BLUF
Army Directive 2026-20 realigns Army legal services responsibilities between the General Counsel of the Army (GC) and The Judge Advocate General (TJAG) pursuant to HQDA General Orders 2026–17. The GC assumes oversight and supervision of specified functional legal organizations, including Litigation Division, Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division, Procurement Fraud Division, Environmental Law Division, and Civilian Employment and Labor Law. The directive also immediately changes numerous Army regulations to reflect the revised division of legal responsibilities.
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
WASHINGTON
05 AUG 2026
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-20 (Army Legal Services Realignment)
1. References.
See enclosure 1.
2. Purpose.
This directive aligns Army policy with revised functions and responsibilities for the provision of legal services pursuant to Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) General Orders (GO) 2026–17 (reference 1g).
3. Applicability.
The provisions of this directive apply to the Regular Army, Army National Guard/Army National Guard of the United States, and U.S. Army Reserve.
4. Policy.
a.
The policy changes in enclosure 2 clarify the responsibilities of the General Counsel of the Army (GC) and The Judge Advocate General (TJAG) for legal services and are effective immediately.
b.
Pursuant to the transfer of responsibility for functional legal services under HQDA GO 2026–17 (reference 1g), the GC now retains oversight and supervision for these organizations in the Army Legal Services Agency and Office of The Judge Advocate General reassigned to the GC as part of the Army Legal Services Transformation: Litigation Division, Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division, Procurement Fraud Division, Environmental Law Division, and Civilian Employment and Labor Law.
c.
The Office of General Counsel and Office of The Judge Advocate General will establish processes to coordinate reviews of legal matters assigned consistent with enclosure 2.
5. Responsibilities.
a.
The GC is assigned proponent responsibility and exception approval authority for the following Army regulations (ARs):
(1) AR 27–40 (Litigation).
Effective immediately, the GC will assume proponent responsibility and is assigned exception authority of AR 27–40. The GC will also coordinate with TJAG to develop and clarify policy and responsibilities for the officials listed in paragraph 1–4 of the regulation to comport with this directive. The GC and TJAG will coordinate publication of final rules amending Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 516 and section 257.5, prior to the next update of AR 27–40.
(2) AR 27–60 (Intellectual Property).
The GC will assume proponent responsibility effective the date of rapid revision to implement the provisions of this directive, and will ensure the following Department of the Army (DA) Forms prescribed by the regulation are updated to change TJAG title responsibilities to the GC: DA Form 2871-R (Invention Rights Questionnaire), DA Form 2872-R (Request for Determination of Invention Rights), DA Form 2873-R (License of Invention), DA Form 2874-R (Assignment of Invention), and DA Form 4734-R (Invention Disclosure).
b.
TJAG remains the proponent for AR 27–1 (Judge Advocate Legal Services) and is assigned exception approval authority. TJAG will coordinate with the GC to formulate policy changes, including clarifications in paragraph 2–1 of the regulation, related to newly assigned GC responsibilities described in paragraph 4b of this directive.
6. Proponent.
The GC has oversight responsibility for this directive. The proponents for regulations cited in enclosure 2 will incorporate its provisions within 30 days of the date of this directive.
7. Duration.
This directive is rescinded on publication of the revised regulations.
Encls
Dan Driscoll
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
- U.S. Army Western Hemisphere Command
- U.S. Army Forces Command
- U.S. Army Transformation and Training Command
- U.S. Army Materiel Command
- U.S. Army Pacific
- U.S. Army Europe and Africa
- U.S. Army Central
- U.S. Army Special Operations Command
- U.S. Army Transportation Command
- U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
- U.S. Army Cyber Command
- U.S. Army Medical Command
- U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- U.S. Army Audit Agency
- U.S. Army Military District of Washington
- U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
- U.S. Army Human Resources Command
- U.S. Army Corrections Command
- U.S. Army Reserve Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division
Director, U.S. Army Civilian Human Resources Agency
Executive Director, Military Postal Service Agency
Director, U.S. Army Joint Counter-Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office
Superintendent, Arlington National Cemetery
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
CF:
Commander, Eighth Army
REFERENCES
Enclosure 1
a. Title 10, United States Code, section 7019 (10 U.S.C. 7019) (General Counsel)
b. 10 U.S.C. 7036 (Chiefs of branches: appointments; duties)
c. 10 U.S.C. 7037 (Judge Advocate General, Deputy Judge Advocate General, and general officers of the Judge Advocate General’s Corps: appointment; duties)
d. 10 U.S.C. 801 et seq. (Uniform Code of Military Justice)
e. Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 516 (Litigation)
f. Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 257 (Acceptance of Service of Process)
g. Headquarters, Department of the Army General Orders 2026–17 (Headquarters, Department of the Army Functions and Responsibilities for the Provision of Legal Services), 4 August 2026
h. Army Directive 2020-03 (Installation Energy and Water Resilience Policy), 31 March 2020 (hereby rescinded, in part)
i. Army Regulation (AR) 5–10 (Stationing), 2 April 2025
j. AR 25–22 (The Army Privacy and Civil Liberties Program), 30 September 2022
k. AR 25–30 (Army Publishing Program), 14 June 2021
l. AR 25–55 (The Department of Army Freedom of Information Act Program), 19 October 2020
m. AR 25–400–2 (Army Records Management Program), 18 October 2022
n. AR 27–1 (Judge Advocate Legal Services), 24 January 2017
o. AR 27–20 (Claims), 8 February 2008
p. AR 27–40 (Litigation), 19 September 1994
q. AR 27–60 (Intellectual Property), 1 June 1993
r. AR 70–57 (Army Technology Transfer), 2 March 2022
s. AR 200–1 (Environmental Protection and Enhancement), 15 April 2026
t. AR 215–1 (Military Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Programs and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentalities), 24 September 2010
u. AR 380–49 (Industrial Security Program), 20 March 2013
v. AR 380–53 (Communications Security Monitoring), 23 December 2011
w. AR 380–381 (Special Access Programs (SAPs) and Sensitive Activities), 21 April 2004
x. AR 405–10 (Acquisition of Real Property and Interests Therein), 14 May 1970
y. AR 405–80 (Management of Title and Granting Use of Real Property), 22 April 2024
z. AR 420–41 (Acquisition and Sale of Utilities Services), 3 March 2015
aa. AR 672–20 (Incentive Awards), 6 November 2024
bb. AR 690–300 (Employment), 5 June 2025
cc. AR 690–600 (EEO Discrimination and Complaints), 6 February 2025
dd. AR 690–752 (Disciplinary and Adverse Actions), 10 February 2022
ee. AR 715–9 (Operational Contract Support Planning and Management), 18 September 2024
ff. AR 715–30 (Secure Environment Contracting), 23 September 2019
ARMY POLICY, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
Enclosure 2
AR 5–10
Army Policy Proponent: Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-3/5/7
Para.: 1–12a
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “a. Provide legal advice to the Army Secretariat and ARSTAF on stationing actions as necessary.”
AR 5–10
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-3/5/7
Para.: 1–27a
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “a. Provide legal advice on temporary or operational stationing actions as necessary.”
AR 25–22
Army Policy Proponent: Chief Information Officer (CIO)
Para.: 2–4
Directed Change:
ADD “c. Serve (via Litigation Division) as a liaison between the Army and the Department of Justice.”
AR 25–22
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 2–8
Directed Change:
REMOVE: “a. Provide legal advice to Privacy and Civil Liberties Officers, commanders, and supervisors on requests for PA records under the PA and FOIA.
b. Serve (via Litigation Division) as a liaison between the Army and the Department of Justice.”
REVISE TO: “TJAG will provide legal advice to Privacy and Civil Liberties Officers, commanders, and supervisors on requests for PA records under the PA and FOIA.”
AR 25–22
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 6–6c
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “c. Once the GC issues a determination, the requester has the right to contest the decision within the U.S. District Court of the appropriate jurisdiction. The GC then forwards cases contested before the U.S. District Courts to the Litigation Division, Office of the General Counsel.”
AR 25–30
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 1–11
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “The General Counsel will review all DA policy publications for any SECARMY delegations and legal implications (see para 4–8).”
AR 25–30
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 1–23
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “The Judge Advocate General (TJAG) will review all DA policy publications, in coordination with General Counsel, as necessary and consistent with paragraph 4–8b for compliance with controlling laws, directives, regulations, and other DA publications (see para. 4–8).”
AR 25–30
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 4–8c
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “c. ADs, AGOs (except for award AGOs, which do not require a legal review), and requests for the rescission of DA administrative publications also require a legal review, as determined by TJAG and the General Counsel.”
AR 25–30
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 4–8f(1)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(1) Addressing all comments related to the legal review(s).”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 2–3b
Directed Change:
DELETE: “b. Serves, through the Litigation Division, as a liaison between the Army and the U.S. Department of Justice.”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 2–4
Directed Change:
ADD “e. Serves, through the Litigation Division, as a liaison between the Army and the U.S. Department of Justice.”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 5–3f(1)(a)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(a) Each request for a record related to pending litigation involving the United States will be referred to the staff judge advocate or legal officer of the command. That official will promptly inform the Litigation Division, Office of the General Counsel (OGC) of the substance of the request and the content of the record requested. Mailing address: Litigation Division, Office of the General Counsel; 9275 Gunston Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060.”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 5–3f(1)(c)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(c) Information or records normally exempted from release (that is, personnel and medical records) may be releasable to the judge or court concerned for use in litigation to which the United States is not a party. Refer such requests to the local staff judge advocate or legal officer, who will coordinate them with the Litigation Division, OGC.”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 5–3f(3)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(3) Contract disputes. Each request for a record that relates to a potential contract dispute or a dispute that has not reached final decision by the contracting officer will be treated as a request for procurement records and not as litigation. However, the officials will consider the effect of release on the potential dispute. Those officials may consult with the Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division (KLIP), OGC; 9275 Gunston Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5546. If the request is for a record that relates to a pending contract appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals or to a final decision that is still subject to appeal (that is, 90 days have not lapsed after receipt of the final decision by the contractor), then the request will be—”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 5–3f(3)(b)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(b) Referred to KLIP, OGC.”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 5–7c
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “c. The officials designated by Army activities to make initial determinations should consult with PAOs to become familiar with subject matter considered to be newsworthy and advise PAOs of all requests from news media representatives. FOIA requests from members of the media will be processed and information released in accordance with the FOIA, its withholding exemptions, and AR 25–55. In addition, the officials should inform PAOs in advance when they intend to withhold or partially withhold a record for IDA release determination if it appears that the withholding action may be challenged in the media. For example, a FOIA release or denial action, appeal, or court review may generate public or press interest. In such cases, the IDA (or delegate) should consult the Office of the Chief of Public Affairs or the command or organization PAO. The IDA should inform the servicing PAO of the issue and obtain advice and recommendations on the public affairs aspect of the request and response. Coordination must be completed within the statutory FOIA response limit of 20 working days. The point of contact for the Office of the Chief of Public Affairs is U.S. Army Public Affairs, Office of the Chief of Public Affairs; 1500 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310-1500; or usarmy.pentagon.hqda_ocpa.mbx.foia@mail.mil. If the request involves actual or potential litigation against the United States, the release must be coordinated with Litigation Division, OGC.”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 5–17e(1)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(1) FOIA litigation. For the Army, under the general oversight of the GC, FOIA litigation is the responsibility of the Litigation Division, General Litigation Branch, OGC. If you are notified of a FOIA lawsuit involving the Army, immediately contact the General Litigation Branch at the following mailing address: General Litigation Branch, OGC; 9275 Gunston Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060. The Army activity is responsible for forwarding a copy of the complaint to OGC, OTJAG Administrative Law (Government Information Practices), and to the DA FOIA Office.”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 5–17e(2)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(2) Each request for a record that may be affected by pending litigation involving the United States will be referred to the Staff Judge Advocate or legal officer of the command, who will promptly inform the Litigation Division, General Litigation Branch, OGC, of the substance of the request and the content of the record requested. If information is released for use in litigation involving the United States, the Chief, Army Litigation Division must be advised of the release in accordance with AR 27–40. Information or records normally exempted from release (such as personnel and medical records) may be releasable to the judge or court concerned for use in litigation to which the United States is not a party. Refer such requests to the local Staff Judge Advocate or legal officer, who will coordinate with the Litigation Division, General Litigation Branch, OGC.”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 5–17e(3)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(3) The Litigation Division, General Litigation Branch, OGC will provide guidance on gathering information and assembling a litigation report necessary to respond to FOIA litigation.”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 5–18b
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “b. Contract disputes. Each request for a record that relates to a potential contract dispute or a dispute that has not reached final decision by the contracting officer will be treated as a request for procurement records and not as litigation. However, the FOIA officials will consider the effect of release on the potential dispute. FOIA officials may consult with the Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division (KLIP). (Mailing address: Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division, Office of the General Counsel; 9275 Gunston Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060). If the request is for a record that relates to a pending contract appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, or to a final decision that is still subject to appeal (that is, 90 days have not lapsed since the contractor received the final decision), then the request will be treated as involving a contract dispute, and referred to KLIP, OGC.”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 5–19
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “5–19. Non-U.S. Government source information for judicial actions
A requester may bring suit in a U.S. District Court to compel the release of records obtained from a non-Government source or records based on information obtained from a non-Government source. Such source will be notified promptly of the court action. When the source advises that it is seeking court action to prevent release, the Army activity will defer answering or otherwise pleading to the complainant as long as permitted by the court or until a decision is rendered in the court action of the source, whichever is sooner. In addition, make sure to advise the Litigation Division, OGC.”
AR 25–55
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: Terms—Freedom of information litigation
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “Personnel responsible for processing FOIA requests at the DA level will be aware of litigation under the FOIA. Such information will provide management insights into the use of the nine exemptions by DA personnel. Whenever a complaint under the FOIA is filed in a U.S. District Court, the Army activity named in the complaint will forward a copy of the complaint by any means to Litigation Division, OGC. Litigation Division, OGC is also responsible for forwarding this information to the FOIA and/or PA Office.”
AR 25–400–2
Army Policy Proponent: CIO
Para.: 2–8
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “2–8. U.S. Army Legal Services Agency (USALSA)
USALSA, in coordination with The Judge Advocate General and the General Counsel, will—”
AR 27–20
Army Policy Proponent: The Judge Advocate General (TJAG)
Para.: 2–16
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “Claims for property damage, personal injury, or death arising in the United States based on contamination by toxic substances found in the air or the ground must be reported by USARCS to the Environmental Law Division of the Office of General Counsel and the Environmental Torts Branch of the Department of Justice (DOJ). Such claims arising overseas must be reported to the CCS with geographical jurisdiction over the claim and USARCS. Claims for personal injury from contamination frequently arise at an area that is the subject of claims for cleanup of the contamination site. The cleanup claims involve other Army agencies, use of separate funds, and prolonged investigation. Administrative settlement is not usually feasible because settlement of property damage claims must cover all damages, including personal injury. Payment by Defense Environmental Rehabilitation Funds should be considered initially and any such payment should be deducted from any settlement under AR 27–20.”
AR 27–20
Army Policy Proponent: TJAG
Para.: 14–10a(2)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(2) The head of an ACO should request Chief, Litigation Division, Office of the General Counsel to have the RJA appointed as a SAUSA when the following criterion are met:”
AR 27–20
Army Policy Proponent: TJAG
Para.: 14–11c
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “c. In order to directly initiate or intervene in litigation, a RJA or recovery attorney must prepare a litigation report and formally refer the case through the Affirmative Claims Branch, USARCS, and the Litigation Division, Office of the General Counsel, to the U.S. Attorney. While the RJA or recovery attorney, in conjunction with the Litigation Division Torts Branch, should attempt to have the U.S. Attorney’s Office initiate litigation at least 6 months before the expiration of the SOL, the RJA or recovery attorney may contact USARCS telephonically if SOL problems necessitate quick action on a case. The RJA or recovery attorney should also contact USARCS if a U.S. Attorney is reluctant to pursue an important case. An injured party’s attorney may represent the Government’s interest in litigation without any special coordination.”
AR 27–60
Army Policy Proponent: General Counsel of the Army (GC)
Para.: Throughout
Directed Change:
REPLACE “Intellectual Property Law Division (JALS-IP)” with “Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division (KLIP)” and “JALS-IP” with “KLIP”
AR 27–60
Army Policy Proponent: GC
Para.: 1–4
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “The General Counsel of the Army is responsible for the control, management, and supervision of the Army’s intellectual property law program. This responsibility has been delegated to the Intellectual Property Counsel of the Army (IPCA). The IPCA also serves as the Chief of the Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division (KLIP) within the Office of General Counsel (OGC).”
AR 27–60
Army Policy Proponent: GC
Para.: 1–5l
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “Serve as Chief of KLIP and supervise activities of that Division.
AR 27–60
Army Policy Proponent: GC
Para.: 1–5n
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “n. Review, endorse, and forward through the General Counsel to the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics and Technology (ASA (ALT)) for signature those documents cited in paragraph 1–6.”
AR 27–60
Army Policy Proponent: GC
Para.: 1–7
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “1–7. Duties of Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division
The Chief of the Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division (KLIP), and the attorneys or agents assigned to that division, are designated and authorized to perform the following functions involving the legal aspects of intellectual property:”
AR 27–60
Army Policy Proponent: GC
Para.: 6–14a
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “a. Notwithstanding the above authorities to enter into agreements, the approval of the GC (or designee) is required consistent with the purchase of rights under 10 USC 3793. This applies to technology licenses or options whether or not a specific patent is mentioned.”
AR 27–60
Army Policy Proponent: GC
Para.: 6–14b
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “b. To obtain approval of the agreement, a copy of any proposed agreement shall be submitted in draft to KLIP for review. The draft shall be accompanied by a memorandum of facts setting forth, where pertinent:”
AR 27–60
Army Policy Proponent: GC
Para.: 6–14c
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “c. If the IPCA finds the draft acceptable, the IPCA will notify the assigned counsel that it may be finalized and executed by the parties if it includes, when appropriate, the clause: “Approval of Contract. This contract shall be subject to approval for the Secretary of the Army by or on behalf of the General Counsel of the Army and shall not be binding until so approved.”
AR 27–60
Army Policy Proponent: GC
Para.: 6–14d
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “d. The DA activity will then forward three executed copies to KLIP.”
AR 27–60
Army Policy Proponent: GC
Para.: 6–14e
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “e. After approval, when approval is required by the GC (or designee), KLIP will forward one executed copy to the USPTO for recordation in the recommended register if a specific patent or application is identified in the agreement. One signed copy will be retained by KLIP, and one will be returned to the activity.”
AR 27–60
Army Policy Proponent: GC
Para.: Glossary Section I Abbreviations
Directed Change:
DELETE: titles and definitions for “JALS-IP” and “TJAG”
ADD: “KLIP Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division” and “GC General Counsel”
AR 70–57
Army Policy Proponent: Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology (ASA (ALT))
Para.: 1–13e
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “e. A license of Army IP will not include any provision that would allow a licensee to file an enforcement lawsuit against an alleged infringer unless 30 days’ notice (and a copy of the draft or final license) has been given to the Chief, Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division (KLIP), Office of the General Counsel, that a license will include such a provision. KLIP must provide any objection to such a provision during the 30-day review period. The license provision must require the licensee to notify KLIP at least 30 days prior to either filing an enforcement suit or sending a cease-and-desist letter to an alleged infringer.”
AR 70–57
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (ALT)
Para.: 1–18a(2)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(2) Unless prior concurrence is obtained from the DA Office of the General Counsel (OGC), all proposed technology transfer collaborations or PLAs with foreign government defense agencies involving the defense or military articles, materials, equipment, services, and technical data—as defined under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (see 22 CFR 120)—must be undertaken under “international agreements,” such as ICRDAs (AR 70–41) or IEP annexes.”
AR 70–57
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (ALT)
Para.: 2–2
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “2–2. Army General Counsel
The AGC is responsible for providing legal advice to the ADTT to include reviewing for legal sufficiency all CRADAs and PLAs requiring review, as set forth in paragraph 2–1c, within the 30-day review period, on IP matters, on behalf of the ASA (ALT).”
AR 70–57
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (ALT)
Para.: 2–3
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “2–3 Chief, Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division, Office of the General Counsel (KLIP, OGC)
The Chief, KLIP, on behalf of the GC, will provide advice on IP matters relating to CRADAs and PLAs, on request from ADTT.”
AR 70–57
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (ALT)
Para.: Glossary
Directed Change:
DELETE: “JALS”
ADD: “KLIP Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division” and “GC General Counsel”
AR 200–1
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (Installations, Energy and Environment) (IE&E)
Para.: 1–16
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “1–16. Installations, Environment and Civil Works, Office of General Counsel (IECW, OGC)
OGC (IECW) will provide legal advice to the Army on all environmental law matters, except those arising out of civil works and FUDS activities. The Chief, Environmental Law Division (ELD) will exercise those authorities on behalf of IECW, OGC and will specifically—”
AR 200–1
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (IE&E)
Para.: 1–16b
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “b. Advise the Army Secretariat.”
AR 200–1
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (IE&E)
Para.: 1–16g
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “g. Be responsible for representing the Army in Federal and State litigation and for communicating the Army’s position in litigation and settlement with the Department of Justice.”
AR 200–1
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (IE&E)
Para.: 1–22l
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “l. Where appropriate, coordinate with IECW, OGC early on all environmental agreements, including, but not limited to, fine and penalty settlement agreements prior to signing them.”
AR 200–1
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (IE&E)
Para.: 1–23c
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “c. Investigate regulatory enforcement actions, complaints, and spills/releases, and correct systemic problems. Document investigation, negotiation, and resolution of enforcement actions and submit through the respective chain of command to the Office of the Director of Environmental Programs (ODEP), and through technical legal channels to IECW, OGC.”
AR 200–1
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (IE&E)
Para.: 1–23i
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “i. Coordinate with IECW, OGC early on all environmental agreements, including, but not limited to, fine and penalty settlement agreements prior to signing them. GCs may not delegate approval or signature authority.”
AR 200–1
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (IE&E)
Para.: 2–3
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “2–3. Legal Requirements
All references to legal requirements in this regulation are intended to refer to laws, regulations, and executive orders that, in the opinion of legal counsel, are applicable to the Army. Although most environmental laws apply to the Army, some include exemptions (or provisions for requesting exemptions) for military activities under certain conditions. It is essential that Army counsel; including, but not limited to IECW, OGC; be consulted on the applicability of all laws, regulations, initiatives, and executive orders. Similarly, all permits, agreements, notices of violations, and enforcement actions, especially reports of potential liability under paragraph 16–4, require early and close coordination with the Army legal counsel responsible for direct support to the command or activity. As necessary, legal counsel at the installation level will coordinate issues and positions within the appropriate Army legal chain. Precedent-setting opinions, all enforcement actions, and agreements must be coordinated with IECW, OGC. The requirement to consult with legal counsel supporting a command or activity is considered an essential part of effectively using this regulation. Additionally, this regulation prescribes program requirements in terms of “will” and “must,” requiring mandatory action. All Army organizations will incorporate environmental considerations and requirements into all aspects of the organization’s mission.”
AR 200–1
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (IE&E)
Para.: 15–8b(5)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(5) Army commanders will report overseas violations through command channels to the ASA (IE&E), with a courtesy copy to IECW, OGC.”
AR 200–1
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (IE&E)
Para.: 16–4c
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “c. The 48-hour (2 business-day) reporting requirement includes notification to HQDA DASA–ESOH and IECW, OGC through Command channels. Additionally, coordinate with IECW, OGC in writing, through technical legal channels, regarding litigation, administrative proceedings, and settlement negotiations.”
AR 215–1
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-1
Para.: 19–14c(2)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(2) If a Soldier, employee, or other authorized user of NAF property is sued individually because of an alleged act or omission committed while using NAF property, and if the GC (or designee) determines the property was being used in the manner and for the purpose authorized, NAFs may be used to pay expenses incident to the suit, judgments, and compromise settlements.”
AR 215–1
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-1
Para.: 19–14c(4)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(4) Only the GC (or designee) may authorize employing civilian counsel.”
AR 215–1
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-1
Para.: 19–14c(5)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(5) If authority to employ civilian counsel is granted, the GC (or designee) will—”
AR 215–1
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-1
Para.: 19–14c(6)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(6) On certification by the GC (or designee) that payment of attorney fees, litigation expenses, compromises, and judgments is proper, payment will be made per AR 27–20, chapter 12. Expenses incident to suits arising out of the operations of NAFIs/entities, other than those of the AAFES, are paid by the ACIF.”
AR 380–49
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 1–18b
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “b. Advise the Secretary of the Army, Chief of Staff of the Army, and the Army Staff on legal and policy issues related to industrial security.”
AR 380–49
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 1–24
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “1–24. The Judge Advocate General
TJAG will provide legal and policy advice to Chief of Staff of the Army and the Army Staff on matters related to industrial security in an operational setting.”
AR 380–53
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 1–4a
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “a. General Counsel. The GC will review and certify, in writing, biennially, that COMSEC monitoring notification procedures in effect are adequate throughout the Army.”
AR 380–53
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 1–4b
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “b. The Judge Advocate General. TJAG will—
(1) Review all requests to conduct COMSEC monitoring exercises prior to Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-2 approval.
(2) Review Department of the Army COMSEC monitoring policy for compliance with public law and national and Department of Defense (DoD) policies and regulations.
(3) Review and certify, in writing, biennially, that COMSEC monitoring notification procedures in effect are adequate throughout the Army.
(4) Review all requests for proposed COMSEC monitoring exercises, to include requests that are not based on an Army command (ACOM), Army service component command (ASCC), or direct reporting unit (DRU) request for approval (granted by the DCS, G-2).”
AR 380–53
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 2–6a(1)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(1) The ACOM, ASCC, and DRU commanders will submit requests for certification to Headquarters, Department of the Army DCS, G-2 (DAMI–CDS); 1000 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310-1000. Requests will arrive no later than 15 July of each odd-numbered year. Approval periods run from 1 October (of each odd-numbered year) or date of certification by TJAG (whichever is later) through 30 September (of the next odd-numbered year) to correspond with the fiscal year. Requests will include a detailed description of the notification procedures within the ACOM, ASCC, or DRU, including the following:”
AR 380–53
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 2–6a(2)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(2) The DCS, G-2 (DAMI–CDS) will review all requests to verify the presence of required information. The requests will be consolidated and forwarded to TJAG for legal certification.”
AR 380–53
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 2–6a(3)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(3) On certification by TJAG, the DCS, G-2 (DAMI–CDS) will grant approval for the ACOM, ASCC, or DRU to conduct COMSEC monitoring.”
AR 380–53
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 2–10a
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “a. COMSEC monitoring, IO Red Team activities, and CDAP may be conducted only for certified ACOMs, ASCCs, or DRUs that have notification procedures in place and approved by TJAG, and when authorized by the DCS, G-2.”
AR 380–53
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 5–2a
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “a. The commander, IG, or intelligence oversight officer will ensure that a competent inquiry or investigation into the reported violation is conducted. The responsible official will ensure that the circumstances of the violation are reported within 5 working days through command channels to the DCS, G-2 (DAMI–CDS), with information copies to TJAG and TIG. Reports will contain the following:”
AR 380–53
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 5–2c
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “c. The DCS, G-2 (DAMI–CDS); TJAG; and TIG will work together to ensure appropriate action is taken to correct the violation and to prevent future occurrences of the same violation.”
AR 380–53
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 5–2d
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “d. Within 5 working days of discovery of the incident, TJAG, in coordination with TIG, will send a copy of the initial report and the proposed corrective actions to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks and Information Integration.”
AR 380–381
Army Policy Proponent: Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA)
Para.: 2–6
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “2–6. The General Counsel
The General Counsel will—
a. Review acquisition matters in SAPs, PSAPs, and ACCMs.
b. Advise the SA, Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA), and Army Staff on legal and policy issues related to acquisition matters in SAPs and PSAPs.
c. Conduct policy reviews related to SAPs and PSAPs.”
AR 380–381
Army Policy Proponent: CSA
Para.: 2–20
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “2–20. The Judge Advocate General
The Judge Advocate General (TJAG) will—
a. Review for legality and propriety all Army SAPs, PSAPs, ACCMs, and Army participation in other DoD and Federal agency SAPs or programs that restrict personnel access and coordinate with the Office of the General Counsel (OGC) as appropriate.
b. Provide legal and policy advice on SAP matters to the SA, CSA, and the Army Staff.
c. Coordinate legal and policy issues on SAP matters with DoD and Federal agency legal advisors as appropriate and in conjunction with OGC on acquisition matters in SAPs.”
AR 381–10
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: Proponent and exception authority
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “The Judge Advocate General has the authority to approve exceptions or waivers to this regulation that are consistent with controlling law and regulations.”
AR 381–10
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 1–7
Directed Change:
DELETE “1–7. The General Counsel
The GC is the legal counsel to the SECARMY and the chief Department of the Army (DA) legal officer. The General Counsel’s responsibility extends to any subject of law and other matters as directed by the SECARMY. The General Counsel will—
a. Exercise the SECARMY’s oversight of intelligence activities and monitor sensitive Army intelligence activities for legality and propriety.
b. In conjunction with The Judge Advocate General (TJAG) of the Army and the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G–2, develop and oversee policies and programs for Army intelligence and counterintelligence.
c. Ensure the SECARMY reviews and approves any proposed intelligence operational activity that has the potential to be viewed as controversial or could create the appearance of impropriety or otherwise be embarrassing to the Army.
d. Designate the Office of the General Counsel (OGC) senior intelligence and security legal advisor to serve as the Army’s senior intelligence oversight official (SIOO) who will—
(1) Review intelligence issues before any Secretariat official decision.
(2) Conduct all formal Army coordination with Department of Justice (DOJ) senior officials regarding intelligence matters.
(3) Review for concurrence certain intelligence oversight activities as listed in this regulation.
(4) Forward reports of Federal crimes that meet the Attorney General’s guidelines for reporting through the DoD General Counsel to the DOJ.
(5) Review all matters that raise questions of interpretation concerning the procedures and activities covered by this regulation that cannot be resolved at lower echelons.
(6) Review, in coordination with TJAG, all requests for exception, waiver, modification, or amendment of policies covered by this regulation.
(7) Maintain direct liaison with the DoD SIOO.
(8) Coordinate with the Army Inspector General to ensure proper reporting, investigation, and resolution of reported QIAs and S/HSMs.
(9) Review and process requests for identities of U.S. persons in disseminated intelligence and counterintelligence reports as specified in chapter 6.”
AR 381–10
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 1–11b
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “b. Develop, in conjunction with TJAG, policies and programs for Army intelligence and intelligence oversight. Plan and supervise the execution of those policies and programs.”
AR 381–10
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 1–13b
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “b. Develop and oversee, in conjunction with the DCS, G-2, policies and programs for Army intelligence and counterintelligence. Oversee sensitive activities and counterintelligence investigations.”
AR 381–10
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 1–13e
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “e. Review all requests for exception, waiver, modification, or amendment of policies and procedures covered by this regulation.”
AR 381–10
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 1–13
Directed Change:
ADD “g. Exercise the SECARMY’s oversight of intelligence activities and monitor sensitive Army intelligence activities for legality and propriety.
h. In conjunction with the DCS, G-2, develop and oversee policies and programs for Army intelligence and counterintelligence.
i. Ensure the SECARMY reviews and approves any proposed intelligence operational activity that has the potential to be viewed as controversial or could create the appearance of impropriety or otherwise be embarrassing to the Army.
j. Designate a senior intelligence legal advisor to serve as the Army’s SIOO, who will—
(1) Review intelligence issues before any Secretariat official decision.
(2) Conduct all formal Army coordination with DOJ senior officials regarding intelligence matters.
(3) Review for concurrence certain intelligence oversight activities as listed in this regulation.
(4) Forward reports of Federal crimes that meet the Attorney General’s guidelines for reporting through the DoD General Counsel to DOJ.
(5) Review all matters that raise questions of interpretation concerning the procedures and activities covered by this regulation that cannot be resolved at lower echelons.
(6) Review all requests for exception, waiver, modification, or amendment of policies covered by this regulation.
(7) Maintain direct liaison with the DoD SIOO.
(8) Coordinate with the Army Inspector General to ensure proper reporting, investigation, and resolution of reported QIAs and S/HSMs.
(9) Review and process requests for identities of U.S. persons in disseminated intelligence and counterintelligence reports as specified in chapter 6.”
AR 381–10
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 1–21l
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “l. Provide the command’s legal counsel; DCS, G-2; TIG; TJAG; DoD General Counsel; DoD SIOO; and any inspector general of competent jurisdiction (or the representatives of those officials) with access to any employee and with all information necessary to perform their intelligence oversight responsibilities, including information protected by special access programs, alternative compensatory control measures, or other security compartmentalization.”
AR 381–10
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 1–21n
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “n. Ensure all proposals for intelligence activities that may be unlawful, in whole or in part, or may be contrary to policy, will be referred to TIG or TJAG.”
AR 381–10
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 4–5b
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “b. All reports made pursuant to paragraph 4–3 that involve a possible violation of Federal criminal law will be reviewed by The Judge Advocate General in accordance with chapter 5 of this regulation.”
AR 381–10
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: 5–2d
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “d. Reports flow. The DCS, G-2 will transmit reports received under this chapter simultaneously to OTJAG and OGC. The OTJAG senior national security legal advisor will review and transmit reports received under this chapter pursuant to procedures adopted by DOJ.”
AR 381–10
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-2
Para.: B–4a(1)
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “(1) Does the DCS, G-2, in coordination with TJAG, promulgate policy, procedures, and programs necessary for implementing EO 12333, EO 13355, DoDD 5148.13, DoDD 5240.1, DoDM 5240.01 and DoD 5240.1–R?”
AR 405–10
Army Policy Proponent: Chief of Engineers (COE)
Para.: 2–9l
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “l. Material to be furnished by Chief of Engineers. On completion of the acquisition of land or any interest therein, the Chief of Engineers is responsible for furnishing to the installation commander or local representative of the using command the real property record material and data set forth in AR 735–5, AR 735–27, and AR 405–45. The Chief of Engineers is also responsible for establishing and maintaining for administrative purposes a historical record of all acquisitions and disposals of real estate. This record will include copies of acquisition and disposal authorization and related papers, tract registers, project maps, and summaries of land holdings and costs.”
AR 405–80
Army Policy Proponent: COE
Para.: 8–2b
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “b. The Army will identify, assert, defend, and preserve its water rights to the maximum extent possible under State and Federal law to sustain mission capability. The assertion and defense of Army water rights must be coordinated through the installation and LHC OSJA or legal office with the Chief, Environmental Law Division, Office of the General Counsel.”
AR 405–80
Army Policy Proponent: COE
Para.: 8–4
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “8–4. Command Policy and Guidance
The DCS, G-9 will maintain implementing guidance to execute the policy in this Chapter and coordinate any amendments or additions to the guidance with the Environmental Law Division, Office of the General Counsel. Commands may issue further guidance to aid in local implementation as they deem necessary. Local implementation should also address any additional Federal, State, or regional issues that may be unique to the command’s particular missions and circumstances.”
AR 420–1
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-4
Para.: 23–5b
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “b. In providing utility services, IMCOM will ensure Army garrisons comply with all applicable Federal laws and regulations. Applicability of State and local laws and regulations to installation utility services will be referred to the garrison Staff Judge Advocate for interpretation. Army garrisons that are OCONUS will comply with the FGS issued by the DoD executive agent for the host nation concerned. The FGS may be predicated on the Overseas Environmental Baseline Guidance Document. DoDD 6050.7 authorizes the executive agent to establish and enforce environmental compliance standards. Requirements to assure access to off-site energy and water supplies may necessitate engagement with external utilities. The Office of General Counsel represents the Department of the Army’s consumer interests in regulatory matters, including proceedings involving rates and conditions for the purchase of services for utilities. This policy does not affect the provisions for the Office of the General Counsel in AR 27–40 (Litigation). Energy and water resilience actions that require regulatory approval or affect provisions in AR 27–40; like new or amended rates, regulations, or conditions of service; must be referred to the Office of the General Counsel.”
AR 420–41
Army Policy Proponent: COE
Para.: 2–10
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “2–10. The General Counsel
The GC is responsible for litigation in which the Army has an interest as per AR 27–40. The Office of Installations, Environment, and Civil Works (IECW) is responsible for performing the regulatory law functions assigned to the GC and representing Federal executive agencies, DoD, and DA consumer interests in utility regulatory matters before local, State, and Federal administrative agencies and commissions. IECW is responsible for—
a. Providing legal advice and assistance relating to all regulatory matters concerning the acquisition and sales of utilities and related services.
b. Participating in utility rate intervention in accordance with responsibilities established by AR 27–40 and GSA delegation of authority to represent Federal executive branch agencies on specific utility suppliers’ rate cases.
c. Consulting with the ADAPPO on technical issues related to the acquisition and sale of utilities and related services.”
AR 672–20
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-1
Para.: 3–3
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “3–3. Eligibility
Procedures for determining eligibility, considering an inventor for any award covered by this chapter, and processing award recommendations are the responsibility of the Contract Litigation and Intellectual Property Division (KLIP) within the Office of the General Counsel. These procedures are published in AR 27–60, or as otherwise directed by KLIP.”
AR 690–300
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-1
Para.: 9–3a
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “a. The GC has been delegated authority to approve the qualifications of persons recommended for any civilian attorney or law clerk trainee position. The GC may further delegate this authority. Army organizations will coordinate with OGC prior to initiating hiring actions of civilian legal personnel, including attorneys, paralegals, and administrative personnel. This provision does not apply to the hiring of local nationals or National Guard employees pursuant to 10 USC 10508. Further, prior to any proposed elimination of a civilian legal position, the proposing command or organization will coordinate with the GC prior to taking final action.”
AR 690–600
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (M&RA)
Para.: 6–6d
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “d. When the administrative judge certifies a class complaint, the EEOCCR Director will fax or email a copy of the administrative judge’s decision to the servicing activity EEO Officer; the agency representative; and the Chief, Civilian Personnel Law and Management Division, Office of the General Counsel on receipt.”
AR 690–600
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (M&RA)
Para.: 7–7e
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “e. The activity may enter into a written settlement agreement to resolve the request of attorney fees and costs. In cases where agreement cannot be reached, the agency representative will, within 10 days of receipt of the request and supporting documentation, forward a recommended decision through the Civilian Personnel Law and Management Division, Office of the General Counsel; 2200 Army Pentagon, Room 3D548, Washington DC 20310–2200; to the EEOCCR Director for decision. The attorney’s fee request and supporting documentation, and a copy of the FAD, decision of the administrative judge, or EEOC decision should be included with the recommended decision.”
AR 690–752
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-1
Para.: 1–4d
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “d. Army General Counsel. The GC administers the Army Labor Counselor Program and exercises technical supervision over all Army labor counselors (see AR 27–1). The GC will ensure that the servicing legal office attorneys—”
AR 715–9
Army Policy Proponent: DCS, G-4
Para.: 2–12
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “2–12. The Judge Advocate General
TJAG will provide legal advice and support regarding status of forces agreements (SOFAs); international security agreements; acquisition cross-service agreements; host-nation laws; the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act, Section 3261; Title 18, United States Code (18 USC 3261); the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); procurement fraud; operational contract and fiscal law; and other legal considerations regarding CAAF.”
AR 715–30
Army Policy Proponent: ASA (ALT)
Para.: 2–10
Directed Change:
REVISE TO: “2–10. The Army General Counsel
The General Counsel will—”
View Official Army Directive 2026-20 (PDF)
Source: U.S. Army Publishing Directorate (APD)