested. For example, if a Soldier is administered the listening DLPT
on January 1, and the reading DLPT on January 2, FLPB is not effective until January 2. Soldiers must
complete testing in all three modalities prior to the expiration of the written agreement.
e. For DLPT scores under L3/R3 or TSOPI under S3, FLPB entitlement ends on the last day of the
month the DLPT/TSOPI was taken 1 year (12 months) later. Soldiers must retest before the expiration of
their written agreement (1-year anniversary of their DLPT or TSOPI) to remain eligible to receive FLPB.
For example, a Soldier takes a TSOPI on 21 October 2024, so the Soldier must test not later than 31 Oc-
tober 2025 to remain eligible to receive FLPB.
f. For DLPT scores of L3/R3 or higher or TSOPI scores of S3 or higher, FLPB entitlement ends on the
last day of the month the DLPT or TSOPI was taken 2 years (24 months) later. Soldiers must retest
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 52
before their DLPT or TSOPI written agreement expires (2-year anniversary) to remain eligible to receive
FLPB. For example, a Soldier takes an TSOPI on 25 March 2024, so the Soldier must test on 31 March
2026 or before to remain eligible to receive FLPB.
g. Dialect FLPB criteria is as follows:
(1) Soldiers are only paid for the reading modality once, regardless of how many dialects they test in.
Soldiers must take the AD reading test (DLPT5) and the listening test (DLPT5) for one of the Arabic lan-
guages to qualify for FLPB for any (non-AD) Arabic language which has a listening DLPT. The same ap-
plies for Chinese-Cantonese and Portuguese-Brazilian and European. Soldiers must take the Chinese-
Mandarin reading DLPT and the Chinese-Cantonese listening DLPT within 30 days of each other in order
to have a valid test and be eligible for FLPB. Additionally, Soldiers must test in Portuguese reading and
Portuguese-Brazilian and/or Portuguese-European listening to constitute a valid test and qualify for addi-
tional FLPB.
(2) Soldiers must complete the listening and reading modalities within 30 days to qualify for FLPB. If a
Soldier is taking the OPI it must be completed not later than 60 days from the test date of the first modal-
ity tested. Retesting in all three modalities must be completed prior to the expiration of the written agree-
ment.
h. Soldiers are paid depending on the ARSOF ASLL languages. Exceptions follow:
(1) Always pay Soldiers for their CLANG. Soldiers must be proficient in their CLANG first to be eligible
for FLPB in any additional languages (Soldiers assigned to an SMU are exempt from this rule). A Soldier
is assigned only one CLANG in accordance with paragraphs 5 –6 and 5– 7 of this regulation. The single
CLANG determination does not apply to special operations liaison officer (SOLO) and special operations
forces liaison element (SOFLE). The CG, USASOC will make SOLO and SOFLE CLANG determinations.
Upon termination of assignment as a SOLO or SOFLE, remove any additional CLANGs assigned.
(2) SOLO or SOFLE are authorized FLPB for any language in which they are qualified at the 2/2 level
or higher.
(3) In accordance with paragraph 5– 8, ARSOF Soldiers are exempt from the restrictions pertaining to
Prevalent in the Force languages in reference to FLPB eligibility and payment criteria.
5–14. Army special operations forces language capability
For this regulation, all ARSOF Soldiers are considered language-capable Soldiers.
5–15. Foreign language proficiency bonus proficiency criteria
a. The FLPB payment levels are based on proficiency ratings in listening, reading, and/or speaking
with a minimum proficiency score of 1+/1+ and/or OPI score of S1+ (see table 4–1).
b. Soldiers must take both the listening and reading test of the same level DLPT (very low range, lower
range, upper range, or computer adaptive) or OPI within 30 days to have a valid test and be eligible for
FLPB. However, the upper range DLPT test scores will only be used for FLPB purposes for the modalities
on which the Soldier scored a 3 on a valid lower range DLPT and may be taken up to 30 days after the
effective date of the lower range DLPT. If a Soldier taking the upper range DLPT improves the score suffi-
ciently to receive an increase in FLPB, the date the Soldier took the upper range test is the date used to
calculate their FLPB but does not change the termination of eligibility for FLPB, which is determined by
the date of the lower range DLPT. ARSOF Soldiers may take the DLPT and OPI tests in any sequence.
c. Use the proficiency rating received in listening or reading modality to determine the FLPB payment
level when FLPB eligibility is determined by the DLPT. Use the speaking modality (OPI), if taken, for
FLPB determination when a DLPT score (if taken) would result in a lower payment eligibility to the Sol-
dier. If a DLPT and OPI are taken within 60 days of each other the Soldier is entitled to FLPB based on
the highest two modalities (does not apply to proficiency rating).
(1) For Soldiers with a valid DLPT score only, base FLPB on the DLPT. Always use the most recent
effective date as the DLPT date.
(2) For Soldiers with a valid OPI score only, base FLPB on the OPI. Always use the most recent effec-
tive date as the OPI date.
(3) For Soldiers with both a valid OPI and DLPT score, base FLPB on the following criteria:
(a) AOC/CMF 18, 37, 38, or 180A Soldiers must score L2/R2/S2 to qualify for FLPB in all three modali-
ties. For example, a Soldier scores L2/R2 on the DLPT. This Soldier is eligible to draw FLPB at level 2 for
listening and level 2 for reading ($200 per month). If the Soldier scores an S2 on the OPI, then he or she
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 53
would be eligible for a total payment of $300 per month. ARSOF Soldiers may take the OPI and DLPT in
any sequence.
(b) Base FLPB on the test that authorizes the highest FLPB amount (when drawing for two modalities
only).
(c) Upon expiration of each test used for FLPB payments or when a new valid DLPT or OPI is taken,
re-evaluate FLPB eligibility based on paragraph 5–15c(1), 5–15c(2), 5–15c(3)(a), and 5–15c(3)(b).
(d) For Soldiers with both a valid DLPT score of L3/R3 or higher and OPI 3 or higher, base FLPB on
both the DLPT and the OPI (that is, L3/R3/S3).
(e) For ARSOF Soldiers, emphasis should be on Soldiers testing using the OPI versus the DLPT given
the unique ARSOF mission environment.
(f) A DLPT under the L3/R3 level or OPI under the S3 level remains valid for payment of FLPB for 12
months. A DLPT of L3/R3 and higher or an OPI of S3 or higher is valid for payment of FLPB for 24
months.
(g) For languages in which only one modality is available, the rate of FLPB will be determined as fol-
lows: a score of 2 will equal a 2/2 FLPB rate, 2+ will equal 2+/2+, and a 3 or higher will equal a 3/3 rate.
5–16. Annual or biennial certification
a. Soldiers assigned to an SMU who meet the certification criteria (see paras 5–16a(1) and 5–16a(2))
in a non-CLANG are eligible for FLPB regardless of their qualification status in their CLANG.
(1) Annual certification. Soldiers who score under an L3/R3 on the DLPT or under S3 on the OPI must
retest prior to last day of the month in which they took their DLPT/OPI 12 months later to maintain eligibil-
ity to receive FLPB.
(2) Biennial certification. Soldiers who score an L3/R3 or higher on the DLPT or S3 or higher on the
OPI must retest prior to the last day of their month they took their DLPT/OPI 24 months later to maintain
eligibility to receive FLPB.
b. In situations where no testing facilities are available, commanders (O –5 and above) may use their
discretion to waive the annual recertification requirement for Soldiers who are deployed (for 25 days or
longer and current certification expires during the deployment) or assigned OCONUS. For example, if a
Soldier is assigned to a European country close enough to Germany where they conduct administrative
actions such as renewing identification cards, an appointment to take the language test should be ar-
ranged. This example would not qualify as not being near a testing location. There is no limit to the num-
ber of waivers that can be granted, however, the total number of months waived will not exceed 36 con-
secutive months from the effective date of the original qualifying test. After 36 months from the original
qualifying test effective date, no further waiver is authorized, and the Soldier must obtain a new qualifying
test score to retain their FLPB entitlement.
(1) The commander documents the recertification on an administrative PAR with the following annota-
tion: “The commander certifies that the recipient can perform (his/her) linguistic duties in a satisfactory
manner and remains proficient at a level consistent with the FLPB rate received for the previous qualify-
ing test.”
(2) If the recertification is for a deployment (for 25 days or longer), the commander will include the an-
ticipated redeployment date on the administrative PAR. The recertification period cannot exceed 180
days post-redeployment (as calculated in paragraph 5–16b(3)). In the event the Soldier returns before the
anticipated redeployment date annotated on the administrative PAR, it is the Soldier’s responsibility to no-
tify the commander for recalculation of a recertified waiver period. Adjust the date of the exemption to re-
flect the actual redeployment date. The initial calculated waived period and verbiage notifying the Soldier
of their responsibility to report any changes to their deployment start and end dates will be entered on the
written agreement.
(3) For the waived recertification period, calculate at 2 times the number of days deployed (to include
travel time). The minimum waived certification period is 90 days and the maximum is 180 days. Add the
waived recertification period to the Soldier’s redeployment date (or expected redeployment date) and ad-
justed post-redeployment when necessary.
(4) Enter into a new written agreement for the approved extended period using the PAR approving the
extension as the key supporting document. Forward the new written agreement to the local finance office
for issuance of orders to authorize FLPB.
(5) Waivers granted under this paragraph cover the Soldier’s CLANG and any other non-CLANGs for
which he or she is otherwise entitled to receive FLPB.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 54
(6) Commanders may request a medical waiver to annual recertification for Soldiers if they have a
medical condition that prevents the completion of annual recertification testing. The request must specify
that the Soldier was unable to complete annual recertification testing with supporting documentation from
a physician or profile. The branch manager will review the request and adjudicate. The purpose of this
policy is to ensure that Soldiers unable to retest annually due to a medical prohibition continue to receive
FLPB.
c. Soldiers must retest on the DLPT or OPI as soon as practicable within 180 days of the order’s date
releasing them from the duty assignment. If scheduling an OPI takes longer than 180 days, the TCO must
contact the Chief, Army Foreign Language Team for an ETP so their FLPB does not stop.
d. Soldiers who are already certified proficient in languages for which they are receiving FLPB and are
in a training program longer than 180 days must retest for the languages for which they receive FLPB
prior to the start of the course. Soldiers who require a waiver to take the DLPT or OPI earlier than 180
days from their most recent DLPT or OPI must request waiver from the program manager, ArmyU,
ACCESS (AHRC – PDE) prior to reporting to the course.
Chapter 6
Department of the Army Civilian Foreign Language Proficiency Pay
Section I
Information
6–1. Overview
a. This chapter prescribes policy for the DA Civilian FLPP Program. Nonappropriated fund employees
and contractors are not eligible to receive FLPP.
b. The DA Civilian FLPP is a command driven program based on mission requirements and available
funding. Commanders and heads of activities will determine if their DA Civilian employees receive FLPP.
For a DA Civilian employee to receive FLPP, the commander or head of activities must document the lan-
guage requirement in the DA Civilian’s PD in accordance with the ACOM, ASCC, or DRU commanders,
heads of HQDA activities, and United States Property and Fiscal Officers policy for the payment of FLPP
to DA Civilian employees.
c. The FLPP is a bi-weekly monetary bonus paid to DA Civilians who maintain the required proficiency
in designated foreign languages in accordance with the Army’s needs (see table 6–1).
d. The DA Civilian FLPP Program is authorized under the provisions of the following:
(1) 10 USC 1596 and 10 USC 1596a.
(2) DoDI 1400.25, Volume 2016.
(3) DoDI 5160.70.
6–2. Department of the Army Civilian foreign language proficiency pay
a. Languages or specialties recommended for FLPP must satisfy the conditions prescribed by this
chapter.
b. Forward requests for administrative or policy changes to the DCS, G –1 (DAPE– CPD– EP), 1000
Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310 –0300, with an information copy to the Chief of the Army Foreign
Language Team and the Director of the Civilian Personnel in the DCS, G –2 (DAMI– MS).
c. DA Civilians are responsible for scheduling their own foreign language proficiency tests for annual
recertification except as provided for in paragraph 2–5e(3) of this regulation for civilian linguists who score
3/3 or higher on their proficiency test. 3/3 civilian linguists are required to retest biennially.
Section II
Policy
6–3. Criteria for individual Department of the Army Civilian eligibility
a. A DA Civilian is eligible to receive FLPP if all the following conditions are met:
(1) The commander and/or head of activity decides that a DA Civilian is eligible to receive FLPP. This
determination must be provided in writing to the DA Civilian, signed by the DA Civilian, annotated in the
PD, and be in compliance with the ACOM, ASCC, and DRU commander’s policy.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 55
(2) The employee is certified proficient within the last 12 months (24 months if the linguist scores 3/3 or
higher on their DLPT/OPI) in a foreign language. Determine proficiency by the DLPT, OPI, or other DoD-
approved proficiency test.
(3) The requirement for foreign language proficiency must be noted in the DA Civilian’s PD.
b. The effective date of FLPP eligibility is determined in accordance with paragraph 4–3f.
c. DA Civilians remain eligible for FLPP while attending non-language training courses of 119 days or
less.
d. DA Civilians whose PD does not specify a language requirement are not eligible for FLPP based
solely on their proficiency in a language listed on the ASLL.
e. Do not pay FLPP if the employee is in a leave without pay or other unpaid status of more than 10
consecutive workdays, or in an extended paid absence in excess of 30 consecutive workdays.
f. Terminate an employee’s FLPP when the—
(1) Commander or head of activity determines the need for the language in which the employee has
skills is no longer required.
(2) Employee no longer meets the certification requirements.
(3) Employee’s most recent performance evaluation (for example, close out or early annual) was less
than successful.
(4) Commander or head of activity uses their discretion to terminate the employees FLPP.
g. Consider DA Civilians who are part of the MICECP language-dependent and, as such, are eligible
for FLPP based on their CLANG or any other language authorized in writing by the Commander, U.S.
Army Field Support Center (USAFSC) or Director, MICECP. MICECP employees will have their language
requirements documented in their personnel folders maintained by the USAFSC Human Resources (HR)
section.
6–4. Amount of foreign language proficiency pay payment
a. FLPP is available to all DA Civilian grade and pay bands.
b. Pay FLPP in addition to any other pay or allowance to which the DA Civilian is entitled.
c. FLPP is taxable and such taxes are withheld on a pay period basis.
d. FLPP is included in determining maximum pay subject to the pay cap.
e. Do not consider FLPP as an employee’s rate of basic pay for any purpose (for example, retirement
or insurance).
f. Consider the overpayment or unauthorized payment of FLPP a debt owed to the Government that
the civilian employee must repay.
g. The amount of FLPP may not exceed $184.62 per bi-weekly pay for a single language and $461.54
per bi-weekly pay period for a combination of languages (see table 6–1). Total FLPP payments cannot
exceed $12,000 for any 12-month period. FLPP payment requires the following:
(1) Document a language requirement in the DA Civilian’s PD; the only exception to this requirement is
MICECP employees. MICECP employees will have their language capability documented in their person-
nel files maintained by the USAFSC HR section. Multiple languages may be authorized for pay. MICECP
employees are authorized to hold multiple CLANGs.
(2) Do not pay FLPP if there is no DLIFLC certified testing method for a language.
(3) DA Civilians who are attending or instructing PME or equivalent courses must comply with chapter
4 of this regulation for payment of FLPP.
(4) FLPP entitlement becomes effective on the pay period after the appropriate DA Civilian pay system
has received all documentation and approvals.
6–5. Annual recertification
a. Annual recertification is a requirement for FLPP.
(1) If no DLPT exists for the language, use an OPI or another DLIFLC approved test to determine
FLPP eligibility based on speaking proficiency only.
(2) DA Civilians who are due recertification but are deployed or assigned outside of the United States
where testing facilities are not available can have their commander or supervisor recertify their current
proficiency in lieu of the DLPT or OPI. Document the recertification on an SF 52 (Request for Personnel
Action) with the following annotation: “The supervisor certifies that the recipient can perform (his/her) lin-
guistic duties in a satisfactory manner and is proficient at a level consistent with the FLPP rate for the pre-
vious year.” There is a 2-year consecutive limit on this exemption not directly tied to contingency
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 56
operations. DA Civilians must retest on the DLPT or OPI as soon as practicable within 180 days after they
return to their permanent duty station starting the date the employee is released from the assignment or
redeploys. If a DA Civilian cannot schedule a DLPT or OPI within 180 days of the employee’s release
from assignment or redeployment, then the TCO must contact the DCS, G– 1 (DAPE– CPD –EP) for an
ETP.
(a) DA Civilians who are due to rotate to a foreign country where no language testing facility is availa-
ble and are within 6 months of their test expiration date must retest before rotating overseas.
(b) Supervisors may require DA Civilians to retest within 6 months of their test date when performance
is unacceptable based on a demonstrated lack of language proficiency.
(3) SF 52s authorizing FLPP are effective for not longer than 12 months from the test date except as
provided for in paragraph 2–5b of this regulation.
b. DA Civilians who are proficient in a language for which they are receiving FLPP and are in a training
program for that same language are exempt from the retesting requirement while they are attending the
course. The DA Civilian’s supervisor is responsible for generating a memorandum (using the subject “Re-
quest for Exemption”) and must ensure that the SF 52 authorizes the extension of FLPP to the end of the
course. This exemption applies to all languages for which the civilian is receiving FLPP.
c. DA Civilians will follow the provisions for testing in accordance with paragraph 2 –5 of this regulation.
d. Proficiency expires on the last day of the month in which the DLPT is taken 1 year later. For exam-
ple, A DLPT taken on 5 January 2024 would expire on 31 January 2025. For linguists scoring L3/R3 or
higher on their DLPT, their proficiency would expire on the last day of the month in which the DLPT is
taken 2 years later. For example, a DLPT taken on 5 January 2024 would expire on 31 January 2026.
6–6. Certification funding
a. ACES conducts foreign language testing with visibility operating readiness (VOPR) funding. The
CG, U.S. Army Installation Management Command has oversight of VOPR funding.
b. Organizations may be responsible for funding of foreign language testing for their employee if VOPR
funding is not available.
6–7. Processing foreign language proficiency pay for Department of the Army Civilians
DA Civilian FLPP payments are made at the commander’s or staff principal’s discretion. Pay FLPP out of
the unit’s civilian pay budget. See table 6–1 for DA Civilian FLPP pay rates.
a. The DA Form 330 is the only acceptable document to report results for language proficiency tests.
b. DA Civilians must provide the DA Form 330 to their immediate supervisor.
c. DA Civilians are not required to complete a written agreement. DA Civilian’s supervisors must initi-
ate an SF 52, with the following documents through their commanders or head of activity who will route
these documents to their servicing CPAC:
(1) DA Form 330.
(2) A PD showing foreign language proficiency is required for the DA Civilian to receive FLPP.
MICECP personnel are exempt from this requirement. Treat MICECP personnel the same as a language-
dependent Soldier and as such they are eligible for FLPP based on their CLANG or any other language
authorized in writing by the USAFSC Commander or MICECP Director. MICECP employees will have
their language requirements documented in their personnel folders maintained by the USAFSC HR sec-
tion.
(3) A copy of the agreement showing the DA Civilian is subject to assignment to a position requiring
foreign language proficiency.
d. The Civilian Personnel Records Center and/or CPAC will use the following for FLPP:
(1) To initiate FLPP: Nature of Action 926–Foreign Language Proficiency Pay.
(2) To change FLPP: Nature of Action 927–Change in Foreign Language Proficiency Pay.
(3) To terminate FLPP: Nature of Action 928–Termination of Foreign Language Proficiency Pay.
Table 6 – 1
Department of the Army Civilian foreign language proficiency pay table
Payment per Bi-Weekly Pay Period
DLPT Score Payment
2/2 $92.31
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 57
Table 6 – 1
Department of the Army Civilian foreign language proficiency pay table
Payment per Bi-Weekly Pay Period
DLPT Score Payment
2+/2+ $138.46
3/3 $184.62
Chapter 7
Language Programming and Budgeting
7–1. Definition and purpose of The Army Language Program
TALP is the Army’s mechanism to provide commanders and linguists with sufficient resources to sustain
and enhance post-DLIFLC foreign language skills required to perform mission essential tasks critical to
the success of Army missions. TALP provides essential funding for the operation of unit level CLPs and
their nonresident language maintenance training activities within the Army. However, TALP does not fund
CLPs operated by USASOC to train CMFs 18, 37, 38R, 38W, 38Z Soldiers and 38A officers since
USASOC resources all ARSOF CLPs. Only the CMF 35 linguists assigned to USASOC may use TALP
funding. Units may, however, use TALP for CMFs 18, 37, and 38 Soldiers if they are assigned to the
GPF.
7–2. The Defense Language Program management decision package
For resource planning, programming, and budgeting, TALP is managed as a component of the TDLP
MDEP. The TDLP MDEP is managed by the TDLP MDEP Manager, Institutional Training Division, DCS,
G –3/5/7. The TDLP MDEP has two parts: the DLIFLC budget and TALP. The DCS, G–3/5/7 TDLP MDEP
manager is responsible for the DLIFLC portion of the TDLP MDEP and the SPM manages TALP.
7–3. The Army Language Program requirements in the program objective memorandum process
The preparation of the TALP budget begins with the DA POM process at HQDA. The SPM participates in
this process to justify TALP resources as part of the TDLP MDEP. The DA POM process normally begins
in the first quarter of the FY and concludes during the third quarter.
a. The TALP manager provides TALP requirements data, justifications, and recommendations to the
TDLP MDEP Manager to the DCS, G –3/5/7’s led Training Program Evaluation Group.
b. The TALP manager uses a TALP requirements model to determine the POM funding requirements
for the entire program (within the TDLP MDEP) on behalf of the participating commands (ACOMs,
ASCCs, DRUs, National Guard Bureau, and USAR). The DCS, G –2 reviews the TALP requirements
model annually with the participating commands (usually through email) and updates as necessary.
c. In its current form, the TALP requirements model includes the following steps:
(1) Determine linguist population to train in all components (for example, those in CLP-based language
maintenance programs).
(2) Gather proficiency data and assess level of training required considering standard versus specific
training needs.
(3) Calculate total annual hours to train per linguist.
(4) Calculate average training cost per hour (average instruction, support, and TDY costs) by compo-
nent.
(5) Determine total program AT costs (total population multiplied by hours required to train multiplied
by cost per hour).
d. The TALP manager also conducts the following analysis of the DA TALP POM requirements prior to
submission:
(1) Review and validate TALP funded training requirements.
(2) Review and validate ACOMs’, ASCCs’, DRUs’, and components TALP historical execution data.
(3) Evaluate language proficiency levels as a measure of program success.
(4) Review linguist mission requirements from the field.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 58
(5) Examine future requirements to identify the potential impact to funding levels based on changes in
language and number of linguists, increased proficiency requirements, historical execution rate, and
changing force structure.
(6) Verify TALP total, validated, and critical funding requirements.
(7) Coordinate the TALP POM requirements with the participating component and commands TALP
managers in accordance with paragraph 1–23g prior to submission to the TDLP MDEP Manager.
7–4. Other guidance for The Army Language Program
a. HQDA principal officials, including other staff elements besides the DCS, G–2, may task the partici-
pating commands to submit POM requirements through their channels. Participating commands will re-
spond to this and any other HQDA TALP planning, programming, and budgeting guidance. Use the
proper channels (according to AR 1–1) to make POM submissions. Always provide an information copy of
the POM submission to the TALP manager.
b. Participating commands will identify TALP requirements separately in the POM and command oper-
ating budget. Do not submit or include TALP requirements in other major programs.
c. Establish accounting processing codes that identify CLP language training expenses to monitor exe-
cution of TALP funds.
d. Coordinate all TALP fund transfers conducted by the TALP manager with the impacted component,
ACOM, ASCC, DRU, or participating command’s CLPM.
e. Submit all unfunded requirements for end-of-year funding through the ACOM, ASCC, DRU, or com-
ponent to the TALP manager by 1 April.
f. Commands receiving TALP will notify the TALP manager of any unobligated TALP funding not later
than 15 April. Units with unobligated TALP remaining as of 15 April will provide the DCS, G –2 with a de-
tailed spend plan for their remaining funds. If the commander determines they cannot obligate their re-
maining TALP, they should return this funding to the TALP manager to redistribute to other commands.
This enables the TALP manager to redistribute TALP funding to ensure obligation rates remain high.
7–5. Restrictions on the use of The Army Language Program funds
a. All TALP funds are limited to funding training for Soldiers in language-dependent or language-capa-
ble MOSs. Exceptions to this policy include:
(1) The use of TALP funds to pay for DA Civilian and contractor CLPM training.
(2) DA Civilian and contractor CLPM attendance at CLPM workshops and conferences.
(3) DA Civilian and contractor CLPM travel costs associated with subordinate CLP inspections.
b. Use TALP funds to resource unit CLPs, except for USASOC CLPs, in which only language training
for CMF 35 Soldiers and their prorated share of CLP overhead costs is TALP funded. This does not pre-
clude local programming of other P2 training funds to support CLP or language maintenance training.
c. Only use TALP funds for approved language training activities and opportunities. Do not use TALP
funds for acquisition language training, to include acquisition of a second language.
d. Do not use TALP funds for other programs or sub-accounts.
e. TALP funds may not be mixed with, used instead of, or used to supplement funds specifically appro-
priated to pay for MOS producing training or to fund formal civilian education resulting in a degree (that is,
travel and per diem costs to attend an MOS producing course or tuition fees at a civilian institute to obtain
a college degree).
f. Do not use TALP to fund foreign language training for DA Civilians or contractors. Units may use
TALP for DA Civilian and contractor CLPM training, conference attendance, and inspections required by
this regulation as this enables language training for Soldiers. Units may also use TALP to fund contract
language instructors and contract CLPM travel when appropriately allocated to a new or existing contract.
Language-enabled DA Civilians may participate in TALP funded installation sustainment language train-
ing if space is available.
g. Units are authorized to use TALP funds to provide English language training and foreign language
sustainment training to heritage speaking language-dependent or language-capable MOS/AOC/FA Sol-
diers. Units may not request additional TALP funding to support this English language training.
h. Units may use no more than 5 percent of their allocated TALP funding to support the administrative
overhead required for language conferences or workshops approved in accordance with current HQDA
policy and in accordance with AR 1–50.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 59
i. Commanders will not expend TALP funding or other designated language training funds on Soldiers
who are within 180 days of separation/retirement from the Army. This does not apply to Soldiers who are
enlisting in an ARNG or a USAR unit in a language-capable or language-dependent MOS from the RA.
j. TALP funds are authorized for the purchase of equipment, materials, and services directly related to
the enhancement and sustainment of language skills. Funds may be used for, but are not limited to, the
purchase of televisions, DVD players, personal media devices, computers (desktops and laptops), com-
mercial internet, contract instructors, contract CLPMs for units with 70 or more authorized linguists, dic-
tionaries, periodicals, subscriptions to target language publications and media, and applications to sup-
port distance language training. CLPMs may purchase other equipment for their language lab (such as
furniture) if it is used to enhance language training and is not available through the installation. All equip-
ment purchased must be accounted for and maintained on an Army hand receipt and should be properly
accounted for and inventoried as part of the unit’s Command Supply Discipline Program. CLPMs should
use the policies prescribed in AR 25–1 to purchase and manage information technology, including com-
mercial internet.
k. Units must schedule all DLIFLC MTTs through the SMDR process. Units requesting DLIFLC MTTs
without using the SMDR process must request an ETP from the Chief, Foreign Language Team.
7–6. The Army Language Program mandatory reporting
Commanders of ACOMs, ASCCs, DRUs; the CNGB; and the CAR are required to submit three annual
TALP reports to the TALP manager. Submit the TALP plan (annual funding request) by 1 August. Unit
commanders will submit a 6-month TALP report not later than 15 April detailing how much of their TALP
budget they have obligated as of 1 June and either a spend plan for the remaining funds or a date they
will return TALP they are unable to obligate to the TALP manager. Submit the end of FY TALP report
(language funding status report) by 1 December. The detailed TALP report explains how the unit spent
their TALP budget for the FY that just ended. Subordinate unit commanders with CLPs will provide sup-
porting data to their MSC’s TALP manager upon request. The ACOM, ASCC, DRU, and USAR TALP
managers, and the CNGB will consolidate input from their subordinate units and provide a report to the
Army Foreign Language Team’s TALP Manager.
Chapter 8
Contract Linguist Support
8–1. General
The Army has relied on the use of contract linguists since the early 1990s to provide heritage speaking
linguists to support contingency operations in Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, the Horn of Africa, Afghani-
stan, and during the Ukraine crisis. Future conflicts may also require the use of contract linguists depend-
ing on the size of the U.S. force committed, the number of military linguists available to support military
operations, the language(s) required, the language proficiency required, and the length of the conflict.
Commanders and planners are required to use the procedures contained in this chapter to plan for and
requisition contract linguists. This chapter also delineates the procedures for providing contract linguist
support to DoD components.
8–2. Department of Defense contract linguist authorities and oversight
a. The Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) designated the Secretary of the Army (SECARMY) as the DoD
executive agent for the DoD Contract Linguist Program (see DoDD 5160.41E). In accordance with AR
1 –19, the SECARMY-delegated RO for the DoD Contract Linguist Program is the DCS, G– 2. The Chief of
the DCS, G–2’s Foreign Language Team executes the RO responsibilities for the Contract Linguist Pro-
gram for the DCS, G– 2.
b. The Contract Linguist Program does not apply to contracts whose purpose is primarily foreign lan-
guage instruction.
c. The Contract Linguist Program is limited to interpretation and translation services. Do not use lin-
guists hired under these policies as cultural advisor or analysts.
d. Exceptions to the required use of the DoD Contract Linguist Program are the combat support agen-
cies (such as NSA, Defense Intelligence Agency) and United States Special Operations Command
(USSOCOM). The combat support agencies and USSOCOM are authorized to establish their own linguist
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 60
contracts and do not require DCS, G– 2 approval, however they may use the DoD Contract Linguist Pro-
gram to support their requirements. All other DoD components are prohibited from executing their own
contracts for contract linguist support without a written waiver from the DCS, G –2. Send waiver requests
by email to the DCS, G– 2 (usarmy.pentagon.hqda-dcs-g-2.list.foreign-language-office@army.mil). The
DCS, G– 2 will review the requests for a waiver on a case-by-case basis and provide notification to the
requestor concerning the status of their waiver request (see sample waiver format at figure 8– 2). As a
minimum, waiver requests should include:
(1) Scope of the requirement to include mission, number of required linguists, location where required,
duration of the event, language requirements, and security clearance requirements.
(2) A justification statement explaining why a waiver is required.
(3) Acknowledgment of the requirement for counterintelligence (CI) vetting of contract linguists.
(4) The DoD component point of contact information.
8–3. Contract Linguist Program responsibilities
a. The DCS, G–2 will––
(1) Execute policy for the employment and the screening and vetting of continental United States
(CONUS) hired contract linguists. DCS, G – 2 is not responsible for the screening and vetting of CAT I (no
clearance) local national linguists (LNLs). Screening and vetting CAT I LNLs is a theater responsibility.
(2) Coordinate with the Army Budget Office (ABO) annually to secure funding for the execution of lin-
guist contracts and execute RO responsibilities.
b. The Chief, Army Foreign Language Team will––
(1) Manage the Contract Linguist Program on behalf of the RO.
(2) Coordinate with the requiring commands’ linguist managers and the Contract Linguist and Intelli-
gence Program Support Office (CLIPSO) Director to provide enough linguists to support military opera-
tions.
(3) Provide overall guidance and oversight for contract linguist support.
(4) Coordinate with DoD components for the responsibilities and support activities necessary to pro-
vide continuous, sustainable, and global linguist support required by end users. This will include develop-
ment of a coordinated process for transition from peacetime to contingency operations and back.
(5) Execute RO responsibilities to include the development of an annual budget and coordinate with
ABO to submit the annual budget request for the Contract Linguist Program.
(6) Maintain oversight of linguist contracts and the use of contract linguist resources and related ex-
penditures.
(7) Grant waivers for commands to establish their own linguist contracts if the CLIPSO Director is una-
ble to support their linguist requirements.
(8) Respond to congressional inquiries on the funding required to sustain contract linguist operations
and respond to all Army and DoD audits and DoD Inspector General assistance visits.
(9) Delegate the responsibility of administering and managing the day-to-day operation of the linguist
contracts to the CG, INSCOM. The INSCOM G–3’s CLIPSO manages the contracts that provide linguists
to support military operations.
c. The CG, INSCOM will––
(1) Establish the CLIPSO to administer the DoD linguist contracts providing worldwide contract linguist
support to DoD components.
(2) Coordinate and perform actions as necessary to ensure DoD has a contract vehicle(s) available to
procure linguist support services.
(3) Conduct appropriate administration and oversight regarding the requirements placed on the linguist
contract(s) to include the execution of funds provided for contract linguist support.
(4) Serve as the requiring activity for Contract Linguist Program management and provide the COR for
appointment by the KO. The COR serves as the primary interface between the Government and the ven-
dor’s program management personnel.
(5) Report projected funding shortfalls to the RO.
(6) Monitor contract linguist support and conduct quality assurance assessments of vendor services.
(7) Consult with the supporting legal advisor regarding legal issues related to the execution of the pro-
gram and worldwide DoD program requirements.
(8) Provide Soldiers on a continuing basis to function as alternate contracting officer’s representatives
(ACORs) in areas with deployed linguists.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 61
(a) The ACOR is a forward deployed INSCOM Soldier directly appointed by the KO to perform certain
administrative functions regarding the DoD language contract on the COR’s behalf. ACORs serve as the
primary interface between the supported military units, theater leadership, and the vendor.
(b) ACORs perform contract surveillance and inspections to ensure contract support is provided in ac-
cordance with the contract performance work statement. This includes assisting military units with obtain-
ing contract linguist support to include coordinating for life support, equipment, transportation, and facili-
ties to support contract linguists and vendor management.
(c) ACORs seek resolution of contract related issues between supported units and the vendor. They
also develop and submit performance evaluation reports on vendor execution of contractual requirements
to the COR.
(9) Submits weekly status reports to the Operations Division, DCS, G – 2 (DAMI– OIO). These reports
include information on linguist fill rate (percentage of fill against requirements).
(10) Coordinates with the Army Contracting Command KO to manage the linguist contracts.
d. Commanders of requiring commands will—
(1) For contract linguist support provided through supplemental contingency funds, submit AOR vali-
dated contract linguist requirements by email through command channels to the RO
(usarmy.pentagon.hqda-dcs-g-2.list.foreign-language-office@army.mil). Requests must include the num-
ber of linguists required, language(s) required, security clearance level(s), requisite language proficiency
skills (reading, writing, or speaking), and any specific requirements (such as physical fitness level, simul-
taneous translation capability, dual language) and the named operation the linguists are supporting.
(2) For non-OCO contract linguist support provided by the DoD linguist contract but reimbursed by the
requestor, submit agency validated requests for contract linguist support to the Director, CLIPSO with a
copy furnished to the RO. Additionally, the requester must––
(a) Identify the funding source when submitting the request for contract linguist support.
(b) In conjunction with local commanders, ensure contract linguists hired in theater undergo a security
screening. Local commanders may tailor the screening to meet the force protection posture within the
theater. At a minimum, this screening will include a local police check. For theaters where the force pro-
tection posture is high or in combat zones, this screening will include an interview, biometrics checks, and
a check against existing counterterrorism databases.
(3) Appoint a TLM to manage all contract linguist operations with the AOR. TLMs will––
(a) Consolidate, prioritize, and process contract linguist requests for the theater.
(b) Manage language mix to meet mission requirements.
(c) Provide contract linguist requirements validation to the RO in accordance with paragraph 8–5b(4).
(d) Authorize and assign linguists to units in conjunction with the ACOR.
(e) Maintain theater-wide linguist accountability.
(f) Coordinate with the J/G– 2X to screen LNLs.
8–4. Contract linguist capabilities
a. Contract linguists are hired for their ability to listen, read, speak, and write proficiently in a foreign
language when organic capabilities are insufficient to meet operational requirements. Contract linguists
are categorized by their level of security clearance. Contract linguists may or may not have a security
clearance. The contract linguist categories are:
(1) CAT I. No security clearance. CAT I linguists can be local national (LN) hires or U.S. or Five Eyes
(FVEY) nation hires. For U.S. or FVEY CAT I hires, a national security determination does not result in a
security clearance.
(2) CAT II. Secret security clearance eligibility. A CAT II linguist often takes 4 to 6 months to complete
the Secret security clearance process.
(3) CAT III. Top Secret (TS) or TS/Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) eligibility. A CAT III lin-
guist often takes 9 to 12 months to complete the TS/SCI and CI polygraph process. Signals intelligence
(SIGINT) or cyber mission support also requires a favorable screening by the NSA’s A525 Directorate.
The NSA security screening process often takes 12 additional months or longer to complete after the con-
tract linguist has received a fully adjudicated TS/SCI security clearance and a favorable CI polygraph.
The cost for CAT III linguists is substantially higher than for the other categories; therefore, approving offi-
cials should balance the need for a CAT III contract linguist against the resources necessary to secure
their services.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 62
b. KOs and commanders of requiring commands will ensure that contracts for foreign-cleared FVEY
CAT II and CAT III linguists require the linguists to hold the appropriate security clearance issued by a
FVEY country with which the U.S. has a reciprocal security agreement. KOs and commanders of request-
ing commands will ensure that contracts require all non-U.S. persons hired as contract linguists to be
subject to contract linguist screening procedures.
c. Foreign language services can be contracted to support DoD missions, operations, and activities,
including:
(1) CAT I (LN and U.S.):
(a) Support to tactical operations and patrols.
(b) Convoy operations.
(c) Training missions.
(d) Medical operations.
(e) Open-source intelligence cells.
(f) Translation cells.
(g) CA missions.
(h) Detention operations.
(i) Logistics and procurement activities support.
(j) Military information support operations.
(k) Liaison.
(l) Document and media exploitation (DOMEX).
(2) CAT II:
(a) SIGINT collection (mission-specific).
(b) Human intelligence (HUMINT) collection.
(c) Interrogation support.
(d) PSYOPS (echelon-specific).
(e) Detainee analysis.
(f) Explosive ordnance disposal forensics.
(g) Commander’s interpreters (brigade and above).
(h) DOMEX.
(i) Liaison (echelon- and mission-specific).
(j) Detention operations.
(3) CAT III:
(a) SIGINT/cyber collection and/or analysis.
(b) HUMINT collection and/or analysis.
(c) Strategic debriefing.
(4) To facilitate linguist training and unit familiarization, the RO permits the pre-deployment positioning
of a limited number of CAT II contract linguists with commanders of deploying Army Corps, divisions, and
brigade combat teams; special forces groups; SFABs; and the commanders of U.S. Marine Corps equiva-
lent units. KOs and commanders of requesting commands will ensure that contracts require these CAT II
linguists to report to the specified units 90 days prior to deployment, or as otherwise specified.
(5) Each brigade combat team (or U.S. Marine Corps equivalent), special forces group, or SFAB may
receive one CAT II linguist (usually reserved for the commander), and each division and corps may re-
ceive up to three CAT II linguists (one for each general officer).
(6) Prepositioned linguists count against theater manning level requirements.
8–5. Requesting contract linguist support
a. Contract linguist support. CLIPSO serves as the single point of entry for all contract linguist require-
ments validated and resourced under the Army’s RO authorities.
b. Requirements, identification, validation, and timelines.
(1) Commanders of requiring commands identify operational contract linguist requirements that can be
RO funded or customer funded, such as by the unit commander.
(2) If the operational contract linguist requirements are related to an approved named contingency op-
eration, the commander of the requiring command coordinates with the RO for possible funding. See fig-
ure 8– 1 for an acquisition flowchart.
(3) Historical information provides useful guidelines when determining linguist requirements. For exam-
ple, Troops-to-contract linguist ratios historically run approximately 10 to 1 for counterinsurgency
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 63
operations. The contract linguist population supporting counterinsurgency operations is historically broken
down using the following percentages:
(a) CAT I (LN), 67 percent.
(b) CAT I (U.S.), 10 percent.
(c) CAT II, 20 percent.
(d) CAT III, 3 percent.
(e) Large-scale combat operations percentage fills are significantly lower.
(f) Humanitarian operations (like the Afghanistan evacuation) require 1 linguist for every 40 refugees.
(4) Once the commander of a requesting unit has validated these requirements, the TLM sends a vali-
dation request (see fig 8– 3) signed by an O –6 or above through email to the RO (usarmy.pentagon.hqda-
dcs-g-2.list.foreign-language-office@army.mil) who forwards the requirements to the combatant com-
mander for validation. Unit commanders must attach a spreadsheet that provides detail on the requested
linguist support (see fig 8 –4). Unit commanders are required to send revalidation requests annually but
are authorized to send revalidation requests up to three times a year depending on operational require-
ments (15 March, 15 July, and 15 November). Once the combatant commander and the RO validate the
requirements, the DCS, G–2 will instruct INSCOM’s CLIPSO to place the requirements on contract. Fail-
ure to obtain validation by the combatant commander and the RO will delay funding and possibly require
customer funding to satisfy requirements. Eligible units supporting approved named operations receive
their validated linguist requirements with no associated labor costs. Unit commanders are required to pro-
vide all life support requirements per the terms of the contract. If the unit commander requires the linguist
to travel in a TDY status, the unit commander is responsible for life support and must provide funding to
reimburse travel expenses prior to travel. The unit commanders must provide the funding before the RO
and/or CLIPSO will authorize the linguists to travel.
(5) If the operational contract linguist requirements are not supporting an approved named operation,
the customer is responsible for funding the linguist support. The commander of the requiring command
coordinates directly with the CLIPSO COR for the cost estimate and execution of these requirements with
a copy furnished to the RO. The customer sends funds to the CLIPSO COR using DD Form 448 (Military
Interdepartmental Purchase Request). Once the CLIPSO COR receives the DD Form 448, the KO adds
the requirement to the contract through a contract modification. Contract modifications may take up to 90
days although the KO can verbally authorize the requesting organization to proceed sooner.
(6) Once the linguist requirements are on contract, the CG, INSCOM initiates the security screening
and clearance of the vendor-provided linguist candidates. When linguists arrive in theater, the TLM pro-
vides unit assignments. Contract linguists are delivered to the units or to the major transportation hub and
are managed in theater pursuant to the terms and conditions of the applicable contract.
(7) Linguist distribution and priority of unit fill is at the discretion of the theater commander through the
combatant command, ASCC, or combined Joint task force TLM.
8–6. Funding contract linguist support and requesting contract linguist waivers
Funding for contract linguist support is provided by contingency, supplemental, or customer reimburse-
ment funds. Organizations requiring contract linguist support for contingency operations request funding
through the RO using the process outlined in figure 8– 1. Organizations planning to fund contract linguist
support using organizational funds must coordinate with the CLIPSO COR with a copy of the requirement
furnished to the RO and endorsed at the O–6 level.
a. Annual funding. The RO prepares the annual contingency funding request based on requirements
from the commanders of requiring commands and provides it to the ABO. ABO includes the requirement
in the overall Army supplemental request if the linguist requirements are related to direct war costs or are
supporting a supplemental funded operation (like the Ukraine Crisis). If the contract linguist requirements
are enduring (for example, Operation Spartan Shield, CJTF –HOA, Guantanamo), then the RO must POM
for these requirements. Once appropriated, the ABO directly releases the funding to the INSCOM G–8 for
contract execution.
b. Reimbursable funding.
(1) If a linguist request does not qualify for contingency operations funding, the commander of the re-
quiring command provides cost reimbursement to satisfy the contract linguist requirement. The com-
mander of the requiring command forwards requirements to the CLIPSO COR with a copy furnished to
RO. The request for support includes the identification of a funding source. Commanders of the requiring
commands send a DD Form 448 with a copy furnished to the CLIPSO COR to Commander, U.S. Army
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 64
Intelligence and Security Command (IARM –PB–HQ), 8825 Beulah Street, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060–5246.
Once the CLIPSO COR receives the DD Form 448, the KO adds the requirement to the contract through
a contract modification. Contract modifications may take up to 90 days although the KO can verbally au-
thorize the requesting organization to proceed sooner.
(2) The head of an organization requiring linguist support may also request a waiver from the use of
the Department of Defense Language Interpretation and Translation Enterprise (DLITE) contract if a busi-
ness case can be made that the organization’s contract is cheaper or there is insufficient time available
for DLITE to provide the linguist support. Heads of organizations requesting a waiver should email a
waiver request memorandum to the RO at usarmy.pentagon.hqda-dcs-g-2.list.foreign-language-of-
fice@army.mil. The memorandum should state the rationale for requesting a waiver and acknowledge
that the head of the requesting organization is responsible for conducting the CI screening required by
DoDD 5160.41E. See figure 8 –2 for an example of a contract linguist waiver request.
8–7. Contract linguist recruiting, processing, screening, and management
a. Linguist recruiting, processing, and screening.
(1) KOs will include the following linguist recruiting requirements as a part of contract negotiations with
vendors:
(a) Write and speak with clear and concise grammar and pronunciation of the specified contract re-
quired language at the proficiency level described in the contract performance work statement.
(b) Provide idiomatic translations of nontechnical material using correct syntax and expression from
English to the specified contract required language or vice versa.
(c) Conduct consecutive, accurate translations of ongoing conversations and activities. Linguists are
subject to periodic random reviews of their translation skills to ensure they comply with contractual stand-
ards. Linguists must conduct themselves in accordance with the local culture and customs.
(d) Deal unobtrusively with the local populace.
(e) Adhere to the standards of conduct as prescribed by Army instructions, the contract, and the host
nation laws.
(2) KOs will include the following language skill requirements in individual contract delivery order re-
quirements:
(a) Consecutive interpretation into and from English and from English into the required foreign lan-
guage.
(b) Interpreting aptitude and maintenance of integrity and meaning of material.
(c) Transcription of aural target language material into written form.
(d) Other technical skills, such as word processing used in conjunction with written translation, are pre-
ferred, but they can be part of on-the-job training and are not prerequisites for linguist hiring.
(3) KOs will include in vendor contracts a requirement for vendors to conduct an initial security screen-
ing of all linguist candidates. KOs will include the following security screening elements in contract negoti-
ations with vendors:
(a) Pending criminal or civil charges (including divorce and child custody proceedings).
(b) Felony arrest record.
(c) Alcohol related arrest within the last 5 years.
(d) Any involvement in hate crimes.
(e) Involvement in any group or organization that espouses illegal violence as a legitimate means to
achieve an end.
(f) Dual or multiple citizenships.
(g) Illegal use, possession, or distribution of narcotics or other controlled substances.
(h) Financial issues to include delinquent debt and bankruptcy including documentation of satisfaction
or resolution of the same.
(4) KOs will ensure that vendor contracts require each CONUS hired prospective linguist candidate to
undergo a personnel security background investigation conducted by the Defense Counterintelligence
and Security Agency (DCSA) and adjudicated by the DCSA Adjudications Facility for interim and final se-
curity clearance eligibility. KOs will ensure that vendor contracts require CAT III linguists to complete a
favorable CI polygraph exam and pass the NSA security screening process conducted by the A525 Direc-
torate (Military External Affairs Division) if specified or requested by the requiring activity.
(5) KOs will ensure that vendor contracts require each CAT I LN linguist to undergo a CI screening
prior to hire to determine eligibility. LN linguist CI screening is a theater responsibility.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 65
(6) Theater CI personnel will debrief all linguists prior to their return from theater.
(7) KOs will ensure that vendor contracts include the mandatory drug-free workplace clause (DFARS
252.223 –7004), as prescribed in DFARS 223.570– 2. KOs will consult with the supporting legal advisor to
determine if the applicable intergovernmental agreement permits drug testing of contract linguists who are
foreign nationals (see DoDI 1010.16). Customers will contact their supporting CI office to request poly-
graph examinations (see DoDI 5210.91).
b. Linguist management.
(1) Supported unit commanders will provide the vendor and the ACOR with a schedule of required lin-
guist services. If a linguist is not required for the scheduled amount of time, the unit commander will con-
tact the ACOR and the vendor’s supervisory personnel to notify them that the linguist is released from the
unit for the day. Unit commanders cannot give contract linguists unscheduled time off.
(2) The CLIPSO COR or the ACOR will coordinate work locations of onsite managers with the vendor
to ensure access to any resources the government is contractually obligated to furnish and to facilitate
coordination with government representatives.
(3) The CG, INSCOM is responsible for developing theater-specific handbooks to address linguist
management issues.
c. Questions. Direct all questions and comments by email to the RO at usarmy.pentagon.hqda-dcs-g-
2.list.foreign-language-office@army.mil.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 66
Figure 8 – 1. Contract linguist acquisition flowchart
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 67
Figure 8 – 2. Sample memorandum for contract linguist waiver request
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 68
Figure 8 – 3. Sample memorandum for contract linguist request/revalidation
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 69
Figure 8 – 4. Sample format for contract linguist validation technical exhibit spreadsheet
Chapter 9
Command Language Program Inspection Program
9–1. Information
Inspections are a required best practice to ensure unit CLPs meet HQDA and other supported organiza-
tions’ standards. Inspections are the primary means by which expenditures are monitored, programs are
evaluated, and problems and issues are identified and corrected. The inspection process identifies best
practices and reinforces key CLP principles. The inspection process synchronizes the CLP across all lev-
els. Year-round compliance with the Army’s foreign language programs policies and standards ensure a
properly functioning CLP.
9–2. Command language program inspection requirements
a. Incorporate the CLP inspection into each unit's organizational inspection program in accordance
with AR 1 –201. Unit commanders will inspect all subordinate CLPs at least biennially to monitor compli-
ance with this regulation, all applicable higher headquarters guidance, and unit policies and SOPs. If a
CLP does not meet the standard of 80 percent or more of the line items in table B– 1, the program will be
subject to reinspection 12 months after the initial inspection.
b. Maintain reports of all inspections that include language-related subjects for at least 2 years.
c. All unit commanders who receive language-related inspections or official visits from agencies out-
side of the DA will forward a copy of the inspection or visit report to the Army SPM within 30 days of re-
ceipt of the report.
d. The Army SPM conducts inspections of participating commands (ACOM, ASCC, and DRU) every 2
years and provides at least 30 days’ notice of the upcoming inspection.
9–3. Inspection checklist
DCS, G–2’s inspection checklist (see app B) is the basis for all CLP inspections within the Army. This
guide is reviewed and updated annually. Prior to inspections, inspectors provide a copy of the checklist
and the plan of action and milestones format to the CLPM. The inspection checklist is written for a unit
level (battalion and brigade) CLP. Larger CLPs will use the same checklist however, their roles are pri-
marily oversight for some of the activities (such as execution of weekly language training, inspection of
subordinate units, and do on).
9–4. Command language program inspection penalties
a. The SPM may impose penalties on participating commands or subordinate commands for noncom-
pliance with this regulation. The DCS, G– 2 may restrict the use of TALP funds (see para 7–5). Language
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 70
management personnel at all levels of the command are obligated to report potential program abuses
through their chain of command. ACOM, ASCC, DRU, RC commanders, and subordinate commanders
will use the DA Inspection Checklist for Participating CLPs located at appendix B and prescribed in AR
11 –2 to guide their inspection programs as appropriate.
b. Penalties may include:
(1) Withholding or reallocation of TALP funds.
(2) Withdrawal of ETP authority.
c. Maintain files on SPM and ACOM, ASCC, and DRU inspection results for 2 years.
9–5. Service Program Manager audit of the Foreign Language Proficiency Bonus Program
a. The SPM conducts internal review of the FLPB Program on a quarterly basis to ensure all personnel
who are receiving FLPB are entitled to it.
b. Once the quarterly review is complete, the SPM emails a spreadsheet containing the names of all
Soldiers drawing FLPB for which they are not entitled to the Chief of the USAHRC ICB for validation and
possible recoupment of overpayment.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 71
Appendix A
References
Section I
Required Publications
Unless otherwise stated, Department of the Army publications are available on the Army Publishing Direc-
torate website at https://armypubs.army.mil/. DoD issuances are available on the Executive Services Di-
rectorate website at https://www.esd.whs.mil/dd/. The USC is available at https://uscode.house.gov/.
AR 1–1
Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (Cited in para 7–4a.)
AR 1–19
Secretary of the Army Delegations of Authority (Cited in para 8–2a.)
AR 1–50
Army Conference Policy (cited in para 7–5h.)
AR 1–201
Army Inspection Policy (Cited in para 9–2a.)
AR 5–22
The Army Force Modernization Proponent System (Cited in para 2–8i.)
AR 11–2
Risk Management and Internal Control Program (Cited on title page.)
AR 25–1
Army Information Technology (Cited in para 7–5j.)
AR 25–30
Army Publishing Program (Cited in title page.)
AR 135–91
Service Obligations, Methods of Fulfillment, Participation Requirements, and Enforcement Provisions
(Cited in para 4–2d(1)(c).)
AR 350–20/OPNAVINST 1550.13/AFI 35–4004/MCO 1550.4E
Management of Defense Foreign Language Training (Cited in para 3–12b.)
AR 350–100
Officer Active Duty Service Obligations (Cited in para 3–1a(2)(a).)
AR 600–4
Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness (Cited in para 4– 10.)
AR 600–8–104
Army Military Human Resource Records Management (Cited in para 1–22c.)
AR 600–8–105
Military Orders (Cited in para 1–22b.)
AR 601–280
Army Retention Program (Cited in para 3–1a(2)(b)1.)
AR 611–5
Personnel and Classification Testing (Cited in para 1–23d.)
AR 612–201
Initial Entry/Prior Service Trainee Support (Cited in para 1–20c.)
AR 614–200
Enlisted Assignments and Utilization Management (Cited in para 2– 12.)
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 72
DA Pam 25–403
Army Guide to Recordkeeping (Cited in para 1–5.)
DA Pam 611–21
Military Occupational Classification and Structure (Cited in para 1–22b(1).)
DoD 7000.14–R, Volume 7a
Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation: Military Pay Policy–Active Duty and Reserve
Pay (Cited in para 4–1h.) (Available at https://comptroller.defense.gov/.)
DoDD 5160.41E
Defense Language, Regional Expertise, and Culture (LREC) Program (Cited in title page.)
DoDI 1315.20
Management of the DoD Foreign Area Officer Program (Cited in title page.)
DoDI 1332.18
Disability Evaluation System (Cited in para 4– 21.)
DoDI 1340.27
Military Foreign Language Skill Proficiency Bonuses (Cited in title page.)
DoDI 1400.25, Volume 2016
DoD Civilian Personnel Management System: Administration of Foreign Language Pay for Defense Civil-
ian Intelligence Personnel System (DCIPS) Employees (Cited in para 6–1d(2).)
DoDI 5160.70
Management of the Defense Language, Regional Expertise, and Culture (LREC) Program (Cited in title
page.)
Public Law 116–92
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Cited in para 1–14n.) (Available at
https://www.congress.gov/public-laws/.)
Universal Joint Task List TA 7.4.3.4
Provide Language Capabilities (Available at https://www.jcs.mil/doctrine/joint-training/ujtl/.) (Cited in para
1–13l.)
10 USC 1596
Foreign language proficiency: special pay for proficiency beneficial for intelligence interests (Cited in para
6–1d(1).)
10 USC 1596a
Foreign language proficiency: special pay for proficiency beneficial for other national security interests
(Cited in para 6–1d(1).)
10 USC 10147
Ready Reserve: training requirements (Cited in para 4–2d(1)(c).)
10 USC 12732
Entitlement to retired pay: computation of years of service (Cited in para 4–2d(2).)
37 USC 353
Skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus (Cited in title page.)
Section II
Prescribed Forms
Unless otherwise stated, DA Forms are available on the Army Publishing Directorate website
(https://armypubs.army.mil/).
DA Form 330
Language Proficiency Questionnaire (Prescribed in para 1–18d.)
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 73
Appendix B
Department of the Army Inspection Checklist for Participating Command Language
Programs
B–1. Use of the checklist
Total available points are reflected after each line item in table B–1. Some line items are weighted more
heavily than others. Inspectors annotate a score for each line item and note the total for each of the fol-
lowing sections:
a. Command-level consideration (total available points = 25).
b. CLPM (total available points = 16).
c. SOPs (total available points = 10).
d. Linguist utilization (total available points = 9).
e. Linguist recordkeeping and tracking (total available points = 20).
f. Dedicated space and other training program resources (total available points = 15).
g. Linguist retention and incentives (total available points = 10).
h. Budget execution (total available points = 17).
i. Training, testing, and access (total available points = 30).
j. FLPB (total available points = 15).
k. Use of DLIFLC services (total available points = 10).
B–2. Scoring
See paragraphs 9– 2 and 9– 4 for inspection requirements.
Table B – 1
Inspection items—Continued
Review questions Reference Points
Command-level consideration
1
Has the ACOM, ASCC, or DRU conducted a biennial inspection of subordinate
units’ CLPs? Provide copies of the inspections and plans of action and mile-
stones of subordinate units (for example, Corps for FORSCOM).
para 1 –23i 10
2
Do subordinate units inspect their subordinate’s CLPs (for example, Corps
CLPMs inspect division CLPs, division CLPs inspect BCT CLPs)? Provide docu-
mentation of subordinate unit inspections, to include checklists and plans of ac-
tion and milestones.
para 9–2a 10
3 Does the commander’s training guidance at each level
(ACOM/Corps/division/brigade) address language training? para 1–23c 5
4
Does the ACOM, ASCC, or DRU have a standing CLC? Do subordinate units
have a CLC/participate in the DRU/ACOM CLC? How often does the CLC meet?
This is a bonus question and will not count against the unit.
para 3–11e 5
Total: / 25
Command language program manager
5 Does the unit have a primary and alternate CLPM appointed in writing (provide
copies of the appointment orders for the ACOM/DRU/subordinate unit CLPMs)? paras 1–23e, 3–11c 5
6 Has the CLPM attended the DLIFLC resident or nonresident CLPM course? para 3–11f(2) 5
7 Are CLPM functions documented through job descriptions? para 3–11f(2) 2
8 Is the CLPM’s tenure assured for at least a year? para 1–23e 2
9 Do all CLPMs have a current copy of AR 11 – 6 (and other language policies)? para 3–11f(1) 2
Total: / 16
Standard operating procedures
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 74
Table B – 1
Inspection items—Continued
10 Has the CLPM established and implemented an SOP covering all aspects of the
unit CLP? para 3–11f(5) 10
Total: / 10
Linguist utilization
11
Are authorized language coded positions updated in accordance with DCS, G – 2
guidance? What is your percentage fills for the 4+1 languages? Are you compli-
ant with the most recent Army Command Plan guidance on language coding?
para 1–23t, 2–5f(7), 2–6c 3
12 Are linguist fit, fill, and proficiency recorded in the units’ net unit status reporting? para 1–23v, 3 – 19 3
13 Have 100% of sub-proficient linguists received IMREPR codes of 9P in accord-
ance with AR 11 – 6? paras 1–23j, 2–6b(4) 3
Total: / 9
Linguist recordkeeping and tracking
14
Does the CLPM maintain or provide oversight of the organizations use of the
ACD ensuring the following elements are input for each linguist (ACOM, ASCC,
DRU would spot check subordinate units):
a. Basic demographic data, including duty assignment and primary occupational
specialty and/or job title.
b. Additional language training completed following DLIFLC graduation.
c. ETS and PCS dates.
d. Administration dates and results of all DLPTs and OPIs taken.
e. ILTPs including language maintenance and improvement objectives driven by
the requirements of the mission, personnel manning tables, and authorizations.
f. Are all DLPTs/OPIs (DA330s) uploaded to the ACD?
g. Are all FLPB agreements uploaded to the ACD?
para 1–24s, 3–4f(2) 20
Total: / 20
Dedicated space and other training program resources
15
Does the ACOM, ASCC, or DRU have a lifecycle replacement plan for unit lan-
guage lab equipment (minimum of 20% replaced annually)? Has the unit budg-
eted for it? (Oversight responsibility for ACOM, ASCC, DRU, or RC)?
paras 1–24e, 7–5j 5
16 Do subordinate unis have Language Analyst Resource Center (LARC) accounts
to order training materials for their language labs? paras 1–23h, 1–24d, E – 9 5
17 Has the unit budgeted for the replacement of language lab furniture (ACOM,
ASCC, DRU, RC oversight/budget responsibility)? paras 1–23h, 7–5j 5
Total: / 15
Linguist retention and incentives
18
Is a linguist incentives and awards programs in place that carries tangible bene-
fits, for example, Linguist of the Year/Quarter or recognition when a linguist
achieves a 3/3 score on his or her DLPT?
para 1–24i 5
19 Does the ACOM/DRU/component provide submissions for the annual DLI Lan-
guage Professional of the Year/CLP of the Year awards? para 1–24i 5
Total: / 10
Budget execution
20
Has the ACOM, ASCC, DRU, or component CLPM submitted an annual lan-
guage budget report on the execution of TALP and National Intelligence Pro-
gram (funding) dollars for the upcoming FY to the DCS, G – 2 no later than 1 Sep-
tember?
paras 1–24o, 7 – 6 3
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 75
Table B – 1
Inspection items—Continued
21
Has the ACOM, ASCC, or DRU CLPM established internal fiscal control policies
(annual plans, periodic reports, and subordinate command TALP inspections)
and documented these requirements in their unit SOP?
paras 1–24o, 3–11f(5). 7 – 6 3
22
Did the unit expend TALP funds to satisfy requirements identified in the annual
plan? Is the unit executing 95 to 100% of its TALP funding? If not, what does the
unit do with excess TALP funding?
para 7 – 4 5
23 Are CLP funding requirements maintained separately from other training budg-
ets? para 7 – 4 3
24 Does the unit training spend plan ensure all linguists will receive an SLTE? paras 1–23m, 3–1b(4), 3–
10a 3
Total: / 17
Training, testing, and access
25 Do 100% of all linguists receive a 160-hour SLTE annually? para 1–23m, 3–1b(4), 3–10a 5
26
How many linguists in this command are sub-proficient? Do sub-proficient lin-
guists receive a minimum remedial training of 160 consecutive hours language
training and retest within 6 months of their DLPT failure? Have any received 9P
IMREPR codes this year and either reclassified or involuntarily separated? How
is this tracked at the headquarters level (both number of sub-proficient linguists
and actions taken to retrain/reclassify or separate them)?
para 2–5f 5
27 Has every linguist been tested for proficiency every 12 months (below L3/R3) or
24 months (L3/R3 or higher)? paras 1–23j, 2–5b 5
28 Is the unit tracking 35P Soldiers who are unable to access NSA systems or facili-
ties? 5
29
How many linguists denied access by the NSA’s Military Affairs Division (A525)
or Virtual Access Request System (VARS) process were reclassified or sepa-
rated in the last 24 months?
para1–24r 5
30 Does the CLPM report the annual requirement for OPIs to their higher headquar-
ters no later than 1 June annually? para1–24r 5
Total: / 30
Foreign language proficiency bonus oversight
31 Has the unit established internal controls to verify Soldiers FLPB for accuracy? para 1–23r(2) 5
32 Does the ACOM/DRU/Corps/division/brigade spot check subordinate units to en-
sure 100% of Soldiers submit a written agreement? para 1–23r(3) 5
33 Is the unit monitoring FLPB pay issues and resolving these issues within 90
days? (ACOM/DRU/ASCC/component spot check) para 1–23r(4) 5
Total: / 15
Use of the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center services
34
Has the CLPM identified which of the unit’s training requirements could be met
by DLIFLC assistance with the following:
a. DLIFLC instructional materials?
b. CLPM course?
c. On-site language training MTTs?
d. Telephonic OPIs?
e. MTTs (language training)
para 3–2a 5
35 Has the CLPM requested DLI MTTs using the SMDR process? paras 3–2a, 7–5k 5
Total: / 10
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 76
Appendix C
Command Language Program Development
C–1. Introduction
a. The four necessary ingredients for a successful CLP are as follows:
(1) Command involvement, emphasis, and advocacy of the program.
(2) A sound program with detailed objectives and appropriate resources.
(3) A program that is in direct compliance with regulations.
(4) Periodic evaluations to determine progress toward these objectives.
b. The key to success is the commander. The commander must recognize that language is as im-
portant to the unit’s success as weapons qualifications, physical training, vehicle maintenance, or any
other Soldier qualification or training requirement. The CLP should be an integral part of the unit training
schedule.
c. There is no book solution. Creative thought and innovative methods bring the best results.
C–2. Developing a command language program
a. Step 1. Before starting, ask the following questions:
(1) What are the specific language requirements?
(2) What are the language training program’s objectives?
(3) How many linguists require training annually and in what languages?
(4) Are training facilities and equipment (classrooms, language laboratories, and electronic devices (for
example, iPads and computers)) available and properly accounted for?
(5) What specific language training resources are available? What language training materials are on
hand? Are the language training materials easily accessible?
(6) Do instructors conduct the language training? If so, what are their qualifications?
(7) What is the projected length of the training course in hours and weeks? How many instructional
hours per day and per week are scheduled? What are the start and end dates?
(8) What are the costs of instructor salaries, instructional equipment, and materials (dictionaries, inter-
net, textbooks, audio-visual aids, and computer equipment)?
b. Step 2. In-unit programs.
(1) When developing a CLP, consider and choose programs that are flexible for the unit and the lin-
guists assigned to the unit. Generally, two levels of language training will fit most cases; one for linguists
who are at L2/R2 or above foreign language proficiency levels and the other for linguists who fall below
the L2/R2 foreign language proficiency standard as measured by the DLPT.
(2) Interview newly assigned linguists and check their records to ascertain their current foreign lan-
guage proficiency level. Review each linguist’s DA Form 330 to determine his or her language profi-
ciency. The test results should not be older than 12 months. If the results are older than 12 months, refer
to paragraph 5 –4 for actions the commander must take.
(3) SLTEs should be at least 160 consecutive hours in a classroom or virtual environment.
(4) Look around the area of operations for opportunities for language enhancement programs. In Eu-
rope, the PLTCE provides excellent language training in European languages. In Korea, Yonsei Univer-
sity provides Korean language instruction under the National Security Affairs sponsorship.
(5) Self-study language training consists of supervised or self-paced language training and study ac-
complished by Soldiers on their own time or during duty hours. For maximum effect, the training supervi-
sor, with feedback from the language mentor, and CLPM, prepares an ILTP listing individual training ob-
jectives, tasks, performance standards, milestones, and a program schedule for each linguist designed to
enhance the individual’s language proficiency.
(6) Language training events involve team, section, or group training events established and con-
ducted through the normal Army Training Management System schedule. The purpose of this training is
to maintain and improve language proficiency and mission capability. This type of training includes gen-
eral language maintenance exercises, task-oriented language drills, global language vocabulary, topic
discussions, worldwide language competition contests, classroom instruction, and Soldier participation in
Foundry or other live mission opportunities. Effective team or section language training includes a wide
variety of training materials and methods, as well as use of contract language instructors.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 77
(7) Task-oriented and mission-related language training consists of drills organized and conducted as
part of the unit training by the training supervisor or other qualified Soldiers on specific mission tasks and
vocabulary required to execute language-related missions.
(8) Units can identify local streamlined acquisition contract vehicles using the General Services Admin-
istration language service schedule at https://www.gsa.gov.
c. Step 3. Contracting for language instruction. See paragraph 3–21.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 78
Appendix D
Guidelines for a Successful Command Language Program
D–1. Command support
The single most significant characteristic of a highly successful CLP is the degree of support provided to
the program by the commander and, by example, the rest of the chain of command. The following ques-
tions address both command level issues and the day-to-day aspects of operational support of an effec-
tive CLP.
D–2. Command level considerations
a. Does the commander monitor linguists’ language proficiency scores?
b. Does the commander receive regularly scheduled briefings and other reports on the CLP?
c. When problems arise in the CLP, is the commander receptive to the issues and willing to provide
needed support?
D–3. Command Language Council (optional)
a. Does the CLC consist of all unit members who have an interest in the CLP?
b. Is the CLC membership recognized and documented as an official duty for all members?
c. Has the CLC been formally established through a unit charter or SOP?
d. Is the CLC chairperson selected based on his or her Defense Foreign Language Program
knowledge and experience? Does the council meet regularly (quarterly or more often)? Does the council
follow bylaws or other procedural guidelines?
e. Does the council prepare and follow an agenda? Does the council prepare and distribute meeting
minutes?
f. Do council recommendations become policy (following command endorsement)?
g. Does the rationale and the SOP for the council provide for and promote both command level and
chain of command involvement in CLP planning and operation?
D–4. Command language program manager
a. Will the commander consider employing a full-time civilian CLPM with a specified job description?
b. Does the CLPM have some academic background or experience in foreign language education or
related areas?
c. Has the CLPM attended DLIFLC’s CLPM course and annual seminar within 6 months of appoint-
ment?
d. Does the CLPM participate in the command’s quarterly or semi-annual training briefs?
e. Is the CLPM the chairperson of the CLC?
f. Is the CLPM’s tenure assured for at least 1 year?
g. Are all substantive CLPM functions documented through job descriptions, SOPs, or other means?
D–5. Linguist recordkeeping and tracking
a. Does the CLPM maintain the ACD with the following elements for each linguist in the unit?
(1) Basic demographic data, including duty assignment, PMOS, and job title.
(2) Original DA Form 330 and certificate of completion/graduation (with grades) from DLIFLC.
(3) Additional language training completed following DLIFLC graduation.
(4) Ongoing language training.
(5) ETS and PCS dates.
(6) FLPB status, including orders to award, terminate, change, or reinstate FLPB.
(7) Administration dates and results of all DLPTs and OPIs taken.
(8) Required testing dates to prevent expiration of FLPB.
(9) ILTPs including language maintenance and improvement objectives driven by the mission require-
ments.
b. The CLPM should maintain copies of any ETPs/waivers. Do entries in the database match the indi-
vidual linguist’s personnel records on file at the servicing MPD and/or HR Office?
c. Are procedures in place to ensure that the data remains current and accurate?
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 79
d. Is a historical database maintained as a point of reference for measuring changes in overall linguist
proficiency from year to year and for assessing the effectiveness of the CLP?
D–6. Linguist retention and incentives
a. What percentage of the unit’s linguists are eligible for FLPB?
b. Are subordinate unit linguists notified of training opportunities such as the MLI program; Middle en-
listed cryptologic career advancement program; Military Language Analyst Program (MLAP) for SIGINT
Soldiers; and intermediate and advanced language training courses at the DLIFLC and the NCU?
c. Is a linguist incentives and awards program in place that carries tangible benefits. For example, lin-
guist of the quarter/year, 4-day pass for achieving L3/R3 for the first time, and so on?
D–7. Command language program standard operating procedures
a. Is the CLP SOP—
(1) Self-explanatory?
(2) Specific in task assignments?
(3) Updated on a regular basis to reflect changes in mission, commanders, personnel, procedures?
(4) An integral component of the unit command SOP?
b. Does the CLP SOP—
(1) Explain the rationale for the CLP, as well as outline procedures for specific requirements such as
ACD use, inspections, ILTP, mentorship programs, award/reward programs, CLP of the Year and Lan-
guage Professional of the Year, and so forth?
(2) Specify points of contact?
D–8. Adequate funding
a. Are CLP budget requirements identified and documented on a routine basis?
b. Are CLP funding requirements explicitly addressed in the annual unit budget planning?
c. Are the commander, CLPM, or other CLC members knowledgeable about procedures to obtain CLP
funding through TALP, the Consolidated Cryptologic Program, and/or the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence Foreign Language Funds?
d. Is the CLP represented in long-range budget planning?
e. Are CLP funding requirements separate from other training budgets?
D–9. Access to current regulations
a. Are the required regulations and pamphlets readily available (digitally and/or hard copy)?
b. Does the CLPM understand where he or she can obtain new/updated regulations?
D–10. Utilization and sustainment of unit linguist assets
a. Can linguists not assigned to the unit (for example, from other companies or battalions) be utilized
as instructors, assistant instructors, or language mentors?
b. Is there a linguist development program with quantifiable benchmarks within the unit?
D–11. Dedicated instructional time
a. Is language training designated regularly on the unit training schedule? If not, why?
b. Does the CLPM actively participate in training schedule preparation? If not, why?
c. Is the amount of dedicated time on task sufficient for measurable language proficiency improve-
ment?
D–12. Dedicated space and other training program resources
a. Does the unit have adequate, dedicated space for language training activities?
b. If the current LTF is not adequate, are there specific plans to upgrade it?
c. Is the training facility conducive to learning (quiet, well lit, comfortable, and open to linguists beyond
regular training or duty hours (cypher locked/padlocked facility that can be utilized like a coffee shop))?
d. Are current, appropriate foreign language texts, supplementary materials, newspapers, magazines,
movies, podcasts, and other resources available in the LTF?
e. Is it clear as to where training materials can be obtained?
f. Is the furniture and equipment adequate for classroom instruction and self-study?
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 80
g. Does the LTF have space and equipment for individual listening and studying?
D–13. Use of training options
a. Is the use of self-study materials encouraged?
b. Can linguists check out self-study materials and devices to use during off-duty hours? If adult edu-
cation courses in the target language are available in the local area, does the CLPM receive or subscribe
to the course bulletins?
c. Does the CLPM enroll the linguists in appropriate courses during the duty day and encourage off-
duty enrollment?
d. Does the CLPM regularly afford linguists opportunities for operational readiness training (for exam-
ple, live environment training)?
e. Does the CLPM receive training bulletins or journals listing other CONUS or outside CONUS lan-
guage instruction opportunities such as college or university, commercial programs, PLTCE, Yonsei Uni-
versity, and immersions?
f. Do the linguists make use of these training opportunities?
g. Are unit linguists enrolled in regional resident military training programs such as the PLTCE?
D–14. Use of the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center services
Has the CLPM identified and/or requested DLIFLC assistance through the CLP Office (available at email
clp.support@dliflc.edu) with the following?
a. Advice and/or guidance on establishing and maintaining a language program.
b. Curriculum selection or development.
c. Availability of DLIFLC instructional materials.
d. Teacher training workshops.
e. “Train the trainer” workshops for CLPMs and platform instructors.
f. CLPM course.
g. Onsite language training through MTTs.
h. Clarification on DLAB, DLPT administration, and/or interpretation issues.
i. Telephonic or face-to-face OPIs.
j. Online diagnostic assessment.
k. Distance learning language training (Broadband Language Training System).
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 81
Appendix E
Training Resources
E–1. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center resources
a. DLIFLC provides a comprehensive collection of language learning tools focused on improving indi-
vidual language proficiency. The DLIFLC website (https://www.dliflc.edu) should be the primary CLP
online resource. This site not only includes important information on DLIFLC, but also provides key lan-
guage support links including eLearning products and access to resources such as the Aiso Library gen-
eral catalog, DLPT familiarization guides, and DLIFLC publications. The Academics menu features links
to information on DLIFLC degree programs, transcripts and records, continuing education, and the CLP
Office.
b. DLIFLC offers language MTTs for language sustainment and enhancement training courses.
CLPMs identify and report recurring DLIFLC MTT requirements during annual requirements data calls for
inclusion into the annual DLIFLC SMDR conducted by the DCS, G– 3/5/7 (usually in August of each year).
The e-learning link provides pre-deployment language tools and other downloads. The Global Language
Online Support System (GLOSS) provides learning and teaching tools for improving foreign language
skills in 16 languages. The Language Materials Distribution System link provides hundreds of language
survival kits and other materials free of charge to deploying Servicemembers. Units can also view, down-
load, and order language materials under the products tab (under E-Learning). The site also provides an
online diagnostic assessment.
E–2. Other language resources
Other resource sites are available as follows:
a. Army Open Source Portal (https://daiis.mi.army.mil/iis/hermes/siteassets/aosphome.aspx). Common
access card (CAC) required.
b. Hermes (https://daiis.mi.army.mil/iis/hermes/pages/default.aspx). CAC required.
E–3. Webliography
The webliography of LCTL represents a comprehensive compendium of online internet materials. De-
pending on the language, available resources can include socio-historic language sketches, introductions
to writing systems and phonologies, beginning and intermediate online tutorials and exercises, online dic-
tionaries, media sites, and cultural and target country materials. Links to webliographies for Slavic, East
European, and Eurasian languages are available with permission of the Slavic and East European Lan-
guage Resource Center at Duke University. The ILR website also gives clear proficiency level descrip-
tions. The webliography is on the ILR website at https://govtilr.org.
E–4. Defense Language Institute English Language Center
The DLIELC is the DoD Center of Excellence for English language training. It offers a wide variety of resi-
dent and nonresident English training packages tailored to a linguist’s specific needs, whether it is English
grammar, reading, writing, speaking, listening, or comprehension skills. DLIELC conducts resident pro-
grams at the DLIELC Lackland Air Force Base, TX campus. Instruction is provided in small groups, using
modern language teaching technologies. Nonresident instruction consists of correspondence courses or
MTTs. The DLIELC also helps units establish a local LTD to serve a unit’s specific needs. The student
handbook link is at https://www.dlielc.edu.
E–5. Joint Language University
The Joint Language University (JLU) (https://jlu.mygovlearn.com) is a free resource that offers thousands
of hours of training and familiarization in both language and culture for over 50 languages and regions.
NSA offers this resource free for anyone using a valid.mil or.gov email address. Many of the materials are
focused on LCTLs and provide maintenance and sustainment exercises in the ILR 2+ to 3+ ranges. JLU
is a great place to find language materials and resources for maintenance and enhancement of reading
and listening skills and DLPT practice objects.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 82
E–6. Contract language instructors
Commanders are encouraged to incorporate contract language instructors into their CLPs. Use these in-
structors to decrease the impact of operational tempo by providing more flexible one-on-one and small
group language enhancement to supplement self-study plans.
E–7. Personal electronic devices
The https://www.dliflc.edu website has numerous downloads for handheld devices which allow Soldiers to
learn on-the-go and while deployed.
E–8. English language enhancement
The NCU offers English (course designator ENGL) as a second language course as well as English
grammar and writing courses for native speakers. CLPMs should search school code 820 for classes in
the ATRRS catalog at https://www.atrrs.army.mil. Units can also forecast English enhancement MTTs
during the annual SMDR process.
E–9. Language Analysis Resource Center
Language-specific working aids and dictionaries are available through LARC (formerly known as
SCHOOLBAG working aids). These resources include newspaper reader workbooks, dictionaries, and
glossaries tailored to specific vocabulary sets. LARC information, catalogs, and request spreadsheets are
in the ACD in the Resource Center’s Language Resource folder. CLPMs submit requests for LARC mate-
rials to usarmy.belvoir.inscom.mbx.g37-trex-language-training@army.mil.
E–10. Middle Enlisted Cryptologic Career Advancement Program
Middle Enlisted Cryptologic Career Advancement Program is a 3-year work-study program designed to
develop the technical and managerial skills of selected military career senior enlisted Soldiers through ad-
vanced formal training and individually planned operational assignments at NSA. Participation in the Mid-
dle Enlisted Cryptologic Career Advancement Program incurs an ADSO (see AR 614–200).
E–11. Military Cryptologic Continuing Education Program
NSA established the Military Cryptologic Continuing Education Program (MCCEP) to provide a structure
for the professional development of military cryptologic language analysts. MCCEP provides career guid-
ance to assist cryptologic language analysts in broadening and deepening their target knowledge and job
abilities. The program is divided into phases, which lay out a roadmap for professional development from
novice through master cryptologic linguists. MCCEP monitors and facilitates professional and language
training needs by working with the NCU and private vendors to provide training in language and job per-
formance skills. Enroll in MCCEP by typing “go MCCEP” in the uniform resource locator window on
NSAnet.
E–12. National Language Service Corps
The National Language Service Corps (NLSC) identifies and recruits on-call, volunteer civilian language
specialists. The NLSC has expanded its capabilities to support over 414 languages and dialects. To meet
the increasing need for professionals with language skills, in 2018 the NLSC extended its support beyond
DoD organizations to all Federal Government agencies. Administered by the Defense Language and Na-
tional Security Education Office within the Office of the SECDEF for Personnel and Readiness, the NLSC
enables Federal agencies to leverage a full range of language capabilities, including interpretation, trans-
lation, instruction, and cultural support. For more information, visit the program website at
https://www.nlscorps.org/.
E–13. CultureReady
CultureReady (https://cultureready.org) is a website for discovering all the resources, programs, and initi-
atives to nurture culture and language learning. CultureReady provides the necessary culture and lan-
guage resources to prepare personnel to build bridges and to interact with other people, no matter where
you are in the world.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 83
E–14. Military Language Analyst Program
NSA’s MLAP is a 3-year internship program that prepares qualified Army cryptologic linguists for ad-
vanced positions in cryptologic language missions. The internship consists of advanced formal language
training and a series of individually tailored operational assignments. Upon graduation from MLAP, the
Army places the Soldier on a 3-year worldwide assignment as an expert cryptologic linguist and subject
matter expert in the focus language. Participation in the program incurs an ADSO (see AR 350– 100 and
AR 614– 200). Languages included are Arabic, Chinese, Korean, Persian-Farsi, Russian, and Spanish.
Interested Soldiers can find additional application requirements in the MLAP message on the USAHRC
MI Branch homepage.
E–15. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center field support resources
a. Country and language familiarization tools are available online through the https://www.dliflc.edu.
Language familiarization resources are available for over 35 countries. They include basic language fa-
miliarization and area studies and many even provide aircrew, CA, command and control, cordon and
search, and force protection modules. Field support module downloads also include countries in perspec-
tive, pronunciation guides, cultural orientation, Headstart, Headstart II, and Rapport downloads.
b. Audio, printable material, and personal media device downloads are available and easily accessible.
c. The site also includes a DLI cultural awareness assessment that is a practical tool used to gauge
familiarity with specific cultures. Developed using DoD regional and cultural expertise guidelines, these
easy-to-use online tests measure knowledge in topics such as geography, religion, traditions, history, and
security. Language survival kits for many languages are also available on short notice through the Order-
ing toolbar on the site. These survival kits contain a compact disc, language card, and survival language
booklet.
E–16. Internet resources
The following Internet sites provide training material or information. This list is not exhaustive but serves
as a starting point for units and linguists to obtain language training material. A reference to commercially
available language courses in this regulation does not constitute an endorsement on the part of the Army
of those language courses. Visit the following websites for more information:
a. Online newspaper directory for the world (https://www.onlinenewspapers.com/).
b. Voice of America news (https://www.voanews.com/).
c. Duolingo (https://www.duolingo.com/).
d. Concordia language villages (https://www.concordialanguagevillages.org/).
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 84
Appendix F
Internal Control Evaluation
F–1. Function
The function covered by this evaluation is the Army Foreign Language Program (unit training, readiness,
utilization, TALP, and FLPB).
F–2. Purpose
The purpose of this evaluation is to assist CLPMs and their counterparts at FORSCOM, USASOC,
INSCOM, ARNG, and the USAR in evaluating and inspecting key internal controls.
F–3. Instructions
Base responses on the actual testing of key internal controls such as document analysis, direct observa-
tion, interviewing, sampling, and simulation. Explain responses that indicate deficiencies and take correc-
tive action as indicated in supporting documentation. Evaluate these internal controls every 2 years. Doc-
ument the accomplishment of this inspection on DA Form 11–2 (Internal Control Evaluation Certification).
F–4. Key control questions
Refer to the DA Inspection Checklist for Participating CLPs located appendix B in lieu of test questions.
F–5. Supersession
This evaluation replaces the evaluation previously published in AR 11– 6, dated 25 February 2022.
F–6. Comments
Help to make this a better tool for evaluation internal controls. Submit comments to the DCS, G– 2 via
email at usarmy.pentagon.hqda-dcs-g-2.list.foreign-language-office@army.mil.
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 85
Glossary of Terms
Acquisition language training
Initial language training conducted at an accredited institution of higher learning (DLIFLC or college) with
the express purpose of learning a foreign language.
Army Command Language Program Manager’s Database
See paragraph 3 –18.
Army Strategic Language List
See paragraph 4 –8.
Conversion
Training an Army linguist in an additional foreign language designed to meet the Army’s proficiency
standard, for example, DLIFLC basic course. Conversion courses are for similar languages (for example,
Russian conversion course to Serbian-Croatian or Persian-Farsi to Dari conversion course); not the same
as a cross-training course.
Cross-training
Foreign language training that is designed to provide limited capability in another language. Not consid-
ered an acquisition course.
Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center
The primary DoD school for providing resident foreign language acquisition training. DLIFLC also offers
intermediate/advanced language courses, nonresident language training programs (for example, MTTs),
and CLPM certification and refresher courses.
Defense Language Proficiency Test 5–Computer Adaptive
A DLPT designed to evaluate global proficiency from ILR 0+ to 4.
Defense Language Proficiency Test System
The DoD standardized testing system for measuring an individual’s proficiency in a language. It consists
of a battery of tests that measures the general ability of a native or near-native speaker to comprehend a
spoken and written language and to speak the language. The OPI can test both native and non-native
language speakers. DLPT and OPI scores are reported as ILR skill levels in accordance with DoDD
5160.41E and the Federal Government ILR website (see DoDI 5160.71).
Enhancement language training
Training which improves the general language skills and proficiency of already qualified linguists.
Executive agent
The DoD component head, or official required in statute, to whom the SECDEF or Deputy SECDEF has
assigned specific responsibilities, functions, and authorities to provide defined levels of support for opera-
tional missions, or administrative or other designated activities, that involve two or more DoD components
(see DoDD 5101.01).
Interpretation
Spoken rendering of a conversation from one language into another. For example, a Soldier interpreting
(speaking) a conversation between a Russian speaker and an English speaker and providing either sim-
ultaneous or consecutive feedback in either language.
Language identification code
The two-digit alpha code used to designate a particular language as prescribed in this regulation.
Language proficiency
The continuum—from memorized proficiency to functionally native proficiency—that describes the ability
of an individual to function in the reading, listening, and speaking modalities of a foreign language as as-
sessed by the U.S. Government ILR proficiency rating scale (see DoDD 5160.41E).
Linguist
Language professionals and language skilled individuals (see DoDI 5160.70).
AR 11–6 • 9 May 2024 86
Proficiency level
Quantitative statement of the degree of overall ability using a language based on the ILR skill level de-
scriptors and associated 0 to 5 level scale.
Senior Language Authority
An individual at the general officer/flag officer, senior executive service, or equivalent level designated in
writing by the head of the military departments, Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, combatant commands,
and Defense Agencies to represent their organization’s foreign language equities in the Defense Lan-
guage, Regional Expertise, and Culture Program and participate in the DLSC. The SLA must have direct
access to their component’s senior leadership and understand the joint capabilities in foreign language,
regional, and culture capability needs of his or her component. SLAs are responsible for drafting, coordi-
nating, and executing their organizations’ language, regional expertise, and culture capability strategic
plans and for overseeing capability allocation and utilization policies within their component (see DoDD
5160.41E).
Sustainment language training
Training that prevents skill deterioration through periodic general language review and frequent practice,
but not specifically designed to improve proficiency.
Target language
The foreign language in which one is trained, sustained, and tested.
Translation
Written rendering of text from one language into another. For example, a Soldier translating from a for-
eign language into English will produce a written version of the foreign language into clear, concise, idio-
matic English while conveying the meaning of the original text to the English language reader.
UNCLASSIFIED PIN 084365–000