Army National Guard AGR Jobs

Do you need a job? Why not work for the National Guard? Go check out the list of AGR available for your state.

Texas Army National Guard AGR Jobs

Are you a member of the Texas Army National Guard? "Texas AGR jobs" are the most searched AGR jobs on Google. Check them out now!

Florida Army National Guard AGR Jobs

Are you a member of the Florida Army National Guard? "Florida AGR jobs" are the second most searched AGR jobs on Google. Check them out now!

California Army National Guard AGR Jobs

Are you a member of the California Army National Guard? "California AGR jobs" are the third most searched AGR jobs on Google. Check them out now!

Monday, November 3, 2014

ARMY DIR 2014-28 REQUESTS TO UPGRADE DISCHARGE BY VETERANS CLAIMING POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ad2014_28.pdf

 SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
WASHINGTON
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
NOV - 3 2014
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-28 (Requests to Upgrade Discharge by Veterans
Claiming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder)
1 . References:
a. Memorandum, Secretary of Defense, 3 Sep 2014, subject: Supplemental
Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records Considering
Discharge Upgrade Requests by Veterans Claiming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
b. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552.
c. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records),
31 March 2006.
2. Pursuant to reference 1a, this directive implements supplemental guidance to the
Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) regarding requests to upgrade discharges by
veterans claiming post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It augments the ARBA
processes outlined in references 1b and 1c.
3. Under the supervision of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and
Reserve Affairs), ARBA will:
a. immediately implement the supplemental guidance outlined in the attachment to
reference 1a for all boards that review the characterization of discharges. This includes,
but is not limited to, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
b. prioritize the review of all applicants with service in the Vietnam theater and
provide me with a quarterly status beginning in January 2015.
c. coordinate a public messaging campaign targeting veterans groups that includes
congressional messaging with the Chief, Legislative Liaison and Chief, Public Affairs by
14 November 2014.
d. coordinate any additional medical resources needed to support this effort with
The Surgeon General.
4. The Office of the Surgeon General will provide expert guidance to ARBA on clinical
manifestations of PTSD and behavioral indicators to help ARBA assess the presence of
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-28 (Requests to Upgrade Discharge by Veterans
Claiming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder)
PTSD and its potentially mitigating effects. When requested, the office will provide
consultation to supplement ARBA's efforts on complex cases that exceed ARBA's
capabilities.
5. The Chief, Legislative Liaison and Chief, Public Affairs will implement the messaging
campaign for the remainder of 2014 and calendar year 2015.
6. This directive is effective immediately. The Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Manpower and Reserve Affairs) is the proponent for this policy and will publish
appropriate implementing instructions as soon as possible.
~-(,,,. I.I( • UI... ~'":~
- ')ohn M. McHugh 1
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Africa/Southern European Task Force
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
(CONT)
2
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-28 (Requests to Upgrade Discharge by Veterans
Claiming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder)
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery
Commander, U.S. Army Accessions Support Brigade
Commandant, U.S. Army War College
Commander, Second Army
CF:
Director, Army National Guard
Director of Business Transformation
Commander, Eighth Army
Commander, U.S. Army Cyber Command
3

Thursday, October 23, 2014

ARMY DIR 2014-25 ESTABLISHMENT OF A PUBLIC WEB SITE SHARING INFORMATION ABOUT ARMY WANTED FUGITIVES

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/NOCASE-ARMY_DIR_2014-25-000-WEB-0.pdf

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
WASHINGTON
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
2 3 OCT 20H
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-25 (Establishment of a Public Web Site Sharing
Information About Army Wanted Fugitives)
1. References:
a. 5 U.S. Code§ 552a.
b. Department of Defense (DoD) System of Record Notice, N05520-6 DoD, Law
Enforcement Defense Data Exchange, 6 May 2010, 75 FR 24931.
c. DoD Instruction 1325.02 (Desertion and Unauthorized Absence (UA)),
16 November 2012.
d. Army Regulation (AR) 25-1 (Army Information Technology), 25 June 2013.
e. AR 190-45 (Army Law Enforcement Reporting), 30 March 2007.
f. AR 360-1 (The Army Public Affairs Program), 25 May 2011.
g. National Crime Information Center (NCIC) 2000 Operating Manual, 30 July 2013,
Federal Bureau of Investigation Criminal Justice Information Services.
2. This directive authorizes the establishment of a publicly accessible Web site offering
information about the Army's Wanted Fugitives. For the purposes of this directive, Army
"Wanted Fugitives" are defined as Soldiers in Title 10 status, who:
a. without authority go or remain absent from their unit, organization or place of duty
with the intent to remain away permanently; and
b. are wanted for alleged commission or convictions for violation of offenses that
aggravate desertion, as listed in enclosure 3, paragraph 4c of reference 1c; and
c. have warrants for their apprehension posted in the NCIC database.
3. The Provost Marshal General will establish a publicly accessible Web site that
publishes the name, aliases, age, date of birth, height, weight, race, hair color, eye
color, physical identifiers (such as descriptions of tattoos), photographs and
occupational/vocational skills of fugitives. The site will also include brief descriptions of
the alleged offenses and/or convictions the Army wants the fugitives for and contact
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-25 (Establishment of a Public Web Site Sharing
Information About Army Wanted Fugitives)
information for the Army law enforcement or civilian investigative agency leading the
investigation.
4. The Web site will not contain personally identifiable information related to victim s,
witnesses and Family members, or the wanted individuals' Social Security number and
last known address.
5. The Office of the Provost Marshal General will monitor compliance with the guidance
in this directive and ensure the continuous review and validation of the data on Army
fugitives before it is posted to the site. Additionally, the office will ensure that site
operators comp ly with the guidance in references 1d and 1f concerning External Official
Presence sites, including conduct of a quarterly operational security review.
6. The Provost Marshal General is the proponent for this policy and will incorporate the
provisions of this directive into the next revision of reference 1e. This directive is
rescinded upon publication of the revised regulation.
1l~ ~ vi-i<-
J hn M. McHugh
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe
U.S. Army Central
U. S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U. S. Army Africa/Southern European Task Force
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
(CONT)
2
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-25 (Establishment of a Public Web Site Sharing
Information About Army Wanted Fugitives)
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
U.S. Army Test and Eva luation Command
U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
Comman der, U. S. Army Accessions Support Brigade
Commandant, U.S. Army War College
Commander, Second Army
CF:
Director, Army National Guard
Director of Business Transformation
Commander, Eighth Army
Commander, U.S. Army Cyber Command

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

ARMY DIR 2014-26 REASSIGNMENT OF SOLDIERS REQUIRING A COMMAND-DIRECTED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH EVALUATION OR FOLLOW-ON TREATMENT

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/NOCASE-ARMY_DIR_2014-26-000-WEB-0.pdf

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
WASHINGTON
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
2 2 OCT 2014
SUBJECT: Anny Directive 2014-26 (Reassignment of Soldiers Requiring a Command-
Directed Behavioral Health Evaluation or Follow-on Treatment)
1. References:
a. Department of Defense (DoD) Instruction 6490.04 (Mental Health Evaluations of
Members of the Military Services), March 4, 2013.
b. DoD Instruction 6490.10 (Continuity of Behavioral Health Care for Transferring
and Transitioning Service Members), March 26, 2012.
c. Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-11 (Reassignment), 1 May 2007, Rapid Action
Revision Issued 18 October 2012.
d. AR 614-30 (Overseas Service), 30 March 2010 .
e. AR 614-100 (Officer Assignment Policies, Details, and Transfers), 10 January
2006.
f. AR 614-200 (Enlisted Assignments and Utilization Management), 26 February
2009, Rapid Action Revision No. 2 Issued 11 October 2011.
2. The purpose of this directive is to prevent the reassignment of Soldiers, both officers
and enlisted, who may require the continued care and treatment of a trained behavioral
health professional. Under this policy, Soldiers requiring a referral for a command-
directed behavioral health evaluation, or undergoing follow-on treatment from a
behavioral health evaluation, will be stabilized at their current unit and identified as
medically nonavailable for permanent change of station (PCS) and deployment until
properly cleared by a behavioral healthcare provider (BHP). Consistent with the
guidance in reference 1a, commanders must refer a Soldier for a behavioral health
evaluation when:
a. the Soldier, by actions or words such as actual, attempted or threatened
violence, intends or is likely to cause serious injury to himself, herself or others;
b. the facts and circumstances indicate that the Soldier's intent to cause such injury
is likely; or
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-26 (Reassignment of Soldiers Requiring a Command-
Directed Behavioral Health Evaluation or Follow-on Treatmenl)
c. the commander believes the Soldier may be suffering from a severe mental
disorder.
3. When referring a Soldier for a behavioral health evaluation, commanders must follow
the referral procedures in reference 1a, enclosure 3, paragraph 2.
4. Upon notice of assignment instructions for a Soldier identified as requiring a
behavioral health evaluation or follow-on treatment, unit level commanders will consult
with the appropriate BHP. If the BHP determines that the Soldier should be stabilized in
their current assignment, the commander will initiate a request for a deferment or
deletion of the Soldier's reassignment based on the existing medical situation. The
Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command; Chief, Army Reserve; or
Director, Army National Guard will then identify the Soldier as medically nonavailable in
personnel assignment systems.
5. If the BHP anticipates that the Soldier will become eligible for PCS within 90 days of
the scheduled report date, the commander will request a deferment of assignment.
During this deferment period, BHPs will work to resolve the circumstances preventing
the Soldier's reassignment. The command will confer with the BHP to determine if a
Soldier is PCS-eligible and may request a second 90-day deferment, if necessary. If
the Soldier's mental health condition cannot be sufficiently improved within 180 days of
the originally scheduled report date, then the command must, in coordination with the
BHP, ensure that the Soldier's medical condition rs properly documented and tracked.
The command will then submit a request for a deletion of assignment to the appropriate
personnel agency. This does not prevent the commander from initiating a Medical
Evaluation or Physical Evaluation Board consistent with Army regulations.
6. If the BHP determines that the Soldier is eligible to PCS, the procedures outlined in
the enclosure to reference 1b must be followed. Additionally, in accordance with
reference 1b, paragraph 3, the gaining commander will be notified when the Soldier's
adherence to an ongoing treatment plan is deemed necessary to ensure mission
readiness and/or safety. Commanders and BHPs will ensure that any notification or
disclosure of a Soldier's behavioral health treatment is consistent with applicable law
and policy.
7. When a Soldier identified as requiring a behavioral health evaluation or follow-on
treatment is stationed outside the continental United States (OCONUS), the date
eligible for return from overseas (DEROS) will be the determining factor when a
commander submits a request for stabilization, deletion or deferment. Requests that
will result in Soldiers departing the OCON US location after their scheduled DE ROS will
be submitted as a request for extension of a foreign service tour in accordance with
2
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-26 (Reassignment of Soldiers Requiring a Command-
Directed Behavioral Health Evaluation or Follow-on Treatment)
reference 1c, chapters 2 or 3. Accordingly, the applicable component will identify the
Soldier as medically nonavailable for PCS or reassignment.
8. The provisions of this directive are effective immediately and apply to all
components. The scope of this directive is limited to the reassignment of Soldiers
requiring a command-directed behavioral health evaluation or follow-on treatment.
Commanders will ensure compliance with the policies and procedures in references 1a
and 1b.
9. The Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 is the proponent for this policy. Questions should be
directed to the Chief, Distribution and Readiness Branch, Office of the Deputy Chief of
Staff, G-1 at (703) 695-7961.
10. The Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 will incorporate the provisions of this directive into
the next revision of AR 600-8-11 as soon as practicable. The Commander, Human
Resources Command, in coordination with the Chief, Army Reserve and Director, Army
National Guard, will publish detailed guidance necessary for implementing this policy.
11. This directive is rescinded upon publication of the revised AR 600-8-11 .
oL., itt ~~LJ.......-ohn M. McHugh
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Africa/Southern European Task Force
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
(CONT)
3
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-26 (Reassignment of Soldiers Requiring a Command-
Directed Behavioral Health Evaluation or Follow-on Treatment)
DISTRIBUTION (CONT):
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery
Commander, U.S. Army Accessions Support Brigade
Commandant, U.S. Army War College
Commander, Second Army
CF:
Director, Army National Guard
Director of Business Transformation
Commander, Eighth Army
Commander, U.S. Army Cyber Command
Commander, U.S. Army Reserve Command

Friday, August 1, 2014

ARMY DIR 2014-22 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE OFFICE OF ENERGY INITIATIVES

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/NOCASE-ARMY_DIR_2014-22-000-WEB-0.pdf

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
WASHINGTON
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
0 1 AUG 2014
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-22 (Establishment of the Office of Energy Initiatives)
1. References:
a. Memorandum, Secretary of the Army, 29 Aug 2011, subject: Directive for Energy
Initiatives Office - Task Force.
b. Memorandum, Secretary of the Army, 19 Apr 2013, subject: 1-Year Extension of
the Energy Initiatives Task Force.
c. Memorandum, SAFM-CE, 18 May 201 1, subject: Review of Cost Benefit
Analysis (CBA) for Energy Initiatives Office (CBARB #493).
2. The Army is making significant progress toward advancing the energy security of our
installations to meet mission requirements and comply with congressional and
Presidential mandates to increase the use of renewable energy. We specifically
recognized the critical role renewable energy plays in long-term predictability and
sustainability. To galvanize our efforts, I directed the formation of the Energy Initiatives
Task Force (EITF) in 2011. As a result of its significant progress over the first year of
operation, I extended the EITF through fiscal year 2014.
3. Over the past three years, the EITF has guided more than 175 megawatts of
privately financed renewable energy projects through procurement at multiple
installations. Every project is expected to realize future cost avoidances and enhance
the energy security of the installation. In addition, the EITF has developed a healthy
pipeline of large-scale renewable energy projects with over 500 megawatts of additional
opportunities under assessment, including more than a dozen Army National Guard and
U.S. Army Reserve sites. The EITF has proven to be a sound investment with
substantial returns for the Army, attracting private capital to develop cost-effective,
large-scale renewable and alternative energy projects.
4. Effective 1 October 2014, I am establishing the Office of Energy Initiatives (OEI) as
an enduring organization within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Installations, Energy and Environment) (ASA (IE&E)). The OEI will serve as the Army's
central management office for the development, implementation and oversight of all
privately financed, large-scale (greater than or equal to 10 megawatts) renewable and
alternative energy projects.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-22 (Establishment of the Office of Energy Initiatives)
5. The OEI will leverage and expand on the momentum and early successes the EITF
garnered to position the Army to meet the congressionally directed goal that 25 percent
of our energy comes from renewable sources by 2025, as well as the President's goal
that the Army deploy one gigawatt of renewable energy by 2025.
6. The business case analysis for the OEI, as validated by the Office of the Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller), recognized annual
resource requirements for nine civilian personnel and $28.4 million in funding. Given
the fiscal constraints and resulting program reductions confronting the Army, the ASA
(IE&E) reprioritized functions and reduced the scope of the projects in the business
case analysis. Adjusted requirements are five civilians and $21 million in funding. The
ASA (IE&E) will resource the five civilian authorizations internally. The Installations
Program Evaluation Group will rebalance the energy investments to fund the $21 million
for the OEI, but a funding bridge of $13 million is required for fiscal year 2015. Funding
for this shortfall is a priority and will be reprogrammed in the year of execution from
within the energy investments. This funding and manning strategy is a prudent use of
resources and negates the requirement for a concept plan to establish the OEI.
7. The President recently submitted his fiscal year 2015 budget to Congress. In it, he
specifically mentioned American energy and, in particular, renewable energy. We know
we will face many budgetary challenges in the coming years, but we will be in a better
position to predict and manage our utility costs and meet our mandates with a continued
focus on long-term renewable energy initiatives. Our investment now ensures future
energy security to achieve our missions.
8. The Office of the ASA (IE&E) is the proponent for this guidance and will incorporate
the provisions of this directive into the appropriate administrative publications as soon
as possible.
Encls
f)lh u-i, ,--l-\~
ohn M. McHugh
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
2
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-22 (Establishment of the Office of Energy Initiatives)
U.S. Army South
(CONT)
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
U.S. Army Africa/Southern European Task Force
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery
Commander, U.S. Army Accessions Support Brigade
Commandant, U.S. Army War College
Commander, Second Army
CF:
Director, Army National Guard
Director of Business Transformation
Commander, Eighth Army
Commander, U.S. Army Cyber Command

Wednesday, June 4, 2014

ARMY DIR 2014-10 ADVANCED METERING OF UTILITIES

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/NOCASE-ARMY_DIR_2014-10-000-WEB-0.pdf

 SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
WASHINGTON
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-10 (Advanced Metering of Utilities)
0 4 JUN 2014
1. Purpose. This directive establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for installing
advanced meters on utility systems. Related references are at the enclosure .
2. Applicability. This policy applies to all permanent Active Army, Army National Guard
and U.S. Army Reserve installations, sites and facilities operated and/or maintained by
Federal funds in and outside the continental United States, hereafter referred to as
"installations." This policy does not apply to contingency bases or Civil Works facilities .
For the purposes of this policy, a "facility" is defined as any building that is owned ,
constructed, renovated, leased or purchased in part or in whole for use by the Federal
Government or any building that receives Federal funds to support utility expenses.
3. Policy
a. The Army's policy is to appropriately manage our natural resources (references a
and b). An essential part of managing those resources is to quantitatively determine
how much energy and water we are using through the use of advanced meters
(references c and f) . Advanced meters are electronic meters that, at a minimum, have
the capability to measure and record use at regular intervals and communicate that data
to the Army's enterprise Meter Data Management System (MOMS) (references h and i).
Accurate meter data is fundamental to the Army's ability to identify cost-effective energy
and water investments and greatly reduces the personnel time associated with manually
entering and reporting utility data (reference g). Advanced meters and MOMS must
comply with Department of Defense guidance on cybersecurity and the risk
management framework for information technology (references d and e) . Additional
information on utilities metering is in references j and k.
b. The Army will maximize the effect of its investment in advanced meters and
minimize the overall cost of purchasing and installing meters. Strategies that must be
considered include:
(1) ensuring that meters provide only the necessary capability for the targeted
application . Utility-grade meters capable of measuring harmonics, power factors ,
reactive power and other advanced capabilities may not be necessary for many facilities
covered by this directive.
(2) leveraging the use of building automation systems or energy management
control systems where possible.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-10 (Advanced Metering of Utilities)
(3) fitting existing analog meters with pulse counters that can communicate with
MOMS.
(4) contracting for meter installation across multiple installations, which may
provide cost savings through the use of larger contracts.
(5) incorporating meters in larger capital improvement projects. Advanced
meters will be installed and connected to MOMS on all new construction projects , major
renovation projects, Energy Conservation Investment Program projects and third-party
financed projects . Major renovation projects include changes to a building that provide
significant opportunities to improve energy and water efficiency. These projects may
include, but are not limited to, heating, ventilation and air-conditioning; lighting; building
envelope; and other building components that have a major effect on energy and water
use.
(6) coordinating with all utility privatization , Residential Communities Initiative
and Privatized Army Lodging vendors to leverage existing meter data.
c. Utility meters with remote communications capability must be installed in each
building for each utility serving the building (for example, district steam, district hot and
chilled water, electricity, natural gas, water or fuel oil) in the appropriate standard units
of measure (kilowatt-hour, kilowatt, cubic feet, gallons, etc.) to capture the consumption
levels prescribed in paragraphs 3c(1 )-(4) where it is cost-effective, as determined by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Meter Program Manager and approved by the Office
of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management (OACSIM). The Meter
Program Manager will evaluate cost-effectiveness on a case-by-case basis. In doing
so, the manager will consider not only the initial cost of meter installation, but the value
and benefit from the use of meter data to identify and execute energy- and cost-saving
projects.
(1) Electricity. Advanced meters will be installed in individual facilities to
accurately capture a minimum of 60 percent of electricity use by 2020 with a goal of
85 percent at the installation level by the end of fiscal year 2020, based on available
funding.
(a) Energy-intensive facilities should be submetered where practical to identify
electricity use by individual tenants and high-use operations or processes, such as data
centers, laboratories and manufacturing processes. Major mechanical and electrical
subsystems also should be submetered.
(b) Operational energy uses will be metered where practical. "Operational
energy" is defined as the energy required for training, moving and sustaining military
forces and weapons platforms for military operations. The term includes energy used
2
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-10 (Advanced Metering of Utilities)
by tactical power systems, generators and weapons platforms. Examples of training
uses of operational energy are range complexes , virtual collective simulators (both fixed
and mobile), individual- and crew-level non-systems-specific and systems-specific
simulators (including hardstands where tactical equipment plugs in for power to support
embedded training systems), constructive simulations and large live training complexes,
such as home station forward operating bases and urban operations training facilities.
(2) Natural Gas. Advanced meters will be installed on individual facilities to
accurately capture a minimum of 60 percent of natural gas use by 2020 with a goal of
85 percent at the installation level by the end of fiscal year 2020, based on available
funding. Where practical, facilities should be submetered to identify high-use operations
or processes.
(3) District Steam, Hot and Chilled Water. Advanced meters will be installed on
individual facilities and distribution lines connected to district steam , hot and chilled
water systems to accurately capture at least 60 percent of steam , hot and chilled water
use by 2020 with a goal of 85 percent at the installation level by the end of fiscal year
2020. Where practical, facilities should be submetered to identify high-use operations
or processes.
(4) Potable and Non-Potable Water. Advanced meters will be installed on
individual facilities and landscape irrigation systems to accurately capture a minimum of
60 percent of potable and non-potable (industrial , landscaping and agricultural) water
use by 2020 with a goal of 85 percent at the installation level by the end of fiscal year
2020, based on available funding . In addition , meters will be installed at on-post water
sources and distribution systems to effectively identify supply quantities and system
losses by the end of fiscal year 2020. Where practical, facilities and systems should be
submetered to identify high-use operations or processes .
d. Meters must be connected to the Army's MOMS as quickly as practical after
installation using an accredited metering system. All metering systems with advanced
meters will be configured to automatically communicate their data to MOMS. At a
minimum, advanced meters will provide hourly data and record 15-minute usage
profiles. These profiles will be used to assess building performance at least monthly.
e. The MOMS will be capable of electronically storing data for at least 10 years and
creating user reports showing a minimum of hourly, daily, monthly and annual
consumption.
f. Installations with privatized utilities will work through the contracting officer to
partner with the owner of the distribution system to share existing meter data or
negotiate acceptable terms for the installation of new meters and cost sharing .
3
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-10 (Advanced Metering of Utilities)
4. Communications Strategy and Plan for Reimbursable Tenant Meters. Not later than
12 months after publication of this directive, OACSIM will write and update, as needed,
a communications strategy for Army metering and a plan for metering reimbursable
tenants. The plan will explain why meters are needed, when they will be installed and
for which utility service(s) and how reimbursable tenants will be billed for each utility
service.
5. Meter Data Management Plan. Not later than 9 months after publication of this
directive, OACSIM will develop a meter data management plan that describes how the
Army plans to cost-effectively deploy metering systems with advanced meters and how
it intends to use the meter data to manage energy and water use. The plan will include
all utility meters and establish guidance on which installations and their facilities have a
priority. The plan will be updated as needed, but not less than every 3 years.
6. Reporting . OACSIM will brief the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations,
Energy and Environment) (ASA (IE&E)) quarterly on the Army's metering program and
implementation progress. The brief may be included as part of other OASCIM quarterly
briefs to the ASA (IE&E). OACSIM will develop appropriate performance measures and
use these measures in reporting progress.
7. Budgeting. OACSIM will identify the requirements to support the Army's metering
program through the planning, programming, budgeting and execution process. In
consultation with ASA (IE&E), OACSIM will provide annual guidance to the Corps of
Engineers' Meter Program Manager concerning the priorities and level of effort that will
be achieved each fiscal year. Installations will be provided resources, depending on
availability, to support the provisions of this directive and the meter data management
plan.
8. Proponent. The proponent for this directive is the Assistant Chief of Staff for
Installation Management, who will incorporate the guidance in this directive into the next
revision of Army Regulation 420-1 (Army Facilities Management) as soon as practical.
9. Rescission. This directive is rescinded upon publication of the revised regulation.
Encl
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
(CONT)
4
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-10 (Advanced Metering of Utilities)
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
Commander
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Africa/Southern European Task Force
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery
Commander, U.S. Army Accessions Support Brigade
Commandant, U.S. Army War College
Commander, Second Army
CF:
Director, Army National Guard
Director of Business Transformation
Commander, Eighth Army
Commander, U.S. Army Cyber Command
5
REFERENCES
a. The Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58 (2005) .
b. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, Pub. L. No. 110-140 (2007).
c. DoD Instruction 4170. 11 (Installation Energy Management), December 11, 2009.
d. DoD Instruction 8500.01 (Cybersecurity), March 14, 2014.
e. DoD Instruction 8510.01 (Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information
Technology (IT)), March 12, 2014.
f. Memorandum , Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics) ,
April 16, 2013 , subject: Utilities Meter Policy.
g. AR 420-1 (Army Facilities Management), 12 February 2008, including Rapid Action
Revision No. 2 issued 24 August 2012.
h. Executive Order 028-12, 162247Z Nov 11, subject: Program Management of the
Army Central Meter Program.
i. Fragmentary Order (FRAGO) No. 1 to HODA EXORD 028-12 , 111810Z Apr 12 ,
subject: Program Management of the Army Central Meter Program.
j. Metering Best Practices: A Guide to Achieving Utility Resource Efficiency, Release
2.0, U.S. Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program, August 2011 .
k. ASHRAE Standard 189.1-2011 (Standard for the Design of High-Performance
Green Buildings).
Enclosure

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

ARMY DIR 2014-11 ENLISTED TO MEDICAL DEGREE PREPARATORY PROGRAM

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/NOCASE-ARMY_DIR_2014-11-000-WEB-0.pdf

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
WASHINGTON
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
t 4 MAY 2014
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-11 (Enlisted to Medical Degree Preparatory Program)
1. Purpose. This directive authorizes the Army Enlisted to Medical Degree Preparatory
Program (EMDP2) in conjunction with the Uniformed Services University of the Health
Sciences (USUHS). Related references are at the enclosure.
2. Background. Under the EMDP2, USUHS and the Army will partner to provide an
opportunity for highly qualified, Regular Army enlisted Soldiers to remain on active duty
while completing the coursework necessary to be eligible to apply for admission to
USUHS or civilian medical schools via the Health Professions Scholarship Program
(HPSP). In turn, this partnership will strengthen the Army Medical Corps by providing
the Army with a new source of physicians who have an enlisted background and
strongly rooted Army values.
a. The EMDP2 includes full-time coursework in a traditional classroom setting,
structured pre-health advising, formal preparation for the Medical College Admission
Test, dedicated faculty and peer mentoring at USUHS, and integrated clinical exposure.
The EMDP2 is a post-baccalaureate program for Regular Army enlisted Soldiers who
have an undergraduate degree, but need to complete additional specific coursework to
apply for admission to USUHS or most civilian medical schools.
b. The training Soldiers will receive as part of the EMDP2 is necessary to give them
the opportunity to complete the required preparatory coursework for admission to
USUHS, most medical schools and the HPSP.
3. Policy. To establish the EMDP2, and subject to the supervision of the Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs), I am delegating to The Surgeon
General the following authorities and directing the following actions. The Surgeon
General wil l:
a. enter into a memorandum of agreement with USUHS, pursuant to reference b, to
establish the specific roles and responsibilities of the Army and USUHS for the EMDP2.
The Surgeon General may agree that the Army will fund training billets on a
nonreimbursable basis.
b. establish eligibility requirements, guidelines and procedures, consistent with this
directive, for Regular Army enlisted Soldiers to apply for the EMDP2. The Surgeon
General will coordinate these areas with the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 ;
U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC); and U.S. Army Recruiting Command.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-11 (Enlisted to Medical Degree Preparatory Program)
c. ensure that all participants meet the academic eligibility requirements USUHS
sets forth.
d. appoint a board to screen candidates and recommend those who are best
qualified for detail into the EMDP2. The Surgeon General will make final selections.
e. exercise, in coordination with HRC, my authority under reference a to annually
detail Regular Army enlisted Soldiers to participate in the EMDP2. HRC will track the
number of enlisted Soldiers detailed to participate in the program as required by
reference a. Details are limited to a maximum of seven and are subject to the
Commander, HR C's authority to ensure that no more than 2 percent of the authorized
strength of Regular Army enlisted Soldiers be detailed as students.
4. Eligibility Requirements
a. Regular Army enlisted Soldiers who meet the academic requirements set forth by
USUHS and who have served a minimum of 3 years at the time of enrollment in the
EMDP2 are eligible to apply.
b. As a condition of admittance into the EMDP2, applicants must agree to and
qualify for reenlistment or extension for a period of 54 months, or for the time required to
participate in the program and meet the service remaining requirement of 36 months
after completion of the program, in accordance with reference i, chapter 4 and
reference j, paragraph 4-6.
c. Applicants must meet the eligibility criteria for appointment as a commissioned
officer as prescribed by references e-g , or obtain a waiver.
(1) Applicants may not be considered for EMDP2 if they are currently scheduled
for or attending military occupational specialty training resulting from an approved
reclassification or reenlistment contract. However, before training begins, applicants
may request cancellation of a voluntary reclassification or waive the reenlistment
contract option in accordance with reference i.
(2) Applicants must meet age and time-in-service requirements for appointment
to the Medical Service Corps in accordance with reference f, as required for
participation in USUHS or the HPSP, and will account for the projected date of
appointment after the 2-year EMDP2.
(3) Applicants must satisfy the medical standards for appointment as a
commissioned officer in accordance with reference d.
(4) Requests for waivers with supporting documentation must be submitted and
approved by the appropriate authority by a date The Surgeon General will determine.
2
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014- 11 (Enlisted to Medical Degree Preparatory Program)
d. Applicants must obtain a conditional letter of release from their branch manager
at HRC.
e. Applicants must meet eligibility requirements set forth pursuant to paragraph 4b.
5. Application to Medical Degree Programs
a. Soldiers will agree to apply to USU HS upon completion of the EMDP2.
Application requirements are in accordance with USUHS policies and procedures.
b. Soldiers may apply to civilian medical degree programs concurrently with
application to the HPSP. Application to the HPSP will be in accordance with
reference h, paragraph 2- 7.
c. Soldiers accepted into the USU HS medical degree program or the HPSP will
request discharge in accordance with reference k, paragraph 16-2.
6. Service Obligation
a. Soldiers who complete the EMDP2 and are appointed as a commissioned officer,
in conjunction with attendance at USUHS or participation in the HPSP, will incur a
3-year active duty service obligation, which wi ll be served consecutively with the active
duty service obligation arising from the respective medical degree program.
b. Soldiers who participate in the EMDP2 but do not complete the program, who
decline participation, or who are otherwise not later appointed as commissioned officers
upon entry into USUHS or the HPSP will serve their remaining service obligation, in
accordance with paragraph Sb , as HRC directs, in their enlisted status.
7. The Army's partnership with USUHS to participate in the EMDP2 is meant to be
enduring and wi ll continue until it is rescinded by USUHS or the Army. The Surgeon
General is the proponent for EMDP2 and will staff policy for the program for publication
in a new Army regulation within 1 year of the date of this directive.
8. This directive is rescinded upon publication of the new Army regulation.
Encl
DISTRIBUTION:
(see next page)
~I... l,q • "'' ~,.__
John M. McHug~
3
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014 - 11 (Enlisted to Medical Degree Preparatory Program)
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Africa/Southern European Task Force
U.S. Army Special Operati ons Command
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
U.S . Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U. S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
U. S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Superintendent, U.S. Mili tary Academy
Director, U.S. Ar my Acquisition Support Center
Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery
Commander , U. S. Army Accessions Support Br igade
Commandant, U.S. Army War Coll ege
Commander, Second Army
CF:
Director, Army National Guard
Director of Business Transformation
Commander, Eighth Army
Commander , U.S. Army Cyber Command
4
REFERENCES
a. 10 U.S.C. section 4301 (Members of Army: detail as students, observers, and
investigators at educational institutions, industrial plants, and hospitals).
b. Department of Defense Instruction 4000.19 (Support Agreements), April 25, 2013.
c. Department of Defense Instruction 6000.13 (Medical Manpower and Personnel),
June 30, 1997.
d. Army Regulation (AR) 40- 501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), 14 December 2007,
including Rapid Action Revision 3 Issued 4 August 2011.
e. AR 135-100 (Appointment of Commissioned and Warrant Officers of the Army),
1 September 1994.
f. AR 135-101 (Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers for Assignment to
Army Medical Department Branches), 15 February 1984.
g. AR 601 -100 (Appointment of Commissioned and Warrant Officers in the Regular
Army), 21 November 2006.
h. AR 601-141 (U . S. Army Health Professions Scholarship, Financial Assistance, and
Active Duty Health Professions Loan Repayment Programs), 19 September 2006.
i. AR 601-280 (Army Retention Program), 31 January 2006, including Rapid Action
Revision 1 Issued 15 September 2011.
j. AR 614-200 (Enlisted Assignments and Utilization Management), 26 February 2009,
including Rapid Action Revision 2 Issued 11 October 2011 .
k. AR 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations}, 6 June 2005,
including Rapid Action Revision 3 Issued 6 September 2011 .
Enclosure 

Monday, May 12, 2014

ARMY DIR 2014-08 WATER RIGHTS POLICY FOR ARMY INSTALLATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ad2014_08.pdf

MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-08 (Water Rights Policy for Army Installations in the
United States)
1. Reference Memorandum, Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Logistics
and Environment), 24 Nov 95, subject: Policy Guidance on Water Rights at Army
Installations in the United States.
2. Purpose. The Army requires enough water to carry out its missions without
significant disruptions. This directive, which supersedes the reference, sets policy and
assigns responsibilities for identifying, asserting and preserving the Army’s water rights.
3. Background. Water is scarce throughout much of the Western United States and
becoming scarcer in some parts of the Eastern United States. Increasing demand for
water to support growing populations and economic development places stress on the
same supplies of ground and surface water that Army installations depend on to fulfill
their missions. Over the past decade, several Army installations have become involved
in litigation over water rights. As competition for water increases, more Army
installations are likely to become involved in disputes over water. Consequently, it is
critical that we protect the Army’s water rights and its ability to carry out its missions.
4. Applicability. This policy applies to all Army installations in the United States. It is
not applicable to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Civil Works projects and facilities.
5. Policy. Effective immediately:
a. the Army will acquire and maintain water rights for both ground and surface water
consistent with mission requirements;
b. the Army will identify, assert, defend and preserve its water rights to the
maximum extent possible under State and Federal law to sustain mission capability;
and
c. Army installations will locate, record and retain documentation related to water
rights.
6. Reporting. By 31 December of each calendar year, the Office of the Assistant Chief
of Staff for Installation Management (OACSIM) will report to the Office of the Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy and Environment) on the current state of
the Army’s water rights. This report will include the following topics: an assessment of
the sufficiency of existing water rights to meet mission requirements; the state of
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y
W A S H I N G T O N
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-08 (Water Rights Policy for Army Installations in the
United States)
2
documentation to assert, maintain and defend the Army’s water rights; and a current
summary of all legal challenges to the Army’s water rights.
7. Command Policy and Guidance. OACSIM will issue implementing guidance to
execute this policy no more than 180 days from the date of this directive and will
coordinate the guidance with the Environmental Law Division, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, before it is issued. Enclosure 1 contains a legal framework for water
rights to aid OACSIM, commands and command counsel in identifying, asserting and
preserving water rights. Enclosure 2 offers a nonexclusive list of issues to address in
the guidance.
8. Proponent. The proponent for this policy is OACSIM, who will incorporate the
guidance in this directive into the next revisions of Army Regulation 405-80
(Management of Title and Granting Use of Real Property) and Army Regulation 420-1
(Army Facilities Management), as appropriate.
9. Rescission. This directive is rescinded upon publication of the revised regulations.
Encls John M. McHugh
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Africa/Southern European Task Force
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
(CONT)
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-08 (Water Rights Policy for Army Installations in the
United States)
3
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery
Commander, U.S. Army Accessions Support Brigade
Commandant, U.S. Army War College
Commander, Second Army
CF:
Director, Army National Guard
Director of Business Transformation
Commander, Eighth Army
Commander, U.S. Army Cyber Command
Army Directive 2014-08 Enclosure 1
LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR WATER RIGHTS
A water right is the legal right to use water from a source. Water rights are distinct from
contractual rights of purchase. Federal installations own and can obtain water rights in
support of their missions. The analysis of the status of Army water rights is specific to
each installation, highly specialized and dependent on careful legal review by the
installation’s Staff Judge Advocate.
Army water rights may arise from State or Federal law. State water rights are typically
obtained through acquisition. Although the Army is part of the Federal Government,
many of its installations’ water rights are held pursuant to State law. The character of
these State water rights depends on the legal doctrine each State follows. In general,
the Eastern States assign “riparian” water rights: all landowners whose property adjoins
a body of water have the right to make reasonable use of it. The Western States use a
system called “prior appropriation,” which assigns water rights prioritized by the date on
which a person first put a quantity of water to beneficial use. In these prior
appropriation States, ownership of land is divorced from ownership of water rights.
Some States have hybrids of these two systems. Each State’s specific laws are unique
and should be reviewed by the installation legal counsel.
Federal water rights differ significantly from State water rights and, most critically, take
priority over State rights. Army installations may have obtained Federal water rights in
one of the following ways:
 Federal Reserved Water Rights. When the Federal Government withdraws land
from the public domain to establish a reservation or installation, courts infer the
intent to reserve unappropriated water to fulfill the reservation’s established
purpose, both presently and in the future.
 Cession. On land ceded to the Federal Government, the cession authorization
may include water rights.
 Preemption. When Congress has clearly and specifically preempted State water
law, either expressly or by necessary implication, on lands that are not reserved,
the Federal installation will have senior water rights.
For Federal reserved rights, uses of water to fulfill the “primary purpose” of the
reservation or installation include all municipal and industrial uses of water necessary to
sustain a self-contained community, including water adequate for the morale and
welfare needs of the Army community. Federal reserved rights may also change over
time, depending on the installation’s future needs.
A final significant difference between Federal and State water rights is that Federal
reserved water rights clearly may not be lost by nonuse. Under the law of some prior
appropriation States, a long period of nonuse may raise a rebuttable presumption of
intent to abandon a State right. Reserved rights are not subject to abandonment. It is
Army Directive 2014-08 2 Enclosure 1
not clear, however, whether other water rights owned by the United States are subject
to State laws on abandonment.
Although the Federal Government is generally immune to lawsuits from the States, the
McCarran Amendment, Title 43 United States Code section 666 (1988), provides a
limited waiver of sovereign immunity for “general stream adjudications.” In this
situation, individual States can require the United States to quantify, assert and define
its water rights. During an adjudication, a court will consider evidence to establish the
existence of water rights within a watershed or basin. The result of the adjudication is a
decree fixing the amounts, relative priorities and specific details of water rights.
However, even when such rights have been fixed, Federal reserved rights may still
trump State water rights, and the appropriation of water may have to be revisited,
depending on the Army’s needs.
Timely and thorough identification and characterization of an installation’s water rights
are important. State water rights must be preserved to prevent arguments that they
have been abandoned. Generally, State adjudications of water rights also require the
assertion of water rights claims to be brought within a certain timeframe. If the Army
fails to assert or preserve its water rights in a timely manner, it may be in jeopardy of
losing those rights.
The policy in this directive requires that the Army identify, assert, defend and preserve
its water rights to the maximum extent possible under State and Federal law. The
complexity and diversity of water rights means that installation commanders must
consult with their Staff Judge Advocates to determine what legal rights and limitations
apply at their specific installation to ensure continued access to a sufficient water supply
to carry out the Army’s missions. The Office of the Judge Advocate General,
Environmental Law Division is available to coordinate guidance at the command level
and specific implementation instructions at the installation level.
The assertion and defense of Army water rights must be coordinated, through the
installation and land holding command’s Office of the Staff Judge Advocate or legal
office, with the Chief, Environmental Law Division, U.S. Army Legal Services Agency.
The Environmental Law Division represents the Department of the Army in litigation
(and some administrative proceedings) involving water rights and other environmental
and natural resources matters. The U.S. Department of Justice has the primary
responsibility for representing Federal agencies in litigation. Consequently, the
Environmental Law Division will coordinate as necessary with the Justice Department
and Office of the Army General Counsel on all matters related to Army water rights.
Army Directive 2014-08 Enclosure 2
ISSUES TO ADDRESS IN GUIDANCE
Here is a nonexclusive list of issues the Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for
Installation Management (OACSIM) will include in its water rights guidance to
commands. Commands may issue further guidance to aid in local implementation as
they deem necessary. Local implementation should also address any additional
Federal, State or regional issues that may be unique to the command’s particular
missions and circumstances.
1. Importance of the Army Water Rights Policy. Each command must emphasize the
critical importance that sufficient water rights and access to water may have on the
command’s ability to continue to carry out its missions in the future.
2. Assignment of Responsibilities. Each command must clearly establish who is
responsible for collecting and maintaining records; analyzing current and future water
needs and supply; analyzing water rights necessary for continued access to a sufficient
supply of water; and asserting, maintaining and defending water rights and access.
3. Federal and State Water Rights Laws. OACSIM’s guidance should include a
summary of Federal and State water laws, and also direct appropriate legal counsel to
supplement this summary with State and regional laws and issues that may be pertinent
to each installation or activity. The guidance should discuss potentially relevant Federal
laws, such as the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
4. Analysis of Existing Water Rights. All installations or activities must analyze the
adequacy of their current and future water supply needs, rights and access. Such rights
and access should be sufficient to continue essential activities under drought or other
shortage conditions and to support increased demand due to mobilization, contingency
operations or increases in population or missions. Attention should be paid to actions
necessary to maintain existing water rights, including planning and continued beneficial
use to avoid abandonment or loss. Likewise, any privatization of Army-owned water
systems must be accomplished in such a manner as to not jeopardize the Army’s water
rights. If additional water access or rights are necessary, the analysis should also
include what other sources of water are available and how to acquire the rights or
access to that water.
5. Identification of Supporting Data and Records. The guidance should address the
importance of collecting and maintaining sufficient evidentiary records to assert,
maintain and defend the Army’s water rights. Guidance should be provided on how to
locate, record and retain existing and future water rights documentation. As applicable,
this documentation should include information concerning the dates, locations, means,
rates of diversion and uses of water, as well as documents establishing the acquisition
and history of all water rights acquired (for example, executive orders, decrees or
permits).
Army Directive 2014-08 2 Enclosure 2
6. Maintenance of Records. OACSIM should require commands to initiate procedures
for permanently maintaining such records. These procedures should clearly identify
who is responsible for the maintenance, how the maintenance will be monitored to
ensure that it is carried out, and how such records will be passed on to successors.
The transfer of documents is especially important given the indefinite number of years
during which the Army will need to assert, maintain and/or defend its water rights.
Effective retention of information collected, now and in the future, will be key to
protecting the current and future property interests of the United States Army.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

ARMY DIR 2014-02 NET ZERO INSTALLATIONS POLICY

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/NOCASE-ARMY_DIR_2014-02-000-WEB-0.pdf

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
WASHINGTON
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 201 +02 (Net Zero Installations Polley)
1 . References:
2 8 JAN 2014
a. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, Public Law 11 0-140.
b. Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58.
c. Executive Order 13514 (Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and
Economic Perfonnance), October 5, 2009.
d. Executive Order 13423 (Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and
Transportation Management), January 24, 2007.
e. Department of Defense Strategic Sustainability Perfonnance Plan, FY 2012.
f. Finding of No Significant Impact, Programmatic Environmental Assessment:
Implementation of the Net Zero Program at Army Installations, October 2, 2012.
g. Programmatic Environmental Assessment: Army Net Zero Installations, Final,
July 2012.
2. Purpose. The Army's vision is to appropriately manage our natural resources with a
goal of Net Zero in energy, water and solid waste at installations. This memorandum
sets policy and assigns responsibilities to strive toward Net Zero at all Army installations
where fiscally responsible and in support of mission accomplishment. Net Zero is not a
new program, but seeks to build on existing Army sustainability efforts to integrate
environmental, energy and green procurement programs. This holistic strategy is
targeted to improve management of existing Federal energy, water and solid waste
programs with the goal of increasing resiliency where fiscally responsible. Net Zero is a
force multiplier that enables the Army to appropriately steward available resources,
manage costs and provide Soldiers, Families and Civilians with a sustainable future.
3. Applicability. This policy applies to all permanent Active Army, Army National Guard
and U.S. Army Reserve installations, sites and facilities operated and/or maintained by
Federal funds in the continental United States (CONUS) and outside the continental
United States (OCONUS), hereafter referred to as "installations." This policy does not
apply to contingency bases or Civil Works facilities. For the purposes of this policy, the
tenn "Commands" refers to U.S. Army Materiel Command, U.S. Anny Installation
Management Command, the Army National Guard and the Army Reserve.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014·02 (Net Zero Installations Policy)
4. Policy. Net Zero builds on longstanding sustainable practices and incorporates
emerging best practices in building and community management of energy, water and
solid waste at Army installations.
a. Effective immediately, Commands will implement Net Zero to the maximum
extent practical and fiscally prudent by:
(1) reducing overall energy use , maximizing efficiency, implementing energy
recovery and cogeneration opportunities, and offsetting the remaining demand with the
production of renewable energy from onsite sources so that the Net Zero energy
installation produces as much renewable energy as it uses over the course of a year.
{2) reducing overall water use, regardless of the source; increasing use of
technology that uses water more efficiently; recycling and reusing water, shifting from
the use of potable water to non-potable sources as much as possible; and minimizing
interbasin transfers of any type of water, potable or non•potable, so that a Net Zero
water installation recharges as much water back into the aquifer as it withdraws.
(3) reducing, reusing, recycling/composting and recovering solid waste streams
and converting them to resource values, resulting in zero landfill disposal.
b. Commands, both CONUS and OCONUS, will work to gain local, regional and
national (where applicable) support toward Net Zero goals.
c. The original Net Zero pilots will continue to strive toward a goal of Net Zero in
energy, water and/or solid waste by fiscal year 2020. The Net Zero pilots will serve as
sources of "best practices" that other installations can implement.
5. Implementation. Army Net Zero is designed to further the Army energy, water, solid
waste and overall sustainability goals, primarily through improved management
practices.
a. Commands are expected to move toward the Net Zero goals using existing
programs and resources, where practical. Efforts will be funded with existing program
resources from funds for military construction; the Energy Conservation Investment
Program; the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program ; sustainment,
restoration and modernization; and base operations services.
b. Commands are encouraged to:
(1) leverage existing utilities privatization contracts, energy savings performance
contracts and utility energy service contracts; ·
2
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-02 (Net Zero Installations Policy)
(2) explore options for alternative financing through power purchase agreements
end enhanced use leases;
(3) collaborate with other Federal agencies and the private sector to finance
project development; and
(4) use life-cycle cost analysis to assess any proposed new Net Zero initiative or
project.
c. Commands are expected to review and validate all life-cycle cost analyses that
installations develop to ensure that the recommended project or initiative is fiscally
responsible and cost-effective.
6. Responsibilities
a. The Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy and
Environment) (OASA (IE&E)) develops Net Zero strategy and policy, represents Army
environmental and sustainability interests, and provides strategic oversight and direction
for Net Zero.
b. The Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management (OACSIM)
establishes guidance and secures program resources to achieve Net Zero goals.
OACSIM will develop and maintain a process to oversee command performance, share
best practices and lessons learned across commands, and report progress toward Net
Zero by leveraging existing systems and reporting requirements.
c. Commands will oversee installation performance as they strive to exceed the
legal, regulatory, Presidential, Department of Defense and Army policy requirements for
increasing efficiency, and reusing and reducing energy and water consumption and
solid waste generation as cost-effectively as possible (references 1a-1 g and the
supplemental Net Zero references at the enclosure). Commands will continually
evaluate and implement efficiencies, reductions and reuse of energy, water and solid
waste to the maximum extent possible within available funding levels and as new
technologies and approaches are proven cost-effective.
7. Tracking Progress
a. OACSIM will provide quarterly updates to the CASA (IE&E) on each command's
progress, as well as overall Army energy, water and solid waste goal performance.
OACSIM will include periodic Net Zero training in existing Army Energy Managers
Workshops and help commands incorporate Net Zero into other appropriate Army
training.
3
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-02 (Net Zero Installations Policy)
b. Commands will hold quarterly conference calls to facilitate information exchange,
identify best practices, track progress and publish success stories and lesson learned.
Commands will summarize the results in quarterly reports to OACSIM.
c. Commands will ensure that installations report progress quarterly and annually
on energy, water and solid waste in accordance with Army policy via existing reporting
systems (for example, Army Energy and Water Reporting System, Solid Waste Annual
Reporting and Headquarters Army Environmental System). Commands will review and
certify the accuracy and completeness of data quarterly, track progress toward Net Zero
goals through the aggregation of existing data sources, and assess and report individual
installation progress toward Net Zero.
8. Exceptions. Requests for exception to this policy must be forwarded in writing
through the chain of command to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Energy
and Sustainability) for approval.
9. Proponent. The proponent for this policy is OACSIM, who will incorporate the
guidance in this directive into the next revisions of Army Regulation 200-1
(Environmental Protection and Enhancement) and Army Regulation 420-1 (Army
Facilities Management), as appropriate.
10. Rescission. This directive is rescinded upon publication of the revised regulations.
Encl
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Africa/Southern European Task Force
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command
(CONT)
4
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2014-02 (Net Zero Installations Policy)
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
U.S. Army Cyber Command
U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command/9th Signal Command (Army)
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army MIiitary District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Installation Management Command
Superintendent, United States Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
Executive Director, Arlington National Cemetery
Commandant, U.S. Army War College
Commander, U.S. Army Accessions Support Brigade
CF:
Director, Army National Guard
Director of Business Transformation
5
SUPPLEMENTAL REFERENCES FOR NET ZERO INSTALLATIONS POLICY
1. 10 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 2911 (e), Goal regarding use of renewable energy
to meet facility energy needs.
2. 10 U.S.C. § 2913, Energy savings contracts and activities.
3. 10 U.S.C. § 2662, Real property transactions: reports to congressional committees.
4. 10 U.S.C. § 2667, Leases: non-excess property of military departments and
Defense Agencies.
5. 10 U.S.C. § 2922a, Contracts for energy or fuel for military installations.
6. 42 U.S.C § 8287, Authority to enter into contracts.
7. Memorandum; Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology
and Logistics); 19 Jan 10; subject: DoD Implementation of Storm Water Requirements
under Section 438 of the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA).
8. Memorandum ; Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology
and Logistics); 25 Oct 1O; subject: Department of Defense Sustainable Buildings.
9. Army Regulation 200-1 (Environmental Protection and Enhancement),
13 December 2007.
1O. Army Regulation 420-1 (Army Facilities Management), 12 February 2008, Rapid
Action Revision 2 dated 24 August 2012 .
11. Memorandum; Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) and
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisitions, Logistics and Technology); 22 Nov 06;
subject: Establishment of the Army Green Procurement Program.
12. Memorandum; Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy and
Environment); 23 Aug 12 ; subject: Comprehensive Energy and Water Evaluations
Policy.
13. Memorandum; Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy and
Environment); 16 Dec 13; subject Sustainable Design and Development Policy
Update.
14. Memorandum, ACSIM, DAIM-ZA, 23 Nov 11, subject: Master Planning Policy
Guidance for Sustainable Design and Development (Environmental and Energy
Performance). ·
Army Directive 2014-02 Enclosure
15. Memorandum, ACSIM, DAIM-OD, 15 May 13, subject: FY2013 Solid Waste Annual
Reporting (SWARWeb) Schedule.
16. Facility Energy Management Guidelines and Criteria for Energy and Water
Evaluations in Covered Facilities (42 U.S.C. 8253 Subsection (f), Use of Energy and
Water Effic;ency Measures in Federal Buildings), Federal Energy Management
Program, 25 November 2008.
17. Unified Facilities Criteria 1-200-01 (General Building Requirements), 1 July 2013,
with Change 1, 1 September 2013.
18. Unified Facilities Criteria 2-100-01 (Installation Master Planning), 15 May 2012.
19. Unified Facilities Criteria 3-210-10 (Low Impact Development), 15 November 2010.
20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Technical Guidance on Implementing the
Stormwater Runoff Requirements for Federal Projects under Section 438 of the Energy
Independence and Security Act, EPA 841-8-09-001, December 2009.
Army Directive 2014-02 2