ARMY DIR 2026-09 GROOMING STANDARDS AND RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN46731-ARMY_DIR_2026-09-000-WEB-1.pdf

S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y
W A S H I N G T O N
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-09 (Grooming Standards and Religious Accommodation)
1. References.
a. Secretary of War memorandum (Guidance on Grooming Standards for Facial Hair and
Religious Liberty), 11 March 2026
b. Secretary of War memorandum (Grooming Standards for Facial Hair Implementation),
30 September 2025
c. Department of Defense Instruction 1300.17 (Religious Liberty in the Military Services),
1 September 2020
d. Army Directive 2025-13 (Facial Hair Grooming Standards), 7 July 2025
e. Army Regulation (AR) 600–20 (Army Command Policy), 15 April 2026
f. AR 670–1 (Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia), 26 January 2021
2. Purpose. This directive updates policy on grooming standards for facial hair and prescribes
processes that commanders will follow when reviewing all uniform, grooming, and appearance
religious accommodation (RA) requests. Adherence to these standards and discipline are tied to
operational readiness.
3. Applicability. This directive applies to the Regular Army, Army National Guard (ARNG)/
Army National Guard of the United States, and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).
4. Policy. All Soldiers will meet the standards outlined in this directive and reference 1d, which
build on and, where applicable, supersede the provisions of references 1e and 1f. Strict
grooming and appearance compliance ensures personnel can safely and effectively employ
protective equipment. This is critical not only for defense against chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) threats, but also for firefighting, disaster relief, and other
hazardous mission sets where respiratory protection may be required, often on short notice. All
current approved uniform, grooming, and appearance RAs will be reevaluated, and ongoing
uniform, grooming, and appearance RA requests will be resubmitted pursuant to the provisions
of this directive.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-09 (Grooming Standards and Religious Accommodation)
2
a. Sideburn Grooming Standards.
(1) All male Soldiers will maintain a clean-shaven face when in uniform or on duty in
civilian attire in accordance with reference 1f. Mustaches remain authorized.
(2) Effective immediately, sideburns will be trimmed to above the opening of the ear
canal.
b. Religious Accommodation for Uniform, Grooming, and Appearance.
(1) The Army defines religion as a personal set or institutionalized system of attitudes,
moral or ethical beliefs, and practices that are held with the strength of traditional religious
views, characterized by ardor or faith, and generally evidenced through specific religious
observances. A religious exercise includes any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled
by, or central to, a system of religious belief.
(2) Variance from the uniform, grooming, and appearance standards contained in
references 1d and 1f is generally not authorized. When requesting an RA that requires
accommodation from uniform, grooming, and appearance standards, the Soldier is responsible
for demonstrating a sincerely held religious belief and that Army policy substantially burdens the
Soldier’s religious exercise. Soldiers may request an RA based on a sincerely held religious
belief only; secular beliefs, no matter how sincerely or closely held, are not grounds for
accommodation.
(3) Accessions applicants, including reentry candidates, must comply with the grooming
standards outlined in this directive and reference 1f or have an approved RA prior to entry or
reentry. An accessions applicant is defined as an individual who has made a request before any
of the following occur: contracting for enlistment, contracting in a senior Reserve Officers’
Training Corps (ROTC) program, accepting appointment to the United States Military Academy,
or accepting appointment through direct commission. Applicants unable to comply will be
deferred from accession until standards are met, either by compliance with grooming standards
or approved RA.
(4) Absent an approved RA, temporary medical profile, or modification of grooming
standards based on validated mission-essential requirements, non-compliance with uniform,
grooming, and appearance standards may result in initiation of administrative separation.
c. Reevaluation of All Currently Approved RA Requests.
(1) All previously approved uniform, grooming, and appearance RA requests will be
resubmitted for review in accordance with the implementation guidelines outlined in
paragraph 4d and enclosure 1 of this directive. Guidelines for worship and dietary practice
accommodation remain unchanged.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-09 (Grooming Standards and Religious Accommodation)
3
(2) All uniform, grooming, and appearance RAs approved prior to the date of this
directive remain valid until a final decision is rendered by the approval authority. The
accommodation remains in effect throughout the entire reevaluation process, regardless of
duration. During the review, Soldiers are not required to alter their uniform, grooming, and
appearance practices and may continue to comply with the provisions of their previously
approved RA until they receive official notification of a final decision. If, after review, the
approval authority disapproves the RA request, the accommodation is then rescinded, and the
Soldier must conform with uniform, grooming, and appearance standards in accordance with
references 1d and 1f within 24 hours of notification of denial.
d. Phased RA Request Evaluation Process. The consideration of new RA requests and the
reevaluation of RA requests approved prior to the date of this directive will occur in three
distinct phases as outlined below.
(1) Phase 1—Reevaluation of Currently Approved Facial Hair RA Requests.
(a) This phase commences immediately on publication of this directive. Pursuant to
reference 1c, this directive serves as written notification that a review of previously approved RA
requests is being initiated.
(b) No later than 120 calendar days from the publication of this directive, the Assistant
Secretary of the Army for Manpower and Reserve Affairs (ASA (M&RA)) will approve or
disapprove all facial hair RA requests submitted for reevaluation.
(2) Phase 2—Reevaluation of Currently Approved Appearance and Uniform RA
Requests. This includes, but is not limited to, uncut hair, all types of religious headgear (such as
hijabs, turbans, patkas, kufis, and feathers); religious jewelry, apparel, or articles with religious
significance that do not meet the criteria for wear in AR 670–1; modesty items (such as
leggings); and tattoos.
(a) This phase commences no earlier than 120 days from publication of this directive.
Pursuant to reference 1c, this directive serves as written notification that a review of previously
approved RAs is being initiated.
(b) No later than 240 calendar days from the publication of this directive, the
ASA (M&RA) will approve or disapprove all appearance and uniform RA requests submitted
for reevaluation.
(3) Phase 3—Steady-state Evaluation of New Uniform, Grooming, and Appearance RA
requests. This phase represents the return to steady-state processing for all new RA requests
following the completion of Phases 1 and 2. Steady-state processing is expected to commence
once the ASA (M&RA) completes both reevaluation phases. In the interim, commands will
continue to receive, process, and route all new requests to the approval authority without delay.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-09 (Grooming Standards and Religious Accommodation)
4
e. Implementation Guidelines and Processing Instructions.
(1) RA Requests. When making a request, Soldiers must sign a written Department of
the Army (DA) Form 2823 (sworn statement) under oath. This oath must be administered by
a commissioned officer authorized under Article 136 of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice (UCMJ), such as any judge advocate; any adjutant or personnel section (S1); any
commanding officer; or any officer designated as a notary public. In this statement, Soldiers
affirm that their belief is sincerely held and religious in nature. False statements may be subject
to disciplinary action under Article 107 of the UCMJ (False official statements) or denial of
accession as appropriate. Each request must adhere to the guidelines prescribed at enclosure 1 of
this directive.
(2) Routing. RA requests will be routed via a personnel action request (PAR)
submission in the Integrated Personnel and Pay System (IPPS-A) for approval by the
ASA (M&RA). Step-by-step submission instructions in the RA Request Training Guide will be
available at: https://ipps-a.army.mil/Training/
(3) Chaplain Interview Guidelines.
(a) Chaplains are the command teams’ subject matter experts on religion, and they
advise on religious accommodation. All RA requests require a formal and nonconfidential
interview with a chaplain. When operationally feasible, the interview will occur at least one
level higher than the unit of the Soldier requesting an accommodation. The interviewing
chaplain will provide a memorandum stating that the interview occurred and address the
religious basis and sincerity of the religious belief.
(b) Interviewing chaplains will use the Religious Basis Tool (RBT) and Sincerity
Tool (ST) at enclosures 2 and 3 of this directive to assist with assessing sincerity and the
religious basis for a request.
(c) The interviewing chaplain’s RA memorandum will provide a thorough summary of
the interview, with relevant details of the Soldier’s religious basis for the request and sincerity of
belief, to best inform commanders.
(d) The interviewing chaplain’s technical supervisor or equivalent will review the
interviewing chaplain’s RA interview memorandum to ensure the memorandum thoroughly
discusses the religious basis and thoroughly evaluates the requestor’s sincerity of belief.
(4) Processing RA Requests.
(a) The immediate (lowest level) commander will review the final chaplain
memorandum and complete a recommendation memorandum. At a minimum, commanders will
assess the sincerity of the Soldier’s belief and provide relevant details of the Soldier’s duties;
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-09 (Grooming Standards and Religious Accommodation)
5
current and anticipated work environment; required protective equipment; and scheduled
deployments, exercises, or assignments. The commander’s and chaplain’s memorandums will be
uploaded to the PAR in IPPS-A for routing to a commander at the O-5 level.
(b) Units and commands are authorized to establish routing chains for RA requests that
may not include all levels of intermediate commanders. At a minimum, requests must go via
IPPS-A through the immediate (lowest level) commander, the O-5 commander, and the GCMCA
for Active Component (AC) Soldiers or first general officer in the chain of command for ARNG
and USAR Soldiers.
(c) The GCMCA (AC) or first general officer in the chain of command (ARNG and
USAR) will thoroughly review the applicant’s entire case for completion and return to the
applicant’s commander any applications that are missing required documents. After considering
the totality of the record and individually evaluating the application, the GCMCA (AC) or first
general officer in the chain of command (ARNG and USAR) will recommend approval or
disapproval of the RA request. Although coordination with HQDA is no longer required,
commands may consult with Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) technical experts,
such as those in the Office of the Chief of Chaplains (OCCH) and the Office of The Judge
Advocate General (OTJAG).
(d) The GCMCA’s recommendation will be routed via IPPS-A to the Military Policy
Integration Division within the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-1 for staffing to the
ASA (M&RA). The ASA (M&RA) is the approval authority for all uniform, grooming, and
appearance RA requests.
(e) The decision of the ASA (M&RA) will be actioned in IPPS-A, and a copy of the
PAR will automatically be uploaded to the interactive Personnel Electronic Records
Management System (iPERMS) for filing in the Soldier’s Army Military Human Resource
Record (AMHRR).
(5) Approvals. Soldiers with an approved RA request for facial hair will be
automatically coded in IPPS-A with code “ACREWA.” Soldiers with an approved request for
all other uniform, grooming, or appearance accommodation will automatically be coded in
IPPS-A with code “ACUGRE.” This includes, but is not limited to, uncut hair; all types of
religious headgear (such as hijabs, turbans, patkas, kufis, and feathers); jewelry, apparel, or
articles with religious significance that do not meet the criteria for wear in AR 670–1; modesty
items (such as leggings); and tattoos.
(6) Disapprovals. Soldiers with a disapproved request for facial hair accommodation
will be automatically coded in IPPS-A with code “ACDHHNT.” Soldiers with a disapproved
request for all other uniform, grooming, or appearance accommodation will be automatically
coded in IPPS-A with code “ACDHJTS.” Soldiers whose RA requests are disapproved must
continue to comport to uniform, grooming, and appearance standards. If a previously approved
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-09 (Grooming Standards and Religious Accommodation)
6
RA is rescinded after review, Soldiers will be required to comport to uniform, grooming, and
appearance standards within 24 hours of their notification. Disapproval of sincerely held
religious beliefs requires a written decision memo that must include a clear explanation of
operational risks and concerns, citations to relevant studies or standards, analysis of alternatives
and why they were deemed insufficient, and an explanation of how the decision is no less
restrictive than exemptions based on non-religious reasons (for example, medical).
(7) Separation. Absent an approved RA, temporary medical profile, or modification of
grooming standards based on validated mission-essential requirements, non-compliance with
uniform, grooming, and appearance standards may result in initiation of administrative
separation.
(8) Modification or Suspension. Pursuant to reference 1c, when the commander of a
Soldier with any type of RA identifies a specific threat to health and safety based on the
Soldier’s RA (for example, the threat of exposure to toxic CBRN agents that may merit a
heightened protective posture), the commander will notify the Soldier of the need to modify or
suspend the RA, the basis for the modification/suspension, and the date the modification/
suspension will likely go into effect.
(9) Issues of Sincerity. When the commander of a Soldier with an RA identifies an
issue of sincerity following an approved RA, the commander will forward the issue of sincerity
to the GCMCA (AC) or first general officer in the chain of command (ARNG and USAR), who
will determine whether an issue of sincerity exists and may direct the RA for review and
rescission in accordance with reference 1c.
5. Responsibilities.
a. The DCS, G-1 will maintain accountability of the disposition of requests for RA
permitting facial hair and will publish procedures for reporting to the DCS, G-1 all changes in
circumstances, including anticipated operational requirements, that merit reevaluation of
approved requests.
b. The Chief of Chaplains will—
(1) Develop and publish training on the proper use of enclosures 2 and 3 within
15 calendar days of the publication of this directive.
(2) Ensure the U.S. Army Chaplain Corps is educated on this directive and prepared to
advise and assist approval authorities with good faith determinations in support of RA requests.
(3) Support commander requests, including direct communication for HQDA chaplains
to interview Soldiers regarding RA requests, as needed.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-09 (Grooming Standards and Religious Accommodation)
7
c. The Judge Advocate General (TJAG) will—
(1) Review religious accommodation training and provide legal reviews of religious
accommodation requests and waivers.
(2) Support commander requests for consultation, including direct communication from
servicing judge advocates general, as needed.
6. Proponent. The ASA (M&RA) has oversight responsibility for this policy. The DCS, G-1
will incorporate its provisions into AR 600–20 and AR 670–1 within 2 years of the date of this
directive.
7. Duration. This directive is rescinded on publication of the revised regulations.
Encls Dan Driscoll
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Western Hemisphere Command
U.S. Forces Command
U.S. Army Transformation and Training Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe and Africa
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
U.S. Army Transportation Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Cyber Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Audit Agency
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Human Resources Command
(CONT)
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-09 (Grooming Standards and Religious Accommodation)
8
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
U.S. Army Corrections Command
U.S. Army Recruiting Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Civilian Human Resources Agency
Executive Director, Military Postal Service Agency
Director, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division
Director, U.S. Army Joint Counter-Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office
Superintendent, Arlington National Cemetery
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
CF:
Commander, Eighth Army
UNIFORM, GROOMING, AND APPEARANCE: PROCEDURES FOR REQUESTING
RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION
Enclosure 1
1. General Principles.
a. Determination of Sincerity. The central question is whether the Soldier’s religious
beliefs are sincerely held. Commanders, chaplains, and reviewing authorities should look at the
Soldier’s overall conduct—past and present—to determine whether the stated beliefs consistently
guide the Soldier’s actions. This includes reviewing the application, supporting documents,
demeanor, and observable behavior. Requests that do not show a consistent link between the
asserted beliefs and the Soldier’s actions, or that appear driven by convenience or avoidance of
Army standards, may be disapproved.
b. Relevant Decision Factors. In assessing sincerity, commanders may consider factors
such as the Soldier’s religious background and training, participation in religious practices, study
or reflection supporting the belief, credibility of the Soldier and any supporting statements, and
consistency between the Soldier’s conduct and claimed beliefs. Commanders may also rely on
their personal knowledge of the Soldier’s behavior and statements. No single factor is
determinative; commanders should evaluate the totality of the circumstances.
c. Mitigating Factors Warranting Further Inquiry. Some circumstances, such as requests
based on non-religious reasons or those submitted shortly after a policy change, may warrant
additional inquiry into sincerity. These factors alone are not sufficient to deny a request and
must be supported by other evidence before recommending disapproval.
2. Religious Accommodation Request.
a. Soldiers will submit all uniform, grooming, and appearance RA requests via self-initiated
PAR through IPPS-A to their immediate (lowest level) commander, accompanied by a signed
DA Form 2823 (sworn statement) attesting to the following:
(1) full name and DoD ID number
(2) religious denomination or tradition of the applicant
(3) description or explanation of the following matters:
(a) nature of the belief that requires the applicant to seek RA
(b) how the applicants’ beliefs changed or developed, including an explanation of
factors (how, when, and from whom or from what source training was received or belief
acquired) that caused the change in or development of beliefs requiring RA
(c) when and why these beliefs became incompatible with the applicable military
standard
2
(4) detailed statement as to the applicants’ beliefs, addressing the following items
(as applicable):
(a) name of the belief and the name and location of its governing body or head, if
known
(b) name and location of any religious organization, congregation, or meeting that the
applicant customarily attends and the extent of the applicant active participation therein,
including the name, title, and present address of the pastor or leader of such religious
organizations, congregation, or meeting
(c) how the current military standard burdens their exercise of religion
(d) description of the creed or official statements as they pertain to the requested RA
(5) additional information, such as a letter of reference or official statements of the
organization to which the applicant belongs/applicant names in the application
(6) any other relevant items that the applicant desires to submit in support of the
application
b. Non-unit Soldiers (Individual Ready Reserve and Standby Reserve) will submit their
applications via assigned and dated DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) to the Commander,
U.S. Army Human Resources Command; 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue; Fort Knox, KY
40122–5100. Officers include office code (AHRC-OPL-P). Enlisted Soldiers include office
code (AHRC-EPO).
c. A pre-accession request is defined as a request submitted before any of the following
occur: contracting for enlistment, contracting in a senior Reserve Officers’ Training
Corps (ROTC) program, accepting appointment to the U.S. Military Academy (USMA), or
accepting appointment through direct commission. The chain of command routing for
pre-accessions requests will be established by each accessions agency and command up to the
ASA (M&RA). Pre-accession applicants will submit their applications in accordance with
instructions from their respective accessions agencies.
3. Chain of Command Actions. The applicant’s chain of command will ensure—
a. The application is processed expeditiously.
b. All people involved in the application process are familiar with their respective
responsibilities. At the time of application, the immediate (lowest level) commander will
counsel the applicant on the RA process. The applicant will sign and date acknowledging this
counseling.
c. An operational assessment is included. At a minimum, the immediate (lowest level)
commander will assess the sincerity of the Soldier’s belief and provide relevant details of the
3
Soldier’s duties; current and anticipated work environment; required protective equipment; and
scheduled deployments, exercises, or assignments. The recommendation will evaluate the
operational impact of the request, including effects on mission readiness; the fit, function, and
safety of required protective equipment; role-specific requirements for emergency response,
combat, or hazardous material handling; the feasibility of alternative accommodations; and
overall safety implications in relation to unit requirements.
4. Chaplain Interview.
a. All applicants for RA will be interviewed by an Army chaplain. When operationally
feasible, the interview will occur at least one level higher than the unit of the Soldier requesting
an accommodation. The interviewing chaplain will provide a memorandum stating that the
interview occurred and address the religious basis and sincerity of the religious belief. The
chaplain may recommend approval or disapproval but is not required to do so. Chaplains will
use the Religious Basis Tool (RBT) and Sincerity Tool (ST) to assist with assessing sincerity and
the religious basis for a request.
b. Before interviewing applicants, the chaplain will advise the applicant that any
communication between the applicant and chaplain will not be privileged because a detailed
report of the interview will become a part of the application for consideration in the adjudication
process. Thus, if the applicant has established a relationship of confidentiality (counseling) with
a chaplain, a different chaplain will conduct the interview. This provision does not prevent an
applicant from soliciting a letter to support the claim from anyone the applicant chooses.
c. The interviewing chaplain will submit a detailed report of the interview to the
commander. This report will include comments on the following:
(1) nature and basis of the applicant’s claim
(2) opinion on the source of the applicant’s religious belief, including whether the belief
is religious or secular in nature
(3) opinion as to the sincerity of the applicant’s belief
(4) appropriate comments on the applicant’s demeanor and lifestyle as they bear on the
claim
(5) specific reasons for the chaplain’s conclusions (For example, if the interviewing
chaplain feels the applicant is insincere in belief or that the applicant’s lifestyle is incongruent
with the claim, the chaplain should include statements to this effect in the report.)
d. If the applicant refuses to be interviewed by a chaplain, the chaplain will submit a report
explaining the circumstances. Appropriate comments on the applicant’s demeanor as it bears on
the claim will be included.
RELIGIOUS BASIS TOOL FOR UNIFORM, GROOMING, AND APPEARANCE
RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION REQUESTS
Enclosure 2
1. Discuss the Soldier’s beliefs to understand the Soldier’s faith group, beliefs, or system
of values serving as the basis for the religious accommodation request. Apply the following
definition from Army Regulation (AR) 600–20 to foster understanding during the interview
process (see also Department of the Army Pamphlet 165–19, paragraph 2–3c, and Field
Manual 7-22, paragraph 10-7):
Religion is a personal set or institutionalized system of attitudes, moral or ethical
beliefs, and practices held with the strength of traditional views, characterized
by ardor and faith, and generally evidenced through specific observances.
Soldier’s Stated Faith Group and/or Religious/Spiritual/Personal Belief:
__________________________________________________________________________
2. Interview the Soldier to understand the religious basis. Questions and interview prompts
will include, but are not limited to, the following:
• What is your religious preference, and is it correctly reflected in your official
military record?
• Describe in detail your request and your main reason for the request.
• Describe the connection between the requested religious accommodation request and
your religious/personal system of attitudes, morals, or ethical beliefs.
• Why do you believe that your requested accommodation is a necessary “specific
observance” that “generally evidences” your religion/belief system (further
explained in AR 600–20)?
• Why do you understand your requested accommodation to be encouraged, required,
or necessary by your religious/personal beliefs?
• How does military service/regulation interfere with the practice of your religion?
• What is the practical, ethical, or spiritual impact you anticipate if you were denied
this religious accommodation?
SINCERITY TOOL FOR ALL UNIFORM, GROOMING AND APPEARANCE
RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION REQUESTS
Enclosure 3
1. The absence or presence of any specific factor below does not automatically render a request
for religious accommodation sincere or insincere. Every request must receive an individual
assessment based on the facts presented by the Soldier making the request and evaluated
consistent with law and policy. The sincerity evaluation focuses on whether the belief is
genuinely held by the Soldier rather than the validity (or religious nature) of the belief itself.
2. Consider the following:
• Does the Soldier observe certain holidays/holy days/specific seasons and dates that align
with the stated faith/belief?
• Is the Soldier actively engaged in training, study, contemplation, or other activity related
to the stated faith/belief?
• Does the Soldier keep dietary practices related to the stated faith/belief?
• Can the Soldier articulate a personal experience of the circumstances of when and why
the Soldier converted to/chose to follow the system of faith/belief?
• Has the Soldier acted in a manner inconsistent with the professed faith/belief? Note that
perfect adherence is not required to demonstrate sincerity.
• Does the Soldier attend gatherings and/or is the Soldier a member of a community of the
stated faith/belief?
• Does the Soldier give alms, tithes, or financially contribute to the furtherance of the
stated faith/belief?
• Does the Soldier utilize personal talents to further self and others as an expression of the
stated faith/belief?
• Does the timing of the request raise questions? Does the request coincide with other
events that might suggest ulterior motives, such as a post hoc action to avoid discipline? 

Read More

ARMY DIR 2026-08 PERMANENT CHANGE TO TIMELINE FOR REQUESTING VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT FROM ACTIVE SERVICE

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN46486-ARMY_DIR_2026-08-000-WEB-1.pdf

S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y
W A S H I N G T O N
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-08 (Permanent Change to Timeline for Requesting Voluntary
Retirement From Active Service)
1. References.
a. Army Regulation (AR) 600–8–24 (Officer Transfers and Discharges), 8 February 2020
b. AR 635–200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), 30 June 2025
2. Purpose. This directive modifies the retirement request timeline for Soldiers. The provisions
of this directive will enhance the accuracy of forecasting unanticipated losses, synchronize
personnel movement cycles with United States Army Human Resources Command (HRC), and
provide greater support to Soldiers transitioning out of military service.
3. Applicability. This directive applies to the Regular Army, Army National Guard/Army
National Guard of the United States, and the U.S. Army Reserve.
4. Policy. Effective immediately, Soldiers may submit voluntary retirement requests under this
directive at least 12 months, but no more than 24 months, before their requested retirement date.
a. Eligibility. Soldiers can request voluntary retirement if they are currently on active duty
(including the Active Guard Reserve program pursuant to Title 10 or Title 32 of the United
States Code), have at least 18 years of active Federal service (AFS), and be able to complete all
service obligations by the requested retirement date. Requesting or being approved for
retirement does not prohibit reassignment if necessary to meet Army requirements or to be
subject to future force shaping initiatives determined to be in the best interest of the Army.
b. Ineligibility. Soldiers with at least 18 years of AFS may not submit a voluntary
retirement request if they are actively being considered for a future assignment or have received
official notification of a permanent change of station (PCS), including placement into an
assignment market or consideration for a nominative position. Soldiers who are otherwise
ineligible due to assignment consideration or PCS notification and who have at least 19 years of
AFS may request retirement in lieu of the PCS within 30 days of notification. The requested
retirement date must be no later than 12 months from the date of assignment consideration or
official PCS notification.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-08 (Permanent Change to Timeline for Requesting Voluntary
Retirement From Active Service)
2
c. Additional Requirements. The following provisions apply to the requests of Soldiers in
the ranks of lieutenant colonel and colonel (O-5/O-6), chief warrant officer 4 and chief warrant
officer 5 (CW4/CW5), and master sergeant through command sergeant major (E-8/E-9):
(1) Commanders will provide a thorough, comprehensive, and candid assessment of
each Soldier’s complete career record when rendering recommendations on requests for greater
than 12 months, but no more than 24 months, before the requested retirement date.
(2) Battalion and brigade commander endorsements do not constitute an approved
retirement. These endorsements represent a recommendation to permit the Soldier to submit a
packet to HRC for final adjudication.
(3) The responsible chain of command will develop a written utilization plan prior to
forwarding the packet to HRC. The level at which the plan is approved, tracked, and managed is
determined by the unit. The plan will include proposed duties and utilization to ensure continued
meaningful employment of the Soldier throughout the approved transition period.
(4) Soldiers may begin planning for transition and may engage with Transition
Assistance Program (TAP) resources on submission of a retirement request; however,
participation in transition activities will not detract from assigned duties or mission requirements
until the Soldier is within 365 days from separation. Command-approved transition activities—
including permissive temporary duty, Career Skills Program/Skill Bridge participation,
installation clearing, or other separation-related actions—will not commence prior to 365 days
from separation.
(5) Soldiers who receive a commander’s recommendation and approval from the
talent management office to retire remain subject to all normal duties, standards, and obligations.
Such approval does not relieve a Soldier of accountability, utilization requirements,
deployability, or compliance with all Army policies.
d. For Soldiers with less than 30 years AFS, commanders and retirement approval
authorities retain the authority to recommend disapproval or disapprove voluntary retirement
requests greater than 12 months, but no more than 24 months, due to operational readiness,
critical manning requirements, or adjudication of adverse action.
e. Policy for requesting retirement remains otherwise unchanged.
5. The Commander, HRC will publish supporting procedural guidance separately via military
personnel message.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-08 (Permanent Change to Timeline for Requesting Voluntary
Retirement From Active Service)
3
6. Proponent. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) has
oversight responsibility for this policy. The Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 will incorporate its
provisions into AR 600–8–24 and AR 635–200 within 2 years of the date of this directive.
7. Duration. This directive is rescinded on publication of the revised regulations.
Dan Driscoll
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Western Hemisphere Command
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Transformation and Training Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe and Africa
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
U.S. Army Transportation Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Cyber Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Audit Agency
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Human Resources Command
U.S. Army Corrections Command
U.S. Army Reserve Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division
Director, U.S. Army Civilian Human Resources Agency
Executive Director, Military Postal Service Agency
(CONT)
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-08 (Permanent Change to Timeline for Requesting Voluntary
Retirement From Active Service)
4
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
Director, U.S. Army Joint Counter-Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office
Superintendent, Arlington National Cemetery
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
CF:
Commander, Eighth Army

Read More

ARMY DIR 2026-07 ARMY PHYSICAL FITNESS STANDARDS

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN46456-ARMY_DIR_2026-07-000-WEB-1.pdf

S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y
W A S H I N G T O N
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-07 (Army Physical Fitness Standards)
1. References. See enclosure 1.
2. Purpose. This directive establishes the Combat Field Test (CFT) as an Army fitness
requirement and updates the Army Fitness Test (AFT) to align with Secretary of War intent in
reference 1a.
3. Applicability. The provisions of this directive apply to the Regular Army (RA) and U.S.
Army National Guard/Army National Guard of the United States and U.S. Army Reserve
(referred to collectively as the Reserve Components, or RC).
4. Policy.
a. Implementation of the CFT.
(1) Effective immediately, the CFT is required for all Soldiers serving in combat
specialties, listed in enclosure 2. RA, Active Guard Reserve (AGR), and RC Soldiers on active-
duty orders for 365 days or more will now take 1 CFT and 1 AFT record test annually. All other
RC Soldiers in combat specialties will take one fitness test per calendar year alternating between
the AFT and CFT, taking a record AFT one calendar year and a record CFT the next calendar
year.
(2) The CFT is designed as a pass or fail test (no points). The CFT is a continuous event
where no individual event is timed; instead, the cumulative time to complete all events in
succession is used to determine whether a Soldier passes or fails. The Deputy Chief of
Staff (DCS), G-3/5/7 will publish the time standard to implement this directive.
(3) The CFT consists of 7 events that are performed in sequence: (a) 1-mile run;
(b) 30 dead-stop pushups; (c) 100-meter sprint; (d) 16 forty-pound sandbag lifts onto a 65-inch
platform; (e) 50-meter carry of two 5-gallon army water cans (each weighing 40 pounds);
(f) 50-meter movement drill consisting of a high crawl for 25 meters and a 25-meter, 3–5 second
rush; and (g) a second 1-mile run.
(4) The uniform for the CFT is the Army Combat Uniform (top and bottom), including
brown t-shirt and combat boots but no headgear. All personnel taking the test must complete
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-07 (Army Physical Fitness Standards)
2
each event before moving to the next. Individuals unable to complete an event will be
terminated from the test, and the test will be recorded as a failure.
(5) The CFT is not a substitute for the AFT.
(6) There is no prerequisite to take or pass the AFT prior to or after the CFT. The
minimum time between a record CFT and AFT is 4 months for Soldiers in combat specialties,
listed in enclosure 2, who serve in the Regular Army, AGR, and RC on active-duty orders for
365 days or more. For all other RC combat specialty Soldiers, the minimum time between a
record fitness test, either CFT or AFT, is 8 months. RC Soldiers in combat specialties who are
not on AGR orders on or active-duty orders for 365 days or more may take an additional record
AFT within 8 months of a previous CFT or AFT for promotion or schooling.
(7) Soldiers on Permanent Profiles.
(a) Soldiers in combat specialties with permanent profiles that prevent them from
performing any primary event on the AFT are ineligible to complete the CFT and will be
evaluated for military occupational specialty (MOS)/area of concentration (AOC) reclassification
pursuant to references 1j and 1n.
(b) Waiver authority for reclassification resides with the general court-martial
convening authority (GCMCA) or the first general officer (GO) in the chain of command, who
will evaluate occupational requirements outlined in Department of the Army Pamphlet 611–21
(Smartbook) as well as Soldier performance, chain of command recommendations, and the
Soldier’s ability to meet MOS/AOC requirements. Waivers for existing permanent profiles or
those assigned during the diagnostic/implementation period for this policy may be requested.
Soldiers may appeal waiver denials to the next higher commander in their chain of command. If
there is no such commander below the Headquarters, Department of the Army, the appeal will be
referred to the DCS, G-1.
(c) Soldiers granted a waiver for a permanent profile will remain subject to the annual
2-AFT requirement (1 AFT annually for RC Soldiers not on AGR orders or on active-duty orders
for 365 days or more).
(d) The GCMCA or first GO in the chain of command will review all profiles and
annually reassess waiver applicability for every Soldier under their waiver authority.
(8) Soldiers on Temporary Profiles. Soldiers serving in combat specialties with
temporary profiles preventing completion of the CFT, including pregnancy and postpartum
profiles, will adhere to their profiles and the guidance for AFTs in Field Manual 7-22 (Holistic
Health and Fitness) until such time that they can take a CFT. Test/event modifications are not
available for Soldiers on profiles.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-07 (Army Physical Fitness Standards)
3
(9) Implementation Period. The implementation period provides a one-year transition,
when no administrative action will be taken solely because of a failed CFT or a permanent
profile that prevents a Soldier from taking the CFT. Full implementation begins 365 days from
the date of this directive, when failure to pass the CFT will result in administrative actions,
including flagging and potential reclassification.
(10) Administrative Procedures.
(a) Soldiers in combat specialties failing the CFT will be flagged and enrolled in
reconditioning training pursuant to unit standing operating procedures detailed in FM 7-22
(Holistic Health and Fitness).
(b) Soldiers must then retake the test within 90 days after the test failure (180 days for
RC Soldiers who are not AGR or on active-duty orders for 365 days or more).
(c) All Soldiers serving in combat specialties listed in enclosure 2 who fail to take a
record CFT within 12 months of full implementation will be flagged unless taking the CFT is
prohibitive due to a temporary profile.
(d) The unit commander (or other authorized initiating official) will initiate
reclassification or utilization actions for Soldiers who fail the CFT retest pursuant to
references 1j and 1n unless the Soldier has an approved waiver.
(e) Soldiers in combat specialties listed in enclosure 2 are required to include CFT
pass/fail or waiver on evaluations with a thru date 18 months after publication of this directive or
later.
(f) Enlisted Soldiers in combat specialties listed in enclosure 2 who fail two consecutive
CFTs, or who have an AFT-limiting permanent profile and are denied a waiver, are subject to
involuntary separation pursuant to Army Regulation (AR) 635–200, chapter 13 (RA enlisted),
and AR 135–178, chapter 9 (RC enlisted), if they refuse to extend or reenlist to facilitate
reclassification or are otherwise ineligible to reclassify their MOS.
(g) Officers in combat specialties listed in enclosure 2 who fail two consecutive CFTs,
or who have an AFT-limiting permanent profile and are denied a waiver, are subject to
elimination pursuant to AR 600–8–24, paragraph 4–2(a) (RA officer), and AR 135–175,
paragraph 2–12 (non-active duty officer), if they refuse or are otherwise ineligible for an
involuntary branch transfer and/or mandatory assignment utilization.
b. Changes to the AFT. Effective immediately, where the provisions of this policy conflict
with another Army regulation or directive, this directive is controlling. This includes AR 350–1
and AD 2025-06
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-07 (Army Physical Fitness Standards)
4
(1) All evaluation reports will reflect both pass/fail and actual points earned for the
record AFT.
(2) AOCs/MOSs 12D, 89D, and 89E are hereby designated as combat specialties, and
Soldiers assigned to them are required to meet the AFT combat standard in AR 350–1,
paragraph C–5.
5. Proponent. The DCS, G-3/5/7 will track policy proponent incorporation of the provisions of
this directive into related Army regulations within 2 years of the date of this directive. The
proponents of other related regulations will incorporate the provisions of this directive into all
identified references within 2 years of the date of this directive.
6. Duration. This directive is rescinded on publication of the revised regulations.
Encls Dan Driscoll
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Western Hemisphere Command
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Transformation and Training Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe and Africa
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
U.S. Army Transportation Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Cyber Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Audit Agency
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Human Resources Command
(CONT)
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-07 (Army Physical Fitness Standards)
5
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
U.S. Army Corrections Command
U.S. Army Reserve Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division
Director, U.S. Army Civilian Human Resources Agency
Executive Director, Military Postal Service Agency
Director, U.S. Army Joint Counter-Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office
Superintendent, Arlington National Cemetery
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
CF:
Commander, Eighth Army
REFERENCES
Enclosure 1
a. Secretary of War memorandum (Military Fitness Standards), 30 September 2025
b. Secretary of the Army memorandum (Mission Focus of Army Training), 31 July 2025
c. Army Directive 2025-06 (Army Fitness Test), 17 April 2025 (hereby superseded, in part)
d. Army Regulation (AR) 40–501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), 27 June 2019
e. AR 40–502 (Medical Readiness), 27 June 2019
f. AR 135–175 (Separation of Officers), 29 May 2025
g. AR 135–178 (Army National Guard and Reserve Enlisted Administrative Separations),
6 June 2025
h. AR 140–111 (U.S. Army Reserve Reenlistment Program), 2 March 2018
i. AR 350–1 (Army Training and Leader Development), 1 June 2025
j. AR 600–8–24 (Officer Transfers and Discharges), 8 February 2020
k. AR 601–280 (Army Retention Program), 14 April 2023
l. AR 614–100 (Officer Assignment Policies and Procedures), 8 May 2024
m. AR 635–200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), 30 June 2025
n. Department of the Army Pamphlet 611–21 (Military Occupational Classification and
Structure), 20 December 2022
o. Headquarters, Department of the Army Field Manual 7-22 (Holistic Health and Fitness),
October 2020, incorporating Change 2, effective 1 August 2025
p. Army Techniques Publication 7-22.01 (Holistic Health and Fitness Testing), 1 October 2020
q. U.S. Army Infantry School Pamphlet 350-6 (Expert Infantryman Badge), 21 April 2025
COMBAT SPECIALTIES
Enclosure 2
11A Infantry Officer
11B Infantry Soldier
11C Indirect Fire Infantry Soldier
11Z Senior Infantry Leader
12A Engineer Officer
12B Combat Engineer
12D Army Diver
13A Field Artillery Officer
13F Fire Support Specialist
180A Special Forces Warrant Officer
18A Special Forces Officer
18B Special Forces Weapons Sergeant
18C Special Forces Engineer Sergeant
18D Special Forces Medical Sergeant
18E Special Forces Communications Sergeant
18F Special Forces Assistant Operations and Intelligence Sergeant
18Z Special Forces Team Sergeant
19A Armor Officer
19C Bradley Fighting Vehicle Crewman
19D Cavalry Scout
19K M1 Armor Crewman
19Z Armor Senior Sergeant
89D Explosive Ordnance Disposal Specialist
89E Explosive Ordnance Disposal Officer

Read More

ARMY DIR 2026-05 INSPECTOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATIONS OVERSIGHT AND REFORM

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN46236-ARMY_DIR_2026-05-000-WEB-1.pdf

S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y
W A S H I N G T O N
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-05 (Inspector General Administrative Investigations Oversight
and Reform)
1. References. See references in enclosure 1.
2. Purpose. This directive updates Army regulatory requirements for inspector general (IG)
complaint processing, collateral personnel actions, and associated training requirements,
consistent with Secretary of War guidance in reference 1c.
3. Applicability. This directive applies to the Regular Army, U.S. Army National Guard/Army
National Guard of the United States, and U.S. Army Reserve.
4. Policy. The provisions of this directive are applicable to IG complaints submitted 90 days
after the date of this directive. This policy will be implemented in accordance with applicable
law and regulation, and consistent with all applicable individual due process protections.
Proponents of the Army regulations (ARs) identified in paragraph 6 of this directive retain
authority to approve exceptions to any requirement of this directive. This policy does not create
any entitlement, right, cause of action, or defense at law or in equity, in favor of any person or
entity. For the definitions of terms used in this directive, see enclosure 2.
a. The following provisions apply to the processing of IG complaints, IG-retained
investigations, and command administrative investigations and preliminary inquiries conducted
pursuant to an IG referral. These provisions are not applicable to whistleblower reprisal and
restriction investigations. Investigations conducted pursuant to other policies (such as
AR 600–52, on the Sexual Harassment/Assault Response and Prevention Program) will comply
with procedures mandated in the applicable policies.
(1) IGs must first determine whether the complaint they have received contains alleged
misconduct. Initial contact with a complainant may present IGs with issues and allegations that
require varied responses, which may include a clarification interview, assistance, referral, or
teach and train. Once an IG has sufficient information to determine an IG complaint alleging
misconduct, the IG will conduct a credibility assessment to determine next steps.
(2) IGs will conduct a credibility assessment of all complaints with allegations of
misconduct within 7 duty days. This period commences when the office of inquiry receives
sufficient information to determine the complaint contains alleged misconduct. This period ends
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-05 (Inspector General Administrative Investigations Oversight
and Reform)
when the office of inquiry determines the complaint should be closed pursuant to the guidance in
this directive as a non-credible misconduct complaint; pursuant to AR 20–1, refers the complaint
to the appropriate command for further action; or retains the complaint for further IG action. IGs
will conduct the assessment consistent with the requirements of the IG preliminary analysis in
AR 20–1, paragraph 7–1b(2), and The Assistance and Investigations Guide (reference 1p).
Department of Defense Inspector General (DoDIG) Hotline action referrals are exempt from the
IG credibility assessment described in this paragraph.
(a) “Credible misconduct complaints” are complaints with a matter of alleged
misconduct supported by credible evidence or information (as defined in enclosure 2 of this
directive) that warrants initial investigative work or additional investigation, and not otherwise
deemed inappropriate for IG action by paragraph 4a(2)(b) of this directive or AR 20–1. IGs
must determine that a complaint is supported by credible evidence and warrants investigation
before referring it outside the Army IG system.
(b) “Non-credible misconduct complaints” include: (1) those not supported by credible
evidence/information; (2) those filed more than 1 year after the alleged event that forms the basis
of the complaint, unless new compelling evidence is presented; and (3) repeat/duplicate
submissions with no new facts presented. IGs must inform complainants that their complaint did
not meet the definition of credible and provide the complainant with guidance, assistance, or
referral to a more appropriate venue or process for action, as warranted. The existence of new
compelling evidence sufficient to investigate a complaint filed more than 1 year after the alleged
event will be determined by the appropriate directing authority consistent with the requirements
of AR 20–1, paragraph 6–1e, and may include, but is not limited to, events that occurred more
than 1 year before complaint filing but whose existence was not learned of until a later date.
Repeat duplicate submissions with no new facts presented will be processed in accordance with
AR 20–1, paragraph 6–2b.
(3) If a credible misconduct complaint is referred to the command, IGs have no authority
to direct the command process. Commanders retain the authority to conduct their own
credibility assessment of the allegation (except in DoDIG Hotline action referral cases) and
determine a course of action pursuant to AR 15–6, paragraph 1–8. Commands must complete
any preliminary inquiries/administrative investigations initiated pursuant to an IG command
referral within 30 duty days. This period begins with the appointment of an investigating
officer (IO) and ends at the approval of the investigation. Extensions to the time limit for
completion of the command preliminary inquiry/administrative investigation for good cause or to
safeguard procedural due process must be approved by the appropriate authority in accordance
with AR 15–6, chapter 2. This may include, but is not limited to, delays due to operational
requirements (such as deployment or extended field exercises); delays requested by the subject to
provide sufficient opportunity to consult with counsel or gather documents or other information
to provide as evidence; or to compile and prepare any rebuttal materials permitted by AR 15–6 or
2
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-05 (Inspector General Administrative Investigations Oversight
and Reform)
other applicable regulation; and delays required to complete the legal sufficiency review and any
additional investigative activity required following initial legal sufficiency review.
(4) All IOs appointed to conduct a preliminary inquiry/administrative investigation
pursuant to an IG command referral will receive a brief from their appointed legal advisor prior
to initiating investigative work. In addition to the topics required in AR 15–6, paragraph 2–5b,
the brief will include training on the following subjects: correct investigative procedures;
interviewing techniques; evidence handling; bias mitigation; and report writing. The legal
advisor will record successful completion of this training, which will be maintained by the
supporting legal office as part of the report of investigation.
(5) During an ongoing command preliminary inquiry/administrative investigation
pursuant to an IG command referral, the investigating organization, after consulting the
supporting legal advisor, will provide a status update to the subject, the subject’s commander, the
complainant(s) (if known to the command), and the referring IG via individual email (that is, not
to all recipients as a group) or via an individually addressed letter every 14 duty days. This
update will include only the current investigation status, forthcoming steps, and anticipated
completion date. The update will not include any pre-decisional, deliberative, or substantive
information, such as a summary of evidence collected, additional evidence sought, the identity of
any witnesses interviewed, or anticipated findings.
(a) Servicing legal advisors will first review the 14-duty-day updates to ensure they do
not affect the integrity of the investigation.
(b) Case status updates are not binding and serve as procedural updates to keep the
complainant, subject, and subject’s commander informed of the status of the command
preliminary inquiry/administrative investigation. The following is a sample update template:
SUBJECT: (Do Not Reply) CASE # Update
Status of the Investigation: Pending initiation / In progress / Pending legal review /
Pending approval / Complete
Next Steps: Legal review / Approval of findings / Notification of results
Anticipated Completion Date: Estimated date (Ensure sufficient time for legal review
and commander’s review/action on investigation. Notification of results will occur when
the investigation’s findings and recommendations are approved.)
(6) Referring IGs will review the final command product for any allegation(s) they refer
to a command to ensure all allegations and any related issues have been addressed thoroughly
and completely and will resolve any disagreements regarding the command product in
accordance with AR 20–1.
3
Dan Driscoll
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-05 (Inspector General Administrative Investigations Oversight
and Reform)
5. Responsibilities. The Inspector General will—
a. Update internal policies and information systems and explore the integration of approved
artificial intelligence tools and emerging technologies to streamline intake processes, conduct
credibility assessments, improve case processing timelines, provide additional capabilities to
identify repeat and serial complainants, flag potential false information, and ensure timely
classification and routing of complaints while maintaining human oversight to safeguard privacy
and due process.
b. Develop requirements to modernize the IG suite of applications to enable an enterprise-
wide view of complaints and investigations, including a common data schema in coordination
with the DoDIG Defense Case Activity Tracking System-enterprise Program Management
Office to facilitate seamless case transitions. These efforts will increase efficiency and
timeliness in intake processes, complaint tracking, reporting, and overall transparency.
6. Proponent. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) has
oversight responsibility for this policy. The Inspector General will incorporate its provisions
into AR 20–1, and The Judge Advocate General will incorporate its provisions into AR 15–6,
within 2 years of the date of this directive.
7. Duration. This directive is rescinded on publication of the revised regulations.
Encls
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Western Hemisphere Command
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Transformation and Training Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe and Africa
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
U.S. Army Transportation Command
(CONT)
4
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-05 (Inspector General Administrative Investigations Oversight
and Reform)
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Cyber Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Audit Agency
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Human Resources Command
U.S. Army Corrections Command
U.S. Army Reserve Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division
Director, U.S. Army Civilian Human Resources Agency
Executive Director, Military Postal Service Agency
Director, U.S. Army Joint Counter-Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office
Superintendent, Arlington National Cemetery
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
CF:
Commander, Eighth Army
5
REFERENCES
a. Title 10, United States Code, section 615 (Information furnished to selection boards)
b. Title 10, United States Code, section 14107 (Information furnished by the Secretary
concerned to promotion boards)
c. Secretary of War memorandum (IG Oversight and Reform: Enhancing Timeliness,
Transparency, and Due Process in Administrative Investigations), 30 September 2025
d. Department of Defense (DoD) Instruction 1320.04 (Military Officer Actions Requiring
Presidential, Secretary of Defense, or Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness
Approval or Senate Confirmation), 3 January 2014, incorporating Change 1, effective
30 June 2020
e. DoD Instruction 1320.14 (DoD Commissioned Officer Promotion Program Procedures),
16 December 2020
f. DoD Instruction 6495.03 (Defense Sexual Assault Advocate Certification
Program (D-SAACP)), 28 February 2020
g. Chief National Guard Bureau Manual 0400.01A (National Guard Complex Administrative
Investigations Procedures), 16 May 2018
h. Army Directive 2025-07 (Standardization of Investigation and Personnel Action Processes),
22 May 2025
i. Army Regulation (AR) 15–6 (Procedures for Preliminary Inquiries, Administrative
Investigations, and Boards of Officers), 22 June 2025
j. AR 20–1 (Inspector General Activities and Procedures), 23 March 2020
k. AR 27–10 (Military Justice), 8 January 2025
l. AR 135–155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers), 12 February 2025
m. AR 600–8–2 (Suspension of Favorable Personnel Actions (Flag)), 5 April 2021
n. AR 600–8–29 (Officer Promotions), 9 September 2020
o. AR 600–52 (Sexual Harassment/Assault Response and Prevention Program),
11 February 2025
p. Department of the Army Inspector General Agency, The Assistance and Investigations
Guide, March 2025, available at https://ig.army.mil/IG-SCHOOL-RESOURCES/TIGS-
Online/Digital-Library/
Enclosure 1
DEFINITIONS
Contact: Any submission of a written or oral disclosure to an inspector general (IG). A contact
will not be considered an IG complaint until sufficient information is submitted to meet the
criteria of an IG complaint (see definition). Contacts will be documented and recorded with a
tracking number.
Credible Evidence/Information (As applied to Army Regulation (AR) 15–6, AR 20–1, and
AR 600–8–2 in Army Directive 2025-07): Evidence of attributable or corroborated information,
in any form, disclosed to or obtained by an Appointing Authority or Investigative Authority
that—considering the original source, the nature of the information, and the totality of the
circumstances—is sufficient to raise a question of fact that would cause a reasonable Appointing
Authority or Investigative Authority under similar circumstances to inquire further. Information
may be credible, even though not initially supported by a preponderance of the evidence.
However, to be credible, the information must be based on more than mere speculation and not
clearly contradicted by known and material facts. To be attributable, the Appointing Authority
or Investigative Authority must be able to authenticate the evidence or information. To be
actionable, the original source(s) of information should be reasonably valid or verifiable.
Inspector General Complaint Alleging Misconduct: A formal assertion of misconduct,
normally submitted on an official Department of Defense complaint form, Webform, or other
similar documents, that a subject committed a wrong, or violation of law, regulation, instruction,
policy, procedure or rule. Assertions, reports, opinions, or rumors of conditions detrimental to
the operation, mission, or reputation of the Service or organization are not considered matters of
individual misconduct but may be examined or reviewed separately.
Enclosure 2

Read More

ARMY DIR 2026-03 CHILD, YOUTH, AND SCHOOL SERVICES IMMUNIZATION REQUIREMENTS

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN46009-ARMY_DIR_2026-03-000-WEB-1.pdf

S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y
W A S H I N G T O N
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-03 (Child, Youth, and School Services Immunization
Requirements)
1. References. See references enclosed.
2. Purpose. This directive implements immunization policy to protect children and Army Child
and Youth Services (CYS) personnel from communicable diseases in the Army’s Child, Youth,
and School Services (CYSS) programs pursuant to Department of Defense (DoD)
Instruction 6060.02. Safe, reliable childcare reduces the stress between parental responsibilities
and mission requirements, an integral factor in military readiness. The Army remains committed
to ensuring the wellness of Families enrolled.
3. Applicability. The provisions of this directive apply to the Regular Army, Army National
Guard/Army National Guard of the United States, and U.S. Army Reserve.
4. Policy.
a. Age-appropriate immunizations are required for adults and children working or
participating in CYS programs. Pursuant to references 1f and 1j, all children, employees, and
staff will obtain immunization against communicable diseases in accordance with
recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control Advisory Committee on Immunization
Practices (ACIP). Immunizations are required only for diseases that are reasonably anticipated
to be contracted or transmitted in the workplace. Since there is no reasonable risk of exposure to
or transmission of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) or Mpox associated with working in CYS,
HPV and Mpox vaccines are not required. Additionally, pursuant to reference 1d, vaccines for
the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) are no longer required.
b. For the purposes of this policy, CYS appropriated (APF) and non-appropriated fund (NAF)
civilian employees are referred to collectively as “CYS civilian employees,” and “other CYS
staff” includes OCONUS foreign national/host-nation employees, Family Child Care (FCC)
providers, and specified regular volunteers.
c. Immunization of foreign nationals/host-nation employees employed by CYS programs
outside the United States will comply with CYS immunization policies to the extent permitted by
host-nation agreements and laws. Immunization of contractor personnel must be coordinated
with the appropriate contracting officer representatives/contracting activities.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-03 (Child, Youth, and School Services Immunization
Requirements)
d. Newly hired employees have 30 days to initiate and 60 days to complete all required
immunizations once onboard.
e. To reduce the risk of spreading vaccine-preventable disease in Army CYS programs, the
following requirements take effect 60 days from the date of this directive.
(1) CYS civilian employees and other CYS staff members who are not immunized as
directed in paragraph 5a of this directive will not be assigned to care for infants.
(2) If, in consultation with the Installation Public Health Department (IPHD), the senior
commander declares an outbreak of a vaccine-preventable disease on the installation, or the
garrison commander declares an outbreak of a vaccine-preventable disease within the CYS
program, the following requirements will apply:
(a) The 30-day grace period for children to begin immunization series after starting care
will be suspended.
(b) The grace period for newly hired CYS civilian employees and other CYS staff
(30 days to initiate and 60 days to complete all required immunizations once onboard) will be
suspended.
f. The preservation of public health and safety remains a primary factor in decisions to
grant or deny an exemption. All immunization exemptions must be in writing. Medical
immunization exemptions are valid for no longer than 1 year from the date of exemption
approval or on policy revision, whichever is sooner. Non-medical immunization exemptions are
valid for the duration of CYS involvement at the approving installation.
(1) CYS Civilian Employee Immunization Exemption Requests—Medical and Religious.
(a) The garrison commander is the approval authority for all CYS civilian employee
immunization exemption requests. This authority may not be delegated lower than the deputy to
the garrison commander.
(b) CYS civilian employees may request a medical- or religious-based exemption to the
immunization requirements as a reasonable accommodation in accordance with reference 1l.
Philosophical exemptions are not permitted.
(c) Requests for a medical exemption will include a written statement from the
employee’s healthcare provider explaining why an exemption from a specific immunization
requirement is medically recommended.
(d) Requests for a religious exemption will include a written statement describing the
2
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-03 (Child, Youth, and School Services Immunization
Requirements)
employee’s religious belief, practice, or observance that is the basis for the request for a religious
exemption from the CYS vaccination requirement and how the identified vaccine(s) conflict(s)
with the religious belief, practice, or observance.
(e) Exemption requests will be submitted to the requestor’s supervisor and will be
processed as requests for reasonable accommodation under the provisions of reference 1l in
consultation with the designated supporting Equal Employment Opportunity Office’s Disability
Program Manager. When appropriate, coordination will be made with the servicing legal office,
IPHD/Preventive Medicine, and garrison commander. Requests will include a written statement
from a healthcare provider explaining why an exemption from a specific immunization
requirement is medically recommended. The garrison commander may approve CYS employee
exemption requests unless providing the accommodation would pose an undue hardship, as
explained in reference 1l.
(f) CYS civilian employees requesting an immunization exemption must be informed
that, when there is a declared outbreak within the installation or within multiple CYS programs,
they will not be scheduled to work within childcare settings until it has been determined by the
IPHD office that conditions allow for unimmunized or under-immunized staff members to return
to work. In the event an outbreak is declared within a single CYS facility, unimmunized or
under-immunized staff may be scheduled to work in alternate facilities, as available, if deemed
appropriate by the IPHD office.
(2) Other Immunization Exemption Requests.
(a) The garrison commander is the approval authority for all other CYS staff and child
immunization exemption requests. This authority may not be delegated lower than the deputy to
the garrison commander.
(b) Other CYS staff and parents/guardians of children participating in CYS Services
programs may request, in writing, a medical-, non-medical, or administrative-based exemption to
the immunization requirement. Administrative exceptions may be based on host-nation laws or
similar matters. Philosophical exemptions are not permitted.
(c) OCONUS foreign national/host-nation staff members may request an administrative
exemption in accordance with host-nation agreements or law.
(d) Immunization exemption requests will be submitted to the director or program
manager in which the child or other CYS staff member is enrolled or working.
(e) Medical Exemption Requests. Parents/guardians, and other CYS staff submitting a
request for a medical exemption will include a written statement from a healthcare provider
explaining why an exemption from a specific immunization requirement is medically
3
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-03 (Child, Youth, and School Services Immunization
Requirements)
recommended. All child and other CYS staff medical exemption requests will be
reviewed/acknowledged by a licensed practitioner (physician, physician’s assistant, nurse
practitioner) appointed in writing by the installation medical officer, preferably within the IPHD
office, and consultation provided through the installation Director of Health Services/senior
medical officer to the garrison commander prior to decision. If an appointed medical practitioner
is not available for review and/or consultation to garrison command, this responsibility may be
fulfilled by the preventive medicine physician within the Medical Readiness Command/Office of
the Surgeon General, U.S. Army Medical Command, or Office of Deputy Chief of Staff for
Force Health Protection.
(f) Religious Exemption Requests. Parents/guardians and other CYS staff requesting
exemption based on a religious objection will include a statement explaining how the required
vaccination imposes a substantial burden to a sincerely held religious belief. In accordance with
reference 1a, and in consultation with local installation-designated supporting offices, when
applicable, (including Equal Employment Opportunity, the servicing legal office,
IPHD/Preventive Medicine, and the personnel office), garrison commanders may accommodate
religious practices based on a sincerely held religious belief. If vaccination imposes a substantial
burden on a sincerely held religious belief, the accommodation may be denied only if
vaccination of this individual furthers a compelling governmental interest and vaccination of this
individual is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling government interest.
(3) Approval authorities will consult, when applicable, with their servicing Equal
Employment Opportunity Office, legal offices, and medical staff prior to approving or
disapproving requests received from non-civilian employees or parents on a child’s behalf for
medical, religious, and all other (administrative) exemption requests. Recommendations made
by the installation public health authority will be routed to the installation Director of Health
Services/senior medical officer (appointed by the installation senior commander) for concurrence
prior to forwarding to the garrison commander.
(4) Parents/guardians and other CYS staff must be informed of the immunization
requirements and exemption request process at the time of employment (for staff), registration,
re-registration, or prior to an immunization renewal date for children. Parents/guardians and other
CYS staff must be informed when an outbreak occurs that a non-immunized child or other CYS
staff member will be excluded from care or program activity until the IPHD office determines
conditions allow for unimmunized or under-immunized children staff to return to care.
g. Reporting Requirements.
(1) Program managers will track all CYS civilian employees, other CYS staff, and
children who are delinquent on an immunization or have an approved medical or non-medical
exemption, identifying which immunizations are exempt.
4
Dan Driscoll
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-03 (Child, Youth, and School Services Immunization
Requirements)
(2) The installation CYS Coordinator will input a monthly report of all delinquent
immunizations or approved medical and non-medical (religious or administrative) exemptions
into the Child and Youth Management System (CYMS). The report must be submitted through
the Commanding General, U.S. Army Installation Management Command to the Chief, Child
and Youth Services in the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-1. The report will detail
the number of children and staff (APF/NAF employees, OCONUS foreign national/host-nation
staff, FCC providers, specified volunteers, and contractors), type of exemption (medical or non-
medical), immunization waived, and date of approval.
5. The DCS, G-1 will publish execution guidance for submitting participant and program
personnel requests for medical and non-medical exemptions from immunization.
6. Proponent. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) is the
proponent for this policy. The DCS, G-1 will incorporate its provisions into Army
Regulation 608–10, and The Surgeon General will incorporate its provisions into Army
Regulation 40–562, within 2 years of the date of this directive.
7. Duration. This directive is rescinded on publication of the revised regulations.
Encl
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Western Hemisphere Command
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Transformation and Training Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe and Africa
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
U.S. Army Transportation Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Cyber Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
(CONT)
5
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-03 (Child, Youth, and School Services Immunization
Requirements)
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Audit Agency
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Human Resources Command
U.S. Army Corrections Command
U.S. Army Reserve Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division
Director, U.S. Army Civilian Human Resources Agency
Executive Director, Military Postal Service Agency
Director, U.S. Army Joint Counter-Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office
Superintendent, Arlington National Cemetery
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
CF:
Commander, Eighth Army
6
REFERENCES
a. Title 42, United States Code, section 2000bb-1 (Free exercise of religion protected),
as amended
b. Executive Order 14099 (Moving Beyond COVID-19 Vaccination Requirements for Federal
Workers), 15 May 2023
c. Secretary of Defense memorandum (Recission of August 24, 2021 and November 30, 2021
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination Requirements of Members of the Armed Forces),
10 January 2023
d. Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum (Child and Youth
Programs Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination Guidance), 4 August 2025
e. Department of Defense Instruction 1300.17 (Religious Liberty in the Military Services),
1 September 2020
f. Department of Defense Instruction 6060.02 (Child Development Programs (CDPs)),
5 August 2014, incorporating Change 2, effective 1 September 2020
g. Army Directive 2020-17 (Child, Youth, and School Services Immunization Requirements),
15 December 2020 (hereby superseded)
h. Army Directive 2015-44 (Updated Policy for Army Child, Youth, and School Services
Programs), 14 December 2015 (hereby superseded in part)
i. Army Regulation (AR) 40–5 (Army Public Health Program), 12 May 2020
j. AR 40–562 (Immunizations and Chemoprophylaxis for the Prevention of Infectious
Diseases), 7 October 2013
k. AR 215–3 (Non-appropriated Funds Instrumentalities Personnel Policy), 7 May 2024
l. AR 608–10 (Child, Youth, and School Services), 11 May 2017
m. AR 690–12 (Civilian Personnel Equal Employment Opportunity Employment Programs,
6 February 2025
Enclosure

Read More

ARMY DIR 2026-02 ELIMINATION OF DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AD HOC REVIEW BOARDS

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN45659-ARMY_DIR_2026-02-000-WEB-1.pdf

S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y
W A S H I N G T O N
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-02 (Elimination of Department of the Army Ad Hoc Review
Boards)
1. References.
a. Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999, Public
Law 105-261, 112 Statute 2003
b. Department of Defense Instruction 1332.30 (Commissioned Officer Administrative
Separations), 11 May 2018, incorporating Change 3, effective 9 September 2021
c. Army Regulation (AR) 600–8–24 (Officer Transfers and Discharges), 8 February 2020
2. Purpose. This directive eliminates the provisions of Army Regulation 600–8–24 that require
ad hoc review boards for boards of inquiry, streamlining the officer elimination process,
reducing administrative delays, and ensuring timely resolution of officer elimination actions.
3. Applicability. The provisions of this directive apply to the Regular Army, Army National
Guard/Army National Guard of the United States, and U.S. Army Reserve.
4. Policy. The requirement to refer boards of inquiry to an ad hoc review board, as prescribed
in AR 600–8–24, paragraph 4–17, is hereby eliminated. Boards of inquiry will be conducted in
accordance with AR 600–8–24 but will not be referred to an ad hoc review board prior to final
action by the Secretary of the Army or designee.
5. Proponent. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) has
oversight responsibility for this policy. The Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 will incorporate its
provisions into AR 600–8–24 within 2 years of the date of this directive.
6. Duration. This directive is rescinded on publication of the revised regulation.
Dan Driscoll
DISTRIBUTION: (see next page)
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2026-02 (Elimination of Department of the Army Ad Hoc Review
Boards)
2
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Western Hemisphere Command
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Transformation and Training Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe and Africa
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
U.S. Army Transportation Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Cyber Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Audit Agency
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Human Resources Command
U.S. Army Corrections Command
U.S. Army Reserve Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division
Director, U.S. Army Civilian Human Resources Agency
Executive Director, Military Postal Service Agency
Director, U.S. Army Joint Counter-Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office
Superintendent, Arlington National Cemetery
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
CF:
Commander, Eighth Army

Read More

ARMY DIR 2025-26 SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN45623-ARMY_DIR_2025-26-000-WEB-1.pdf

MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2025-26 (Supply Chain Risk Management for Weapon Systems)
1. References. See references enclosed.
2. Purpose. This directive rescinds Army Directive 2023-16 (Supply Chain Risk Management
for Weapon Systems) due to non-compliance with Executive Order 14154 (Unleashing
American Energy) and reissues policy and assigns responsibilities for conducting supply chain
risk management (SCRM) for weapon systems to enhance the Army’s ability to detect and
manage supply chain threats and associated risks, with no mention of climate change.
3. Applicability. The provisions of this directive apply to the Regular Army, Army National
Guard/Army National Guard of the United States, and U.S. Army Reserve.
4. Policy. Army original equipment manufacturers and other industry partners are responsible
for managing their supply chain during development through production, but the government has
a shared responsibility to manage the risk.
a. SCRM is the process for managing risk by identifying, assessing, and mitigating threats,
vulnerabilities, and disruptions to the Department of War supply chain, from beginning to end, to
ensure mission effectiveness. Successful SCRM maintains the integrity of products, services,
people, and technologies, and ensures the undisrupted flow of product, materiel, information, and
finances throughout the life cycle of a weapon system. SCRM encompasses all subsets of risk,
such as cybersecurity, software assurance, obsolescence, counterfeit parts, foreign ownership of
sub-tier vendors, single points of failure (single-source producers), material sources,
transportation, and other categories of risk that affect the supply chain pursuant to reference 1a.
b. SCRM will be conducted on systems throughout their life cycle. SCRM encompasses a
system’s mechanical, electrical, electromechanical, microelectronic, firmware, data, software,
hardware, energetic compounds, and critical materials, as applicable.
c. Organizations will plan, program, budget, and execute funding for SCRM by balancing
risk management with mitigations to ensure affordability.
d. System-specific supply chain vulnerabilities and risks will be protected at the appropriate
security level determined by the organization’s security manager and security classification
guide.
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y
W A S H I N G T O N
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2025-26 (Supply Chain Risk Management for Weapon Systems)
2
e. Organizations conducting SCRM will leverage commercially available tools, standards,
and best practices. A summary of high risks will be captured in the Life-Cycle Sustainment Plan
(sustainment risk section) or product support strategy.
f. SCRM compliance will be incorporated into sustainment reviews.
g. Policies for conducting cyber-SCRM on information, communication, and technology
components, and for capturing the results in the Program Protection Plan, remain in effect
pursuant to references 1g and 1h.
5. Responsibilities.
a. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology)
(ASA (ALT)) will—
(1) Develop SCRM policy for Army science and technology efforts and systems
managed under the Warfighter Acquisition System, regardless of the system’s Adaptive
Acquisition Framework Pathway.
(2) Develop, publish, and maintain an Army SCRM guidebook that defines risk levels
and provides detailed descriptions of SCRM processes and responsibilities.
(3) Ensure that portfolio acquisition executives carry out SCRM requirements,
including:
(a) conducting SCRM activities within the framework of identify, assess, mitigate, and
monitor systems for which they oversee development
(b) developing funding requirements to support SCRM activities across systems for
which they oversee development
(c) conducting SCRM assessments on systems for which they oversee development and
documenting the results, capturing companies, suppliers, vendors, and distributors that pose the
highest risk to the supply chain and the reasons why (detailing risk levels, acceptance authorities,
residual risk levels, mitigations applied, risk categories, monitoring methods, and planned
response actions to address emerging risks)
(4) Develop a long-term strategy to employ SCRM capabilities to identify, assess, and
mitigate supply chain risks to current and future weapon system programs.
(5) Develop and publish procedures to promulgate SCRM lessons learned and
mitigation strategies across the acquisition and sustainment communities. Forge relationships
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2025-26 (Supply Chain Risk Management for Weapon Systems)
3
with industry, Department of War organizations, and other Federal agencies to adopt effective
SCRM practices within the Army’s SCRM capability.
(6) Develop and promulgate recommended contract statement of work language to
support SCRM within the acquisition and sustainment communities. Take into consideration the
inclusion of deliverables necessary to conduct SCRM, such as a bill of materials, original
equipment manufacturer/vendor assessments, and notifications to materiel developers on supply
risks/disruptions.
(7) Ensure SCRM is conducted within a life-cycle framework of identify, assess,
mitigate, and continuously monitor all systems. Take into consideration the need to document
results.
b. The Commander, U.S. Army Transformation and Training Command (T2COM) will
establish procedures that maintain our competitive advantage by protecting science and
technology overseen or executed by the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development
Command (DEVCOM).
c. The Commander, U.S. Army Materiel Command (AMC) will—
(1) Manage the supply chain in sustainment, including the integration of SCRM into the
Army’s sustainment enterprise management process.
(2) Ensure acquisition logisticians have the skills, knowledge, and abilities in supply
chain risk management to provide the matrix support to program management organizations.
(3) Synchronize with the Defense Logistics Agency to ensure proper alignment with
Army SCRM efforts and risk mitigation.
(4) Integrate the U.S. Army Contracting Command into the Army SCRM approach to
ensure contracts contain statement of work language to support SCRM and establish oversight
mechanisms that ensure compliance.
(5) Through the U.S. Army life-cycle management commands, partner with materiel
developers during SCRM to formulate an understanding of the system’s supply chain risk,
mitigating actions, and monitoring requirements to effectively execute supply chain management
at provisioning and throughout the system’s life cycle until disposal.
d. The Deputy Chief of Staff, G-2 will—
(1) Collaborate and partner with stakeholders to develop a SCRM intelligence and
security framework.
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2025-26 (Supply Chain Risk Management for Weapon Systems)
4
(2) Assist the ASA (ALT) and the Commanding General, T2COM and Commanding
General, AMC in protecting mission-critical technologies, products, materials, and services by
identifying and informing risk owners of foreign intelligence entity activities and any other
adversarial attempts to compromise the Army’s modernization and supply chain.
(3) Align Army intelligence and security enterprise assets and full-spectrum intelligence
and security analytical support to supplement SCRM.
(4) Assist the ASA (ALT) in developing security statement of work language to support
SCRM within the acquisition and sustainment communities.
(5) Provide counterintelligence and intelligence analytical support to materiel
developers conducting SCRM.
(6) When requested by the ASA (ALT), represent the Army in the Army SCRM Threat
Assessment Center, with the mission of conducting counterintelligence analysis of companies,
suppliers, vendors, and distributors of components identified by materiel developers during
SCRM.
6. Proponent. The ASA (ALT) is the proponent for this policy and will incorporate the
provisions of this directive into a new Army regulation for SCRM within 2 years of the date of
this directive.
7. Duration. This directive is rescinded on publication of the new regulation.
Encl Dan Driscoll
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Western Hemisphere Command
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Transformation and Training Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe and Africa
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
(CONT)
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2025-26 (Supply Chain Risk Management for Weapon Systems)
5
DISTRIBUTION: (CONT)
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
U.S. Army Transportation Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Cyber Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Audit Agency
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Human Resources Command
U.S. Army Corrections Command
U.S. Army Reserve Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division
Director, U.S. Army Civilian Human Resources Agency
Executive Director, Military Postal Service Agency
Director, U.S. Army Joint Counter-Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office
Superintendent, Arlington National Cemetery
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
CF:
Commander, Eighth Army
REFERENCES
Enclosure
a. Department of Defense (DoD) Instruction 4140.01 (DoD Supply Chain Materiel
Management Policy), 6 March 2019, incorporating Change 1, effective 2 September 2025
b. DoD Instruction 4140.67 (DoD Counterfeit Prevention Policy), 2 February 2024
c. DoD Instruction 4245.15 (Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages
Management), 5 November 2020, incorporating Change 1, effective 2 September 2025
d. DoD Instruction 5000.83 (Technology and Program Protection To Maintain Technological
Advantage), 20 July 2020, incorporating Change 1, effective 21 May 2021
e. DoD Instruction 5000.90 (Cybersecurity for Acquisition Decision Authorities and Program
Managers), 31 December 2020
f. DoD Instruction 5010.44 (Intellectual Property (IP) Acquisition and Licensing),
16 October 2019
g. DoD Instruction 5200.44 (Protection of Mission Critical Functions To Achieve Trusted
Systems and Networks), 16 February 2024
h. Army Regulation 70–77 (Technology and Program Protection), 30 May 2025

Read More

ARMY DIR 2025-25 STREAMLINING AND CLARIFYING ARMY SOCIAL MEDIA USE FOR ORGANIZATIONS

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN45491-ARMY_DIR_2025-25-000-WEB-1.pdf

MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2025-25 (Streamlining and Clarifying Army Social Media Use for
Organizations)
1. References.
a. Title 10, United States Code, sections 7013, 7014, 7064
b. Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, section 2635.702 (Use of public office for private
gain)
c. Department of Defense (DoD) 5500.07-R (Joint Ethics Regulation), as amended
d. DoD Instruction 5400.17 (Official Use of Social Media for Public Affairs Purposes),
12 August 2022, incorporating Change 2, effective 14 February 2025
e. Army Regulation (AR) 360–1 (The Army Public Affairs Program), 8 October 2020
f. AR 600–20 (Army Command Policy), 6 February 2025
2. Purpose. This directive limits authorized official social media accounts and reinforces
guidelines for Soldiers.
3. Applicability. The provisions of this directive apply to the Regular Army, Army National
Guard/Army National Guard of the United States, and U.S. Army Reserve.
4. Policy. Commanders who have table of distribution and allowances (TDA) or modified table
of organization and equipment (MTOE) authorizations that include a 46-series Public Affairs
Officer, Public Affairs Noncommissioned Officer (NCO), or a Department of the Army Civilian
Public Affairs Specialist (Career Program 22/1035) are the only commanders who may establish
and maintain an authorized organizational social media presence.
a. Effective and official communication with the public across local, regional, national, and
international levels is essential for achieving our mission. Army social media accounts should be
optimized by improving message synchronization, utilizing resources efficiently, and enhancing
the quality of messaging and content to provide a better experience for our audience.
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y
W A S H I N G T O N
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2025-25 (Streamlining and Clarifying Army Social Media Use for
Organizations)
2
b. For the National Guard Bureau, State and territory adjutants general may establish and
maintain positional social media presences. Although federally recognized, Army National
Guard State adjutants general are State or territory employees who are not subject to this
guidance when not on Title 10 orders. Their maintenance of an official social media presence is
not mandatory, but it is recommended they follow this guidance for the purposes of Army
message and brand synchronization.
c. To ensure brand integrity, governance, and compliance, Army Reserve units are
authorized to maintain official organizational social media accounts only at the general officer
level (1-star and above) and must have oversight by a 46-series Public Affairs Officer, Public
Affairs NCO, or Department of the Army Civilian Public Affairs Specialist (Career Program
22/1035).
d. Although Special Reporting Code 45 units include 46-series personnel and actively
produce social media content in support of their assigned or attached units, they are not
authorized to operate independent organizational accounts. Units will deactivate any existing
accounts associated no later than 28 February 2026.
e. Commanders will limit their social media accounts to those necessary to achieve
communication objectives.
f. Authorized organizational social media presences must be established and maintained in
accordance with references 1d and 1e.
g. Subordinate units without authorized personnel will deactivate their social media
following record management procedures in reference 1d. To maintain communication efforts,
they should submit content to higher-level accounts for posting. For example, the Fort Hood
garrison Instagram account should feature content from other Fort Hood garrison organizations.
Closed groups, such as Facebook groups, are not considered official and may be used by
subordinate units.
h. Principal officials in the Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA), commanding
generals and command sergeants major of Army commands (ACOMs), Army service component
commands (ASCCs), and direct reporting units (DRUs) are authorized, but not required, to have
official social media accounts. Leadership social media is considered official communication
and must adhere to the same standards and requirements as official accounts. Leadership
accounts below these levels are not authorized, and their content must be integrated into
organizational social media accounts.
i. Social Media Messaging and Content. All social media posts will be synchronized to the
greatest extent possible. Principal officials in the HQDA and the commanders of ACOMs,
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2025-25 (Streamlining and Clarifying Army Social Media Use for
Organizations)
3
ASCCs, and DRUs will coordinate and synchronize social media efforts to enhance creative
content and minimize inefficiencies.
j. Brand Standardization. To boost brand awareness, commands will standardize their
social media content in alignment with Army branding guidance available at:
https://armyeitaas.sharepoint-mil.us/sites/HQDA-CPA. Army National Guard content creators
are authorized to use National Guard Bureau branding.
k. Exceptions to authorized accounts must be approved by public affairs directors at the
HQDA principal, ACOM, ASCC, and DRU levels, and sent to the Army Communication and
Outreach Office (ACOO) for final approval by the Director, ACOO.
l. Marketing and recruiting activities, Civil Works, or non-appropriated fund Morale,
Welfare, and Recreation activities are exempt from this directive.
5. Responsibilities.
a. No later than 28 February 2026, commanders will confirm that their organizations
comply with this directive and must report compliance to their higher headquarters commander.
b. All public-facing command social media accounts that do not have an assigned 46-series
Public Affairs Officer, Public Affairs NCO, or Department of the Army Civilian Public Affairs
Specialist (Career Program 22/1035) will deactivate and archive by 28 February 2026 pursuant
to reference 1e.
c. No later than 28 February 2026, all commands with authorized social media presences
will register each account in the HQDA social media directory at: https://www.army.mil/
socialmedia/directory/.
6. Proponent. The Director, ACOO has oversight responsibility for this policy and will
incorporate this directive’s provisions into AR 360–1 within 2 years of the date of this directive.
7. Duration. This directive is rescinded on publication of the revised regulation.
Dan Driscoll
DISTRIBUTION: (see next page)
SUBJECT: Army Directive 2025-25 (Streamlining and Clarifying Army Social Media Use for
Organizations)
4
DISTRIBUTION:
Principal Officials of Headquarters, Department of the Army
Commander
U.S. Army Western Hemisphere Command
U.S. Army Forces Command
U.S. Army Transformation and Training Command
U.S. Army Materiel Command
U.S. Army Pacific
U.S. Army Europe and Africa
U.S. Army Central
U.S. Army North
U.S. Army South
U.S. Army Special Operations Command
U.S. Army Transportation Command
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/Army Strategic Command
U.S. Army Cyber Command
U.S. Army Medical Command
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army Audit Agency
U.S. Army Military District of Washington
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command
U.S. Army Human Resources Command
U.S. Army Corrections Command
U.S. Army Reserve Command
Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy
Director, U.S. Army Civilian Human Resources Agency
Executive Director, Military Postal Service Agency
Director, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division
Director, U.S. Army Joint Counter-Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Office
Superintendent, Arlington National Cemetery
Director, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center
CF:
Commander, Eighth Army

Read More